Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPOUDRE HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 59 93 - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSa Robb, Brenner and Brelig, Inc. 6. We have been in contact with Doug Martine to coordinate this. He has given the District the option of "buying" the fixtures and connecting them to a metered source, or renting them. The District has decided to buy the ones that are scheduled to remain. We will coordinate details of this arrangement with Doug Martine. 7. ADA Standards will be net in the construction of the entry, drop off lanes, etc. We have increased the number of accessible spaces from 10 to 12 (2% of total parking) to meet ADA Standards. The location are carefully placed to provide the most useful parking in each area. 8. We agree, but may have to do this at a future date due to budget considerations. We felt the south(east) side the most importantoto do now as the other side has some great trees"in place now that will remain. 9. Our design intent is to make the landscaped areas available to us very attractive and maintainable. Island landscaping works well in some situations, but would force us to increase the amount of overall parking lot area to accommodate the same number of cars, and is a very large maintenance�roblem for the District in the winter. p 6.cj-f Thige ZJtHwoa 4fr4,sca? IF r•, WMAT'f 7rto Of-intEn u17tEis? 10. We have talked with Tim Buchanan about these trees. For the Norway Maple Columnar we will use the Greenspire Linden or a substitute Class I tree. For the Bechtel Crab we will use Brandywine Crab. For the Newport Plum, we will use the "Mayday Tree". 11. We can accommodate approximately 50 bicycles in this plan. The racks are located for better security and access from both sides of the site. Hopefully, this will help to increase ridership in the future. Currently, less than 1/4 that number ride to school. More racks can easily be accommodated as needed. 12. OK. Elevations to be provided October 18th. 13. We will continue to work with Poudre Fire Authority as the plan progresses. 14. Yes. Sinc,prely, 6R 16u George A. Brelig, AIA President GAB/lw Robb, Brenner ano orelig, Inc. 125 South Howes • Suite 880 • P O. Box 2- - Fort Collins. CO 80522 • (303) 484-0117 0 it Architecture Planning Interior Design October 7, 1993 Mr. Ted Shepard Senior Planner City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Ted, The following are our responses on a line item basis to your Interdepartmental Review letter of September 27, 1993. 1A. The District has not given easements for on -site detention ponds or storm services in the past and would prefer not to change this arrangement. 1B. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. 1C. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. 1D. The flow controls are now shown on the plans. The east lot flows are now more clearly shown. 2. Most monuments exist from previous survey. The only missing ones we know of are on the north side between the two I C/ps'-P sections of School property and thus not a concern to us. ,Aft 3. This is a Poudre R-1 cost item that the District would prefer not to incur, but we are open to further discussion (NA � on this subject. 4. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. Utility plans showing the realignment of the existing main and sewer lines have been submitted to Mark Taylor and are included as part of this submittal. 5. OK. Robb. Brenner ar nlig, Inc 6. We have been in contact with Doug Martine to coordinate this. He has given the District the option of "buying" the fixtures and connecting them to a metered source, or renting them. The District has decided to buy the ones that are scheduled to remain. We will coordinate details of this arrangement with Doug Martine. 7. ADA Standards will be met in the construction of the entry, drop off lanes, etc. We have increased the number of accessible spaces from 10 to 12 (2% of total parking) to meet ADA Standards. The location are carefully placed to provide the most useful parking in each area. 8. We agree, but may have to do this at a future date due to budget considerations. We felt the south(east) side the most important to do now as the other side has some great trees in place now that will remain. 9. Our design intent is to make the landscaped areas available to us very attractive and maintainable. Island landscaping works well in some situations, but would force us to increase the amount of overall parking lot area to accommodate the same number of cars, and is a very large maintenance problem for the District in the winter. 10. We have talked with Tim Buchanan about these trees. For the Norway Maple Columnar we will use the Greenspire Linden or a substitute Class I tree. For the Bechtel Crab we will use Brandywine Crab. For the Newport Plum, we will use the "Mayday Tree". 11. We can accommodate approximately 50 bicycles in this plan. The racks are located for better security and access from both sides of the site. Hopefully, this will help to increase ridership in the future. Currently, less than 1/4 that number ride to school. More racks can easily be accommodated as needed. 12. OK. Elevations to be provided October 18th. 13. We will continue to work with Poudre Fire Authority as the plan progresses. 14. Yes. Sincerely, kt IZA-1) George A. Brelig, AIA President GAB/lw Robb, Brenner a Telig, Inc 125 South Howes • Suite 880 • P O. Box . Fort Collins, CO 80522 • (303) 484-0117 Architecture Planning Interior Design RB+B October 7, 1993 Mr. Ted Shepard Senior Planner City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Ted, The following are our responses on a line item basis to your Interdepartmental Review letter of September 27, 1993. 1A. The District has not given easements for on -site detention ponds or storm services in the past and would prefer not to change this arrangement. 1B. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. 1C. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. 1D. The flow controls are now shown on the plans. The east lot flows are now more clearly shown. 2. Most monuments exist from previous survey. The only missing ones we know of are on the north side between the two sections of School property and thus not a concern to us. 3. This is a Poudre R-1 cost item that the District would prefer not to incur, but we are open to further discussion on this subject. 4. This is addressed on drawings as resubmitted. Utility plans showing the realignment of the existing main and sewer lines have been submitted to Mark Taylor and are included as part of this submittal. 5. OK.