Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS - PDP - 6-03C - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYFUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet 'N CJ, CSU Campus Transit Center 0.8 8 9 Foothills Fashion Mall 3.5 15 33 Fort Collins High School 6.0 21 50 Downtown Fort Collins 2.0 11 20 Total Travel Time -1 55 112 2.04 Service Level Standards Worksheet R xg Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours x Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes x Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x x Peak Load Factor 51.2 S 1.2 x 3 of 4 = LOS B INlultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p 20 I,OS Standards for Development Review • Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service • connectivity mutinnun actual proposed base connectivity: C /) specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area destination area within I'320' classification including address (see text) F-11 C.oZ.O aAr'0 STATE INs7t1(lTia,V sC-t#ooc. � C] W t G1.10AR974 hoc+uEec �.o�a«ee«ate 3 TA A IL City of Port Collins Transportation Master Plan. Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review • Pedesirian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: (;)CDG5Ti21AN ($T12(C i (enter as many as apply) description of applicable destination area level of service (minimum based on project location classification) destination area within 1,320' classification including address (see text) Gr ness r ,i 'Welt b �To+dngs inierv>ik nrnvm �❑ �^r�arc; amv�itlae a nwtim�un Q A '.ocdtzaao IUST1TvTroN UAJI vets r-r y A A proposed Q .4 13 0 �65)ID&aVTtAL 'i0 �BStDSUY�A 00 F-z 4lwe$T r ®©1 : �[�1�l101l�1C!1' P. 18 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan 2 W. L rel W. Plum W. Plum W. Elizabeth o O m L 4 Prospect SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA ZZ APPENDIX D Z� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2 2003 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent total Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: West Access/Bluebell Street Intersection 6rientation: EW Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbounc Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 L T R I L T a 0.25- volume 6 154 0 22 189 69 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 181 0 25 222 81 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 3 17 28 2 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 19 32 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration . LTR LTR. Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 7 25 23 35 C(m) (vph) 1259 1394 741 461 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.08 95% queue length 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.25 Control Delay 7.9 7.6 10.0+ 13.4 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.0+ 13.4 Approach LOS B B Zd HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Anal-yst: - Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent otal Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: West Access/Bluebell Street Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25• Vehicle. -Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 221 0 1 31 27 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 259 0 1 36 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 1 0 13 21 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly.Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 15 24 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11. 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 3 1 16 25 C(m) (vph) 1535 1306 769 623 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.13 Control Delay 7.3 7.8 9.8 11.0 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.8 11.0 Approach LOS A B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: -- - Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: W. lum/East Access/Aster Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent tota Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: East Access/Aster Street Y Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle..Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 L T R I L T I 0.25 Volume 1 197 1 18 277 4 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 231 1 21 325 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 0 16 1 0 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 18 1 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 1 21 21 1 C(m) (vph) 1234 1336 712 404 v/c 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.01 Control Delay 7.9 7.7 10.2 13.9 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.2 13.9 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: ..Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: W. Plum/East Access/Aster Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ota Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: East Access/Aster Street Intersection drientation: EW Study period (hrs)• 0.25. Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound . Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 0 252 3 10 56 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0'.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 296 3 11 65 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 0 16 3 0 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 18 3 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WE Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 11 21 3 C(m) (vph) 1536 1262 710 548 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 0.09 0.02 Control Delay 7.3 7.9 10.2 11.6 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.2 11.6 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Shields/W, Plum Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date:---12/2/2003 -- - Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am (9? Year recent tota_� Project ID: 0349 E/W St: W. Plum Street N/S St: Shields Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T_ R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I LTR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 172 60 82 1111 120 19 170 1121 160 1f8 1501•,109 i Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1_ RTOR Vol_ I . Q I 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _Signal Operations__ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 E EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 100.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate _ (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 277 990 0.31 0.28 29.0 T 522 1863 0.14 0.28 27.1 R 617 1583 0.16 0.39 19.9 Westbound LTR 412 1471 0.69 0.28 36.9 Northbound L 198 1770 0.40 0.63 21.2 TR 1945 3473 0.74 0.56 19.1 Southbound L 206 1770 0.10 0.63 12.6 TR 1962 3503 0.91 0.56 27.7 Intersection Delay = 24.8 (sec/veh) C C 25.0 C B D 36.9 D C B 19.2 B B C 27.5 C Intersection LOS = C secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Shields/W, Plum Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 12/2/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: pm pm Year recent total Project 4f 0349 E/W St: W. Plum Street N/S St: Shields Street _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 ( 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L T R I LTR I L TR 1 L TR Volume 180 130 61 123 24 7 117 1087 67 117 883',.26 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol._. i 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A ( Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A i Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right 1 WB Right Green 28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0. secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane.Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 375 1340 0.25 0.28 28.2 C T 522 1863 0.29 0.28 28.6 C 26.4 C R 617 1583 0.12 0.39 19.6 B Westbound LTR 438 1566 0.14 0.28 27.2 C 27.2 C Northbound L 323 1770 0.06 0.63 8.8 A TR 1964 3508 0.68 0.56 17.6 B 17.5 B Southbound L 229 1770 0.08 0.63 11.3 B TR 1973 3524 0.51 0.56 14.5 B 14.5 B Intersection Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B APPENDIX C Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (intersections) Land Use (from structure plan) Other corridors within: Mixed use Low density mixed use All other Intersection type Commercial corridors districts residential areas Signalized intersections D E' D D (overall) Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control N/A P. F" E (arterial/collector or local — any approach le Stop sign control N/A C C C (collector/local—any approach leg) mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment 13 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Average Tool Delay stW.vcll 13 1 0and < 15 15 and < 25 25 and < 35 ------- 35 and < 50 > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS lz HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst.:- Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: am(zm:) Intersection: Shields/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent' otal Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: RT Access North/South Street: Shields Street Intersection 6rientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25, Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments . Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1688 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1875 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -.- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 Percent Heavy -Vehicles 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 I I 10.9 B 12, R 7 620 0.01 0.03 10.9 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: _._..Michael Agency/Co:: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period:(�aa;)pm Intersection: Shields/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent'total Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: RT Access North/South Street: Shields Street Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 963 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1070 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 . 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 11 L T R Volume 3 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (t) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vpn) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 I i R 3 862 0.00. 0.01 9.2 A 9.2 A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/212003 Analysis Time Period: am dp6) Intersection: W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell Jurisdiction: Fort.Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen total Project.ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: West Access/Bluebell Street Intersection Orientation: EW I Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehic.le_Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 154 0 18 189 69 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0:85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 181 0 21 222 81 . Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 .0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 .9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 3 12 28 2 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 14 32 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR. Delay, Queue Length, and ..Level of.Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I..,10 11 12 Lane Config. LTR LTR I LTR I_ LTR v (vph) 7 21 18 35 C(m) (vph) 1259 1394 717 470 v/c 0.01 0,02 0.03 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.24 Control Delay 7.9 7.6 10.2 13.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.2 13.3 Approach LOS B B 1 - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael. Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecentttotal Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: West Access/Bluebell Street Intersection orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 '4 5 L T R I L T Volume 3 221 0 1 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 259 0 1 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? 0. 25 6 R 27 0.85 31 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 0 9 21 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 10 24 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length,. and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 3 1 11 25 C(m) (vph) 1536 1306 764 631 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.12 Control Delay 7.3 7.8 9.8 10.9 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.8 10.9 Approach LOS A B q HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: - .-Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: am( � Intersection: W. Plum/East Access/Aster Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent total Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: East Access/Aster Street Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 L T R I L T Volume 0 194 0 11 273 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 228 0 12 321 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? 0.25. 6 R 0 0.85 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 0 7 0 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 8 0 0. 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 12 11 1 C(m) (vph) 1242 1340 660 751 v/c 0.00 0_01 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.00 Control Delay 7.9 7.7 10.5 9.8 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.5 9.8 Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst:--M-ichael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 12/2/2003 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: W. Plum/East Access/Aster Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent total Project ID: 0349 East/West Street: W. Plum Street North/South Street: East Access/Aster Street Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25, Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 0 248 3 5 56 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 291 3 5 65 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 2 0 9 0 0 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 10 0 0 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 5 12 1 C(m) (vph) 1537 1268 714 999 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.00 Control Delay 7.3 7.9 10.1 8.6 LOS A A B. A Approach Delay 10.1 8.6 Approach LOS B A N HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Shields/W, Plum Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 12/2 2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am Year ecent total Project ID: 0349 E/W St: W. Plum Street N/S St: Shields Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 0 1 0 i 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LGConfig I L T R I LTR I L TR I L TR Volume 168 54 79 1111 110 19 167 1121 160 118 1501'..107 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A P Thru A i Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right 1 WB Right Green '28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 100.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate _ (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 284 1015 0.28 0.28 28.7 T 522 1863 0.12 0.28 26.9 R 617 1583 0.15 0.39 19.9 Westbound LTR 417 1491 0.65 0.28 35.4 Northbound L 198 1770 0.38 0.63 20.9 TR 1945 3473 0.74 0.56 19.1 Southbound L 206 1770 0.10 0.63 12.6 TR 1962 3504 0.91 0.56 27.6 Intersection Delay = 24.6 (sec/veh) C C 24.8 C B D 35.4 D C B 19.2 B B C 27.4 C Intersection LOS = C secs HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Shields/W, Plum Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 12/2/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am m Year • recen total Project ID: 0349 E/W St: W. Plum Street N/S St: Shields Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 I I I I 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 LGConfig I L T R I LTR I L TR I L TR Volume 17fT 122 57 123 22 7 115 1087 67 117 883 24 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal_Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 28.0 6.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 375 1340 0.25 0.28 28.2 C T 522 1863 0.28 0.28 28.4 C 26.4 C R 617 1583 0.11 0.39 19.5 B Westbound LTR 438 1564 0.14 0.28 27.1 C 27.1 C Northbound L 323 1770 0.05 0.63 8.7 A TR 1964 3508 0.68 0.56 17.6 B 17.5 B. Southbound L 229 1770 0.08 0.63 11.3 B TR. 1974 3525 0.51 0.56 14.5 B 14.4 B Intersection Delay = 17.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B secs L� APPENDIX B 3 M MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 4.29-03 Observer: City of Fort Collins Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right tum F-Intersection: Shields/Plum S = straight L = ieTt turn Time Northbound: Shields Southbound: Shields Total Eastbound: Plum Westbound: Plum Total Total Begins L T 7S R Total L S I R Total north/south L 8 1 R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:30 4 1272 1 29 305;, - 6 234 6246 551 22 38 23 2 3 1 89 640 7:45 3 314 21 4 250 3 .. ....l`25T 595 35 41 9 7 2 is 101 696 8:00 5 247 10 .:: 162 3 210 12 487 14 18 13 3 5 3 56 543 8:15 3 254 7 4 189 3 460 7 25 25 12 44 1-0 7 1 8 52j 512 7:30-8:30 1... 169 924 2093 257 :12 41 98 2391 PHF 0.86 0.9 0.76 0.64 4:30 13 259 21 ,293 5 297 23 618 11 12 18 41 29 29 8 66 107 725 4:45 17 274 44 5 5 387 25 7 52 12 13 26 29 19 5 53 104 $56 5:00 12 273 57 342 5 389 40 434 776 17 13 17 -4 7. 32 34 2 -,-t , ';M 115 891 L N5 25 315 38 3 428 19 828 28 16 18 21 28 4 - 5.1 . 4:30-5:30 21 - 1'07;. 1626 2974 :79 201 .Ilf -116 '19 240 441 3415 PHF 0.89 0.9 0.81 0.88 APPENDIX A TABLE 3 Total Peak Hour Operation 'w" Bs,; l i +n t�,,:�_^ r ✓e ] 5 3lnten'set�n ,4t '� f'.Yi�o -". r r , L$v�et Seivrce s Shields/W. Plum (signal) EB C C WB C DNB B B SB B C OVERALL B C W. Plum/East Access/Aster (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT A B SB LT/T/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A W ` N 27/69 +311189 � 1 22 1/22 W. Plum 3/6 ---/ !1 f r 221/154 — T M 010 o cn cn (TW, V Q 1n >m 0 0 ` Jt 0 o m f 1 a� cn 1 /4 f- 56/277 10/18 0/1� 252/197 - — M. o ro 3/1 a' o T o T fn U Q N (0 W - w — AM/PM d o a) L T 0 o to o_ T o0 (D00r- N OD '- + 7/19 — 24/120 23/111 ,J /— 80/72 130/60 - - o T o 61 /82 r N co T \ c co h 0 T TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC . Figure 6 ro n m 7 m T 1/0 0/3 W. Plum 0/1 0!0 iL O ccM U) rn m U U Q V) N N a� Q �- 0/3 5/5 3/2 —► 0/1 o t U) fN m U U Q ._. fN (0 W — AM/PM U) a� L V1 N N — 1 /3 2/3 3/2 cl) 313 I N SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 10% NOM W. Plum Site Apartments Office TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 ps w A& N i ry r.z_7 r a 2yv� r F 11 _ J1�11111111111/111111111011111111111111/11� SCALE: 1"=100' SITE PLAN Figure 3 M TABLE I Current Peak Hour Operation Re ShieldsM.- Plum (signal) EB C C WB C D. NB B B SB B C OVERALL B C W. Plum/East Access/Aster (stop sign) NB LTIT/RT B B SB LTITIRT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A W. Plum/West Access/Bluebell (stop sign) NB LTIT/RT A B SB LTITIRT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A Shields/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) I EB RT I A B TABLE 2 Trip Generation OEM 7w. --- - ---- PeaKiiour> ,1 IM "p g kv 01,-Z,7� 220 Apartment 18 D.U. 6.63 120 0-08 1 0.43 8 0.42 8 0.20 4 710 Office 3.1 KSF 11.01 34 1.37 4 0.19 1 0.25 1 1 1,24 ��4 Total 154 5 9 9 8 8 Do y" 27/69 N `I o N f 301189 �1/18 W. Plum 3/6 1 221/154 cn N 0/0 o C� Q .-. N U) El O O O 0/0 IO O O 56/273 ) � � 5/11 0/0 —Io( 1 4 f 248/194 m o t- 3/0 c4 o rn, U) m U Q NU) f0 W RT Access --a-- AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N L O O CO 'IT 7/19 N CO 22/110 23/111 78/68 1 4 122/54 n O 57/79 CO 04 `D � co CD 0 Co co O (h [h C> (D O O ,401 1 3/6 Figure 2 W. Plum W. Laurel W. Plum Cambridge House v Apartments a� L U W. Elizabeth Prospect SCALE: 1'=1000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 E Directness- Due to the location of the Cambridge House Apartments within this area of Fort Collins, LOS A is achieved to all destinations. Continuity- There are no gaps in the sidewalk system within the study area. However, some of the sidewalks were built under previous Fort Collins design criteria. It is not reasonable to expect a small development proposal to bring all sidewalks up to the current City design standard. Y Therefore, the existing sidewalk system was deemed to be acceptable. Street -- A11--signalized intersections have marked pedestrian Crossings- crossings. Visual Interest All land within the study area, is developed. The And Amenity- sidewalk system in much of this area was built with some landscaping and sidewalk furniture, therefore the goal of LOS A is satisfied. Security- Most of the study area has good lighting levels and pedestrians are clearly visible to motorists. Also, since this area is a "pedestrian district," drivers of motor vehicles expect heavy pedestrian activity. Therefore, the goal of LOS A is satisfied. Bicycle Level of Service As stated in the pedestrian level of service section, generally the primary bicycle destination areas for Cambridge House Apartments will be Colorado State University and, to a lesser extent, the commercial uses along W. Elizabeth Street. There are bicycle facilities along Shields Street, W. Elizabeth Street, and W. Plum Street. The Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix D. Transit Level of Service Currently, this area is served by transit routes 2, 3, 6, 11, and 61. In the future, transit service will be improved as depicted on the Fort Collins Transit System Plan. Appendix D contains a future transit level of service worksheet. As indicated, the future level of service will be in the B category. Conclusion The Cambridge House Apartments Expansion will have minimal impact on traffic and operation at the key intersections. No additional auxiliary lanes should be built at the key intersections. There is adequate intersection sight distance at the key intersections. The alternative modes level of service is acceptable. 2 Site Proposal The site plan for Cambridge House Apartments Expansion is shown in Figure 3. As indicated on the site plan, there will be a building with 18 apartment dwelling units and 3,100 square feet of office. With the, proposed Cambridge House Apartments Expansion, the RT Access to Shields Street will be eliminated. Therefore, access to the site will be via the existing East Access and West Access to W. Plum Street. Trip generation was calculated using Trip Generation, 6" Edition, ITE as the reference document. Land use codes 220 (Apartment) and 710 (Office) were used. Table 2 shows the calculated daily and peak hour" trip generation for the Cambridge House Apartments Expansion. It is expected that -this -development will generate 154 daily trip ends, 14 morning peak hour trip ends, and 17 afternoon peak hour trip ends. The trip distribution for the Cambridge House Apartments residential development is shown in Figure 4. The trip distribution was determined from existing counts and in consideration of the site location relative to Fort Collins. Figure 5 shows the site generated traffic that is associated with the proposed Cambridge House Apartments Expansion. Total Peak Hour Traffic Traffic volumes in this area of Fort Collins are relatively stable. Therefore, the background traffic is considered to be the existing traffic. The site generated traffic was added to the existing traffic volumes at the key intersections and is shown in Figure 6. Table 3 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will continue to operate acceptably. Based upon criteria in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, northbound and southbound right -turn lanes are required on Shields Street approaching W. Plum Street. However, due to physical constraints, these right -turn lanes are not likely to be built. Therefore, the geometry at the key intersections will remain as it exists today. A sight distance analysis indicated that there is adequate sight distance at the key intersections. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix D shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of Cambridge House Apartments Expansion. There are four pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of Cambridge House Apartments Expansion: 1) Colorado State University, 2) residential areas to the north of the site, 3) commercial uses along W. Elizabeth Street, and 4) residential areas to the south of the site. While there are residential neighborhoods within 1320 feet of Cambridge House Apartments, the affinity between the likely residents of Cambridge House Apartments and those neighborhoods is very small. This site is in an area termed "pedestrian district." The minimum level of service for "pedestrian district" is A for all measured categories, except for the street crossings category which is level of service B. .The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix D. Each pedestrian LOS category, as it relates to the CSU Main Campus, is discussed below: M 00 M C) O 0 cc a O J O U Z a w J w Cr z w a W w J CD N N N a: w 2 U_ J W Q W ,W 0 PE"6 CO TO: 0 LO 6 CD 0 o FROM: O1 DATE: x Q Y LL SUBJECT: 0 N 0) co cD 0 r rn W Z 0 S d 0 Z cc W W Z a Z W Z O cc 0 IL U) Z Cc cla V LL LL a CC Don Brookshire, Eastpoint Studio Design Chris Ray,.Cambridge House LLC City of Fort Collins Staff Matt Delich December 8, 2003 Cambridge House Apartments Transportation Impact Study (File: 0349ME01) The Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Department has requested a traffic memorandum, as described in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards, for the proposed Cambridge House Apartments Expansion development, located west of Shields Street and south of W. Plum Street in Fort Collins, Colorado. The site location is shown in Figure 1. A scoping conversation was held with Eric Bracke, Traffic Engineer, Fort Collins Engineering Department. The Shields/W. Plum and Site Access intersections were the intersections that were requested to be analyzed. Existing Conditions The proposed site is.in an area of primarily residential uses. There are commercial uses to the south of the site. Colorado State University is to the east of the site, across Shields Street. The Shields/W. Plum intersection has signal control. At the Shields/W. Plum intersection, Shields Street has northbound and southbound left - turn lanes and two through lanes in each direction. Also at this intersection, W. Plum Street has all movements in a single lane on the west approach and all movements in separate lanes on the east approach. Shields Street is classified as a four -lane arterial street. There are existing bike lanes with no parking on Shields Street. West Plum Street is classified as a collector street west of Shields Street. There is parking on West Plum Street. The posted speed on.Shields Street is 30 mph. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic counts at the Shields/W. Plum, W. Plum/East Access, W. Plum/West Access, and Shields/RT Access intersections are shown in Figure 2. Raw count data is provided in Appendix A. Traffic'volumes at the Shields/W. Plum intersection were obtained on April 29, 2003 and traffic volumes at the Site Access intersections were obtained in June 2003. Table 1 shows the current peak hour operation at the key intersections using the volumes shown in Figure 2. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.