Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBEAUCAIRE TREATMENT CENTER - PDP - 4-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - (13)Yours Truly, Bob Barkeen City Planner Page 5 Show and label locations of existing water/sewer services and location of existing curbstop/meter pit. Maintain four feet of separation between curbstop/meterpit and future building envelope. If existing meter is located inside existing house it will need to be relocated outside in a meter pit. Curb stop and meter pit may not be located in a drive. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 2 Created: 1 /30/2003 The perimeter of the 3820 sf parking area must be landscaped in compliance with Sec. 3.2.2(J), and screened in compliance with Sec. 3.2.1(E)(4). 10-2-03: The 2nd submittal still doesnl show compliance with the above sections. Fence? Trees?, etc. Are the trees they show existing or proposed? Number: 3 Created: 1 /30/2003 The interior of the parking area must be landscaped in compliance with Sections 3.2.1(E)(5) and 3.2.2(M)(1). 10-2-03: The 2nd submittal still doesnl contain the required interior landscaping. The landscape areas shown are really perimeter landscaping. Number: 6 Created: 1 /30/2003 All new construction must comply with the required setbacks in Sec. 4.8(D)(3). It seems like they are proposing a 5'side setback for the new addition, which is OK. However, the required front setback is 15', and it doesnl look like they will meet that. If not, a modification will be required. 10-2-03: The 2nd submittal contains a "land use statistics" table that states that the building setback is 15'. However, the site plan shows only a 7' front setback. Therefore a modification is required. Number: 8 Created: 1 /30/2003 In order to have 16 residents, the lot area has to be a minimum of 10,000 sf per Sec. 3.8.6(B). 5000 sf for the first 6 residents, and 500 sf for each of the additional 10 residents. Their lot of 9855 sf is large enough for only 15 residents. 10-2-03: The 2nd submittal states that the lot area is 9105 sf. This is less than the 9855 sf indicated on the original submitted. Based on the revised lot area, only 14 residents are allowed per the above -cited code section. Number: 26 Created: 10/2/2003 Since perimeter and interior landscaping is required, a landscape plan is also required. Number: 27 Created: 10/2/2003 The handicap space has to be a van accessible space and must be 8' wide with an 8' wide access aisle per Section 3.2.2(K)(5)(d) of the land use code. Number: 28 Created: 10/2/2003 The site plan land use statistic" table states that phase 2 will consist of storage, laundry, 4 BEDROOMS, 2 BATHROOMS, OFFICES, etc. Yet their latest project description letter has no mention of phase 2 including bedrooms, bathrooms or offices. Which description is correct? The site plan or the letter? If it's the site plan, then there is an issue with the offices. If they are going to be locating their offices and/or day treatment use in the building, then this will be a mixed -use building and will have to be processed as a Type 2. Red -line drawings are available at the Current Planning Front Desk. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Page 4 Front addition is shown in the 15'setback, will need a modification. Number: 38 Created: 10/7/2003 Show the existing water and sewer lines from the mains to the house. Show the sewer main. Number: 39 Change the title preamble to "Utility Plans for..." Created: 10/7/2003 Number: 40 Created: 10/7/2003 Provide a note that driveway must be concrete to property line (this will apply to the shared portion of the driveway as well). Number: 41 Created: 10/7/2003 A new checklist has been attached with additional redlines. The shaded areas are what is required before going to hearing. The unshaded line items can wait until final compliance. You can email me at sjoy@fcgov.com if you would like the new appendix emailed to you. Number: 42 Provide detail 1601. Department: Light & Power Topic: General Number: 25 see comments of 1 /24/03 by Doug Martine Created: 10/7/2003 Issue Contact: Janet McTague Created: 10/1 /2003 Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 44 Created: 10/9/2003 Contact the City Forester for approval and mitigation requirement for the loss of existing trees. Tree preservation standards may apply. 3.2.1(F) Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 45 Created: 10/9/2003 Detention will most likely not be required for this site due to the parking lot being reduced and the site impervious being below 50%. A final determination will be made at the next submittal with the changes to the site plan. Number: 46 Created: 10/9/2003 Water quality should be provided at the next submittal. An alternative design to the 40-hour extended detention is open for consideration. Number: 47 Created: 10/9/2003 New comments may be applied once a drainage report is submitted as well as the modified plans. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 48 Created: 10/9/2003 Please put City of Fort Collins standard erosion control noted on the plan. Delete the notes under the heading "Grading and Erosion Control Notes:" Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 12 Created: 2/18/2003 Page 3 Number: 29 Created: 10/7/2003 As previously required in conceptual review and the first round of comments: The driveway cut and all other improvements must be in accordance with LCUASS standards (for example, driveway must be straight for a minimum of 25' from flowline). There are issues w/the driveway conflicting with the existing stormwater inlet. Suggested sharing driveway access with the neighbor to the east. If access is not shared, then the driveway location must maintain the minimum separation distance of 30' between neighboring driveway edges. 10/7/3: There are two options for the driveway location, both of which are mentioned above. You will need shared access with the neighbor to the east or move the driveway to the west. Either option may eliminate the need to move the inlet and the existing water meter pit (not currently shown on the plans). If you share the driveway access with the neighbor, both property owners would need to dedicate an access easement to each other. If you move the driveway to the west, you would need to submit a variance request for the minimum separation distances between driveway edges. In order to go to hearing, a few things need to be provided depending on which option is chosen. If the driveway is shared with the neighbor, then either the actual access easement or a signed Letter of Intent from the neighbor stating they will grant the easement will need to be submitted. If the driveway moves west, a variance will need to be submitted by a licensed engineer and approved prior to hearing. If the driveway stays where it is, then a design showing how the inlet and the driveway will work together. Some type of shared driveway is still necessary due to the proximity of the neighboring drive (along with the necessary easements). Number: 43 Created: 10/7/2003 Because this property is no longer just a single-family house, it falls under the multi-family/commercial requirements for driveway widths. Therefore, the driveway width must be 24' min and 36' max. A variance would be required for anything less than 24'. Topic: Site Number: 30 Created: 10/7/2003 Remove the landscaping from the site plan. Number: 31 Created: 10/7/2003 Hatch Phase 2 like the utility plans so that it is very clear what is being done in each phase. Number: 32 Created: 10/7/2003 Show the neighbors driveway to the east. Number: 33 Created: 10/7/2003 The driveway area doesnl match the utility plans. Number: 34 Created: 10/7/2003 Some of the existing barbed wire fence between this property and the property to the east will need to be removed if these two properties share the driveway access. Topic: Utility Number: 35 Created: 10/7/2003 Show where the existing electrical unit located in the future driveway is being relocated to and label with what phase if not phase 2. Number: 36 Created: 10/7/2003 Show locations of neighboring driveways and the house to the east. Number: 37 Created: 10/7/2003 Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Gtvof Fort Collins DIRECTIONS UNLIMITED - LYNETTE MCCLAIN Date: 10/24/2003 DBA BEAUCAIRE YOUTH SERVICES 406 N. COLLEGE AVE FT. COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for BEAUCAIRE TREATMENT CENTER - TYPE I (LUC) #4-03, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 49 Created: 10/20/2003 (10/20/03) The applicant is proposing to redesign the site plan by demolish the existing building and replacing it on the east side of the lot. While this new location should help with a number of issues previously identified, the proposed building must fully comply with the Land Use Code. Particular emphasis will be on compatibility with other structures adjacent to the site. The new building must comply with Section 3.5.1, 3.5.2 and 4.7 of the Land Use Code (Attached). A copy of the Neighborhood Character Design Guidelines for the East and West Side Neighborhoods in Fort Collins is included as well. This provides examples of preferred building design for the area around downtown. This is only a guideline document, but can be helpful in meeting the compatibility criteria within the Land Use Code. A landscape plan will need to be submitted showing existing landscaping, landscaping to be removed and proposed landscaping. Number: 50 Created: 10/20/2003 (10/20/03) Any parking areas may not be located between the front of the building and the adjacent street. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 2/3/2003 This is an incomplete submittal and cannot be reviewed until a complete submittal is received. To repeat the comments given in the original Conceptual Review dated March 4, 2002: 1. Street Oversizing and Lorimer County Road Impact Fees apply. Please Contact Matt Baker for amounts at 221-6605. 2. A Traffic Impact Study may be required. Contact Eric Brocke at 224-6062 3. Repair and replace any existing damaged curb/gutter/sidewalk. 4. The driveway cut and all other improvements must be in accordance with LCUASS standards (for example, driveway must be straight for a minimum of 25' from flowline). There are issues w/the driveway conflicting with the existing stormwater inlet. Suggested sharing driveway access with the neighbor to the east. If access is not shared, then the driveway location must maintain the minimum separation distance of 30' between neighboring driveway edges, 5. Driveway and parking area must be paved. 6. Utility plans are required, see LCUASS for submittal requirements. Possible Development Agreement and/or Development Construction Permit. 10/7/3: This comment is being carried forward to keep the history. The actual issues will be discussed separately for clarity in the following new comments. Page 1