HomeMy WebLinkAboutBEAUCAIRE TREATMENT CENTER - PDP - 4-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - (11)Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: zoning
Number: 1 Created: 1 /30/2003
The site plans (before, phase 1, phase 2, phase 3, and the improvement location certificate) must be to scale
and large enough to read clearly. It appears that they've been reduced. The scale that is used must be
indicated on the plan.
Number: 2 Created: 1 /30/2003
The perimeter of the 3820 sf parking area must be landscaped in compliance with Sec. 3.2.2(J), and
screened in compliance with Sec. 3.2.1(E)(4).
Number: 3 Created: 1 /30/2003
The interior of the parking area must be landscaped in compliance with Sections 3.2.1(E)(5) and 3.2.2(M)(1).
Number: 4 Created: 1 /30/2003
Parking stalls must be at least 18' in depth per Sec. 3.2.2Q.
Number: 5 Created: 1 /30/2003
The site plans must show the front property line. According to the improvement location certificate, it
appears that the lot line is about 2' behind the sidewalk.
Number: 6 Created: 1 /30/2003
All new construction must comply with the required setbacks in Sec. 4.8(D)(3). It seems like they are
proposing a 5'side setback for the new addition, which is OK. However, the required front setback is 15', and
it doesn't look like they will meet that. If not, a modification will be required.
Number: 7 Created: 1 /30/2003
3 parking spaces may not be enough to comply with the minimum number of parking spaces required in
Section 3.2.2(1)(e). It's not clear to me how many employees/supervisors will be on site in addition to the 16
residents. The 16 residents alone will require 4 parking spaces unless they're prohibited from owning or
operating a vehicle. This information (how many staff people present, whether residents can drive) needs to
appear on the plan somewhere.
Number: 8 Created: 1 /30/2003
In order to have 16 residents, the lot area has to be a minimum of 10,000 sf per Sec. 3.8.6(B). 5000 sf for the
first 6 residents, and 500 sf for each of the additional 10 residents. Their lot of 9855 sf is large enough for only
15 residents.
Number: 9 Created: 1 /30/2003
Some additional clarification is needed with regards to the "office" use that will be conducted in the building.
Is Beaucaire moving their office/day treatment from 406 N. College to 302 Cherry? There will be 5 individual
offices in the building at the completion of Phase 3. What is the purpose of that much office space? It
seems to me that this will no longer just be a "group home" at that point. (Even at the Phase 2 level it is
becoming questionable). If we determine that this is a multi -principal use building (Group home/office/clinic)
then this will have to be processed as a Type 2 review per Section 4.8(13)(3)(C)(1).
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yours Truly,
Bob Barkeen
City Planner
Page 3
Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: General
Number: 16 Created: 2/19/2003
Natural Resources requests that trash enclosures for this project be built to large enough to accommodated
recycling services. Suggested layout for the enclosure would be 12' x 14' in size and include a walkway door
for people to walk through. 1-10 90 gal. Carts (2 co -mingled 1:1 ratio).
Number: 17 Created: 2/19/2003
Existing Trees- Tree Preservation Standards 3.2.1 of the Fort Collins Land Use Code must be followed, sited and
show on relevant plans, including details.
Number: 19
No Issues
Department: Police
Topic: General
Number: 18
No Comments.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: General
Created: 2/24/2003
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Created: 2/21 /2003
Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Number: 20 Created: 2/24/2003
Please provide plans showing all the improvements that will be done on this site. The currently provided plans
do not adequately show the grading that will be done. Please note since there will be a significant amount
of impervious area added, a drainage report is required for this site, while none was submitted.
The existing inlet that is currently in the driveway needs to be converted to a v-shaped open area inlet to
allow traffic from the street into the driveway. Please show that on the plans once these are prepared.
Department: Transfort
Topic: General
Number: 14
No comments regarding Transfort service
Department: Transportation Planning
Topic: General
Number: 15
Issue Contact: Garold Smith
Created: 2/18/2003
Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Created: 2/18/2003
Please provide at least one bike rack located near the entrance in a visible secure location and designed to
the standards as outlined in the Land Use Code. (LUC 3.2.2 (C.4a,b,c)
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
Number: 12 Created: 2/18/2003
Show and label locations of existing water/sewer services and location of existing curbstop/meter pit.
Maintain four feet of separation between curbstop/meterpit and future building envelope.
Number: 13 Created: 2/18/2003
Are existing water and sewer services adequate for this size of facility? Will a fire line be required for this type
of facility?
See site plan for other comments.
Page 2
6a STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
DIRECTIONS UNLIMITED - LYNETTE MCCLAIN Date: 3/24/2003
DBA BEAUCAIRE YOUTH SERVICES
406 N. COLLEGE AVE
FT. COLLINS, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for BEAUCAIRE TREATMENT CENTER - TYPE I (LUC)
#4-03, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen
Topic: General
Number: 21 Created: 3/14/2003
Permanent parking areas may not be located between the front face of the building and the adjacent
street. Parking must be located along the sides or rear of the building.
Number: 22 Created: 3/14/2003
Building setbacks from the adjacent property lines will need to be included within the site plan.
Number: 23 Created: 3/14/2003
Any additional fences proposed on the site must be labeled and an elevation provided on the site plan.
Department: Historic Preservation Issue Contact: Karen McWilliams
Number: 24 Created: 3/14/2003
The property may contribute to a potential National Register of Historic Places district, this will require a
Section 106 Review, since federal funds are involved. Applicant would need to contact Mark Wolfe at the
Colorado Historical Society in Denver. Property status as potentially eligible for designation as a contributing
property in a National Register district would not effect development review process. Property is not
individually eligible for designation, so Section 3.4.7 does not apply, However, I am not sure how well this
design fits the neighborhood.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 11 Created: 2/3/2003
This is an incomplete submittal and cannot be reviewed until a complete submittal is received. To repeat the
comments given in the original Conceptual Review dated March 4, 2002:
1. Street Oversizing and Lorimer County Road Impact Fees apply. Please Contact Matt Baker for amounts at
221-6605.
2. A Traffic Impact Study may be required. Contact Eric Bracke at 224-6062.
3. Repair and replace any existing damaged curb/gutter/sidewalk.
4. The driveway cut and all other improvements must be in accordance with LCUASS standards (for
example, driveway must be straight for a minimum of 25' from flowline). There are issues w/the driveway
conflicting with the existing stormwater inlet. Suggested sharing driveway access with the neighbor to the
east. If access is not shared, then the driveway location must maintain the minimum separation distance of
30' between neighboring driveway edges.
5. Driveway and parking area must be paved.
6. Utility plans are required, see LCUASS for submittal requirements. Possible Development Agreement
and/or Development Construction Permit.
Page 1