Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVINEYARD REZONING - 2-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONFROM : FT COLLINS FEED FAX NO. : 970 462 8609 Aug. 21 2003 12:56PM P2 In 1987 the issue of displacing animals from their habitat and endangering them was a major mWern of the zoning and planning board. Has this Changed? What will happen to the animals that inhabit this area now? Will you relocate them or will they be left to find new homes closer to our trucks or the county road that passes this area and be endangered by more traffic. There is also the problem of mom theft and vandalism when urban areas are intermbVied with fndusrial areas. This causes our business more money in surveillance and security which could become a burden financially. Or will the city. provide this $ vice to accommodate a new urban area? We would rather have this property stay industrial for the safety of the children and the sanity of all adults dried. Sincerely. Stephen J. Woodward General Manager AL Gilbert Co. dba Fort Collins Feed Post•ir Fax Note 7671 o u of Tom- . '`�_"�'11 n z �9�► � -- - 2 - -ZO Z a Fes• Qs.,-cto�.. �,_„c FROM FT COLLINS FEED FAX NO. : 970 482 8609 Aug. 21 2003 12:55PM P1 August 12, 2003 Dear Mr. Bob Berkeen, This letter is concerning the Vineyard Rezone - type 11(LUC) - Fite #2-03. When we were looking at property for our business in 1987 we had 85 people sign a Petition against the sites we had proposed to purchase because we would be endangering eighty two species of wildlife, cause danger to children, cats, dogs and livestock. The residents also complained there would be more dust, noise and traffic. We purchased an industrial site for those reason stated above. Also, The Planing and Zoning board said they would not bother us any more. Now you want to put a residential area right next door. Now we are the ones concerned for the welfare and well being. of the residents that would be in that area if it were approved as an urban estate. The safety of the children and young adults that might be intrigued by the 18 wheelers and the noises that occur would be of great concern. We would not want the children to come on our property and be iniured or worse because of their curiosity. We also have a serious issue with the children and the irrigation ditch which would be located directly behind this urban area. Children are always interested in usher and the danger is greater for drowning in a ditch like this as it is running faster than it looks and is very deep and hard to get out of. This becomes an issue of, are the children protected from this area, and the liability of who would be responsible as both properties own part of this ditch. The other reason we are concerned about an urban area going In is we are considered industrial and we run trucks 7 days a week 24 hours a day. Although the trucks are not loud it is our policy to let the trucks run to build up air pressure for the brakes. This, to some people may be annoying, but it is necessary for our employees safety. We also have safety checks for the trucks which involve backing the truck up and making sure alarms, which are very noisy, are working property It is also a policy of ours to honk the horn to let anyone in the parking area know the truck is about to be moved. Thii s s also for our employees safety, but maybe annoying to residents. Another concern is the flooding hazards and the drainage problems that may exist in this basin. The stormv ater master planing and revision of the foodplain regulations is not yet set for the Boxelder Creek and Cooper Slough area. Would the changes effect this area and what would it do to the homes in that urban estate?