HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMBRIDGE HOUSE APARTMENTS - MODIFICATION OF STANDARD - 6-03B - REPORTS - MODIFICATION REQUESTNumber of Tenants vs Number of Vehicles
2003/2004
Apt.
Tenants;
Vehicles_
D206
Brittney Schmiedbauer and Katherine Ivory
1 2
D207I
Lisa Trull and Kristen Trull
2
D208
Katrin Preiss and Anne Wolf
1
D301'Vacant
0
D302
Abigail Mesah-Bonsu and Marco Licona-Bone
I 1
D303
Anastasia Spence
2
D304
Chris Stewart, Shaunna Larsen and ChanteIle Schooly
2
D305
Vacant
0
D306IVacant
p -
D307
Mike Schonebaum and Sean Conrad
0
D308
I Steve Bryant
j
E101
Kevin Smith and Tim Wildey
1--2—
El 02
1 Tera Bounting and Hannah Baird
2
E103I
Sommer Ho and Ca_lista Magninie
1 0
E1041
Elizabeth Long
1
E105
Justine Olson
1
E106
1 Alise Frallicciardi
2
E201
IJimena Pena and Michelle Cochran 1
2
E202
_
I Elizabeth Kennedy 1
1
E203
I Rigo Jacobo
1
E204
Bret Kranich
i
E205IAndrew
LeCorchick I
0
E2061 Rojelio Rolas Reyes
1
E301 I Rachel — ---T
. p - -
E3021Gustavo Ramirez 1
1
_
E303 Joseph Mihalovich and Timothy Sherely
E304 jAlisha Arnold and Jessica Norris
E305!Tyson Cole and Alyssa Daw_ ley.
1
22
1
E306IMichael
_
Peterson
3
1
Total: 1
106
Number of Tenants vs. Number of vehicles
2003/2004
Apt. j Tenants
B303jJeff rey Hanson and Seth Kaufman
B304jTanya Szerlip
N
B305jAndres
Jaquez and Deam Diemert
1
B306
Hamen Lo
1
B307
Carol Rosa and Keri Foster
1
B308jVacant
0
C101
jJulia Gruner and Allyson Hollatz
1
C103
I Bobbi Westlund
1
C104
Jessica Johnson and Megan Sloan
1
C105
I Heather Codanti and Jill Tomlinson
_
1
C1061Austin
Lampros
0
C201
jJennifer Miller
j 1
C202 j Mauvi Crabe and Donya Gunnell
0
C203
Amanda Betty and Jill Lysengen
2
C204
Jason Tittle and Albert Lionelle
2
C205 j Mike Blea and Jenn Beyer
1
C206 j Katherine Moe and Emily Sherman
1
C301 j Michelle Brandt and Michele Janes
0
C302
_
Kimberly Kern and Edyta Biegunajtys j
2
C303
Tina Marquardt j
0
C304 j
Robyn Irons and Candice Jordan
1
C305 I
Haroun Hammad, Nizar Salih and Salahedien Mohame
3
C306 j
Nicholas Berner j
0
D101 (Megan
Christenson and Rachel Spannuth
2
D1021Charles
_
Beck and Jonathan Muller
1
D103jSean
Miner 7
1
D104
Brett Strickland and Jeffrey Strickland I
1
D105
Vacant j
0
D106,Adam
Smith 1
1
D1071Tim
D108 jJamey
Sparhawk and Mark Holligan .
and Marygrace Danley
2
D201;
Vacant
0_
D202
__
Cassandra Nielson and Beth Carson --!
_
2
D203
David Willen and Richard-' Stillman
2
D204
Will Duncan and James Nershi !
1
D205jChris
Nixon and Bill Maynor j 2
Number of Tenants vs. Number of Vehicles
2003/2004
Apt'
Tenants
Vehicles_
A101IVacant
0
A102'David
Straw and Loren Verville
2
A103
Gagan Tandon, Rajesh Rajan, Kaizer Cooper
0
A104
Jerome Williams
A105
Kristina Sare and Sara Trujillo
A1061
Alan Smith
1
A201
ITusmar Shimpi, Nag Narasimhamurthy, Chetan Nagaral
0
A2021Paul
and Mark Irvin
1 2
A203
Charles Thangaraj, Prakash Pichumani and Arun 'Nair
1
A204
Erin Manzanares and Jamie Pipkin
2
A205
A206
Savanada and Ali
1 Elizabeth Lewis
1
A301
Vacant
0
A302
Sean Carey and Eric Benally
2
A303 'Amanda
Hawkins'and Lindsay Lucas
2
A3041Juntack
Lim and Don Gook Sung
j 1
A3051Ariela
Haberman
1
A306 I
Melissa Rechner (
1
B101 113rian
Lehnhoff and Michael Morrison
1
B102 I
Ryan Hemje
0
8103 JTravis
Reynolds and Brandon Horton
1
B104
Vinod Snarma, Rohan Arora and Tarun Banka
0
B105
Paul Trotman and Kevin K_rcek
2
B106
_
Aaron Brachfeld
1 +
B1071Keith
Spliman and Trevor Cornelius
2
B108;Robert Ambrose and Gregory Thomas j
2
B2011Vacant
0
B2021 Lynette Holmes and Megan Watson .
2
B203 Snehal Shetye and Niraj Pansare
0
B204 Mega Jain, Jayashree Sridharan, Brahimila_K_a_malakar
0
B205 Vacant T
0
62061 Anne Gross and Lauren Grondin
2__
B2071Kelly Gilloti and Megan Avery
_ _
2
B2081 Joseph Benjamin and Chris Martin
B301 'Justin Eloranto and Jocelyn Me_n_ero
B3021 Helal Alhabcha
1
P
F.
4
14r,
wI R
Cambridge House
Option 2
New Residential building
12 — 3 bedroom units
Renovated Pool building
6 — 2 bedroom units
Parking A:
96 standard parking spaces
/{ 6 handi-cap accessible
73 compact parking spaces (43%)
175 total parking spaces
Parking B:
100 standard parking spaces
6 handi-cap accessible
68 compact parking spaces (39%)
174 total parking spaces
- - TTIL
4 Fl�11 �
N..
13 coc�lPA�-i �
' j I-
2 n
coypu
w
Not�-Tri
—:
12 STANDARD .... __ _._------
HG
,
i
Cambridge House
Option 1
New Mixed Use building
12 — 3 bedroom units
Commercial space / Tenant amenities
Renovated Pool building
6 — 2 bedroom units
4" Parking:
96 standard parking spaces
6 handi-cap accessible
68 compact parking spaces
+ 170 total parking spaces
r
1111111"
t` 13 Gor1PA�•"'T
J
uses should share parking areas and quantities. A portion of any
project's parking requirements should be satisfied by on street parking.
b. . Parking lots will not dominate the frontage of pedestrian -oriented
streets or interrupt pedestrian routs. Lots should be located behind
buildings, in side yards, or in the interiocof blocks to the greatest extent
practicable.
c. Large -surface parking lots will be visually and functionally .
segmented into several smaller lots, if practical. Land devoted to surface
parking lots should be reduced, over time, through redevelopment and
/or construction of structured parking facilities.
thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions please
feel free to contact me.
Donald R. Brookshire
i
With the•second solution; the project has a use by right not to include a mixed 0se
component. And the request for a reduced setback will achieve many goals of both
the Land Use Code and City Plan. The project will address the street, provide
pedestrian access„directly from the street, and screen the parking area behind.
With the approval of this modification, the proposed project would achieve goals set
forth in the City's Comprehensive plan as well as the Campus West Community
Commercial District Report. The project will conform to the intended uses in.CC
(Community Commercial) zoning,district: The plan as presented, orients the building
to address to Shields St. while providing screening to the parking area behind. This •
also provides the opportunity to create a plaza and landscape areas adjacent.to the
street, creating a more pedestrian oriented environment. `
The historical use of the existing parking area has proven to be under utilized, and
',the standard number of parking spaces has not been necessary.' The parking lot is
private, and.therefore can tie restricted to residents of the complex. In addition,
because of the -proximity to'campus, a majority of the residents are students, and the
residents rely on ahernative means of transportation. The location of the project
supports a variety of transit options, including City mass transit, bicycles, and
walking. The proposed improvements will .further encourage this type of use,
promoting pedestrian traffic and use of mass transit, as well as achieve goals
outlined in the City Plan.
As outlined in the City Plan's Principles and Policies for Community Commercial
Districts, the following.princi pals can be -achieved with this project.
1. Principal CCD-1 "Community Commercial Districts will be community -wide
destinations and act as hubs for a high -frequency transit system offering
retail, offices, services, small civic uses, and higher density housing. The
physical environment will promote walking,'bicycling, transit and rideghare,
-,as well as provide a high�quality urban life for residents. Vertical mixed=use'
will be encouraged.
'2. 'Policy, CCD-1.10: "Relationship of Buildings to Public Spaces. Buildings will
reinforce and revitalize streets and public spaces, by providing and ordered
variety of architectural features that may include entries, .windows, bys, an
-balconies along public ways. Buildings will have human scale in details and
massing. While vertical mixed -use is encouraged, maximum building height
will be limited to 5 to"6 stories."
.3. Policy CCD-1.18: 'Parking. Reduced parking standards should be applied to
Community Commercial Districts in recognition of their proximity to high
frequency transit service and their walkable environment and mix of uses.
On street parking should be maximized. Parking structures should be
encouraged, including ground floor retail orservice uses. All parking must
provide for visibility, personal safety and security. Other, Parking
consideration include the following.' '
a- Shared -parking is encouraged for -nearby uses in quantities reflecting
staggered, peak periods of demand. Retail, office and entertainmb- t
a
�-landscape. islands throughout the parking area, and by making slight
modifications to the site design for a more efficient parking lay -out.
Option 27 Request that the proposed building be a residential only building,
removing the mixed use.coinponent, to provide additional parking: This
alternative can provide the approved 175 parking space requirements,
and the Modification, request will be to reduce the front setback from the
required minimum of 45' to 1 Y from Shields Street, and increase the
ailowable number of compact parking spaces from 40% to 43% of the
.total parking spaces provided.. This alternative looks at two variations of
the parking areas, as outlined in the following tables:
_ Option A'— 175 Parking Spaces: Option B - 174 Parking Spaces:
96 Standard Spaces 100 'Standard Spaces
73 Compact -Spaces (43%) 68 Compact Spaces (40%)
6 Handi-cap Accessible Spaces 6 Handi-cap Accessible Spaces
This modification request submits the two alternative site plan solutions. It is the
applicants' preference to proceed with option 1, the' mixed -use alternative, as wefeel
-this solution best achieves the goals both for the project and meeting the goals
outlined in the Fort Collins City Plan. With either solution, we offer -the following
support for the Modification of Standards. f
r "
For option 1, we feel that the reduced number of parking "spaces will not be
detrimental to.the public good; and the proposed project will promote the general
purpose of the standard equally well or better than a plan meeting the standard
criteria. The existing parking area historically has been under utilized. Due in part by
the location, and the demographics of the tenant population, demand for panting is
low: A survey taken September, 2003, of,the existing residents supports this. At the
time of the survey, more that 91 % of the units are occupied. The following data
shows the demand for parking -
Total number of existing panting spaces = 175.,
The total cars owned by residents 106
Total number of residents 159
Demand per occupied unit 1:15 spaces / unit ,
Ratio of Cars / tenants .67 cars / tenant
Based on the tenant demand at the time of this survey, and factoring need for current
vacant units,,the project has 57 parking spaces above full capacity.
Per the land use code,* the new project would demand the following:
12 — 3 bedroom units at 2 spaces / unit =.24
6 _ 2 bedroom units at'1.75 spaces /_ unit = 10.5
Total of 35 spaces required for proposed additions.
Using this information, this leaves'an additional 22 parking. spaces unden utilized.
Based' on the following data, .which is consistent with the parking demand of previous
years, the requested number of 170 parking spaces would still provide an additional
17 spaces above the currant demand.
0
Coint -
st1.1di'
O
A Design.Collab'orative
September 15, 2003
1
Mr. Troy Jones, City Planner
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning Department _
281 N. College Ave
Ft. Collins, CO 80521
RE: Cambridge House Apartments Expansions
Modification. request, to parking standards
Dear Troy,
Iam writing on behalf of Cambridge House Apartments, to request a Modification of
'Standards per Article 2.8 of the Land Use Code:
On April 28,.2003 a Conceptual Review meeting with City Staff reviewed a proposal
for a new mixed use building and conversion of existing buildings to apartment units
to the existing Cambridge House Apartments. The project is located directly west
from the CSU Campus and fronts on both Shields St, and Plum St. The current
proposal is for a new building fronting on Shields St, and will include 12 — 3 bedroom '
" units, and secondary use with parking on the ground floor. An existing pool building
will also be converted to have 6 — 2 bedroom units..
This is a second "request for Modification of Standards, following the defeat of a
previous proposal, on August 21, 2003, to reduce the parking requirements for
Cambridge House Apartments to 160 on site parking spaces:
With this request for Modification of Standards we are providing 2 alternative
solutions to the `parking and site constraints for the proposed project. With the first
attemative, we were able to increase the number of parking spaces provided from our
previous request; yet, we are still unable to achieve the approved 175 space-
requirements.- The second aRemative looks at eliminating the mixed use component
of the new building to meet the required 175 parking spaces.
Optioml : Request that,the required number of parking spaces be reduced to 170
on site parking spaces. This proposal includes a new 5 story Mixed Use
building fronting Shields street, with commercial / retail / residential
amenities on the,ground floor, and 12 — 3 bedroom apartment units on
the upper floors, and a remodel of an existing pool building. for 6 — 2
bedroom apartment units. This proposal will include a total of 170 on -'site
parking spaces, 96 Standard spaces, 6 handicap accessible spaces,
and 68 compact parking spaces. We were able to increase the number
of parking spaces from our previous request by utilizing smaller
phone
(97o) 207.1973,
fax
(970) 206.0813,
e-mail
eastpoint@frii.com
correspondence
3207 Kittery Court
-
Fort Collins, CO 80526