The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE FARMSTEAD - PDP - 8-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSIssue # 61) Neither the utility plans nor the site & landscape plans are now proposing a ramp to the bike parking between buildings 92 & 43. Water Wastekvater: Jeff Hill Issue # 104) Revised as requested. Issue # 105) -See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 106) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 107) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 108) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 109) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 1 10) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 1 1 1) Revised as requested. Zoning: Gary Lopez Issue # 74) Revised as requested. Traffic Operations: Ward Stanford Email comment: Regardinu the left turn lane on Laporte Ave. it is our understanding that this comment has been resolved at a City staff level. 5 U Issue # 57) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 58) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 59) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 60) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 76) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Police: .Joe Cerdom Issue # 1 12) Please see the revised lighting plan. Strom rater: Basil Hamdan Issue # 1 14) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 75) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 78) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 1 13) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 9 3) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 87) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. March 7. 2003 Comments) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue #92) The building envelopes on the site plan have been dimensioned with distances to the property lines. Issue # 1 17) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to continents. Issue # 1 19) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 74) Revised as requested. Issue # 96) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Transportation Planning: Tom Reiff Issue #, 49) Revised as requested. H because we are seeking a modification of standards for this requirement. Issue # 138) Revised as requested. Issue 44' 139) Revised as requested. Issue # 140) On street parking supplements the off-street parking to address the distribution issue. Xcel Energv (Public Service): Len Hilderbrand Issue # 120) Acknowledged. Issue # 121) Acknowledged. The final mylar will be revised to include this easement. Engineering: Marc Virata Issue '� 38) The modification request addresses this comment. Issue # 39) The modification request addresses this comment. Issue # 42) The titles have been revised. Issue # 68) The construction of the sidewalk along Taft Hill Road will be timed as requested. The development agreement can reflect this'. Issue # 72) Signing and striping will be used to ensure that cars don't park within the emergency access easement. See the DMW Engineering response and utility plan set regarding the sidewalk thickness. Issue # 77) A utility coordination meeting was held in December. Issue # 1 13) DMW has submitted the variance requests since this comment was made. We are no longer proposing a covered bridge. Issue # 1 16) Revised as requested. Issue # 40) Revised as requested. Issue # 118) Revised as requested. Issue # 52) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue # 55) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Issue 4 56) See DMW Engineering revisions and response to comments. Perimeter Parking Lot Landscaping The parking lots abut the new segment of Pennsylvania Avenue and the property lines on the west, south, and east. Adjacent to Pennsylvania Avenue, shrubs (Alpine Currents) have been provided in addition to the street trees to screen the parking lots from view of the street. Where parking lots abut adjacent property lines, a 6 foot cedar fence is provided along the property line, and in the landscape buffer between the parking lot and the fence, trees are provided at least every 40 feet and lilac shrubs are provided approximately every 8 feet. This standard is therefore satisfied. Issue # 125) See response to comment 4124 above. Issue # 126) The lighting plan has been made into a separate sheet. Off-street lighting is provided throu1-111 the use of the 70 watt Gardco 104 half -cylinder down -directional wall sconce. Please see the attached specification sheet on this fixture. On -street lighting is the standard Citv of Fort Collins street lighting fixture, the Holophane Outdoor Architectural Lip=Ming fixture. Issue # 127) The drawings have been modified to more clearly show the cedar fence locations. Issue 4128) As part of this re-subinittal we have included a tree mitigation plan which clarifies which existing trees are to remain, and which are to be removed. On April 9, 2004. `frov Jones and Tim Buchanan did a site visit together. Tim Buchanan confirmed that none of the trees being removed are significant, because they are all Siberian Elms, and therefore no mitigation is necessary. Issue # 129) The "Plant List' title on the Landscape Plan has been fixed. The tree mitigation plan information is now located on the "Tree Mitigation' Plan. Issue # 130) The quantity of Albert Holden Lilacs has been corrected on the landscape plan. Issue # 131) Comment # 16 on the landscape plan has been revised. It no longer mentions parkways that are outside of the street right-of-way. Issue # 132) Revised as requested. Issue # 133) Revised as requested. Issue # 134) The driveway has been revised. Issue # 135) Revised as requested. Issue # 137) The temporary turnaround at the end of Pennsylvania has been eliminated j Farmstead PDP Response To Comments Steve Oh Current Pl;,nning 281 North (olles_e Ave. Fort Coliw,. CO 80524 Current 1'1anning: Steve Olt �I��ZI�Zao�i Issue =1 , .'l Please see the draft of the formal agreement between this development and the Ne\-N Mercer Ditch Company. Issue # 1 We concur that the ash trees in question are too close to the intersection of Pensy h ania and LaPorte. The two Ash Trees referenced in this comment are no longer being prul-sosed on the Landscape Plan. Issue 4 1,4) This comment referred back to comment numbers 62 (regarding full tree stockin(,)_ 63 (regarding foundation plantings), 64 (regarding interior parking lot landscaping). and 65 (regarding perimeter parking lot landscaping). These code provision are now satisfied as folio« s: Full Tree Stocking Additional trees have been added to the landscape plan so that there are canopy shade trees planted at least every 30 to 40 feet in all areas within 50 feet of any buildins. Foundation Plantings 'hh,: landscape plan has been modified so that there are planting beds at least 5 fc�:t in width placed directly along at least 50% of exposed sections of building \la;ls that are in high -use or high risibility areas. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping lucre are two parking lots provided on the site. The westerly parking lot is 3,381 square feet in size. and is therefore required to have at least 203 square feet of landscaped area (i.e. 6%) within the parking lot. There is 316 square feet of landscape area provided. The easterly parking lot is 6.594 square feet in size, and is tl;_ relbrc required to have at least 395 square feet of landscape area (i.e. 6%)2111eEkrwn Them. is 613 square feet provided. This standard is therefore satisfied. For+Collins, CO80524 970.416.7431 1.888.416.7431 Fax: 970.416.7435 Email: mikol@archifex.com hffp://wwwarchifex.com