HomeMy WebLinkAboutGOLDEN MEADOWS BUSINESS PARK - PDP - 14-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - LUC REQUIREMENTSX
1
Steve Olt Re Golden Meadows 2nd F _ Page 1
From: Ted Shepard
To: Marc Virata; Steve Olt
Date: 5/2/03 10:56AM
Subject: Re: Golden Meadows 2nd Filing
No problem, glad to be of assistance. I think we all agree that a berm with oak trees will look nicer than a
swale, besides, its code.
>>> Marc Virata 05/02/03 10:51AM >>>
I just now realized going through the file that I dragged the wrong planner (Ted) into a utility coordination
meeting last Wednesday for the Golden Meadows 2nd Filing project. Ted, my apologies for dragging you
into a discussion on a project that's not yours. Steve, my apologies for not dragging you into said
discussion.
This particular discussion centered on the question of whether the Golden Meadows 2nd Filing could have
an open ditch within the 80' setback much like Safeway or is berming required per the Harmony Corridor
Plan. I just recalled Ted providing much of the discussion at staff review on this particular situation and
incorrectly tied that to Ted being the planner. This discussion last Wednesday at the utility coordination
meeting concluded with the berming being a requirement and if the open ditch is still being proposed by
the Developer, a modification is required to be approved to P&Z.
Let me know if there's any issues based upon this discussion or my mistake in planner selection