HomeMy WebLinkAboutSANCTUARY WEST - PDP - 30-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY STAFFSteve Olt - Sanctuary West Preliminary C- ments Page 1
From: Susan Joy
To: hoaglund@vignettestudios.com
Date: 6/4/2008 4:59:02 PM
Subject: Sanctuary West Preliminary Comments
I will have the rest of my comments in the system on Friday when I get back (I'm off tomorrow) but here
are the more important ones so you don't lose any time.
1. The strip of land on the east side of Barton owned by the school district will be difficult for them to
maintain. Have they considered this? Would they prefer to sell this property to this development?
2. Webb Avenue is platted as a 51' row but the utility plan typical street section is showing a 53' cross
section. The utility plans have designed it as a 51' road - please correct and make all the sheets in all plan
sets match. Must build to standard to the south PCs including the sidewalks (this part, and this part only
can wait til Final Compliance).
3. Offsite grading shown on the northwest side of the property. If there is an existing drainage easement,
then this is ok (please show and label as such). If there is not, than a letter of intent from the effected
property owner is required prior to scheduling the hearing. An actual grading or slope easement will be
required in FC.
4. A retaining wall is shown on the southeast corner of Briarwood and Barton. Our standards require that
the wall be set back a minimum of 2' behind the row and it can not be placed in public row. This would
push the wall back into another property and we would require a letter of intent prior to hearing and a slope
easement in FC.
5. Lot 1, east end of Kruse needs a 5' access easement behind the interim curb, gutter and sidewalk to
allow for the future removal and reconstruction for the ultimate design.
6. Out O, Private Drive - 20' minimum width required in order for these to be legal lots.
7. Laporte's row is still shown incorrectly on the utility plans (just a labeling issue at this point).
8. Inlets are shown within the radii on Tavelli. I've discussed this with Tracy Dyer, the inspector, and he
would prefer that no inlets be set in a curve as its very difficult to construct. Please take a look at it and
see what you can do to move both. A variance may be considered for the exterior curbline if there are no
other options but the inside radii is just too tight and the inlet will have to be moved.
9. The variance to minimum cover requirements was granted for the one section of pipe across Barton
with the condition that the street be concrete for that one block, PC to PC.
10. There is a shed(?) shown within the proposed 9' UE on the west side of Briarwood. This will need to
be removed along with the two other structures shown within the Briarwood row. Is the property owner
aware that all 3 structures must be removed? Please label the utility plan sheets as "existing shed
(building, etc) to be removed".
I think I hit the highlights.... I'll get the final comments in on Friday.
See you then,
Susan
CC: Sheri Langenberger; Steve Olt