Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSANCTUARY WEST - FDP - 30-07A - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)VIGNEP E s t o s Number: 357 Created: 10/8/2009 [10/8/09] Revise the location of the point of connection to the existing 27-inch water main at Laporte and Briarwood as noted on the red -lined plans. Complete Number: 358 Created: 10/8/2009 [10/8/09] Show ALL pipe crossings in the water and sewer profiles. Check elevations. Some do not agree between water and sewer profile sheets. Complete Number: 359 Created: 10/9/2009 [10/9/091 Add water main and sanitary sewer stubs in Webb Avenue. Per our discussion, a sewer stub is not needed. Number: 360 Created: 10/9/2009 [10/9/09] See red -lined plans for other comments. Complete Number: 361 Created: 10/9/2009 [10/9/09] Prior to the re -submittal of this project, more effort is needed on checking, cross checking and quality control. The plans has been back checked. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: zoning Number: 362 Created: 10/9/2009 [10/9/09] no issues Noted Thank you for your time spent in reviewing these plans. if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact any of the team members. Yours Truly Terence C. Hpagli ASLA, LE D AP PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE studios Number: 365 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] Please see redlined plans for other detailed comments and revisions. Complete Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 228 Created: 6/6/2008 [10/6/09] Will the water main in Briarwood be completed and accepted by the City prior to the timing of the abandonment of the 27-inch steel main crossing the site? [9/26/081 [6/6/08] The water service for 2216 Laporte (actually fronts on Briarwood) currently connects to the 27-inch main to the west which will be abandoned. This service will need to be reconnected to the new main in Briarwood. How will service to this property be provided throughout constructions? A note tivas added Number: 338 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] Add to the Waterline Notes on Sht 2 that the water mains shall be DIP with polywrap or PVC with tracer wire. Complete Number: 339 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] Add the lengths of water main between valves, fittings, etc., etc. Complete Number: 340 Created: 10/6/2009 (10/6/09] Add steel casings whenever water or sewer mains cross under a storm drain that is greater than or equal to 24-inch. Per our- discussion, PVC casing pipe was added.for water crossings. Number: 341 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] Specify diameter and thickness of each steel casing. Complete Number: 355 Created: 10/8/2009 [10/8/09] Label size of all storm sewer crossings on water and sanitary profiles. Complete Number: 356 Created: 10/8/2009 [10/8/09] Correct the references to 16-inch water main and list the correct sizes. Complete PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.corn VIGNETTE s t u d i o s Complete Number: 269 Created: 9/29/2008 [10/13/091 Contours are not reflective of spot elevations shown. [9/29/08] Please revise contours and spot elevations on sheet 22 per redlines. Drainage can not flow as arrows indicate. The contours has been revised. Number: 272 Created: 9/29/2008 [10/13/09] Please see redlines for storm sewers that should be private, but were labeled as public. [9/29/08] Please label all storm sewers public or private on the Utility Plan sheets. Also, please add a note on the storm sewer plan and profile sheets that all public storm sewers are to be inspected by the City. Complete Number: 273 110/13/091 Created: 9/29/2008 [9/29/081 Pease differentiate between outfall, infall, vertical, and flush curb and gutter on the grading plans and provide a legend. Per our discussion, the type ofgutler was labeled. Number: 277 Created: 9/30/2008 [10/13/091 Please see redlines for one additional separation issue. [9/30/081 Please provide 10 feet of separation between storm sewers, inlets and canopy trees. See redlines for specific locations. This has been corrected. Number: 364 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/091 Master Planning Comments: 1. (Repeat Comment #4) On the Utility Plans, the ultimate drainage channel is shown to terminate at the northern property boundary. Please show this swale with a bend to the east to match the hydraulic modeling submitted by URS so the location and size of the ultimate water quality pond can be verified. 2. (Repeat Comment #5) Please revise the Ultimate Conditions hydraulic model to incorporate the bend between Section 0 and Section 100. Also, please define the channel bends and culvert skew at the Barton Street crossing in the model. This will be necessary to determine if super elevation and/or bank stabilization will be required when the channel is constructed. 3. (Repeat Comment #7) With this submittal, there is a pipe shown under Briarwood Road in the Utility Plans. This pipe is not incorporated into the hydraulic modeling. If the pipe is needed, please revise the hydraulic model to incorporate the standard bridge and weir approach. Complete PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.com VIGNEi TE s t i o s a. A road embankment may only be simulated in RAS when the weir function of the roadway is 90% submerged, or more. Submergence on this crossing will not be achieved, and the road must be represented as a broad crested weir. b. Since a broad crested weir is a rapidly -varied flow structure, hydraulics at the weir will be governed by the weir equation, which does not factor Manning's roughness. Therefore, the assertion in Section 3-4 of the Floodplain Modeling Report (Page 3-4, last paragraph, last sentence) that fill will not cause a rise is false. This conclusion is not substantiated with the current modeling. 9. Please correct rounding errors in Tables 3-9 and 3-11. 10. Please revise the Pond 903 hex. outlet pipe calculations to reflect the tailwater rating curve from the downstream cross section. The max WSEL for max discharge was utilized for most of the pipe analysis. HEC-RAS can compute a rating curve for this cross section, which may assist with data input for the culvert analysis. 11. Please label all BFEs on all work maps attached to the Floodplain Modeling Report. 12. Please refer to attached comments from the City of Fort Collins Floodplain Review Checklist (50% Development Review Submittals) for additional comments. These have been completed, a new report is being submitted. Topic: Stormwater Number: 135 Created: 3/19/2008 [10/9/09] We have standard details that include more information. Please replace with our standard details. [5/7/08] At final compliance. [3/19/08] Please provide design and details for the ultimate condition water quality ponds and outlet structures. The details has been changed. Number: 264 Created: 9/26/2008 [10/13/09] On the overlot grading plan, notes and some spot grading needs to be included to show how the low flows entering the property from the private pond to the west will not flow into this proposed water quality detention pond. A constant low flow will cause problems to the proposed detention ponds. [9/26/081 The south water quality pond is proposed within a wetland and will have problems with ground water. The pond will fill full of water and flow down to the retention pond where there is no outfall. This will cause both the water quality pond and the north - south retention pond to fill with 3 feet or more of water. The pond can not hold water for more than 72 hours, so this is a problem and needs to be resolved. A channel grading is shown on the plans. Number: 266 Created: 9/26/2008 [10/13/09] The final grading contours are still hard to read. There are also errors with the final contours inn several locations. [9/26/08] Please revise the final grading plans by removing the overlot grading contours that will be changed with the final grading. Please darken the overlot grading contours that will remain unchanged. This will make these plans easier to read. Also please lighten the existing contour labeling, they are black when the contours are grey. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Floodplain Number: 363 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/091 1. The Floodplain Modeling Report prepared on September 10, 2009 and stamped by John S. Griffith, P.E. #16030, is not complete as submitted and cannot be fully reviewed at this time. The necessary revisions and corrections identified during this review process will modify the results of the report, and those results must be reviewed before the report can be approved. 2. Repeat comment from 09-2008; please combine all simulations into 1 single Project file in HEC-RAS. This will allow all simulations to be compared against each other within the same project. a. The following note provided in the response to comments is not be acceptable; All simulations are provided in the reports as they have been in previous submittals. b. The Proposed Conditions model contains plan, geometry, and flow files labeled as Existing. Please correct this error in all Proposed Conditions simulations. 3. Repeat comment from 09-2008; please add the off-line calculations for the discharge from the existing hexagonal culvert to the Floodplain Modeling Report. a. The analysis was included in the CD attached to the report, but the report must be maintained as a stand-alone document. All supporting analyses, maps, technical documentation, and text must be included in print, and bound in the text or Appendix of the report. 4. The current No -Rise Certification does not explicitly identify which features must be certified against no -rise. Furthermore, the report conclusions determine there is no rise created by the project — this is not true, but if it were, the report would be internally inconsistent. Please remove the current No -Rise Certification from the report. a. All proposed modifications within the floodway must be accompanied by a No -Rise Certification that is signed, stamped, and dated by a registered P.E. licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. b. Any No -Rise Certification must be accompanied by a floodplain use permit, and submitted to Stormwater for approval prior construction mobilization. 5. A corrected effective condition must be prepared for this suite of models. The report identifies changes to cross section location, and updates to cross section station/ elevation pairs with 2007 topo. The effects of these combined changes must be individually broken out so the impacts from DE to CE, from DE to Existing, and from CE to Existing can be duly investigated and justified. 6. Revise all references to interim conditions to read proposed conditions for clarity. You may still reference the ultimate condition when referring to the residual floodplain anticipated after the fully constructed Master Plan improvements are in place. 7. If XSs 830.35, 830.25, and 830.15 must be extracted for Proposed Conditions, then they should not be in the Existing Conditions models. a. These sections are skewed to the alignment of the road, and are too long to represent accurate hydraulics. Removing the XSs from the Existing model will remove errors associated with section alignments. 8. The proposed roadway should be modeled as an inline weir, not as a conveyance element. The current representation of this roadway crossing skews the results to mask the rise created by the construction of the new roadway. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettes udios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s [10/7/09] The boundary and legal close. Noted Number: 345 Created: 10/7/2009 [10l7/09] The right of way & easements along Barton Drive and Brairwood Road that are to being dedicated by separate document, must have reception numbers shown on the plat prior to filing. Acknow4edged. Topic: Site Plans Number: 346 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] The site plans have line over text & text over text issues. This has been corrected. The issue we had has been resolved and the entire file has been relabeled to correct this issue. Topic: Structural Plans Number: 349 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7109] Sheet S1.1 of the structural plans, has line over text issues. Note: These are no longer part of the submittal set. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 350 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] The benchmark descriptions & the "City's benchmark system name" are incorrect. See sheet 3. This has been changed. Number: 351 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] Several sheets have the Matchline - See Sheet X" text labeled incorrectly. This has been revised. Number: 352 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] The utility plans have line over text, text over text & text over symbol issues. Complete Number: 353 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] Several sheets of the overlot grading plans have line work missing near text. Complete PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: Light and Power Number: 354 Created: 10/8/2009 [10/8/09] No issues Acknowledged. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 330 Created: 10/6/2009 Good general notes regarding the Emergency Access Easements. Let's get together soon to hammer out a Fire Lane Plan for signs and/or red curb paint. Acknowledged. Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Topic: Traffic Number: 114 Created: 11 /15/2007 [10/12/09] Have not received the formal variance request for excluding the left turn lanes. [10/21 /08] [5/12/08] The East bound left turn lane on Laporte is a LCUASS policy that all arterials will provide left turn pockets at accesses. You will need to request a variance to this standard with justification as to why this development should not need to meet this policy. [11/15/07] Per Figure 8-1 of the LCUASS, this project will need to provide an east bound left turn lane at its west access. It may be negotiable to forego the left turn lane in favor of a reversible lane east of your west access to provide a 2 stage left turn capability from the west access for your residents trying to turn onto east bound Laporte during the AM rush hour. This Naas previously submitted. Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Architectural Elevations Number: 348 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] Sheet #11 is mis-labeled as a landscape plan. This has been corrected Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 347 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] The landscape plans have line over text issues. This has been corrected. The issue vve had has been resolved and the entire file has been relabeled to correct this issue. Topic: Plat Number: 344 Created: 10/7/2009 PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s landscaping and construction of the ultimate Kruse Drive to the property line for our review and approval. See comment 51 for the history of this comment. Complete Number: 320 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] Repeat. Please see comment 309 on the minimum limits of the ultimate street pavement section. [10/10/08] Kruse Drive interim temp turnaround - please station/define the limits of the full street improvements and where the limits of the temp turnaround construction are. Complete Number: 380 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Please add "and sidewalks" to the label stationing the end of temp asphalt roadways on the profiles, each street this comment applies. Complete Topic: Utility Plans - Utility Sheet Number: 285 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat. [10/8/08] Please provide utilities from Barton Drive through Webb Ave to the property line or at least past the ultimate road improvements so that the property to the south can tie in without cutting into the street. If the utilities are not provided to the property line, an estimate for their construction is required for our review and approval. Per discussion with Roger Ba ffington at the City Utility Department, the sanitary server should not be extended to the property line. The water was extended to the end of the pavement Number: 303 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat - the utilities must be constructed to the eastern PL. [10/8/08] Sheet 34 - Kruse Drive utilities (sanitary, water, electric, gas, etc) needs to be stubbed to the property line. Per discussion with Roger Buffington at the City Utility Department, the Hater NVas extended to the end of the pavement. Topic: Utility Plans - Water Profiles Number: 312 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15109] Still need note on Sheet 56A. [10/10/081 Please provide a detail (label if where it's shown if on another sheet) for all encasements, lowerings, etc on the water and sewer plan and profile sheets. Please see revised water line profiles. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE S t U d i 0 s The proposed grading is one.foot contours and the existing gffsite has 2 foot contours. The grading ties into the existing. Topic: Utility Plans - Plan & Profiles Number: 248 Created: 6/6/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat. [10/8/08] Please add in the future 9' UE and show, label in both the plan view and the typical section. [9/25/08] [6/6/08] This development is responsible for designing the full street section for Briarwood. Please show sidewalks on the east side but label as "future". The fitture 9'easement was added. Number: 287 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] We still need the intersection spot details. [10/8/08] Please provide intersection spot details in accordance with Figure 7-27 and 7-28. Complete Number: 305 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat - the curb can not change type in the middle of the block. Barton Drive, south flowline, must stay the same from PC to PC. [10/10/08] All concrete sections of the street must be constructed by block, from PC to PC. In other words, all of Briarwood must be constructed in concrete and Barton from Tavelli to the east side of Briarwood must be constructed in concrete (to the PC, see redlines). Complete Number: 306 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat. These are narrow lots and the driveways must be placed exactly where they are shown to make sure they aren't placed over the water line. Can do either a typical lot detail with dimensioning for the rollovers and place a note on the plans that states that all driveways must be constructed per the detail OR you can individually station them. [10/10/08] Station all driveway intersections in both plan and profile views. If you don't want to station both sides of the driveways, you station one side only and put a typical driveway intersection detail on each sheet of the P&Ps showing the one side stationed and dimension out the typical width of the driveway. That way you would only have to station both sides of atypical driveways. Complete Number: 309 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15/091 The ultimate section of the roadway must be carried through, both sides of the street to the PL. Only the extra half circle within the temp turnaround can be constructed in the interim. [10/10/08] Please provide an ultimate design for Kruse Drive to the end of the property line. Please provide an estimate for the removal of the temporary turnaround and PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestLidios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s [10/15/09] Information was provided for two out of four sidewalks. [10/8/08] Please provide spot elevations and slope info on the sidewalk connecting to Webb Avenue. Information was added. Number: 299 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat. This duplication shows up on other sheets as well. [10/8/08] Sheet 23 is showing a duplicated line for the property that juts into the detention pond. See redlines. The extra line was erased. Number: 300 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] Some still "off', others missing. Other grading sheets have the same issue. [10/8/08] Sheet 23 - spot elevations for the lot comers are "off' just a little bit... not on the corner itself. The spot elevations were adjusted. Number: 315 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15/09] Please label the concrete drainage pan on the Final Grading Sheets (can show as "typical") or add it to the Legend. Please provide a drainage easement on each lot that is showing one of the pans located on it otherwise people may try to remove the pans in the future. [10/10/08] Sheet 63 - Please add a label that the concrete trickle pan detail is to be "For private improvements only. This detail is not to be used in public right-of-way." The trickle pan is noted as private on Sheet 63. Number: 376 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Need to provide min -max heights on the retaining walls and a min -max on the slope sections. Information was added. Number: 378 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] There appears to be another retaining wall(s) in Outlot C? If so, please label and provide the bow, tow information. If over T, then we'll need a typical section on the utility plans with the final structural design provided to Building and Zoning at permit. Please coordinate the Site and Landscape plans as well. The line is an easement line. Number: 379 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] The proposed grading needs to tie into the existing grades (in both overlot and final). The grading shown is incomplete, missing or does not tie in. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE studios in comment 72. This addition to the plans will trigger the need for another offsite drainage easement. Complete Number: 292 [10/15/09] Please seethe comments from [10/8/08] The match lines do not match up, between the two from sheet to sheet. The match lines do match up. Created: 10/8/2008 Tech Services. each sheet. There is a space missing Topic: Utility Plans - Grading Number: 243 Created: 6/6/2008 [10/15/09] Repeat. I see that you submitted separate structural plans but those aren't review or approved until you pull a permit for those with the Building Department. If you could put the typical sections into the utility plans with a note stating that the final design will be submitted prior to construction, that would be good enough for us. :) Please see Peter Barnes in Building and Zoning if you have any questions about the permit you will need for them. [9/25/08] Please provide a detail for all walls greater than T from the bottom of the footer. [6/6/08] Label all retaining walls with tow, bow. The tow and bow has been labeled. Number: 244 Created: 6/6/2008 [10/15/09] Your response letter stated that the retaining wall has been removed but the plans still indicate "something" is happening there. Also, the portion of the sidewalk that was removed has to be approved by Transportation Planning. [10/8/08] The horizontal control sheet shows what appears to be a retaining wall in the southeast corner of Briarwood and Barton Drive but it doesn't show up on the Final Grading Sheet. It's hard to tell because the match lines are off and there is missing information. This area is a little convoluted... not sure what information is being shown here. There seems to be a section of sidewalk proposed with this project extending to the south - please remove. [6/6/08] The retaining wall needs to be a minimum of 2' behind the sidewalk and cannot be in public row. This will push the wall on the neighboring property and requires a letter of intent prior to scheduling the public hearing. This has been corrected. Number: 295 [10/15/09] Still missing some. [10/8/08] Please provide finish grade elevations for all did not get them all. All of the lot corners have spot elevations. Number: 297 Created: 10/8/2008 lot corners. I marked a few but Created: 10/8/2008 PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s Number: 294 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] Please provide the name and date for each of the reports. [10/8/08] Please reference the updated or current soils investigation report and the subsurface report. This has this been done. Topic: Utility Plans - Detail Sheets Number: 375 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Please label all details for private improvements as "private" or "on -site". This has this been done. Number: 377 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Please replace detail 709 with detail D10, 11, 12 or 13 which ever applies and correct the labeling on the various grading sheets. This has this been done. Topic: Utility Plans - General Number: 56 Created: 10/30/2007 [10/15/09] The line weights continue to be a problem as most of the line weights used are the same. It's very hard to tell which is which, as they are almost all identical. Please choose different line weights for each feature, use darker for proposed and greyscale for existing. There is also a faint line shown around the east side of the project that varies in distance from the property boundaries and I do not know what it is supposed to represent. I'm a little concerned as to what other comments may turn up with the next round of review once things are presented more clearly. [10/8/08] The existing ditch line weight needs to be added to the Legend. [5/5/08] [3/19/08] Please label existing ditches as "to be removed" where ever applicable. [10/30/07] There are a couple of small existing irrigation ditches shown but what are you doing with them? Are you removing? Relocating? Something needs to be done as they cross individual lots. Each and every affected ditch owner will require a signature block on each sheet where their ditch is shown to be impacted. Much work has been to improve the line weights and to make the plans more readable. Number: 93 Created: 11 /2/2007 [10/15/091 [9/25/081 [6/6/08] [5/5/08] [3/19/08] [11/2/07] See redlines for other comments. The plans have been revised per your redlines. Number: 286 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09) [10/8/08] The newly added culvert in Briarwood Drive needs to be extended to the east so that it works for the ultimate. The flared end section needs to be placed outside of the future 9' UE. Also, if the minimum 2' of cover over the pipe to subgrade is not met, that section of the street will need to be in concrete, from PC to the end of the ultimate improvements. Please provide all of the necessary design details as discussed PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s This has been added. Number: 370 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/091 A portion of the sidewalk along Laporte does not match what is shown on the utility plans. Please coordinate with Loonan and correct whichever one is wrong. Thanks Terence! The Laporte walk has been completely realigned per our meetings, and is now shown correctly on all plans. Number: 371 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] There are a few line weights running around the east side of the property and I'm not exactly sure what they are. Some sheets have labels and leaders pointing to them and on others, the labels point to something else. Perhaps the leaders are just a little off? I think 1 have this cleaned up. There are a lot of overlapping easements and buffers along the ditch area. Topic: Site Plan Number: 318 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] [10/10/08] See redlines and coordinate with comments under other topics. Complete Number: 324 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] [10/10/081 Please clearly label and identify concrete & interim asphalt improvements (sidewalk, street) and all type III barricades. As we discussed, it is all clearly shown on the site plans. Due to clarity, not all is labeled on the landscape plans. Where it could be done clearly, it is labeled. Topic: Utility Plans - Cover Sheet Number: 162 Created: 3/20/2008 [10/15/09] The typical street sections have been corrected, however, the changes were not carried throughout the rest of the sheets and curb types can not change in the middle of the block as shown on the south side of Barton. Please carry the curb type all the way to the PC at Briarwood. [10/8/08] Please list the names of the streets under each typical section on the cover sheet. Please remove "and drainage" in the easement labels so that it matches the plat. Please correct this throughout the plan set. [5/5/08] [3/20/08] Typical street sections need to be identified by street name as the sections are not typical and change from street to street with the different curb types. Curb types can change at the end of blocks but may not occur in the middle of a block. Missing a typical section for Webb Avenue. This has been corrected on the plans. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestti(Jios.com VIGNETTE �i s t u d i o s These easements have been submitted tot he city under a separate TDR application Number: 308 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/15/09] [10/10/08] The necessity for a new off -site easement has been generated by the addition of a culvert in Briarwood Drive. This has been completed. Number: 321 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] Repeat comment. Please resubmit the corrected documents on the city's standard dedication template. [10/10/08] Easements 1, 2 and 3 were received (those surrounding Briarwood), however there are some outstanding issues. The exhibit for Vattano is missing the Book and Page. The exhibit for Phillips is missing the Book and Page. The exhibit for Alumbaugh is missing the Book and Page. The dedication statement for Alumbaugh was not submitted with the City's standard dedication language. Also, there are two properties on the west side of Briarwood. This easement does not make it clear that both properties are dedicating this easement. Perhaps a legal description is in order? These are being submitted, and will be shown on the plat prior to recording Topic: Site and Landscape Plans Number: 366 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] Please label either the tow, bow on all retaining walls OR label with the walls with their height. This is the only way that the Building Department will know whether or not you need a permit or a structural design for them at the time of construction. Complete. I have labeled the wall height on the interim walls. Number: 367 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] Please define all abbreviations in a legend or you can spell everything out on the plan sheets. Either way works for me. :) I thought they were, and I can t find anything missing. Can you clarify? Number: 368 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] The easements shown on Lot 1 at the end of Kruse street need to match the plat. This has been corrected. Number: 369 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] Please add a ramp on the north side of Barton at Webb Street. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vi2nettestudios.com VIGNETTE s t u d i o s Per everyones agreement, the ROW and west side utility/slope easements are being dedicated directly to the city via separate document. the remaining sliver of land on the east side is being included in the site and landscape plans, the utility plans, and the plat. Number: 373 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/091 Easements shown on the plat do not match what's shown on the utility plans. Additional drainage easements are needed where lots share a concrete drainage pan and some areas are calling for drainage easements where none are required. This hads been correlated between the various drawing sets. Number: 374 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] Ownership of the lots east of Outlot C has changed. Please change the plan sets accordingly. This had been corrected. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 317 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] [10/10/08] See redlines and coordinate with comments under other topics. Complete. Number: 323 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/09] [10/10/081 Please clearly label and identify concrete & interim asphalt (sidewalk, street) and all type III barricades. As we discussed, it is all clearly shown on the site plans. Due to clarity, not all is labeled on the landscape plans. Where it could be done clearly. it is labeled. Topic: Offsite Easements Number: 160 Created: 3/20/2008 [10/15/09] [9/25/08] Keeping this open until the property is transferred from the school. [6/6/08] This is still an issue and needs to be resolved prior to hearing. [5/5/08] Barton row needs to be dedicated all the way to the existing property line so that a separate tract of land isn't dividing the row and Sanctuary West. Conversations with Vignette indicated that the school district was going to dedicate this area to the development to be owned and maintained by this development. Either solution is fine, the plans just need to reflect the option you are going with and all appropriate letters of intent received prior to scheduling the hearing. [3/20/08] Offsite row, slope & utility easements are required for Barton through the school property. Offsite slope easements may be required for the Webb Ave street stub depending on where the 4:1 slope ends. Offsite slope and utility easements are required to complete the Briarwood connection to Laporte. An offsite access easement will be required for the sidewalk through the small lot on the north side of the large detention pond. In order to go to hearing, only letters of intent from the affected property owner is required. The actual easement itself will be required during FC and prior to plan approval. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE studios Acknowledged Number: 213 Created: 5/14/2008 [10/15/09] Still do not match (example, see utility plans, sheet 10 and 17). Please make sure that all plans, all sheets are showing the same thing. See the comment below regarding the configuration and construction of the sidewalk. [9/25/08] The utility plans do not match the site and landscape plans for this comment. Please terminate the sidewalk perpendicular to the property line (you can't construct a diagonal piece and add on to it successfully later). [6/6/08] Just carrying this through until FC. [5/14/08] The sidewalk in Outlot E is terminated prior to the property line. This development will be responsible for escrowing the remaining dollars needed to complete the sidewalk to the property line so that when the neighboring property develops, they will have the money to tie into it. An estimate will be required in Final Compliance for our review and approval. The agreed upon figure will be put into the DA and paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit. The Sidewalk locations has been revised and coordinated. Number: 291 Created: 10/8/2008 [10/15/09] [10/8/08] The future sidewalk connection from Tavelli to the west into the detention area is in conflict with proposed culvert. Please design the placement of the culvert so that it accommodates the future sidewalk connection. Per out meetings with city staff and Matt Gi%mpe in particular this connection is no longer needed at this time. This walk has been removed, f •om the plans. Number: 316 Created: 10/10/2008 [10/16/091 Thank you for submitting the estimates. I will hang on to them until the plans are ready for mylars and review them at that time. Please adjust your estimates as we continue to adjust the plans but don't submit the updated estimates until we call for mylars. [10/10/08] Please provide an estimate for the design and construction of Barton and Briarwood to Laporte from the point you are ending the ultimate improvements to the new row for our review and approval. Acknowledged Number: 326 Created: 10/16/2008 [10/16/09] Under review. Will finalize as we get closer to mylars. [10/16/08] Please provide an estimate for the design and construction of the future Laporte Street improvements along your frontage for our review and approval. Acknowledged Number: 372 Created: 10/21 /2009 [10/21/09] All Plan Sets will need to be adjusted if the school's property is being transferred to this Development instead of remaining the school's property with them signing the plat and plan sets. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignettestudios.com VIGNETTE studies Number: 336 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/091 A number of apparent storm sewer lines are not labeled on the Landscape Plans. These have been labeled in select locations, as well as having been added to the legend. Topic: Site Plan Number: 331 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] There are lots of undefined lines on the Site Plans. Please see the red -lined plans being forwarded to the applicant. We have addressed all comments on the redline plans, added additional labels, as well as cleaned zip some line weights. Number: 332 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] On Sheet 5 of the Site Plan there is a parallelogram shaped parcel between Outlot O and Lot 13, Block 2 that is not defined. What is it? This is actually part of Ozaloi O and has been clearly labeled now Topic: Utilities Number: 342 [10/7/09] Richard Stiverson of QWEST concerns with the current Final Plans. Created: 10/7/2009 indicated that they have no problems or Number: 343 Created: 10/7/2009 [10/7/09] Don Kapperman of Comcast Cable indicated that they have no problems or concerns with the current Final Plans. Acknowledged Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 43 Created: 10/30/2007 [10/15/09] Thank you for the estimates however they are a little early. There will be the need to update them with the next round of review. Hang on to them for now until we're ready for mylars and then we can review them once we're sure nothing is changing. [10/8/08] Please provide an estimate for the design and construction of Webb Avenue to the property line for our review and approval. I will email you a template to use. [10/30/071 This project is responsible for the design and construction of Webb Ave to the property line plus 500' of offsite preliminary design. At minimum, Webb Ave must be constructed to the PC's (including the pedestrian ramps) and type III barricades must be provided. If any portion of the road is not constructed (from the PCs to the PL), then this development is required to escrow the cash necessary to complete the street. An estimate for our review and approval will be required in FC and that number will go into the development agreement to be paid prior to the first building permit. Also, need to watch whether the street is tipping up or down because the drainage has to either stay on site or a drainage easement from the offsite property owner will be required. PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www vignnettesttidios.coni VIGNETTE s t u d i o s October 27, 2010 Steve Olt City Planner Community Planning and Development 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins Colorado 80524 Dear Steve, The following is the applicant's response to the Sanctuary West FCP staff comments dated October 26, 2009. Please find attached copies of the revised FCP plans for your review. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Architectural Elevations Number: 337 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] Front Elevation for Plan B, sheet 10, appears to be incorrect. It is the Front Elevation for Plan A on the same sheet and does not fit with the other 3 elevations for Plan B. This has been corrected to show the correct elevation. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Topic: General Number: 381 Created: 10/23/2009 [10/23/09] Coordinate adding Limits of Development (LOD) line on all drawings, per conversation w/ T Hoagland on 10/22/09. This has been shown on the site and landscape plans, and utility plans. Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 333 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] Sheet 8 of the Landscape Plan, ditto question in Site Plan comment #332. This is actually part of Outlot O and has been clearly labeled now. Number: 334 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/091 The 2 (?) Sight Distance Easements are, for the most part, lost on Sheets 6 & 8 of the Landscape Plans. The easements plot darker now and should be easier to read. Number: 335 Created: 10/6/2009 [10/6/09] On the Landscape Plans, ditto Site Plan comment #331. Me have addressed all comments on the redline plans, added additional labels, as well as cleaned up some line weights PO Box 1889 Fort Collins, CO 80524 (970) 472-9125 www.vignette5tudios.com