The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAMPUS WEST THEATRE REDEVELOPMENT - PDP - 23-04B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTStOMIFt laiviron nu nral Consultants, It1C consulting engineers and scientists 3801 Automation Way, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Phone: (970) 226-5500 Fax: (970)226-4946 ASBESTOS FIELD DATA WORKSHEET CLIENT NAME: TNC Holdings c/o Poudre Property Services Address: 706 South College Avenue, #201, Fort Collins, CO 80524 PROJECT NAME: Campus West Theatre PCM X Project #: 3641.001(2) TEM Location: Demolition Enclosure Status: NA Hygienist: DLH Sample Date: 10/27/2005 SAMPLE # LAB # PUMP # TIME ON TIME OFF TOTAL TIME (Min) FLOW RATE VOL. (liters) SAMPLE FIBERS BLANK FIBERS SAMPLE FIELDS FIBER DENSITY FIBER CONC. (f/cc) Sample Location and Description Hr Min Pre Post Ave. 27A 05.1393 T84 9 10 30 2.1 2.1 2.1 63 7 0 100 8.917 0.054 Hoe operator- excursion 27B 05.1394 15 40 420 2.1 2.1 2.1 882 CBR CBR CBR Hoe operator- TWA LB Lab Blank FB Field Blank Microscope Field Area (mm ): 0.00785 HSE/NPL: ✓ Scope #: 1 EHec. Filter Area (mm ): 385 Phase: ✓ Reference slide: Fibers: Fields: F/mm2 P/F Analyst: Eloy G. Martinez Analyst: (Printed Name) (Signature) SBC Form A-006a Asbestos Ficld Data Work sheet w/Cale 08-03 Page 1 of 1 l wStewart Environmental C01151,11taaltS, Inc consulting engineers and scientists k �,. 3801 Automation Way, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Phone: (970) 226-5500 Fax: (970) 226-4946 PCM X TEM ASBESTOS FIELD DATA WORKSHEET CLIENT NAME: TNC Holdings c/o Poudre Property Services Address: 706 South College Avenue, #201, Fort Collins, CO 80524 PROJECT NAME: Campus West Theatre Enclosure Status: Secondary Project#: 3641.001(2) Hygienist: DLH Location: Mechanical Room Area Samnla nnt, nQi,)Rnnns SAMPLE # LAB # PUMP # TIME ON TIME OFF TOTAL TIME (Min) FLOW RATE VOL. (liters) SAMPLE FIBERS BLANK FIBERS SAMPLE FIELDS FIBER DENSITY FIBER CONC. (f/cc) Sample Location and Descriptior Hr Min Hr Min pre Post Ave. S - 1 05.1299 15 4 16 15 71 17.7 11.7 17.7 1256.7 8 0 100 10.191 0.003 Projector Area - East S - 2 05.1300 14 54 16 19 85 14.27 14.27 14.27 1213 6 0 100 7.643 0.002 Mechanical Room - East S - 3 05.1301 14 57 16 19 82 16.55 16.55 16.55 1357.1 6 0 100 7.643 0.002 Mechanical Room - North S - 4 05.1302 14 57 16 25 88 15.41 15.41 15.41 1356.1 5 0 100 6.369 0.002 Mechanical Room - West S - 5 05.1303 15 4 16 15 71 17.76 17.76 17.76 1261 5 0 100 6.369 0.002 Projector Area - West LB 0 0 100 Lab Blank FB 0 0 100 Field Blank Microscope Field Area (mm ): 0.00785 HSE/NPL: ✓ Scope #: 1 EHec. Filter Area (mm ): 385 Phase: ✓ Reference slide: Fibers: Fields: F/mm2 P/F Analyst: Eloy G. Martinez (Printed Name) Analyst: t'=� (Signature) SIX Form A-006a Asbestos Field Data Worksheet w/Cale 08-03 Page 1 of 1 STEWART ENVIRONME, .AL CONSULTANTS, INC. CJnsumnp Enpn Pe•s ann Sc Daily Project Notes Office & Laboratory 3801 Automation Way, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (970)226-5500 Fax (970) 226-4946 info@stewartenv.com SEC Personnel: Dana Harris Job No.: 3641-001-2 DATE: 9/28/05 CLIENT: Poudre Property JOB SITE: Campus West WEATHER: Clear TIME NOTES 1215 Onsite. Meet Nick from MDR. Floor in projector room was HEPA vacuumed. Secondary containment setup with walls from just outside ladder extending up into mechanical room. Perfom final visual inspection of containment. Debris, pipe wrap, and duct mastic has been removed. Waste is bagged and labeled. No dust remaining inside containment. Pass containment, inform Nick that they can encapsulate. I will return later to sample. 1245 Offsite. Sample information on sample log Pale of SEC Form G-005 08-02 _ ASBESTOS ABATEMENT INSPECTION CHECK LIST STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC- Project Name: ,- 'J' J Project No. (— p0 Stewart Inspector: ti cif (l i Date/Time: 5 1ll oc-- Supervisor: N;t_k Contractor: !\w" Building, containment location, project description, type of ACM: Vqc,\IC ur�tkGl i 5�,1� C`cCn� �,i� n1JiGiiLnl ))fb�°( lo:,j Background _ Outside Ambient _ Clearance Setup _ Takedown _ Personnels _ ITEM �r n jaa+ it t i ,P, � �r �.. o _ a y'rx •_ r . t ,, �r�-- ...�:NfA ,-'••�' :_ x w"r;. .:t. _,:,Y:es.� .r.,4,.., <�.-€��. x No "' All workers certified Manometer set up and recording +✓ Manometer reading: Sign -in sheet by decon ✓ Asbestos signs posted ✓ Permit posted Decon Unit Separate bag out Critical barriers installed v 2 layers of poly (floors,walls,ceiling) ✓ Emergency exits marked i✓ Air monitoring setup l✓ PPE equipment in use Smoke testing Pass clearance inspection Debris: bagged, sealed, labeled ✓ Waste manifest forms Air samples collected, logged in t/ ITEMS THAT NEED ^nCORRECTION: 2. •-A &z'ke A <S NIA 3. FICCi•J n,` r NOTES: CA 1_ A! Ji 1 r t r Jib 7 n 1 f I{ (� .ram QL (c'nErr "XG ,� NOTE: Draw a sketch of work zone and location of air monitors. SEC Form A-008 Asbestos Abatement Inspection Checklist 05-01 Laboratory Report Asbestos Abatement Inspection Checklist Daily Project Notes Asbestos Field Data Worksheets Certifications btewart tnvironmental Consultants, Inc. Mr. Christian Bachelet Poudre Property Services Page 3 of 3 November 10, 2005 Results of analytical testing and certifications are attached. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with professional environmental services. If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely, STEWART ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS. INC. Dana L. Harris Environmental Scientist 7/�Zl eto k j Y'619-t�a/ Thomas S. Norman, PE Vice President Enc. 3641-001(2)\campus %Nest airmon IOnovMxpt Stewart Environmental Consultants, Inc. Mr. C7iristian Bachelet Poudre Property Services Page 2 of 3 November 10, 2005 The purpose of the air monitoring was to establish a negative exposure assessment (NEA) in accordance with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) [29 CFR 1926.1101 (f)(2)(rr)]. Work practices included wetting building and debris. Stewart Environmental was not on site during the entire demolition, and therefore, we made only very limited observations of wetting practices and the presence of visual emissions. Demolition debris was hauled off site on October 27, 2005. Mr. Dana Harris, certified asbestos building inspector and air -monitoring specialist with our office, performed air monitoring of the asbestos roofing materials that were left in place during demolition. Both excursion and time -weighted average air samples were collected. The analytical method used was PCM, which was done in accordance with NIOSH Method 7400, Asbestos and Other Fibers by PCM. Approximately 25 percent of the workers were monitored in accordance with OSHA protocol. During demolition, one equipment operator and the water hose operator were monitored. During debris loading and hauling, Barker had only one hoe operator on site. The remaining workers were truck drivers. On October 25, 2005, two personal samples were collected. The laboratory determined that one of the samples could not be read (CBR) due to too much dust. The laboratory could not determine if the particulates were fibers or other debris; therefore, the monitoring did not meet the requirements for an NEA. An excursion sample was not collected, as the dusty conditions rendered the sampling unusable. Barker was using water but may not have applied sufficient water to keep dust down. Stewart Environmental reminded Barker of the requirement to maintain no visible emissions. The second sample was below the PEL of 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter (fibers/cc) for asbestos. On October 27, 2005, one excursion sample and one personal sample were collected. While Stewart Environmental was on site, there was no indication of visible emissions. However, the laboratory determined that the sample again was CBR due to too much dust. The excursion sample (0.054 fibers/cc) met the OSHA limit of 1.0 fibers/cc for excursion limits. Because the one sample was CBR, the monitoring did not meet the requirements for an NEA. Debris hauling was completed by the time the final sample analysis was performed. Because of the excessive dust, the work practices resulted in an unacceptable NEA. Therefore, based on these results, the workers should have worn respirator protection as defined in OSHA 1910.134. Elements of a respiratory program include a written program, acceptable respirator equipment, training, medical evaluation, fit testing, respiratory use, and record keeping. Any employee who is exposed to at least 0.1 fibers per cubic centimeter (fibers/cc) of asbestos over an 8-hour period must be involved in a medical surveillance program. The medical surveillance program establishes an employee's fitness to wear a respirator and to detect changes in health due to asbestos exposure. Each medical examination must include a mandatory medical questionnaire, physical examination, pulmonary function test, and other tests as recommended by the physician. Stewart Environmental Consultants, Inc. Stewart Environmental Consultants, Inc. consulting engineers and scientists Corporate Office & Laboratory: 3801 Automation Way, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 ph: (970) 226-5500 fax: (970) 226-4946 www.stewartenv.com November 10, 2005 Mr. Christian Bachelet Poudre Property Services 706 South College Avenue, #201 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 Subject: Air Monitoring, Campus West Theater, Fort Collins, Colorado Project No.: 3641-001(2) Dear Mr. Bachelet: Stewart Environmental has completed its air -monitoring services for the Campus West Theater on West Elizabeth Street, Fort Collins, Colorado. ASBESTOS ABATEMENT On September 28, 2005, Stewart Environmental Consultants, Inc. performed avisual inspection and air monitoring for asbestos abatement at the Campus West Theater site. MDR Corporation performed abatement of pipe insulation and duct mastic materials and spilled debris in the mechanical room and connecting projector room below. Mr. Dana Harris, certified asbestos building inspector and air -monitoring specialist from our office, performed a final visual inspection following MDR's completion of removal of asbestos. After encapsulant applied by MDR was allowed to dry, Stewart Environmental collected and analyzed air samples for final clearance. The analytical method used was Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM), which was done in accordance with NIOSH Method 7400, Asbestos and Other Fibers by PCM. All of the air samples collected were in compliance with state and federal public occupancy standards of 0.01 fibers/cc. Sample locations, results of analytical testing; and asbestos air clearance documentation are provided in the enclosed laboratory report. NEA On October 25 and 27, 2005, Stewart Environmental Consultants, Inc. performed air -monitoring services during demolition. The demolition was performed by Barker Construction using trackhoes. ACEC N'1 EM BEH