No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHOPKO P.U.D., PAD B - PDP - 28-03 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSREVISION ROUTING SHEET �q /A-16�-3 -? PROJECT PLANNER AN BUILDINGINSPECTION LIGHT & POWER TECHNICALFILE: OLI-s��������� ANNING ... PLSTREETS WATER CONSERVATION POST OFFICE US WEST DITCH COMPANY . • • • . • BNSF RAILROAD: �v� If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341. Yours Truly, w 4 )1 Steve Olt, City Planner cc: The Architects Studio North Star Design Page 9 The following comments were offered by City staff at their project review meeting on August 27, 2003: Engineering/Susan Joy re not clear) shown on the plans. 1. An easement exhibit would be good. hey a y p \/2. Please make sure that the project name is consistent on all plans. 3. A separate phasing sheet may be needed for clarity. A utility coordination meeting for this project would be desirable to better �J / address all issues. 5. All necessary letters of intent for off -site improvements and easements from affected property owners must be provided before this development proposal can go to public hearing. Stormwater/Basil Hamdan 1. The location of the (existing) gas line must be shown on the utility plans. / Z / 2. The proposed trellis between Buildings 1 & 2 cannot be located over an easement. 3. Dedication of new and vacation of some existing easements are necessary. This should be done prior to public hearing. Water-Wastewater/Jeff Hill 1. The plans that are part of the initial submittal contain significant drafting errors. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being September 4, 2003) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all of your red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. Page 8 Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: Utility Plan Number: 32 . Created: 8/27/2003 Maintain 4 feet minimum separation between meter pit and all permanent structures (i.e. building envelope, trash enclosure, retaining walls, etc.). P ce meter pits and curb stops adjacent to the main when possible. Number: 33Created: 8/27/2003 Our records indicate an existing water service and fire line stub has been extended into the area of Phase 2. Field locate all utilities, show and label on plans. Clearly define whether existing stubs/services are to be used or abandoned. Number: 34�� Created: 8/27/2003 Provide utility easements for all water service lines upto and including the curb stops. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. -TST Department: Zoning Topic: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols ✓Number: 2 Created: 8/4/2003 Please remove topo lines from final site and landscape plan. ,/Number: 3 Created: 8/4/2003 At least one of the HC spaces needs to be van accessible and signage at the front stating as such. ✓Number: 4 Created: 8/4/2003 Please label building envelope, dimensions, distance to property lines. ,/Number: 5 Created: 8/4/2003 Phase lines aren't real clear - which phase do the different parking lot areas go with? Please clarify ✓ Number: 6 Created: 8/4/2003 OPINION - the trash enclosure is the first things people are going to see when they approach from the adjoining ShopKo parking lot. Is this the first view you want them to have? Is there an alternate, more aesthetic location? / Number: 7 Created: 8/4/2003 No landscape plan received, please submit one for review. Page 7 City will not own or maintain such a line and it would thus be allowed. Since this line is carrying flows from the main 5hopKo parking lot, a private easement may be needed between the owner of this parcel and the owner of the ShopKo, Parcel A. Please add notes on the plan to that effect. 0 Topic: Utility Plans Number: 28 Created: 8/26/2003 The storm sewer manhole along Boardwalk Drive is located in an area that is typically used by Light and Power for their line (behind the walk). Please check with Light and Power to make sure that this location is OK for them. If the manhole is kept at that location, then the lid needs to be offset to keep it away from the walk. The line along JFK could also conflict with gas lies. A utility coordi ation meeting might be helpful to clarify these issues. (4A-r 10P MANHOL9 LoVEk- Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Topic: Traffic Number: 8 Created: 8/5/2003 The Transportation Impact Study prepared for the project dated July 2003 is acceptable and no revisions are required. The project has minimal impact to the surrounding public street network and no street/geometric improvements on JFK or Boardwalk will be required. Minor street left turns fail but this is normal and can be expected. Department: Transfort Issue Contact: Garold Smith Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 8/13/2003 No comments Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff Topic: Transportation Number: 35 Created: 9/1/2003 The LUC requires that a minimum 4 foot clear space be maintain where cars overhang 2 feet into walkways. Increase the width along the NE walkway from JFK to a 6 foot minimum. Number: 36 Created: 9/1/2003 The LUC requires that bike racks be located near building entrances in a visible secure location. Please relocate bike racks near the primary entrances to the stores. See red lines for suggested locations. L Page 6 Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General ✓lumber: 12 Created: 8/25/2003 Lighting between Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildings should be a minimum of 0.7fc throughout. Location and orientation of enclosure (away from buildings) will make natural surveillance difficult - further hindered by location of Austrian Pine. 0"/[eparent: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topc:tmEasements Number: 25 Created: 8/26/2003 Need to vacate the existing storm drainage easements where the storm line is being removed and dedicate a new easement for the relocated line. Provide an easement vacation and dedication exhibit. ,� 7 Topic: Erosion Control Number: 31 Created: 8/26/2003 August 18, 2003 Plan is OK. Thank you. Topic: Grading Plan Number: 11 Created: 8/21/2003 Please provide an interim grading plan showing how the Phase 2 ar a i I be graded prior to its construction and after Phase 1 is completed. -- /7 Please provide tree protection notes on the plans specifying that trees in the area where the new storm sewer is proposed on the east side of the side will be protected in place during construction. Topic: Grading plans Number: 30 Created: 8/26/2003 Please provide cross sections along the east side of the building showing the slope from the building, the Swale and the storm line along JFK. Another cross-section along the retaining wall and pond would also be helpful. Add tree protection notes to the grading plan. Show and call out protective construction fencing for trees to remain. OTopic: Storm Sewer Alignment Number: 10 Created: 8/21/2003 It seems that the storm sewer line coming from the parking area inlet will be crossing�� under a trellis cover. Please make sure that this line is a private line that would not -% require a public easement for it to be allowed. If this is a private line and the then the Page 5 utility easement that is no longer needed, however, that can not be done until the new easement is dedicated and the new line installed. O Number: 22 Created: 8/26/2003 May need a temporary construction easement from the property owner to the north. If so, a letter of intent from that property owner is required before going to hearing. Number: 23 Created: 8/26/20030 Sheet 5 - Correct overlapping labeling. Number: 24 Created: 8/26/20% Con Sheet 6 - Phasing? b (�c�� y(U Number: 26 Created: 8/26/2003 Sheet 9 and 10 - Provide details 707, 1601, 1603, and 1606. Please label all non 0/C standard on -site curb and gutter details as "on -site". )6NUm 29 Created: 8/26/2003 Suggest a Utility Coordination Meeting prior to the nextsubmittal to work out the storm sewer ali nment in re ation to the sidewalk and other utilities. Suggest rotating the manhole away from t e si e` Number: 37 Created: 9/2/2003 No structure of any kind is allowed in utility easements. !UL-LIS 0� %%Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine " Topic: Light d Power Number: 1 Created: 8/4/2003 0 The power source to this site will be from the southwest corner of the site. The developer will need to coordinate transformer location(s) with Light & Power Engineering. Transformer(s) will need to be a minimum of 3 ft. from any structure and have a minimum of 8 ft. of clearance to the front side of the transformer. The transformer(s) also must be within 10 ft. of a paved surface for line truck access. L_ Mavt Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 9/3/2003 No issues. or Auk )1111r IAOO Page 4 Topic: Landscape Plan ✓ Number: 15 Remove the contours. Created: 8/26/2003 ,/Number: 16 Created: 8/26/2003 Show and label all existing and proposed easements. Topic: Site Plan 1 Number: 13 Created: 8/26/2003 Please remove the utilities, contours and landscaping. Number: 14 Created: 8/26/2003 Show and label all existing and proposed easements. ,/Number: 19 Created: 8/26/2003 Pedestrian Access Ramps do not match the utility or landscape plans. See redlines. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 17 Created: 8/26/2003 Sheet 2 - 2 benchmarks are required in Line 40 of the General Notes. lumber: 18 Created: 8/26/2003 Sheet 3 - Under notes: 2. Utility phasing? 0K_ If grading is to be phased, will need a grading plan and erosion control plan for each phase. *& a,;7-4- aant. Number: 20 Created: 8/26/2003 Sheet 4 - Update the street cut note to read: QK Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. You may also place this statement under "NOTES" so that you don't have to put it by each and every street cut. O Number: 21 Created: 8/26/2003 Show and label all existing and proposed utility easements, both on and off -site. Please dedicate additional utility and drainage easements by separate document. It may be helpful to prepare an easement exhibit showing what's existing and what's proposed so that we can keep it all straight. You will want to vacate the portion of the existing �TJT Page 3 Number: 46 Created: 9/3/2003 The bike racks, as shown, do not appear to be in convenient locations relative to the building entries. Depending on the design of the racks, parked bikes could possibly hinder pedestrian movement on the sidewalks around them. Number: 47 Created: 9/4/2003 The parking spaces in front of Building 2 are 17' deep. In 2 locations there are metal roofs held up by 3 columns each. The outside of these columns are only 4.5' from back of curb. City Code requires that there be at least a 6' clear sidewalk in front of 17' parking spaces. This is to allow for at least 4' of unobstructed pedestrian movement. The proposed 4.5' between the columns and back of curb is not in compliance with Code, therefore, something must be changed. Number: 48 Created: 9/4/2003 There is a section of proposed new sidewalk at the west end of Building 2 (where the bike rack is located) that is not shown on the Landscape Plan. This new sidewalk will also conflict with an existing Pear tree. The sidewalk is necessary, however, for direct pedestrian connectivity from the retail/office entries in the new building to the public sidewalk. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 40 Created: 9/3/2003 Len Hilderbrand of Xcel Energy (Public Service) offered the following comments: a. Xcel Energy has a 6" FB gas main along the east side of JFK Parkway. They will need to extend a gas main across JFK Parkway to serve the proposed project. b.No trees may be planted within 4' of any gas lines. 0They need a minimum 9' wide utility easement. A 9' easement is not adequate if other utilities equipment (telephone, cable, electric, etc.) is to be located within this easement. ✓Number: 41 Created: 9/3/2003 The proposed trellis attached to the west end of Building 1, located between Buildings 1 & 2, cannot encroach into a utility easement. Obepartment: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General ✓Number: 27 Created: 8/26/2003 The Project Title on all plan sets do not match the Project Title on DMS, /,,,, ,, 71� - _-;0 -//)/o STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cilvof Fort Collins �e Doberstein Lemburg Commercial, Inc. Date: 9/4/2003 c/o Dan Bernth 702 West Drake Road Building E, #8-102 Fort Collins, CO. 80526 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SHOPKO PUD, PAD B - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Buildings Number: 42 Created: 9/3/2003 In reference to wall -mounted light fixture AA, are the fixtures mounted flush to the ✓ S walls or are they on an arm of some sort that would extend them out from the ��, buildings? The concern is about whether or not these light sources will comply with the WG�w/ City's code requirement that they be down -directional and not create any off -site light / / spillage. Topic: Genera/ Number; 49 Created: 9/4/2003 �� Please see red -lined plans for additional comments. Topic: Light d Power Number: 43 Created: 9/3/2003 The parking lot lighting should be shown on the Site & Landscape Plans. A J Topic: Site Plan Number: 44 Created: 9/3/2003 The trash enclosure is in a location that presents a first impression, focal point for the project. Also, there is minimal landscaping being provided to screen the enclosure as proposed. Is there no better place to put this element of the project? Nu44nnber: 45 Created: 9/3/2003 A detail is needed for the masonry block retaining walls. Page 1 Engineering/Susan Joy 1. Although we do not have an easement exhibit, the easements are clearly outlined on Sheet 4 — Utility Plan. 2. The project name is Tract B, Shopko P.U.D. 3. See Comment 1 above. 4. A utility coordination meeting was held. 5. Acknowledged. Stormwater / Basil Hamden 1, See Sheet 4 — Utility Plans. 2. The trellis will be over a private agreement, not an easement. 3. Acknowledged. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, DO ERSTEIN LEMBURG COMMERCIAL, INC. 7 Daniel ie. Bemth, CCIM President 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL NetworkOLC TEXTTETTERSIPDP - SPRLTR SHOPKOAd Transportation Planning Transportation 35. Refer to Issue #47. 36. Refer to Issue #46. Water Wastewater Utility Plan 32. Acknowledged. 36. Utility easements will be completed for all water service lines up to and including the curb stops. Zoning Zoning 2. Topographic contour lines have been removed from the Landscape Plan. 3. A van accessible parking space has been added. 4. Building envelope, dimensions, distance to property lines are labeled. 5. The Phase lines are clarified. 6. Landscaping has been added around trash enclosures to provide screening. 7. Requested copies have been submitted to Planning Department for distribution. 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL Ne[work\DLC TEXnLETTERS\PDP - SPRLTR SHOPKO.doc 37. The trellis will not be over a utility easement, but a private use agreement. Light and Power Light and Power 1. Two transformers have been located on both ends of the buildings. The transformer location will meet the clearance criteria. Landscape will be used to screen the transformers. Police General 12. The pines will be spaced adequately at their current size to allow surveillance. As pines grow, they will be limbed up to allow visibility under their canopies. New photometric plan has been developed taking into consideration the 0.7 fc. Stormwater Utility Easements 25. The existing storm drainage easements will be vacated concurrently with the dedication of the relocated line. Grading Plan 11. See Sheet 6. 30. See Sheet 8. Storm Sewer Alignment 10. Storm drainage under trellis will be private line and not a public easement. Utility Plans 28. As discussed in the utility coordination meeting, site constraints require some issues to go unresolved, i.e. moving the manhole requires a stormwater drain to run dangerously close to the building foundation. 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL Network\DLC TEXT\LETCERS\PDP - SPRLTR SHOPKO.doc Landscape Plan 15. Contours have been removed from the plan. 16. Existing and proposed easements have been indicated on the Landscape Plan. Site Plan 13. Utilities, contours, and landscaping are removed. 14. Existing and proposed easements will be shown. 19. Pedestrian access ramps match utility and landscape plans. Utility Plan 17. Acknowledged. 18. See resubmittal. Grading will not be phased, it will all be done at one time. 20. Acknowledged. 21. See resubmittal. 22. Acknowledged. 23. Corrected. 24. For phasing, see Sheet 3. 26. See resubmittal. 29. Utility coordination meeting was held. 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL Ndwork\DLC TEX'[1[.ETTERS\PDP - SPRLTR SHOPKO.doc accommodate existing trees. An existing Honeylocust tree, located on the western perimeter of the site, has been relocated due to a proposed water line conflict. Plant counts in the plant schedule have been adjusted to reflect the proposed landscaping. Light & Power 43. Parking lot lighting has been shown on the Site and Landscape Plans. Site Plan 44. Landscaping has been added around trash enclosures to provide screening. A walkway that allows pedestrian traffic from the shops has been added. 45. MESA — Retaining wall system image is included in the re -submittal ( Refer to Sheet A-1 ). 46. Bike racks have been added to the north of the trellis. The potential for bike racks hindering the sidewalk has been taken into consideration. 47. The width of the sidewalk is increased to accommodate for the 4' unobstructed pedestrian movement and the 2' car overhang. 48. This proposed section of sidewalk is now shown on the Landscape Plan and adjusted to accommodate an existing Pear tree. Utility Plan 40. Acknowledged. 41. An agreement will be completed allowing Shopko the ability to use the private storm drain for their runoff. Since it is a private storm drain there will be no easement required. Engineering General 27. The Project Title has been changed to Tract B, Shopko P.U.D. on the Landscape Plan. 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL Network\DLC TEXT\LETTERS\PDP - SPRLTR SHOPKO.doc Doberstein Lemburg Commercial, Inc 702 West Drake Road Building E, Suite B-102 Fort Collins, CO 80526 (970) 221-1965 Office (970) 221-1966 Fax October 16, 2003 Mr. Steve Olt Project Planner 281 North College Avenue P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 RE: Project No.: Tract B, Shopko P.U.D. Dear Steve: The following is an explanation of issues arising from the Staff Project Review Letter dated September 4, 2003. Current Planning Comments Buildings 42. A new light fixture is proposed ( refer to Sheet E2P ). General 49. The following addresses redline comments indicated on the plans Trees identified as being moved, that are in question along JFK Parkway, have been reviewed by Tim Buchanan and accepted due to sidewalk encroachment and over crowding issues. A note indicating a storm sewer easement has been added to the plan. Additional landscaping has been provided around trash enclosures and transformer locations. Parking spaces previously indicated as part of Phase 2 have been changed to Phase 1. Proposed sidewalk locations have been modified to 10/16/2003A\DLC\DL Network\DLC TEXT= FERS\PDP - SPRLTR SHOPKO.doc