The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About317 & 325 CHERRY ST., CHERRY STREET LOFTS - FDP - 29-03C - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 73 Created: 2/3/2005 [2/3/05] As previously indicated, has PFA approved the 4-inch fire line sizing? Number: 74 Created: 2/3/2005 [2/3/05] As previously indicated, maintain 3 feet minimum separation between all existing and proposed water line taps. Number: 75 Created: 2/3/2005 [2/3/05] As previously indicated, provide separate water and sewer services for each proposed use (i.e. commercial vs. residential). Number: 76 Created: 2/3/2005 [2/3/05] As previously indicated, clearly define all abandonment procedures. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Please be sure to return your redlines when you resubmit. The subterranean trash enclosure shop drawings can and should be submitted separately for an informal review. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen City Planner Page 4 [1/25/05] Now the parkways have dimensions, but not the sidewalks. Please re -label the walk widths. [12/10/04] The proposed parkway on Cherry falls short of the minimum 8'. Please revise. [9/10/04] Please provide dimensions for sidewalks and parkways meeting or exceeding LCUASS standards. Topic: Utility plans Number: 66 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please add a note where street cuts are shown: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Number: 51 Created: 12/9/2004 [2/4/05] If electric service is 400 amps or less, options include vault or pad location. A vault is not possible for service over 400 amps. The residential service meters need to be placed such that they are accessible —in an unlocked location, preferably at eye level. Some of the development charges won't count because this project is a redevelopment. [12/9/04] The utility plan states "Existing electric cabinet, relocate underground." The developer has verbally indicated that the new electric service will be single phase which will make this statement possible at additional cost. However, if three phase power does become required, a location for a pad type (above ground) transformer will be necessary. Normal electric development charges plus costs to modify the electric utility system will apply. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 50 Created: 11 /2/2004 [2/4/05] [11/2/04] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. NOTE: The Utility plat indicates a 6" fireline from the proposed building tying into a 4" street line. This will not be excepted. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 63 Created: 1 /29/2005 [1/29/05] Please add a concrete channel detail and a detail for the transition of the channel into the curb and gutter. Number: 64 Created: 1 /29/2005 [1/29/05] Please see other minor comments on the redlined plans. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 70 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] 1 did not find a project schedule form, please provide. You may contact me to email an electronic copy of this form. Page 3 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Alley design Number: 67 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05) It appears that there is a significant grade difference between the top of proposed curb and the existing grades in that location. Please flatten the alley grades (probably to 0.5%) in order to minimize this grade difference. Number: 68 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Where the new alley ties into the existing grades, please mill/overlay to approx sta 8+30 to allow the low point to drain. See redlines. Number: 69 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Max. grade break allowed at curb returns (per LCUASS) is 3%, but 4% is shown on the west curb return. Sheri has ok'd a variance to this, so please add this to your list of approved variances. Please list only engineering variances on the utility plans (remove the stormwater variance). Topic: General Number: 20 Created: 9/10/2004 [1/25/05] The spot elevations provided do not work with the new grades required per the new ADA details. Please review these details, show the locations of the truncated dome panels on the ramps, and provide spot elevations at the flowline, back of truncated dome, and top of ramp. [12/10/04] Please improve the detail quality - it is very fuzzy- and add interim drawing 1606(a). Also, please provide additional information regarding the ramps (spot elevations) so that we know they can be properly constructed. This has been a problem in the past. [9/10/04] The City has just approved new details for pedestrian ramp construction. Please see attached. These details apply to all projects not yet constructed. Number: 21 Created: 9/10/2004 [1 /25/051 [12/10/041 [9/10/04] Please see plans and utility plan checklist for additional redlines and comments. Number: 40 Created: 9/15/2004 [1/25/05] [12/10/04] [9/15/04] In the DA for this project, it will be noted that special paving in the ROW is the responsibility of the Developer/Owner, and that, should the City or other utilities need to work in the ROW under the paving, they will not be responsible for repaving the area except for the standard sidewalk. Number: 61 Created: 1 /3/2005 [1/25/051 [1/3/05] Please show how water will drain out of the underground trash enclosure. Number: 65 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please label the ROW on the east edge of the Alley on all plans. Topic: Site Plan Number: 11 Created: 9/10/2004 Page 2 r C of STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins M. TORGERSON ARCHITECTS Date: 02/04/2005 TROYJONES 223 N. COLLEGE AVE FT. COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff ha's reviewed your submittal for 317 AND 325 CHERRY STREET, CHERRY STREET LOFTS PDP/FC #29-03B/C, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Topic: Drainage Number: 77 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] There was a discussion at staff review about how the subterranean trash enclosure would drain. Please clarify the following issues with a revised shop drawing and narrative if needed to be unofficially routed to me, Jeff Hill, Katie Moore, Doug Moore, and Glen Schlueter for review: +in what manner will it drain? If water tight by way of a gasket and/or slight slope on lid, it can be designed to pump to the wastewater system, which would make sense for clean out purposes. +if no method of keeping storm event flows out of the vault then it needs to pump to the storm sewer system, in which case Natural Resources will want to review how contamination issues will be handled. Topic: General Number: 71 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] In the future, please respond to staff review comments right on the copy I email you (this applies to MTA only —Thanks DMW) Differentiate your comments from ours with italics, bolding or a different color. Thanks. Number: 72 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] Twice now, I've asked you via redlines to label the various lines on the east property. Twice you've said you addressed it but they are still not labelled. Please label. It will help us to identify what's what. Number: 78 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] At staff review, Wes and Glen commented that the fire line needs to be sized and that it will probably need to be 6" not 4". Number: 79 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] Also at staff review, Wes and Glen commented that the water and sewer arrangements would need to be put in the HOA document. We'll need to see this in the form of a letter of intent from the lawyer or a letter showing the boilerplate language. Page 1