HomeMy WebLinkAbout317 & 325 CHERRY ST., CHERRY STREET LOFTS - FDP - 29-03C - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)44: The additional off -site survey information and additional alley design work has been provided in the
Utility Plan set as requested. Also see DMW responses.
54: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
55: See the attached drainage report.
62: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
Transportation Planning Comments
59: Acknowledged.
Water/Wastewater Comments
56: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
57: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
58: Trees have been shifted to provide adequate separation.
Zoning Comments
See revised site plan.
V12: See revised site plan.
3: A variety of shrubs have been integrated as requested.
5: Actual height is now listed on sheet 1 of 5, and also on the building elevations.
✓6: Storage closets are part of the garage building and have been clarified on the site plan.
/: Modifications have been referenced on sheet 1 of 5 on general note 46.
/ / : See the site plan and landscape plan. The bike rack is labeled.
Cherry Street Lofts
Response to Final Compliance Comments
January 19, 2005
from M. Torgerson Architects
Current Planning Comments
✓24: The buildings on the lot to the south are now shown. The curb, -gutter and sidewalks are shown across
/the street to the north and west. TIK //
, / 26: See the revised site plan. The western access doors for the garage are shown. 71K
0: The Building Inspection Department's comments have been forwarded to Dana Lockwood, who is the
LI project architect. He will incorporate the comments into the building permit application.
Engineering Comments
15: The additional off -site survey information and additional alley design work has been provided in the
Utility Plan set as requested. Also see DMW responses.
17: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
18: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
12: Two copies of the soils report are included in the submittal.
13: Both the M. Torgerson Architects drawings and the DMW drawings have been revised to meet
scalability requirements.
20: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
21: Redline comments have been incorporated into the revisions.
22: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
38: See the utility plan set for the new pole location. The pole is only moving slightly to the west.
40: Acknowledged.
52: The building design has been revised and there is no longer any portion of the building overhanging the
right-of-way.
53: The footing detail for the foundation wall has been revised so that no portion of the wall will be
constructed within the right-of-way. No part of the dumpster enclosure is proposed within the right-of-
way.
61: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
11: The sidewalk has been moved to that the parkway is not 8 feet wide.
Light and Power Comments
51: See comment responses DMW Civil Engineers.
Stormwater Comments