HomeMy WebLinkAboutADRIAN SUBDIVISION, 1ST FILING - FDP - 42-03C - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (3)Response: Updated with new city standard detail
Engineering:
There are still some inconsistencies between the plans.
Response: The plan sets are now coordinated.
The detail for the Vine Drive / Impala Drive intersection is not adequate.
Response: Now it is.
There is an 8% maximum slope requirement for drives. Some are shown to be 10%.
Response: Revised
The footings for the retaining wall cannot be in easements.
Response: Revised
The Traffic Engineering Department has some striping comments.
Response: Revised
There are some scanning issues associated with the plans. Please visit J.R. Wilson of
Technical Services for his input.
Response: Done
Page 3
Number: 148
Response: Removed
Number: 149
Response: Revised
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 62
Response: Done
Number: 67
Response: Fixed.
Number: 146
Response: Provided on all sheets as requested.
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Drainage
Number: 89
Response: Revised
Number: 121
Response: Done
Number: 152
Response: Done
Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control
Number: 151
Response: Entire site will be landscaped per the landscape plan.
The following comments and concerns were expressed at staff review on August 10, 2005:
Light & Power:
Light & Power has the same comments that were given to the applicant in 2004. The
comments have not been addressed with this re -submittal. Nothing is new.
Response: Contacted Janet McTague and she stated that the plans are fine and there are no
outstanding comments.
Please get a set of revised plans to Janet McTague of Light &,Power.
Response: Contacted Janet McTague and she stated that the plans are fine and there are no
outstanding comments.
Stormwater:
The water quality structure design is not adequate.
Page 2
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
ADRIAN SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING - FINAL COMPLIANCE - #42-03C
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 15
Response: Met with JR and revised as requested
Number: 122
Response: DMW never received dedication statements, were they sent to the applicant?
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 150
Response: They have been removed.
Topic: Plat
Number: 64
Response: Acknowledged
Number: 145
Response: Separate documents were submitted
Topic: Private Drive
Number: 128
Response: Revised
Topic: Retaining Wall
Number: 125
Response: Revised
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 72
Response: This has been corrected as suggested.
Number: 133
Response: The plan sets are now coordinated.
Topic: Street Design
Number: 69
Response: Additional spots were added to grading sheet
Number: 100
Response: Bike lane is already striped on inside of lane. Stripe was added to outside of lane
(next to eop) although this is probably not necessary.
Number: 147
Response: Updated all plans
Page 1