Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS COLORADOAN - PDP - 41-03 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORT12/15/2003
'
By: meo
Proj. No. COD:03-050
11
r
I
Northern Engineering Services.lnc. COD-Riprap-pipe
Coloradoan Riprap-circular
Sizing of Riprap Apron for Circular
pipe @ Storm Line A
Notes:
pine and Plnw nata
Pipe
Diam
Area
R
Slope
Capacity
Q100 cfs
Type
Dc ft
sf
ft
ft/ft
C-Factor
cfs
8.871
ADS1
1.50 1
1.77
1 4.71
0.0050
113.80
8.05
Flow
r =
x =
x/r
Theta
Theta
Area
Perim
Depth
0.5*D
r-Yh
(7)
Yn
ft
ft
ft
deg.
rad.
sf
ft
1.4244
0.75
-0.67 1
-0.90
308.11
5.38
1.73
4.03
Top
R
C
Qd
Delta
Vel
Froude
Vel
Width
n =
#
head
T
0.012
ft
ft
cfs
cfs
fps
ft
0.656
0.4299
122.29
8.65
-0.22
4.99
0.5410
0.39
STEP 1 Modified Flow Depth if supercritical flow & < full
Subcritical flow Dc= 1.50 feet
STEP 2 Determine Froude Parameter FPx = integer (FP-6)
Q/Dc 2.5 3.22 FPx = 0.00
STEP 3 Determine Type of Riprap
Flow depth macro will set Yt to a value which makes Yt/D = 0.40
if Yt unknown or jump expected. Designer can change Yt if known
Yt (ft) Yt/Dc Q/DCA1.5 Solving Equation MD-18
0.60 0.40 4.83 D50 = 4.002 inches
D50 = 9.00 inches - bury riprap
From Figure MD-21 Use Class L Riprap
STEP 4 Determine Expansion Factor From Figure MD-23
Q/D'2.5 Interpolation of 1/2Tan(Theta)
Yt/D 3.00 3.22 4.00
0.39 4.25 4.06 3.38
0.4000 4.46 4.26 3.54
0.40 4.46 4.26 3.54
1/2TAN(THETA) = 4.26
STEP 5 Determine Required Length of Protection
Allowable Velocity =(Va) 5.00 fps
At = Q/Va = 1.77 sf
L=(1/2TAN(THETA))*(At/Yt-Da)= 6.20 ft
Minimum Length= 3D = 4.50 ft
Max Length(Lmax)= 10D+(FPx*0.25*1 15.00 ft
Conclude: Riprap Geometry
Apron
Length
D50 FES width
ft
inches width ft ft
7.00
9.00 4.17 6.00
Make Longer
' Page 2 of 2
I
I
1
[1
I]
r
I
1
I
12/15/2003
By: meo
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD-Riprap-pipe
Coloradoan Summary
Riprap Schedule
Storm
Line
Q100 cfs
Pipe
Diam ft
1
Riprap
Clas
D50
inches
Length
ft
Width ft
1
A
8.70
1.50
L
9.00
7.00
6.00
I
Page 1 of 2
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
1
u
11
L
1
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc.
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Determine Required width of curb cut to pass Q100 @ Maximum Head
COD -curb cuts
Broadcrested Weir
Design Point
Q cfs
Maximum
Head (H)
ft
C
Req'd
Width ft
(Lr)
Design
Width
(Ld ft
Actual
Head ft
1
2.69
1.00
3.00
0.90
2.00
0.59
2
13.67
1.00
3.00
4.56
5.00
0.94
4
- 5.27
1.00
3.00
1.76
2.00
0.92
Formula : Q = CLHA�V2
L = Q/CH^12
H = (Q/CL)^vs
Page 1 of 1
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc.
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Design of Triangular of Trapezoidal Swale
Swale Description Ex.Swale along south
prop.line
Channel Configuration Trapezoidal
Channel Lining Grass
Design Storm 100 year
Q Design Storm (Qds) 13.67 cfs
Design Q = Qds* 1.33 18.19 cfs
Da Db Dc Sc n W
ft ft ft ft/ft ft
12.00 12.00 2.00 0.0160 0.032 1.00
0.17 Left Bank Slope 6.0 :1 Side Slope
0.17 Right Bank Slope 6.0 :1 Side Slope
Legend
Input
Calculation
Error Check
Title
I
ft
0.25
COD -Swale
Channel
Dc
Top Width
Area
Perim
R 2/3
Sc 1/2
Q
V
ft.
ft.
sf
ft.
(A/P)
cfs
ft/sec
2.00
25.00
26.00
25.33
1.02
0.1265
155.40
5.98
Froude #
Formula Q = 1.486*A*RA2/3*5A0.5/n
Conclude:
Swale is adequate for flows
Page 2 of 2
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc.
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Design of Triangular of Trapezoidal Swale
Swale Description Swale along Railroad
Channel Configuration Trapezoidal
Channel Lining Grass
Design Storm 100 year
Q Design Storm (Qds) 8.87 cfs
Design Q = Qds* 1.33 11.80 cfs
Da Db Dc Sc n W
ft ft ft ft/ft ft
3.00 5.00 1.00 0.0040 0.032 2.00
0.33 Left Bank Slope 3.0 :1 Side Slope
0.20 Right Bank Slope 5.0 :1 Side Slope
Legend
Input
Calculation
Error Check
Title
I
ft
0.25
Top
Dc Width Area Perim R 2/3 Sc 1/2 Q V
ft. ft. sf ft. (A/P) cfs ft/sec
1.00 10.00 6.00 10.26 0.70 0.0632 12.32 2.05
Froude #
Formula Q = 1.486*A*RA2/3*SA0.5/n
Conclude:
Swale is adequate for flows
COD -Swale
Channel
Page 1 of 2
Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
'
Parking Lot Culvert
'
Component:Culvert-1
Culvert Summary
Computed Headwater Elew
4,947.09 It
Discharge 8.87 cfs
'
Inlet Control HW Elev.
4,947.08 ft
Tailwater Elevation N/A ft
Outlet Control HW Elev.
4,947.09 It
Control Type Outlet Control
Headwater Depth/Height
1.34
1
Grades
Upstream Invert
4,945.08 ft
Downstream Invert 4,944.55 It
'
Length
106.00 ft
Constructed Slope 0.005000 ft/ft
Hydraulic Profile
'
Profile
M2
Depth, Downstream 1.15 ft
Slope Type
Mild
Normal Depth N/A It
Flow Regime
Subcritical
Critical Depth 1.15 ft
'
Velocity Downstream
6.09 ft/s
Critical Slope 0.006915 ft/ft
'
Section
Section Shape
Circular
Mannings Coefficient 0.012
Section Material
Concrete
Span 1.50 ft
Section Size
18 inch
Rise 1.50 ft
'
Number Sections
1
Outlet Control Properties
Outlet Control HW Elev.
4,947.09 ft
Upstream Velocity Head 0.43 ft
Ke
0.50
Entrance Loss 0.21 It
Inlet Control Properties
Inlet Control HW Elev.
4,947.08 It
Flow Control Submerged
'
Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall
Area Full 1.8 ft2
K
0.00980
HDS 5 Chart 1
M
2.00000
HDS 5 Scale 1
'
C
0.03980
Equation Form 1
Y
0.67000
Project Engineer: Mark
d:\...\culverts\cod-parking lot culvert.cvm
12/15/03 03:58:41 PM ®Haestad Methods, Inc.
Northern Engineering Services Inc
37 Brookside Road Waterbury
CulvertMaster v3.0 [3.0003]
, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2
Culvert Designer/Analyzer Report
'
Parking Lot Culvert
Analysis Component
Storm Event Design Discharge 8.87 cfs
'
Peak Discharge Method: User
-Specified
Design Discharge 8.87 cfs Check Discharge 8.87 cfs
Tailwater Tailwater
Conditions: Constant
Tailwater Elevation N/A ft
Name Description Discharge HW Elev. Velocity
Culvert-1 1-18 inch Circular 8.87 cfs 4,947.09 ft 6.09 ft/s
'
Weir Not Considered N/A N/A N/A
Project Engineer: Mark
d:\...\culverts\cod-parking lot culvert.cvm Northern Engineering Services Inc
CulvertMaster v3.0 [3.0003]
'
12/15/03 03:58:41 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA
+1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2
12/16/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc.
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Size overflow weir from WQ pond
Design
Design Q
Maximum
C
Req'd
Design
Actual
Storm yr
Head (H)
Width ft
Width
Head ft
ft
(Lr)
(Ld ft
100
10.26
0.3
2.6
24.01
25.00
0.29
Conclude:
Design the weir to split the flow along the south and east retaining walls
Elevation of overflow weir is 4948.00 ft
Top of Wall is 4948.30
WQCV
overflow weir
Page 3 of 3
12/16/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc.
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Determine Volume for WQ pond using Average Area End Method
Top of
Overflow
Pond
Weir
Pond
Increment
First Even
Elevation
elevation
Bottom ft
ft
Contour ft
ft
ft
4944.10
1.00
4945.00
4948.30
4948.00
Stage ft
Elev (E)
ft
Area (A)
sf
Volume
(V1) cf
Cum
Volume
(Vc) cf
Cum
Volume
(Vc) AF
0.00
4944.10
0
0
0
0.00
0.90
4945.00
376
169
169
0.00
1.90
4946.00
1795
1086
1255
0.03
2.90
4947.00
4633
3214
4469
0.10
3.90
4948.00
6519
5576
10045
0.23
4.20
4948.30
6789
1996
12041
0.28
Pine Volume
Pipe
Pipe
Pipe Area
Pipe
Length ft
Diam ft
sf
Volume
cf
106
1.5
1.77
187.32
Determine Reouired WSEL for WO Volume
Required
Volume
cf
WSEL ft
Depth ft
2233.05
4946.30
2.20
Volume cf
Stage ft
4469
2.90
2233.05
2.20
1255
1.90
WSEL = 4946.30 ft
WQCV
Pond Volume
Page 2 of 3
I
1
11
I
12/16/2003
By: meo
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Reference
Northern Engineering Services Inc.
Coloradoan
Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 3 - Best Management Practices, Urban Drainage
and Flood Control District, September 1999.
Project
Coloradoan Expansion
Location
Fort Collins, CO
REQUIRED STORAGE & OUTLET WORKS:
BASIN AREA = 1.250 <-- INPUT from impervious calcs
BASIN IMPERVIOUSNESS PERCENT = 91.00 <-- INPUT from impervious talcs
BASIN IMPERVIOUSNESS RATIO = <-- CALCULATED
WQCV (watershed inches) _ <-- CALCULATED from Figure EDB-2
WQCV (ac-ft) _ =
<-- CALCULATED from UDFCD DCM V.3 Section 6.5
cf
WO Depth (ft) = 2.730 <-- INPUT from stage -storage table
AREA REQUIRED PER ROW, a (in) =<-- CALCULATED from Figure EDB-3
'
CIRCULAR PERFORATION SIZING:
dia (in) =
5/16
<-- INPUT from Figure 5
S, (in) =
2
<-- INPUT from Figure 5
n =
3
<-- INPUT from Figure 5
1
t (in) =
number of rows =
3/8 <-- INPUT from Figure 5
<-- CALCULATED from WO Depth, row spacing, and
channel thickness
'
round to lowest whole -number =M<--
total outlet area (in2) _
<-- INPUT from above cell
CALCULATED from total number of wholes
TRASH RACK DESIGN:
Trash Rack Open Area Ratio =
<-- CALCULATED from Figure 7
Required Trash Rack Open Area (in2) _
<-- CALCULATED from UDFCD DCM V.3 Section 6.6
'
Wconc (In) =
3
<-- INPUT from Table 6a-1
Wopenin9 (in) =
9
<-- INPUT from Figure 4
' DON'T FORGET WELL -SCREEN "
N/A
<-- INPUT from Table 6a-2
I
1
WQCV
EDB
Page 1 of 3
Ml� M M M M M M r M M M MI M M M
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD -rational
By: meo Coloradoan DQ-basin-Minor
Proj. No. COD:03-050
MINOR STORM - 2-YEAR EVENT
Town of Wellington. Colorado
Overland Flow Time of Con .en ra ion: Intensity, 1 From Figure 3-1
Ti = (0.395`(I . I -CCf)"L ^ 0.5)/5 ^ 0.33 Rational Equation: Q = CiA (Equation RO-1)
u er/ wale Flow. Time of .on..n.ra ion•
Tt = L / GOV Velocity (Gutter Flow), V = 20 5u,'
T� = T, + Tt (Equation RO-2) Velocity (Swale Flow), V = 15 5"''
Note: Actual Tc rounded to the nearest 0.5 minutes
C5 assumes all overland flow 15 grass unless otherwise noted
Slopes for Travel times are average slnhPa nver i he traval
Sub -basin Info
Overland Flow
Gutter Flow
Swale Flow
Tc
Intensity,
Length,
Slope,
Length,
Slope,
Vel,
Length,
Slope,
Vel,
Comp.
Travel
Actual
Sub- Area
L
S
T,
L
S
V
Tt
L
5
V
Tt
T,
Length
U 1 80+
T�
I
Flow, Q
Basin acres C2
CCf
(ft)
(%)
(min)
(ft)
(%)
(ft/5)
(min)
(ft)
(%)
(ft/5)
(min)
(min)
(ft)
10
(min)
(in/hr)
(cfs)
Developed flows
1 0.27 0.87
0.95
83
2.00
2.0
0
0.00
0.00
0.0
27
1.0
1.50
0.3
5.0
110
10.61
5.0
2.85
0.67
2 1.51 0,85
0.95
50
2.00
1.5
457
0.50
1.41
5.4
O
0
1.50
0.0
6.9
507
12.82
7.0
2.52
3.22
3 0.45 0.85
0.95
15
25.00
0.4
O
0.00
0.00
0.0
293
0.5
1 .06
4.6
5.0
308
1
5.0
2. 85
1.09
4 0.53 0.52
0.95
E2G
2.00
2.5
0
0.50
1.41
0.0
O
0.0
0.00
N/A
5.0
126
.71
10.70
5.0
2.85
1.39
5 0.52 0,8g
0.20
2.00
6.7
463
0.50
41
5.5
O
0.0
0.00
WA
12. I
489
12.72
12.0
2. 05
0.94
Page 7 of 7
r aAMl
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD -rational
By: meo Coloradoan DQ-basin-Major
Proj. No. COD:03-050
MAJOR STORM - 100-YEAR EVENT
Town of WPlhnQon Colorado
Overland Flow Time- of Concentration: Intensity, i From Figure 3-1
Ti _ (0.355*(1 . I-CCf)'L ^ 0.5)/5 ^ 0.33 Rational Ecivation: Q = CiA (Equation RO-1)
Gutter/Swale- Floe Time of Conr n ra ion•
Tt = L / GOV Velocity (Gutter Flow), V = 20 5"'
T, = T, + Tt (Equation RO.2) Velocity (Swale Flow), V = 15 5"'
Note: Actual Tc rounded to the nearest 0.5 minutes Pipe C factor = 1 .48GAR2/3/n
C5 assumes all overland flow 15 grass unless otherwise noted
51one5 for Travel times are averaae shops over tha trnvvl Aiafnnro
Sub -basin Info
Overland Flow
Gutter Flow
Swale Flow
Tc
Sub- Area
Basin acres C 100
Developed flows
CCf
Length,
L
(ft)
Slope,
S
(%)
T,
(min)
Length,
L
(ft)
Slope,
5
(%)
Vel,
V
(ft/5)
Tt
(min)
Length,
L
(ft)
Slope,
5
(%)
Vel,
V
(ft/5)
Tt
(min)
Comp.
T�
(min)
Travel
Length
(ft)
U 1 80+
10
Actual
T,
(min)
Intensity, I
(m/hr)
Flow, Q
(cfs)
1
2
3
4
5
1 0.27
1.51
0.45
0.53
0.52
11.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
1.00
0.25
83
50
15
26
26
2.00
2.00
25.00
2.00
2.00
1.3
1.0
2.1
1.6
6.3
O
457
0
0
463
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
1.41
0.00
1.41
1.1.
0.0
5.4
0.0
0.0
5.5
27
0
293
0
O
1.00
1.00
0.5-
0.00
0.00
1.50
1.50
06
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.0
4.6
0.0
O.O
5.0
6.4
6.7
5.0
11.8
110
507
308
26
489
10.61
12.82
I I.7I
10.70
2.72
5.0
6.5
6.5
5.0
12.0
9.95
9.06
9.06
9.95
7.16
2.69
13.67
4.07
5.27
3.72
Page 6 of 7
M M M M M M M M M M M M r r M M M M a
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc. con -rational
By: meo Coloradoan
Proj. No. COD: 03-O50
DP- Tc
TIME OF CONCENTRATION TO DESIGN POINTS FROM MOLTIPLS BASINS
Town of Wellington Colorado
Overland Flow Time. of Canceatrnt,nn. Velocity (Gutter Flow), V = 20 50.5
Ti = (0.395'(I.I-05)'L^0.5)/5^0.33 Velocity (5wale Flow), V = 15 50.5
Gutted2wale Flow TutTuta of o n - Pipe C factor = 1 .48GARy3/n
Tt = L / GOV Pipe Velocity based on 1 8" pipe
T, = T, + Tt (Equation RO.2)
Note: Actual Tc rounded to the nearest 0.5 minutes
C5 assumes all overland flow is grass unless otherwise noted
Overland Flow
Gutter Flow
5wale Flow
Pipe Flow
70
Des n
9
CCf
Len th+Slope.
gLength,
(ft)M
5
T,
(min)
L
(ft)
Slope, 5
M
Vel, V
UVS)
Tr
(min)
Length, L
00
Slope, 5
M
Val, V
(ft/5)
T,
(min)
Length, L
(ft)
Slope, 5
M
Val. V
(fy5)
Tt
(min)
Comp.
T�
(min)
Travel
Length (ft)
U180+T�Point
10
Actual
(min)
1
2
3
p
5
I.00
I.00
I.00
1.00
0.25
126
50.00
126.00
126.00
26.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.6
1.0
1.6
1.C'
6.3
O
457.00
0
0.00
463.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
).41
0.00
).41
1.41
O.O
5.4
0.0
0.0
5.5
ggs.00
0.00
309.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
L00
0.50
0.00
0.00
1.0E
1.50
1.0E
0.00
0.00
7.0
O.O
4.9
0.0
O.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.O
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.7
6A
6.5
5.0
11.8
574
507
435
)26
489
13.19
12.82
12.42
10.70
12.72
5.5
6.5
6.5
5.0
12.0
Page 5 of 7
i
r
r
1
r
r
r
r
12/15/2003
By: meo
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Northern Engineering Services Inc.
Coloradoan
Determine Percent Imnerviovs fnr each Ragin
Sub-
basin
%im ery
Paved/
Concrete
ac
Landscaping
ac
Roof ac
Total
100%
096
100%
1
89%
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.24
2
86%
1.10
0.00
0.20
1.30
3
8716
0.14
0.00
0.25
0.39
4
96%
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.51
5
90%
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.47
6
0%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
0%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8
0%
0.00
0.00 1
0.00
0.00
COD -rational
C-dbasins
Page 4 of 7
I
I
I
1
11
1
I
1
I
I
I
11
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD -rational
By: meo Coloradoan C-dbasins
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Determine Composite Runoff Coefficient for Sub -basins
Parrantano of 1anei naa hraAkAnu
Sub-
basin
Area ac
Paved/
Concrete
ac
Landscaping
ac
Roof ac
Check
1
0.27
88.9%
11.1%
0.0%
loops
2
1.51
72.8%
13.9%
13.2%
100%
3
0.45
31.1%
13.3%
55.6%
100%
4
0.53
96.2%
3.8%
0.0%
100%
5
0.52
90.4%
9.6%
0.0%
100%
6
0.05
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
loops
7
0.04
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100%
8
0.01
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100%
Sub-
basin
Area ac
Paved/
Concrete
ac
Landscaping
ac
Roof ac
Total
Area ac
1
0.27
0.24
0.03
0.00
0.27
2
1.51
1.10
0.21
0.20
1.51
3
0.45
0.14
0.06
0.25
0.45
4
0.53
0.51
0.02
0.00
0.53
5
0.52
0.47
0.05
0.00
0.52
6
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
7
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.04
8
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
Determine Runoff Coefficient for
2
yr storm
Sub-
basin
C
Paved/
Concrete
ac
Landscaping
ac
Roof ac
Total
0.95
0.20
0.95
1
0.87
0.23
0.01
0.00
0.23
2
0.85
1.05
0.04
0.19
1.28
3
0.85
0.13
0.01
0.24
0.38
4
0.92
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.49
5
0.88
0.45
0.01
0.00
0.46
6
0.20
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
7
0.20
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
8
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
I
Page 3 of 7
I
I
12/15/2003 Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD -rational
By: meo Coloradoan Dbasins-Summary
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Sub -basin Information For Storm Sewer and Street Capacity Calculations
Area Area C2 C10 C100 Travel%imp
Raain cf arraR ft
1
11865
0.27
0.87
0.87
1.00
574
89%
2
65960
1.51
0.85
0.85
1.00
507
86%
3
19439
0.45
0.85
0.85
1.00
435
87%
4
23270
0.53
0.92
0.92
1.00
126
96%
5
22673
0.52
0.88
0.88
1.00
489
90%
6
2192
0.05
0.20
0.20
0.25
0%
7
1555
0.04
0.20
0.20
0.25
0%
8
305 1
0.011
0.20 1
0.20 1
0.25 1
1
0%
Average C 1
0.68 1
0.68 1
0.85 1
1
0.64
Sub-
basin
Paved/
Concrete
ac
Grass
ac
Roof ac
Total
Ac
Check
1
0.24
0.03
0.00
0.27
OK
2
1.10
0.21
0.20
1.51
OK
3
0.14
0.06
0.25
0.45
OK
4
0.51
0.02
0.00
0.53
OK
5
0.47
0.05
0.00
0.52
OK
6
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
OK
7
0.00
0.04 1
0.00
0.04 jOK
8
0.00
0.01 1
0.00
0.01 JOK
I
Page 2 of 7
12/15/2003
By: meo
Proj. No. COD:03-050
Flow ghmmary fnr
Northern Engineering Services Inc. COD -rational
Coloradoan Flow Summary
('nlnrnrinon Qif. Cvn�..�i....
Design
Point
Upstream
Basins
Total
Area
acres
C2 C100
Tc
min
12 1100
i h !ph
Q2 Q100
cfs cfs
Notes
Developed Flows
1
1,3,4,
1.25
0.88
1.00
8.50
2.35
8.21
2.60
10.26
WQ pond
2
2,
1.51
0.85
1.00
6.50
2.60
9.06
3.31
13.67
curb cut/ WQ swale
3
3,4,
0.98
0.89
1.00
6.50
2.60
9.06
2.26
8.87
WQ swale
4
4,
0.53
0.92
1.00
5.00
2.85
9.95
1.39
5.27
curb cut
5
5,6,7,8,
0.61
0.78
0.98
12.00
2.05
7.16
0.98
4.26
Street flows
Page 1 of 7
VIII CONCLUSIONS
A Compliance with Standards
1 All drainage analysis has been performed according to the City of Fort Collins
Standards.
B Effectiveness of Design
1 The design of the drainage improvements associated with the Coloradoan will
adequately treat the stormwater before it leaves the site.
IX REFERENCES
Drainage Criteria Manual, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Wright Water Engineers,
Inc., Denver, Colorado, Updated June 2001.
Erosion Control Reference Manual for Construction Sites, City of Fort Collins, Colorado,
Hydrodynamics, Inc., January 1991.
Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards, City of Fort Collins, Colorado,
Updated April 1999.
VI WATER QUALITY
' A Water Quality Measures and Criteria
1
Water Quality criteria from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District were used
in designing water quality measures. Refer to Appendix B for the Water Quality
Calculations.
2
A water quality pond will act in tandem with 2-grassed swales to treat the surface
runoff before it leaves the site. The water quality pond has an available volume of
12,041 cf this included available volume in the pond as well as the swale. The
required water quality volume for basin 1 is approximately 2233 cf. Basin 1
contributes directly to the pond. Basins 3 and 4 contribute stormwater to the Water
'
Quality pond via the water quality swale along the east property line.
3
A water quality outlet structure will be built into the retaining wall that defines the
pond.
4
The water quality pond will allow for sediment to settle out in the pond
VII EROSION CONTROL
'
A Erosion Control Plan
'
1
The erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan will control both
wind and rainfall erosion.
'
2
The following temporary sediment control measures are specified to be put in place
and remain until permanent vegetation is established.
' a Gravel bag dikes in swales
b Gravel inlet filters on curb cuts
' c Silt fence along the east, south and west property lines.
3 Permanent erosion protection will consist of buried riprap protection at the storm
sewer outfalls. A construction schedule for the riprap aprons is shown on the Grading
and Erosion Control Plan. A construction detail is provided on the detail sheet. Refer
to Appendix F for the riprap design calculations.
' 4 All disturbed areas outside of the parking lots will be seeded and or landscaped to
establish permanent ground cover. A seeding table is provided on the grading and
erosion control plan.
1
IV DRAINAGE CONCEPTS
' A General Concepts
1 Stormwater is conveyed generally via surface flows across the site to the Water
' Quality pond.
2 Swales are provided in areas where concentrated flows occur outside of the parking
lot. There is an existing swale along the south property line that will continue convey
flows to the south east corner. A proposed swale will be constructed along the east
property line to convey flows from the north parking lot to the southeast corner of the
' building.
B On Site Detention
1 Detention is not required for this site.
1 C Floodplain Considerations
' 1 No portion of the site lies within a FEMA or City of Fort Collins delineated
floodplain. The FIRM map Community Panel Number 08100102-004C Dated March
18, 1996 is attached in the map pocket.
V DRAINAGE DESIGN
' A Storm Sewer
' 1 A culvert is provided under the parking lot along the east property line. Refer to
Appendix C for additional detail on the storm sewer design.
B Swales
1 A proposed swale will be constructed along the east property line to convey flows
from the north parking lot to the southeast corner of the building. Design flows are
133% of the Q100 to the design point. Refer to Appendix D for additional detail on
the swale design.
C Detention
' 1 No detention is required for this site.
1
1
3 The developed site is subdivided in 8 sub -basins designated 1-8. Basins 1-4 all
contribute runoff to the southeast corner of the site. Basins 5-8 contribute runoff to
the street at the southwest corner of the site. Refer to Appendix A for the rational
calculations. Table 1 summarizes the drainage information for the sub -basins.
Table 1 Basin Summary
Basin
Area ac
C2
C10
C100
% Imp
1
0.27
0.87
0.87
1.00
89%
2
1.51
0.85
0.85
1.00
86%
3
0.45
0.85
0.85
1.00
87%
4
0.53
0.92
0.92
1.00
96%
5
0.52
0.88
0.88
1.00
90%
6
0.05
0.20
0.20
0.25
0%
7
0.04
0.20
0.20
0.25
00/0
8
0.01
0.20 1
0.20
0.25 1
0%
4 Basins 1,3 and 4 contribute stormwater to a proposed Water Quality pond in the
' southeast corner of the site. Basins 3 and 4 will be routed to the pond via a grassed
swale and storm sewer along the east property line of the site. Basin 2 contributes
stormwater to an existing grassed swale along the south property line. Both swales
' will act as water quality devices. Basin 5 consists of the existing half ROW along the
frontage of the site. Basins 6-8 consist of portions of proposed landscape areas along
Riverside Drive.
1
III DEVELOPED DRAINAGE
1
A Design Criteria and References
1 Drainage criteria City of Fort Collins Rainfall IDF curves were used in conjunction
with the Rational Method to determine peak flows at design points on the site.
' B Project Constraints
' 1 All grading on the site will have to match the existing or proposed grades at the limits
of the site.
' 2 Detention is not required for this site. Measures to improve the water quality are
required for this site.
'
Final Drainage Report
for
Coloradoan
Fort Collins, Colorado
'
December 16, 2003
' I INTRODUCTION
' 1 This Final Drainage Report summarizes the drainage design for the proposed
development of Coloradoan, an expansion of the existing facilities. All calculations
and design associated with this project are done in accordance with the current City of
' Fort Collins Standards. ,
' II SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A Site Location
1 The site is located in Northwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 7 North, Range 68
West of the 6`h Principal Meridian, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of
' Colorado. More specifically, the site is located at 1212 Riverside Avenue. (See
Vicinity Map). The site is bounded by BNSF Railroad ROW on the east, Riverside
Avenue on the west and developed properties on the north and south.
B Site Description
1 1 The site slopes from northwest to southeast with about 6 feet of relief across the site.
The site encompasses approximately 2.86 acres. There are existing buildings on the
site, which will be removed. A proposed 19,600 sf building will be constructed on
the site along with revisions to the existing parking areas. The parking on the south
side of the site will be permanent. The parking along the north side of the building
will be temporary, as another building will be constructed there in the future. This
will not significantly affect the runoff quantities in the future, as it will be replacing
one impervious surface with another
2 Historically stormwater from the site leaves the site via surface flow at southeast
corner of the site. A site visit on Saturday 12/13/03 showed this to be the case. In
' addition, runoff from the street would only enter the site if the flows in the curb and
gutter overtopped the drives at the north and south ends of the site.
11
1
I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the final drainage design of Coloradoan Expansion
prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) for the owners thereof and meets or exceeds the
City of Fort Collins Criteria.
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
7�Qi OBERS� .9F
• NUMBER
3. 35721Oct
A• <v
'CAeO• e�,4��
i's�.�'Prr•e• \
Mark Oberschmidt
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No. 35721
(Seal)
)Zli 6)c3
[1
I
I
C
[1
Table of Contents
VICINITY MAP
IINTRODUCTION
.................................................................................................................. 2
II
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
.............................................................................. 2
ASite
Location.......................................................................................................................
2
BSite
Description...................................................................................................................
2
III
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE...............................................................................................
3
A
Design Criteria and References...........................................................................................
3
BProject
Constraints..............................................................................................................
3
IVDrainage
Concepts..............................................................................................................
4
AGeneral
Concepts................................................................................................................
4
BOn
Site Detention................................................................................................................
4
C
Floodplain Considerations..................................................................................................
4
VDRAINAGE
DESIGN............................................................................................................
4
AStorm
Sewer........................................................................................................................
4
BSwales
.................................................................................................................................
4
CDetention
.............................................................................................................................4
VIWATER
QUALITY............................................................................................................
5
A
Water Quality Measures and Criteria..................................................................................
5
VIIEROSION
CONTROL........................................................................................................ 5
AErosion
Control Plan ...........................................................................................................
5
VIIICONCLUSIONS
.................................................................................................................6
A
Compliance with Standards................................................................................................
6
B
Effectiveness of Design......................................................................................................
6
IXREFERENCES
...................................................................................................................
6
Appendix A
— Hydrology Calculations
Appendix B
— Water Quality Calculations
Appendix C
— Culvert Design Calculations
Appendix D
— Swale Design Calculations
Appendix E
— Curb Cut Design Calculations
Appendix F —
Riprap Calculations
I
OVICINITY MAP
1 "=1000'
I
NENORTHERN
ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
December 16, 2003
Fort Collins Utilities - Stormwater
P.O. Box 580
'
Ft. Collins, CO 80522
Attn Basil Hamdan,
RE: Coloradoan
Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado
Project Number: COD:03-050
Dear Basil:
Northern Engineering is pleased to submit this Final Drainage Report for the Coloradoan Office
Expansion for your review. This report summarizes the final drainage design for Columbine Estates.
The design of the drainage infrastructure conforms to the current City of Fort Collins Standard Design
Criteria and Standard Construction Requirements dated January 2003.
If you should have any questions or comments as you review this report, please feel free to contact me
at your convenience.
Sincerely,
NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Mark Oberschmidt, PE
Project Engineer
420 SOUTH HOWES, SUITE 202 / FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80521 / 970.221.4158 / FAX 970.221.4159
Final Drainage Report
for
Coloradoan Office Expansion
Latimer County, Colorado
December 16, 2003
Prepared For:
Coloradoan
1212 Riverside Avenue
Fort Collins, CO
80525
Prepared By:
NORTHERN
NE ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC.
420 S. Howes, Suite 202 Fort Collins, Colorado W521
Phone:(970) 221-4158 Fox: (970) 221-4159
Project Number: CO13:03-050
Initial Submittal