The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About300 SMITH STREET, OLD TOWN COMMONS - PDP - 39-03A - CORRESPONDENCE - (21)SfICuuiCaiiy 1Ur Yaruii�; auriaw aYY114,auU11 7. See civil drawings and plat foi Ality easements A"� �a Owner's Certification The undersigned does/do hereby certify that I/we are the lawful owners of • real property described on this site plan and do hereby certify that I/we accept the conditions and restrictions set forth on said site plan. Owner (signed) Date The foregoing dedication was acknowledged before me this _ day of , AD., 2002, by: My commision expires: Notary Public Address • Extent of Development . --. .......... W-08 DRAINAGE EASEHENT C40 NWT TRAIL TO TRAIL SWM ON MOUNTAIN M06 0 2ND. FILING, PLANS j ri I I 100'� � FROM APAM IM FOR ST i 0W0000000, 0A v/ v OWNERS CERTIFICATION fpfR0j;=, �5 &M1F1C.ATION THE UZER516NED DOES/DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I/WE ARE THE LAWFUL OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY DE5CRIBED ON T14I5 51TE PLAN AND•DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I/WE ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON SAID SITE PLAN. R16DEN FAW& LLC Dy WOLVERINE MAkVbE TENT 6ROUP, INC. ITS MANA6ER BY (STATE OF COLORADO) ( ) 55 (CO(ANTY OF LARIMER) ) ,IT5 PRESIDENT DATE SUBSCRIBED AND 5W0RN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF .20 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. NOTAR7 PUBLIC MY G, 15510N EXPIRES APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLAWIN6 OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, UA ORADO. THIS OF 200 __ , DIRECTOR OF FL.0"IN6 LAND USE TABLE BY LOT U5E LOT/TRAGT AREA BUILDING, AREA / % PAVED AREA / % 0 • Seven (7) fq1d1Ld 24" x 36" copies of each of the 2 Elevations Plans, plus one (1) 8.5" x 11" reduction of each of the 2 Elevations Plans. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341. Yours Truly, *X)LDA- Steve Olt, City Planner cc: Marc Virata ARG Engineers Current Planning File #34-03A Page 5 [11/2/04] Questions about site lighting - specifically the east parking area. Also, is there a path from parking area to units? How will access along south side of structure be designed (is there a fence or is it open to foot traffic?) Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic. 6wwml Number: 54 Created: 1/18/2005 [1/18/05] No further comments. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: 6eneml Number: 42 Created: 11/4/2004 [1/17/05] [11/4/04] Show and label location of existing sanitary sewer service. This service must be used or abandoned at the main. Clearly define the abandonment procedure and new tap procedures(If used). Our records indicate that the 4-inch service which extends out of the existing manhole services 200 and 230 Smith st. Our record also indicate another service for this property at approx. 392 feet from the manhole located at Magnolia and the alley. Number: 53 Created: 1/17/2005 [1/17/05] Include the standard general notes pertaining to landscape/utility separation distances on the landscape plans See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: 6eaero/ Number: 52 Created: 1/11/2005 [1/11/05] Did not receive a revised landscape plan so I can't comment on any changes that may have been made. This item has been scheduled for the February 17, 2005, Planning and Zoning Hoard public hearing for discussion and probable decision. The following items are needed no later than February 1, 2005: • Seven (7) olded 24" x 36" copies of the Site Plan, plus one (1) 8.5" x 11" reduction of the Site Plan. • Seven (7) fqjLed 24" x 36" copies of the landscape Plan, plus one (1) 8.5" x 11" reduction of the landscape Plan. Page 4 • Number. 21 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] With only 4' of utility easement being proposed, a variance request is required from the Engineering which will be routed to the various utilities in order to verify their approval. [10/29/04] Additional right-of-way will need to be dedicated along the alley to the back of (driveover) curb. In addition, 8' of utility easement from behind the right-of- way is also required. Where does the alley right-of-way end on the ease side of the alley? Number: 23 1 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] Note on the construction plans (existing conditions) that the existing sidewalk connection from the existing house out to Smith Street is to be removed, which coincides with the site plan. [10/29/04] There appears to be some discrepancy with regards to the sidewalk connection from Smith Street to the property. The landscape plan and utility plan appear to show this existing sidewalk to remain while the site plan apparently shows it to be removed and replaced. If it is proposed to remain, it appears to be substandard for ADA with regards to width and the lack of an access ramp connecting to Smith Street. Number: 25 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] This still is apparently an issue, the site plan specifies foundation elevations that do not match the utility plans. [10/29/04] Site plan, utility plan, and building elevation sets specify information (such as finish floor elevations) that do not match each other. Number: 55 Created: 1/18/2005 [1/18/05] Is it the case that the drainage collected from the inlet on the west side of the alley cannot be directed underneath the sidewalk to the west out to Olive Street instead of the grate system? This would reduce costs as well as general concerns on the amount of concrete pavement beneath the grate system to ensure it holds up to traffic. Department: Police Topic: 6eaero/ Number: 33 [1/18/05] Questions not addressed Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created:11/2/2004 Page 3 L Topic: Site Plan Number: 59 Created: 1/21/2005 [1/21/05] The following items need to be added to the Site Plan: 1. The standard Land Use Data. Some of the information on the previously reviewed Site Plan (prepared by Ryan Bloemaker Design) is appropriate. 2. The Site Plan should be numbered something like 51. As currently shown (C2) it appears to be part of the utility (construction) plans. It will be recorded in the City's Technical Services Department with the Landscape Plan & Architectural Elevations only. The constructions drawings will be recorded in another location. 3. The standard Owner's Certification signature block (see attachment). 4. A standard Notary Public signature block (see attachment). 5. The standard Director of Planning signature block (see attachment). Also, please remove the Site Plan Approval block that is currently on the plan. It is not needed and is inappropriate. That block is really the utility plan signature block. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virato Topic: 6wwml Number: 19 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] Please ensure LCUASS detail 803 is provided to ensure compliance with the comment. [10/29/04] The sidewalk along Olive Street needs to continue across the alley with access ramps on both sides of the alley. Number: 20 Created: 10/29/2004 [1/18/05] With the silt fence shown outside of the property line it appears that a construction easement will be needed to the south with the adjacent property owner. Also, being able to grade with equipment such that a landscape wall can be constructed directly adjacent to the property line, appears to only be possible by getting construction easement permission from the adjacent property owner. [10/29/04] More information is needed with regards to the existing surrounding area and what impact the development may cause. Provide additional contours and existing spot elevations. Will the alley construction result in the need for offsite easements? Page 2 ` STAFF PROJECT REVIEW 21 Fort Collins Rosita Bachmann 8018 Fox Hill Drive Longmont, CO. 80501 Date: 01/21/2005 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 300 SMITH STREET, OLD TOWN COMMONS POP - TYPE II REVIEW & PUBLIC HEARING, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Architeciurn/ P/ons Number: 60 Created: 1/21/2005 [1/21/05] The Elevation Approval block is not needed nor is it appropriate on the Elevations Plans. That signature block format is for utility plans. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 56 Created: 1/21/2005 [1/21/05] Laurie D'Audney, the City's water conservation specialist, has provided a Water Conservation Standards for Landscapes COMMENT SHEET and a copy of the Water Conservation Standards for Landscaping and Irrigation Systems. These documents are being forwarded to you. Comments 1 & 2 (checked) on the COMMENT SHEET relate to requirements for a general note about irrigation systems and information about water consumption categories for the landscape. Number: 57 Created: 1/21/2005 [1/21/05] The Landscape Plan Approval block is not needed nor appropriate on the Landscape Plan and should be removed. That signature block format is for utility plans. Number: 58 Created: 1/21/2005 [1/21/05] The note on the Landscape Plan about landscaping being installed prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy must be revised to read: "Landscaping shall either be installed or the installation shall be secured with a letter of credit, escrow or performance for 125% of the value of the materials and labor for the landscaping prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy." Page 1