Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRAIRIE VILLAGE - FDP - FDP140024 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSDepartment: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 09/10/2014: no new comments. Comment Originated: 09/10/2014 Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 07/30/2014: Show existing and proposed gas and electric on the utility plans. Response: The existing and proposed electric are now shown on the plans, are the existing gas lines. The exact location of the proposed gas line is still being determined, and will be shown on the plans once a determination is made. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 09/09/2014: Show/label existing curb stops. Response: Our initial survey did not detect any existing curb stops, however we have a good guess on where they are located. This approximate location is now shown, and notes have been provided clarifying what is shown. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 09/09/2014: Add this note to Sht C300 Utility Plan: Water service lines beyond City curb stops aqnd the sewer services extending from the City manhole are to be maintained by the homeowners association. Response: The requested note has been added. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 09/09/2014: See redlined utility plans for other comments. Response: The redline comments have been added. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 09/09/2014: Update landscape plan to coincide with current utility plan. Water meters will be inside the units. Remove the meters shown on the common, private service lines outsidee the buildings. Response: Utility plan updated. 09/04/2014: Please correct the poject datum statements. Sheet C000 shows NAVD88 as the project datum, and sheet C001 shows NAVD29 Unadjusted. An equation to get from NAVD88 to NGVD29 unadjusted, i.e. NAVD88 = NGVD29 Unadjusted + , has not been provided. 07/28/2014: Please state the project datum on sheets C000 & C001, and provide an equation to get from NAVD88 to NGVD29 unadjusted, i.e. NAVD88 = NGVD29 Unadjusted + Response: The Datum's have been listed per your most recent e-mail. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 09/04/2014: There are still issues. See redlines. 07/28/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 09/04/2014 09/04/2014: Please mask text(marked) within hatching on sheet C200. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 09/04/2014: There is one issue on sheet C200. See redlines. 07/28/2014: Please mask all text(marked) within hatching. See redlines. Response: Corrected. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 09/08/2014: There is some linework that needs to be corrected. See redlines. 07/28/2014: Please make changes as marked. See redlines. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/29/2014 09/08/2014: There are a few distances that need to be added. See redlines. 07/29/2014: Please add the bearings, distances & curve data as marked. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/29/2014 09/08/2014: Please label the Utility Easement at the northeast corner of Tract A. See redlines. 07/29/2014: All easements must be locatable and labeled. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 09/08/2014 09/08/2014: Please add(as marked) to the "set" description in the legend. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been resolved. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 07/29/2014 09/04/2014: There are still issues. See redlines. 07/29/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Corrected. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 09/04/2014 09/04/2014: Please add a legal description for the project property. Response: Added. Response: We will modify the existing Cross Access Easement for the property to include an EAE dedication. A small portion of the driveway from Harmony Road is not in our ownership, but the adjoining property owner has agreed to join in the dedication. This would provide total access to the building's exterior and exceeds the minimum code requirement. For documentation purposes, the Poudre Fire district will note that required turning radii are not being achieved in all areas of the proposed EAE but those circumstances are acceptable as a pre-existing condition of the site. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-29329 ischlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/17/2014 07/17/2014: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted dose not meet requirements. Please submit; Revised Erosion Control Plans based off redlines from 7-17-2014, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ ischlam@fcgov.com Response: An Erosion Control Report has been provided. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/29/2014 07/29/2014: A suggestion for the cobble swale along the southern edge of the property is to reference the Grove development and to propose a similar design. Response: The cobble swale is being used for water quality treatment. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/29/2014 07/29/2014: At final, landscaping will be reviewed for the rain garden. Response: Noted, landscape plan provided. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 09/09/2014: Stosrmwater is ready for a hearing. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 09/04/2014: The text masking has been addressed, but the elevations are still in color. The colors will cause scanning and reproduction problems. 07/28/2014: All text will need to be masked. The color/shading will cause problems with scanning & reproduction. Response: Elevations are now in black and white. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 Service to these 7 units would most likely originate from existing facilities SW corner of the property. Cable may be extended north in the 5' utility easement to provide an access pedestal. Service drops to one central location (West side of structure for demarcation). Inside wiring to each unit from this network interfaces required. Applicant must work with area engineer to determine existing facility tap in and extension for service to units. Due to tariff requirements, a conduit run for cable extensions and service drop conduits will be needed. Actual route and access pedestal locations (if existing cannot be utilized) will need to be worked out with CTL engineering. Please contact us well in advance as our engineering and construction cycle time is about 8 weeks now due to so much volume all over Front Range North. Response: Acknowledged. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/04/2014 FIRE LANES 9/10/14: Restatement of information detailed in email to City Planner, Ryan Mounce, dated 9/10/14: Fire access is needed on the NE side of the property because minimum fire access requirements cannot be met from Fromme Prairie Way alone. Units 2, 3, 5 & 7 are out of access. Providing an EAE through the commercial area, as currently detailed on the plat, will cover the remainder of Units 5 & 7 but not Units 2 & 3. As a minimum, the EAE needs to extended to the property limits on the north side of the property. From that location, firefighters can cover the majority of Units 2 & 3 within the 150 foot access limitation. Only the courtyard of Unit 3 remains out of access, but as the buildings are to be sprinklered, the 150 foot maximum fire access requirement may be extended in this circumstance. An option proposed by Ken Miller was to include the driveway in the EAE dedication. That would provide total access to the building's exterior but as it exceeds the minimum code requirement it is not compulsory. If that choice is made however, the turning radius of the driveway would have to conform with fire code standards. If it's possible to include the adjoining commercial property in the access easement, that solution would clean up the EAE boundaries. For documentation purposes, I'll note required turning radii are not being achieved in all areas of the proposed EAE but those circumstances are acceptable as a pre-existing condition of the site. 08/04/2014: Fire Lanes shall be provided to within 150' of ALL portions of all buildings, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. Supporting documentation does not provide details of an existing Emergency Access Easement serving the commercial property bordering to the north. Without it, some portions of the east & west buildings (especially units 2,3,6,&7) would be out of fire access. Lacking further site details, it is unclear if access needs are being met with this site design. When fire lanes cannot be provided, the fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system. Further information is required. Comment Number: 1 07/21/2014: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 07/30/2014: tuchanan@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 07/21/2014 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 For the final landscape plan provide direct labeling of plant material and a plant schedule. Select street trees from the City's street tree list. Response: Provided. Comment Number: 4 09/09/2014: Comment Originated: 09/09/2014 Previous comment number 2 from 7/30/14 is continued. Thank you for the response that plant labeling will occur at final. 07/30/2014: For the final landscape plan provide direct labeling of plant material and a plant schedule. Select street trees from the City's street tree list. Response: Plants have been labeled. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/18/2014 07/18/2014: 1. Effective 8-1-14 all property line townhomes require fire -sprinklers systems installed per 2012 IRC. 2. Per state statue 9-5 any townhome project with 7 or more units must provide accessible units per that standard. 3. Call Russ at 970-416-2341 to schedule a pre -submittal code review meeting. Response: Noted. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/25/2014 07/25/2014: The following comments are from Bob Rulli, Field Engineer with CenturyLink, who may be reached at 970-490-7503 or robert.rulli@centurylink.com: MST&T easement runs along the south border of the property. This easement contains the west end of the major W Harmony duct run. Multiple ducts as well as manholes (actual location of manhole not noted on plat). This will not be relocated and access to this manhole must be provided. The manhole will likely sit in one of the units' driveway. Grade changes (frame and cover adjustments) will be developers expense. Ducts must be protected in place during construction. Depth coverage must be maintained for final. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 09/10/2014: The response indicated that .5% will be maintained throughout which is acceptable. The response also added however that curb and gutter is outflow, which I'm unsure why would be intended. The paving plan notes the use of inflow curb and gutter, which would be required with the inset curb and gutter for parking, unless outflow curb and gutter is utilized with concrete parking and a pan between the parking and the through street. Please clarify. 07/30/2014: In measuring and the flowline grade around the inset parking appears to achieve only .4% in areas. Please ensure .5% minimum is obtained. Response: 0.55% is the minimum grade throughout the flowline, and labels are provided to further emphasize this minimum requirement. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 09/10/2014: The response indicates further discussion on making this change. We've made this a requirement on other projects, including Uptown Plaza and minor amendment for the Taco Bell next door on West Elizabeth. 07/30/2014: The project will need to reconfigure the existing access ramp at the southeast corner of the site to face east and direct pedestrians to cross parallel to Fromme Prairie Way, and provide truncated domes in accordance with LCUASS drawing 1607. The new detached sidewalk should just continue to this new access ramp with the existing attached sidewalk south of the new walk removed. Response: The existing ramp is now shown to be removed and reconstructed as requested. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 09/10/2014: The planning related documents (except the building elevations) are still labelled as "Prairie Village Townhomes" while the plat, civil, and building elevations are labelled as "Prairie Village". Please ensure all the documents share one of these titles. From my perspective either title is fine. 07/30/2014: Please coordinate the name of the project across the various documents. The site and landscape plan has "Townhomes" after "Prairie Village" while the other documents do not. Response: Updated to read "Prairie Village". Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/10/2014 09/10/2014: With the emergency access easement defined on the plat connecting Harmony Road with Fromme Prairie Way it appears that in order to maintain the full 24' width that an offsite emergency access easement is needed from Lot 1 of the Overlook Fifth Filing P.U.D. Assuming PFA is requiring this, we would need a letter of intent from that property owner indicating acceptability to the concept of granting an easement, which would be required prior to approval of the plan. The dedication of an emergency access easement by separate document requires a $250 transportation development review fee, along with fees assessed by Larimer County for recording the deed. The City has a standard easement dedication form as well which requires signatures from the grantor along with an attorney certification of the deed. Response:.An additional "offsite" easement will be acquired from the adjacent property owner. Discussions with this owner have begun, and it appears that party is willing to grant the easement. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: General City of F 'rt Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 FortCollins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview October 02, 2014 Kenneth R Mitchell 1021 Nightingale Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Prairie Village, MJA140002, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ryan Mounce, at 970-224-6186 or rmounce@fcqov.com. Responses 10-15-14 Planning Response: Ripley Design Civil Response: Northern Engineering Architect Response: Rentf row Design Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/28/2014 07/28/2014: As landscaping details emerge for Final Plans and species are selected, consider the minimum diversity requirements for trees in LUC 3.21(D)(3). Response: The landscape has been further detailed with the FCP plans. Minimum species diversity has been met. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/30/2014 07/30/2014: From GIS: Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. Response: Acknowledged Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings