Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutADRIAN SUBDIVISION, 1ST FILING - PDP - 42-03A - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (6)Steve O-_._ADRIAN PDP.^ _ Page 2 • prior to creating the risk of damage to others' properties? Perhaps an underground pipe connecting the retention pond to the ditch at Cherry Street is a solution? Larimer County Road and Bridge should require a formal traffic impact study to determine effects of additional traffic on Impala Drive, Cherry Street, and Irish Drives. According to a report from the City of Fort Collins traffic office, it has been estimated that an average of 77 additional vehicle trips per day in and out of our neighborhood will occur because of the proposed density! In a neighborhood where there are many small children outside playing, this situation should be looked at and studied when school is in session. The impact from Irish Elementary on Impala is considerable on school days. Please consider this request so that reasonable and workable answers and solutions can be made before a minor disaster is allowed to ruin an otherwise decent neighborhood in Fort Collins Sincerely, Steven "Doc" Schaeffer 601 North Impala Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 970.416.0498 Dr. Steven L. Schaeffer Manufacturing Instructional Laboratory B09 Mechanical Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 steven@engr.colostate.edu 970.491.5140 (MIL) 970.491.3827 (fax) 970.491.6558 (M.E. office) From: Steven Schaeffer <steven@engr.colostate.edu> To: <gbyrne@fcgov.com>, <cgloss@fcgov.com>, <jfrank@fcgov.com>, <sjoy@fcgov.com>, <solt@fcgov.com>, <gschlueter@fcgov.com>, <droy@fcgov.com> Date: 7/27/04 9:08AM Subject: ...ADRIAN PDP... Please do not allow the Adrian PDP to be approved as submitted. There are issues serious enough that impact others in the neighborhood that need to be addressed. Also, at this time we the neighbors of the Green Acres Subdivision, Irish Drive, Cherry Streets and Plains Court Subdivision request a public hearing pertaining to this project. A property development plan has been submitted for the above property. This past spring, the City of Fort Collins council zoned the property R-L (low density residential) due to the efforts of neighbors working together. Drawings at that time showed a total of 9 lots, of which 7 had carriage houses. The present plan submitted shows again, nine total lots on the existing property! While this is perhaps feasible within R-L zoning, this density is out of character with the surrounding neighborhood! Section 3.5.1 of the city land use code states that "New developments in or adjacent to existing developed areas shall be compatible with the established architectural character of such areas by using a design that is complementary." "Compatibility shall be achieved through techniques such as the repetition of roof lines, the use of similar proportions in building mass and outdoor spaces, similar relationships to the street, [sic] etc." Last spring approximately 150 people wrote letters to city council voicing their opinions against the high density that is now being proposed. With this high of density, higher noise levels may also be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed plot plan shows a U-shaped "private drive" intersecting Impala Drive so that 3 properties on the east side can be accessed. There will be additional driveways from 4 lots onto Impala. Interestingly, several of the lots barely make the minimum 6,000 sq. feet required. In order to achieve this, the property lines have been drawn at the center of the U-shaped driveway, whereby several properties will have easements to allow traffic through their properties. Is it regular practice to densify a property so that a maximum number of lots can be jammed into that space? Does this not set a precedent for property owners to be taxed for land they cannot use, and increases the density of the lots towards a volume that otherwise would not be allowed? A storm water detention pond is required and is planned for the southeast corner of the property. Since there is not enough slope to the property to allow gravity to empty the detention pond (and it must drain), a pump house has been proposed on the drawing to pump the water to the west onto Impala Drive. Keep in mind that electrical outages can occur as the result of severe storm activity and pumps require electricity. Presently, there is no curb and gutter on the property due south (Sandy Knox's property) to contain this additional impact of water onto Impala. Additionally, there is no curb and gutter on the west side of Impala Drive along properties belonging to the Trents' and Stocktons'. Don't these improvements need to be made by the developer