HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAISING CANE'S - PDP - 6-04 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYFUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE
Travel Time Worksheet
Destination
Approximate
Distance
Auto Travel
Time
Bus Travel
Time
Travel Time
Factor
CSU Campus Transit Center
1.5
10
22
Foothills Fashion Mall
1.3
10
22
Fort Collins High School
3.7
15
44
Downtown Fort Collins
2.0
11
25
Total Travel Time
46
113
2.5
Service Level Standards Worksheet
Mixed Use
Remainder of
Standard
Centers and
the Service
Meets Standard
Fails Standard
Commercial..
Area
Hours of Weekday Service
18 hours
16 hours
Weekday Frequency of Service
15 minutes
20 minutes
Travel Time Factor
2.0 x
2.0 x
Peak Load Factor
< 1.2
_< 1.2
X
3of4=LOSB
5
Eel
G
C
J
V
N
V
Iml
I
L
Q1
O
L
>
y
ii
V
y
LO
0
O
�
V
•�
v
O
V
ti
_
06.
v
0.3
bD
u
V
V
41
�n
fld Ed
m
n n Ol �rAA
� u
L C l
— c �
z
m
n n Ol �rAA
� u
L C l
— c �
z
� u
L C l
— c �
z
Prospect
Stuart
OSpring
Johnson paw
O
Ru ers
m
17
0
Drake
SCALE: 1°=10W
BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA
m
R
�o
e
y � v
O
a N
'•
i
0.�.a
R
N
_
O R �
J
�I
y
tn
N
R
a �-
r
C V
y V
4
o J
y
00 V�
1
ti
v
U
N
R
a �-
r
C V
y V
4
o J
y
00 V�
1
ti
v
U
4
o J
y
00 V�
1
ti
v
U
1
ti
v
U
Prospect
Stuart
5 spdry
Johnson pal*
O
Ru ers
m
m
0
ro
Drake
SCALE 1"=IOW
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
4d
APPENDIX
G
3q
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 12/9/2003
Analysis Time Period: noon pm
Intersection: College/Exit Only
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short on total
Project ID: 0364
East/West Street: Exit Only
North/South Street: College Avenue
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach — Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 1703
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1792
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type/Storage Undivided /
RT Channelized?
Lanes 2
Configuration T
Upstream Signal? No No
minor street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
volume 25
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade.(%) 0 0
Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config I R
v (vph)
29
C(m) (vph)
339
v/c
0.09
95% queue length
0.28
Control Delay
16.6
LOS
C
Approach Delay
16.6
Approach LOS
C
HCS2000: Unsignalized°Intersections Release 4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 12/9/2003
Analysis Time Period: noon pm
Intersection: o lege/Exit Only
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short long total
Project ID: 0364
East/West Street: Exit Only
North/South Street: College Avenue
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3" 1 4 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume
1553
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.96
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1617
Percent Heavy Vehicles
-- --
-- --
Median Type/Storage
Undivided
/
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2
Configuration
T
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7 8 9
10 11 12
L T R
L T R
Volume 35
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared -Approach. Exists?/Storage
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 j 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config I R I
v (vph) 41
C(m) (vph) 381
v/c 0.11
95% queue length 0.36
Control Delay 15.6
LOS C
Approach Delay 15.6
Approach LOS C
37
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon(9) Year recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1
Volume 110 0 25 175 0 45 120 2230 20 155 3125 10 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 12.0 12.0 85.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 159
1661
0.23
0.10
53.0
Westbound
L 184
1770
0.43
0.10
54.1
TR 152
1583
0.31
0.10
53.8
Northbound
L 60
87
0.35
0.69
17.8
TR 3454
5079
0.69
0.68
5.1
Southbound
L 71
103
0.82
0.69
68.0
TR 3456
5083
0.95
0.68
14.0
Intersection Delay = 12.1 (sec/veh)
D 53.0 D
D
D 54.0 D.
B
A 5.3 A
E
B 15.0 B
Intersection LOS = B
30
HCS2000: Signalized intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon pm Year recent short ong bkgrd tota
Project 0364
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
No. Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 I 1 3 0
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR I
Volume 120 0 15 150 0 50 125 2090 20 155 2510 15 1
Lane Width I 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary .
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 164
1706
0.23
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.23
TR 190
1583
0.28
Northbound
L 60
90
0.43
TR 3331
5078
0.66
Southbound
L 80
121
0.71
TR 3333
5081
0.79
Intersection Delay = 9.3
0.10 52.9 D 52.9 D
0.13 49.5 D
0.12 50.9 D 50.2 D
0.66 25.1 C
0.66 6.5 A 6.7 A
0.66 47.3 D
0.66 8.4 A 9.2 A
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
3 5�
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon pm Year recent short ong bkgrd otal
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound ►
I L T R ► L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 I 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L TR ► L TR I L TR I L T R
Volume 1180 20 65 135 20 10 160 2390 15 145 2840 140 ►
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ►
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 E
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right ► EB Right
SB Right ► WB Right
Green 26.0 91.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 274
1321
0.69
0.21
54.8
D
TR 330
1649
0.27
0.20
44.4
D 51.5 D
Westbound
L 260
1254
0.14
0.21
42.3
D
TR 353
1767
0.09
0.20
42.5
D 42.4 D
Northbound
L
57
81
1.07
0.71
148.1
F
TR
3557
5081
0.69
0.70
4.0
A 7.5 A
Southbound
L
69
98
0.67
0.71
43.3
D
T
3559
5085
0.82
0.70
5.8
A 6.2 A
R
1108
1583
0.1.3
0.70
1.9
A
Intersection
Delay
= 9.3
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = A
secs ,
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
' Period: noon pm Year recent short ong bkgrd tot
Project 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
' I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L TR 1 L TR I L TR I L T R I
Volume 1210 20 65 150 20 10 170 2145 20 145 2235 90 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 29.0 88.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
' Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 306 1326 0.72 0.23 54.3 D
TR 368 1649 0.24 0.22 41.8 D 50.7 D
Westbound
L 291
1259
0.18
0.23
40.5
D
TR 394
1767
0.08
0.22
40.0
D 40.3 D
Northbound
L 71
104
1.04
0.68
125.5
F
TR 3437
5078
0.66
0.68
5.3
A 9.1 A
Southbound
L 79 115 0.59 0.68 32.4 C
T 3442 5085 0.68 0.68 5.5 A 5.9 A
R 1072 1583 0,09 0.68 2.7 A
Intersection Delay = 10.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
33
APPENDIX F
3Z
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release
4.1d
'
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst:
Michael
' Agency/Co.:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed:
12/9/2003
Analysis Time
Period: noon pm
Intersection:
College/Exit Only
'
Jurisdiction:
Fort Collins
Units: U. S.
Analysis Year:
Customary
shor long total
'
Project ID:
0364
East/West Street:
Exit Only
North/South Street:
College Avenue
' Intersection
Orientation: NS Study period
(hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street:
Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4
5 6
L T R L
T R
Volume
1400
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.92
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
1521
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
-- --
'
Median Type/Storage
Undivided
/
RT Channelized?
Lanes
2
Configuration
T
'
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Westbound
Eastbound
Movement
7 8
9
I 10 11 12
L T
R
I L T R
' Volume
25
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
29
Percent Heavy Vehicles
2
'
Percent Grade (%)
0
0
Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage
Lanes
1
. Configuration
R
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound
Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
Lane Config I R
v (vph) 29
C(m) (vph) 406
v/c 0.07
95% queue length 0.23
Control Delay 14.5
LOS B
Approach Delay 14.5
Approach LOS B
3'
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 12/9/2003
Analysis Time Period: noon pm
Intersection: College/Exit Only
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: isEDlong tots
Project ID: 0364
East/West Street: Exit Only
North/South Street: College Avenue
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6
L T R I L T R
Volume 1283
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1336
Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- --
Median Type/Storage Undivided /
RT Channelized?
Lanes 2
Configuration T
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound
Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
L T R I L T R
Volume 35
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41
Percent Heavy Vehicles 2
Percent Grade (%). 0 _,.._ 0
Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage
Lanes 1
Configuration R
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
NB SB Westbound Eastbound
1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11
I R I
41
458
0.09
0.29
13.6
B
13.6
B
12
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
' Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
' Period: noon pm Year recent ort long bkgrd otal
Project ID: 0 64
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson NIS St: College Avenue
' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound 1 Westbound ( Northbound 1 Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I i I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1' 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I
LGConfig 1 LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1
Volume 110 0 25 175 0 45 120 1800 20 155 2520 10 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.2§ Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
' Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
' Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
' Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0
' Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 159 1661 0.26 0.10 53.2 D 53.2 D
Westbound
'L 227 1770 0.39 0.13 51.1 D
TR 190 1583 0.28 0.12 50.9' D 51.0 D
Northbound
L 60 90 0.37
TR 3331 5077 0.59
' Southbound
L 108 162 0.55
TR 3334 5082 0.81
Intersection Delay = 9.4
0.66 20.1 C
0.66 5.9 A
0.66 22.8
0.66 8.8
(sec/veh)
6.0 A
C
A 9.1 A
Intersection LOS = A
secs
2Y
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10 17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period:(_p2oo pm Year recent short ong bkgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 1
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR I_
Volume 120 0 15 150 0 50 125 1700 20 155 2030 15 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 i
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A i Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0 -
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 164
1706
0.26
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.25
TR 190
1583
0.30
Northbound
L 88
133
0.30
TR 3330
5076
0.54
Southbound
L 136
205
0.42
TR 3332
5080
0.64
Intersection Delay = 7.7
0.10
53.2 D
0.13
49.7 D
0.12
51.1 D
0.66
11.8 B
0.66
5.4 A
0.66 13.1
0.66 6.3
(sec/veh)
53.2 D
50.4 D
5.5 A
B
A 6.5 A
Intersection LOS = A
Z �i
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon pm Year recent short long bkgr total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R i L T R 1 L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 ► 1 3 0 I 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L TR i L TR I L TR ► L T R
Volume 1180 20 65 135 20 10 160 1935 15 145 2280 140 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 ►
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A ► Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X ► Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right I WB Right .
Green 26.0 91.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 273 1316 0.78 0.21 61.8 E
TR 330 1650 0.30 0.20 44.8 D 56.4 R
Westbound
L 258 1242 0.16 0.21 42.5 D
TR 354 1770 0.10 0.20 42.6 D 42.5 D
Northbound
L
79
112
0.77
0.71
54.1
D
TR
3556
5080
0.56
0.70
3.1
A 4.6 A
Southbound
L
123
174
0.37
0.71
10.2
B
T
3559
5085
0.66
0.70
3.8
A 3.8 A
R
1108
1583
0.13
0.70
1.9
A
Intersection
Delay
= 8.0
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = A
Z7
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Coll'
Period: oon pm Year recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 I
LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R
Volume 1210 20 65 150 20 10 170 1740 20 145 1795 90
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 29.0 88.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 305
1321
0.81
0.23
62.3
E
TR 368
1650
0.27
0.22
42.2
D
56.5
E
Westbound
L 288
1247
0.20
0.23
40.7
D
TR 395
1770
0.09
0.22
40.1
D
40.5
D
Northbound
L 98
143
0.81
0.68
53.5
D
TR 3437
5077
0.58
0.68
4.6
A
6.4
A
Southbound
L 116
169
0.46
0.68
15.4
B
T 3442
5085
0.61
0.68
4.9
A
5.0
A
R 1072
1583
0.10
0.68
2.7
A
Intersection
Delay
= 10.1
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
ry
APPENDIX
E
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon pm Year recent short oh kgrd otal
Project ID: 4
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 I 1 3 0
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR
Volume 110 0 25 165 0 45 120 2220 20. 135 3135 10 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound .
LTR 159
1661
0.23
0.10
53.0
D
53.0
D
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.30
0.13
50.2
D
TR 190
1583
0.25
0.12
50.6
D
50.3
D
Northbound
L 60
90
0.35
0.66
19.0
B
TR 3332
5079
0.71
0.66
7.1
A
7.2
A
Southbound
L 64
97
0.58
0.66
37.4
D
TR 3334
5083
0.99
0.66
22.9
c
23.1
c
Intersection
Delay
= 17.4
(sec/veh) Intersection
LOS = B
2e
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 1 17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noo pm Year recent short on bkgr total
Project 0364
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson NIS St': College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
1` Eastbound I "Westbound 1' Northbound I Southbound I
L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1
No. Lanes I` 0 1 0' ) 1 1' 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I
LGConfig I LTR I L TR 1 L TR F L TR I
Volume 120"- 0 15 140 0 50` I25 1 2075-20 130 2520 15
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0.12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0 I U I 0 I 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 "' 3 4 I 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I .. Thru P.,
Right A I Right P
Peds 'g 1 Peds X.
WB Left A I SB' Left P
Thru" A I Thru P
Right A ( Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right' i' WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red " 2.0 2.0 2.0
C cle Len th• 125 0 secs
Y
g
Intersection
Performance
Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios
Lane
Group
Approach
'
Lane Group
Flow Rate
Grp Capacity
(s)
v/c
g/C
Delay
LOS
Delay LOS
' Eastbound
LTR 164
1706
0.23
0.10
52.9
D
52.9 D
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.19
0.13
49.1
D
TR 190
1583
0.28
0.12
50.9
D
50.1 D
Northbound
L 60
90
0.43
0.66
25.1
C
' TR 3331
5078
0.66
0.66
6.5
A
6.7 A
Southbound
L 82
124
0.38
0.66
16.5
B
' TR 3333
5081
0.79
0.66
8.5
A
8.6 A
Intersection
Delay
= 8.8
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = A
23
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon®m Year recent short on kgr total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L TR i L TR I L TR I L T R
Volume 1180 20 65 115 20 10 160 2380 15 135 2850 140 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 26.0 91.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 'secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity. (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 274 1321 0.69 0.21 54.8 D
TR 330 1649 0.27 0.20 44.4 D 51.5 D
Westbound
L 260 1254 0.06 0.21 41.4 D
TR 353 1767 0.09 0.20 42.5 D 42.1 D
Northbound
L
57
81
1.07
0.71
148.1
F
TR
3557
5081
0.69
0.70
4.0
A 7.5 A
Southbound
L
70
99
0.51
0.71
26.4
C
T
3559
5085
0.83
0.70
5.9
A 5.9 A
R
1108
1583
0.13
0.70
1.9
A
Intersection
Delay
= 9.0
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = A
Z2
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: oo pm Year recent short on bkgr total
Project 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall NIS St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0
LGConfig 1 L TR
Volume 1210 20 65
Lane Width 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol 1 0
1 1 1 0
I L TR
120 20 10
112.0 12.0
1 0
1 1 3 0
I L TR
170 2130 20
112.0 12.0
1 0
I 1 3 1
I L T R
135 2245 90
112.0 12.0 12.0
1 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 29.0 88.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound.
L 306
1326
0.72
0.23
54.3
D
' TR 368
1649
0.24
0.22
41.8
D 50.7 D
Westbound
L 291
1259
0.07
0.23
39.2
D
TR 394
1767
0.08
0.22
40.0
D 39.7 D
Northbound
' L 71 103 1.04 0.68 126.0 F
TR 3437 5078 0.66 0.68 5.2 A 9.1 A
Southbound
L 80 117 0.46 0.68 21.0 C
T 3442 5085 0.69 0.68 5.5 A 5.7 A
R 1072 1583 0.09 0.68 2.7 A
Intersection Delay = 10.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
' zl
APPENDIX D
m
. .
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Analyst: Michael
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date: 10/17/2003
Period: noo
Project ID: 64
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson
Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Area Type: All other areas
Jurisd: Fort Collins
Year recent shor lonqrbkgrSVtotal
N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR I
Volume 110 0 25 165 0 45 120 1790 20 135 2530 10 1
Lane Width I 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 159 1661 0.26 0.10 53.2 D 53.2 D
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.33
0.13
50.5
D
TR 190
1583
0.28
0.12
50.9
D 50.7 D
Northbound
L 60
90
0.37
0.66
20.1
C
TR 3331
5077
0.59
0.66
5.8
A 6.0 A
Southbound
L 109
164
0.34
0.66
11.8
B
TR 3334
5082
0.81
0.66
8.9
A 8.9 A
Intersection Delay = 9.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
HCS2000: Signalized
Intersections
Release 4.1c
Analyst:
Michael
Inter.:
College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency:
Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Area Type:; All other areas
Date: 1017/2003
Period: noo pm
Jurisd:
Year
Fort ColljnA
recent shor long kgrd otal
Project
,0364
E/W St:
Spring Park/Johnson
N/S St:
College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound 1 Westbound ( Northbound Southbound
I.
I L T R. i L T R I L T R ► L T R ►
► 1 I I.
No. Lanes ► 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 ► 1 3 0 ►
LGConfig 1 LTR ► L TR ► L TR. I L TR ►
Volume 120 0 15 140. 0 50 125 1685 20 130 2040 15. ►
Lane Width ► 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol ( 0 ► 0 1 0 .1 0 i
Duration 0..25. Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A ► Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P.
Thru A I Thru P.
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X ► Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1_WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red. 2.0 . 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound.,
LTR 164
Westbound
L 227
TR 190
Northbound
L 87,
TR 3330
1706
0.26
0.10
53.2
D 53.2 D
1770
0.20.
0.13
49.2
D
1583
0.30
0.12
51.1
D 50.3 D
131
6.30
0.66
12.0.
B
5076
0.53
0.66
5.4
A 5.5 A
Southbound
L 139 209 -.0.22 0.66 6.9
TR 3332 5080 0.64 0.66 6.3
Intersection Delay = 7.5 (sec/veh)
A
A 6.3 A
Intersection LOS = A
IT
HCS2000: Signalized'Intersections Release 4.1d
' Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon® Year recent short long kgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED.INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound i Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
' I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I i
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 I 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R I
Volume I1$0. 20 65 115 20 10 160 1925 15 135 2290 140 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I
' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A I NB Left, P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A I Right P.
' Peds X 1 Peds X.
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right ( EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
' Green 26.0 91.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
' Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
' Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 273 1316 0.78 0.21 61.8 E
' TR 330 1650 0.30 0.20 44.8 D 56.4 E
Westbound
'L 258 1242 0.07 0.21 41.5 D
TR 354 1770 0.10 0.20 42.6 D 42.2 D
Northbound
' L 78 110 0.78 0.71 56.3 E
TR 3556 5080 0.56 0.70 3.1 A 4.7 A
Southbound
L 125 176 0.29 0.71 7.3 A
T 3559 5085 0.66 0.70 3.8 A 3.7 A
' R 1108 1583 0.13 0.70 1.9 A
Intersection Delay = 7.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: oo pm Year recent short lon kgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R 1 L T` R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1
I
LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R
Volume 1210 20 65 120 20 10 170 1725 20 135 1805.90 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol ( 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8.
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A ( Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right ( EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 29.0 88.0,
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 305 1321 0.81 0.23 62.3 E
TR 368 1650 0.27 0.22 42.2 D 56.5 E
Westbound
L 288 1247 0.08 0.23 39.3 D
TR 395 1770 0.09 0.22 40.1 D 39.8 D
Northbound
L
96
140
0.82
TR
3437
5077
0.57
Southbound
L
118
172
0.35
T
3442
5085
0.62
R
1072
1583
0.10
Intersection
Delay
= 9.9
0.68 57.2 E
0.68 4.5 A 6.6 A
0.68 10.6 B
0.68 4.9 A 4.9 A
0.68 2.7 A
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
APPENDIX
C
Table 4-3
Fort Collins (City Limits)
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections)
Land Use (from structure plan)
Other corridors within:
Intersection type
Commercial
Mixed use
Low density
mixed use
All other
corridors
districts
residential
areas
Signalized intersections
(overall)
D
E*
D
D
Any Leg
E
E
D
E
Any Movement
E
E
D
E
Stop sign control
(arterial/collector or -local --
N/A
P.
F"
E
any approach le
Stop sign control
(col lector/local—any
N/A
C
C
C
approach leg)
' mitigating measures required
" considered normal in an urban environment
', 4-
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level -of -Service
_
Average Total Delay
sec/vch
A
_< 10
>10and<15
C
15 and < 25 ---
D
> 25 and <<35 —
I-
> 35 and _< 50
I
> s0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Lcvcl-of-service
Average Total Delay
sec/vch
A
_< 10
B
> 10 and < 20
C
> 20 and < 35
_ D _
> 35 and _< 55
_ E
> 55 and _< 80
1
> 80
13
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: F Collins
Period: noon Year : recent short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 64
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0. 1
LGConfig 1 LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1
Volume 19 0 23 161 0' 44 120 1754 19 132 2479 10 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1.
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X ( Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR 159 1660 0.24 0.10 53.1 D 53.1 D
Westbound
L 227 1770 0.32 0.13 50.3 D
TR 190 1583 0.27 0.12 50.8 D 50.5 D
Northbound
L 60 90 0.37 0.66 20.1 C
TR 3331 5077 0.58 0.66 5.7 A 5.9 A
Southbound
L 115 173 0.30 0.66 9.9 A
TR 3334 5082 0.79 0.66 8.5 A 8.5 A
Intersection Delay = 6.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
12,
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Spring Park/Johnson
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: noon pm Year recen short long bkgrd total
Project 0364
E/W St: Spring Park/Johnson N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I
LGConfig I LTR I L TR I L TR I L TR I
Volume 119 0 14 137 0 47 122 1648 19 130 1998 12 I
Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I
Duration -0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 12.0 15.0 82.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 125.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity -(s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LTR.:', 164
1707
0.23
Westbound
L 227
1770
0.19
TR 190
1583
0.28
Northbound
L 92
139
0.25
TR 3331
5077
0.52
Southbound
L 145
219
0.21
TR 3333
5081
0.63
Intersection Delay = 7.3
0.10
53.0 D
0.13
49.1 D
0.12
50.9 D
53.0 D
50.1 D
0.66 9.7
A
0.66 5.3
A 5.4 A
0.66 6.6
A
0.66 6.2
A 6.2 A
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = A
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: Fo Collins
Period: noon (0) Year ecen short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 1
I
LGConfig I L LT R I LT R I L TR I L T R I
Volume 150 2 20 113 3 7 16 1884 10 131 2241 90
I
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 ( 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol i 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 15.0 102.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
L 160 1301 0.37 0.12 53.8 D
LT 215 1863 0.61 0.12 50.9 D 53.2 D
R 183 1583 0.13 0.12 52.0 D
Westbound
LT 170
1477
0.11
0.12
51.8
D 51.6
D
R 183
1583
0.04
0.12
51.2
D
Northbound
L 99
125
0.06
6.79
2.0
A
TR 3987
5081
0.48
0.78
1.7
A 1.7
A
Southbound
L 149
188
0.21
0.79
4.2
A
T 3990
5085
0.58
0.78
2.1
A 2.1
A
R 1242
1583
0.07
0.78
1.0
A
Intersection
Delay
= 3.2
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = A
�O
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: College/Rutgers/University Mal
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
' Date: 10/17/2003 Jurisd: F C llins
on Period: nopm Year recen short long bkgrd total
Project ID: 0364
E/W St: Rutgers/University Mall N/S St: College Avenue
' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
' 1 L T R I L T R i L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 1 1
LGConfig I L LT R 1 LT R I L TR I L T R I
Volume 182 4 19 117 3 7 116 1691 14 131 1766 39 1
Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 i
' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
' EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
' Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
' Green 17.0 100.0
Yellow 5.0 4.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 130.0 secs
' Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
,.. Eastbound
L 181 1305 0.53 0.14 55.0+ E
LT 244 1863 0.02 0.13 49.3 D 53.9 D
R 207 1583 0.11 0.13 50.0 D
Westbound
LT 190 1451 0.13 0.13 50.2 D 50.0 D
R 207 1583 0.04 0.13 49.4 D
Northbound
L 125 161 0.14 0.78 3.3 A
TR 3907 5079 0.49 0.77 1.8 A 1.8 A
' Southbound
L 148 191 0.24
T 3912 5085 0.53
' R 1218 1583 0.04
Intersection Delay = 3.8
0.78 4.9 A
0.77 2.0 A 2.0 A
0.77 0.9 A
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
u
APPENDIX B
on
N
Z
N
N
Z
tj
LV
c
d
J
LL
m
a
>
Z
CCL
=�N
�
co
W
>
w
a
WU
Z
UA
I.L.
O
C
Gi
>
0
3
Z
W
Z �
_
LU
>
Q
N
O
�
d
�
q�
Wa
J _
r
a
1
5
a
,>e
G
CO
N
` h,
wrz
o
urn
O:
W
N
�
V
C
7
y
o
0
0
0
O
1
U')
M
N
p
c
0
o
o
O
(D
ccN
W
-j'
N
M
M
7
O
O
c
a_<
W,
O
F-.Nit
<0i
W
m
LO
N
.D
C
0
of
a
.0
To"
rl
0`
tt
ro +t,4
M
GO
C
7
O
f0
t0
CNOZ
Fj
to
M
M
E
9
4
o
w
�
ti
6d
od
H m
M
M
M
o
M
N
0
0
0
0
iTy iw�
'h
gs5esy:
�•St�
�3'T
�Ni
r„�
�Pi'{•
a0r
tOr
t0--.
00
co
L
O
O
O
O
V
N
N
in
h
m
x' k
.ifav b
a� is
CO
N
CCD
to
coo
<o
In
N
�
CO
CO
V
M
-qr
N
N
n
fN7
U')
tO
co
R
v
v
ui
iii
rA
Z
M
1✓
O
V
o
U
J
cc
g
�i
m
W
a
W
?
00
=
L:
Z
_
o
c
a
S-
U
ix G
R N
W
>
Z
to
LL
O
C
Im
LLI C
Q
=
V
z
O
C
U
LU
>
r
r
N
N
O =
J d
CC�
G
0
eV
=
4D
T
CM
W
M
L
c
^J
is
r
is
0
R
N
M
N
r
M
co
O.
N
R
O
C
7
O
3
J
N
T
O
1,-
�
C
�
¢ �
'A
Y� ge
NO
•: vl i
R
L �
.r
t
N
U)
-t
v)
C
O
O
O
oW
O
F-j
O
f7
CD
Sp0
45
�
) P.
N
F
w
m
Q>
O)
0
C
Y
3r
- [
u"NN�
k�-.•tee �'
0
.��
C
7
N
T
cocD
pp
a
l.7
V
In
IA
R
0
O
N
J
CO
CD
1�
,y
sK
r
r
1
ia,,
CO
Ch
In
LO
9
C
H
co
M
o
r�
a
f
0
Z
J
c0
O
t0
E e
o
O
l0
0
n
F
N
N
N
am
c
0
0
U-
0
ou
0
U-
L4 LU
u
xoN
Lu
z
0:8
I.
-0
Lu > 0
-
0
0
LU
a
T
ce
E
17
do
co
SO
0
C>
m
N
C>
O
to
O
0
4m
cn,
-j
c)
N
cn
is
am"6.
co
in
"ZZ
a
m
cn
cc
Go
cm
cn
cn
cc
T
cn
4mto
cc
to
0
r.
O
x
U
cn
cn,
U.)
3 M ,
CD
0
--zr
mr
C:)
0
J2
tnmmM
O
C*oPt
r�
in
cr
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
1
wr
Oil
I
cn
W
M
1.4,
M
N
m
xi
0
I
C)
C>
'i III
Lo
C)
m
(D
fl-
CD
co
v
is
OD
("ll,
—I(nlMlCn
to
I-T
C�.j
..r
CD
Lo
co
I
"t
co
U')
U3
LD
U.)
"C"o
to
cn
M
40
V*
C>
1"I
cql
R0-T-T
I
Cn i
C%
IV
N
O
—1
cn
C> I
cn
lh
c
S%rCF---V
Attachment "B"
Transportation impact Study
Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet
Origin
IW.
(Project Site)
Z (4
OtTiep
List the pedestrian destinations wiuun 1.5Lu- (i.D mucs jul Nuliuulb) vi we Fxui—
boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor
linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity,
M,
types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and
security of the selected route(s).
03 (SPOIA)Q
FLA..'
k0/z-r4&A(G -(
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards
January 2,2001
r
gAtsi,ua CA, Jg15 C6ceKorsi Fticg
�2tP (GAue!?AToAJ 35zr0
L 173Co
,
ociT Z4. ¢ 3 �sCo q2
PM 1� 1'1. 4-I
ou-r 07
MxY,3c Mor oT>F�u /AI AM PEAK
50�
5
Chapter - Attachments
Attachment A
Transportation Impact Study
Base Assumptions
Project Information
Project Name 5 tN (' C
E is C H (CK 6�U
Project Location CASg,be op eOl.Gcr� A% 2T
or-PUr (rCi S
TIS Assumptions
Type of Study
Full: E S
Intermediate: ,V e
Study Area Boundaries
North:
South:
East:
West:
Study Years
Short Range: 2 p p S
Long Range: 2025 '
Future Traffic Growth Rate
P&-je /,) F F
r P
Study Intersections
1. All access drives
5.
2. w� C ZP
6.
3.
7.
4.
8.
Time Period for Study
AM: 7:00-9:00
1 PM :00-6:00
Noon:
Trip Generation Rates
Reg?L A -,r-r e co
Trip Adjustment Factors
Passby: -r C.
Pn da�ov'4
Captive N/
Market: !11
Overall Trip Distribution
TTACHED
Mode Split Assumptions
MIA
Committed Roadway Improvements
Other Traffic Studies
Areas Requiring Special Study
Date: OCTc a c- p-
Traffic Engineer.
Local Entity Engineer.
►`der twiv-- OR4e 8RA�1=e� ou �a/8�o3 �o t`�sevss
Larimer County Urban Area Street Staoaaraa- Repealed and Reenacted October t. M02 Page 44M
Adopbd by Larimer County. City of Loveland. Cdy of Fat Coffins
I/l
APPENDIX A.
1
1
1
1
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Raising Cane's Restaurant
development, located along College Avenue just north of Rutgers Avenue,
on the short range (2005) and long range (2025) street system in the
' vicinity of the proposed development. As a result'of this analysis, the
following is concluded:
The development of the Raising Cane's Restaurant is feasible from
' a traffic engineering standpoint. The Raising Cane's Restaurant
will generate approximately 1190 daily trip ends, 154 noon peak
hour trip ends, and 106 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
' - Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable.
' - In the short range (2005) future, given development of the Raising
Cane's Restaurant and an increase in background traffic, the key
intersections will operate acceptably.
' - In the long range (2025) future, given development of the Raising
Cane's Restaurant, the key intersections will operate acceptably
during the noon and afternoon peak hours.
- No geometric improvements are necessary at the key intersections.
' - The first parking stall should be 75 feet from the flowline of
College Avenue.
' - Acceptable level of service is achieved for the transit mode based
upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines.
Due to physical circumstances beyond the control of this
developer, acceptable pedestrian and bicycle level of service
cannot be achieved.
21
' The minimum level of service for "activity corridor" is B for all
categories. There are sidewalks along most the streets in this area
' of Fort Collins. The pedestrian level of service is acceptable for
all factors, except for street crossings and continuity for the
commercial areas west of College Avenue. It is not possible to
' achieve level of service B for the street crossing factor, since
College Avenue is already six lanes wide and, as such, the maximum
level of service for this factor is C. As mentioned earlier, there
are no sidewalks adjacent to a number of properties along College
' Avenue. Also, some of the existing sidewalks were built under
previous City standards and, as such, do not meet the current
standard, which requires a landscaped parkway to achieve the level of
' service B for this factor. It is not reasonable for any new
development to "fix" the existing sidewalk situation along College
Avenue and other streets, especially since the City has generally
' accepted this for some period of time. Access to Creek Side Park can
be obtained from the Spring Creek Trail which has a tunnel under
College Avenue. The site plan for the Raising Cane's Restaurant shows
' a sidewalk along College Avenue and a sidewalk connection to Remington
Street and Dartmouth Trail.
Bicycle Level of Service
Appendix G contains a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
' the Raising Cane's Restaurant. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS
criteria, there are three destination areas within 1320 feet of the
Raising Cane's Restaurant. These are: 1) the commercial corridor along
' College Avenue including the University Mall, 2) Spring Park including
the Spring Creek Trail, and 3) Creek Side Park including the Spring
Creek Trail. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G. This
site does not directly connect to any streets with bike lanes. It
' indirectly connects to Remington Street and the Spring Creek Trail via
the local streets at the rear of the site. As such, the bicycle level
of service is, by definition, LOS E.
Transit Level of Service
tCurrently, this area is served by Routes 1 and 63. The Fort
Collins Transit System Map shows that College Avenue, will have high
' frequency (20 minute) transit service in the future. A future transit
level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix G. Transit level
of service will be acceptable at level of service B.
20
0
U
Johnson
Spring Park
f4 Exit Only
II�
-� - Denotes Lane
4 4 Enter Only
I I
s 4 Rutgers
I
SHORT RANGE (2005) AND
LONG RANGE (2025) GEOMETRY
19
A&
N
Figure 10
TABLE 5
Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation
EB
E
E
WB
D
D
College/Rutgers
(signal)
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
B
A
EB
D
D
College/Spring Park/Johnson
(signal)
WB
D
D
NB
K
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
College/Exit Only Access
(RT-out)
WB RT
B
B
TABLE
Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Operation
Um
College/Rutgers
(signal)
EB
D
D
WB --
D
D
NB
-A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
B
A
College/Spring Park/Johnson
(signal)
EB
D
D
wd-
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
B
OVERALL
A
College/Exit Only Access
(RT-out)
I VM RT
c
18
provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably
during the noon and afternoon peak hours. In the long range analysis,
the higher peak hour factor caused the operation of the eastbound legs
to improve.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8, the key
intersections operate in the short range (2005) total condition as
indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are
provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate
acceptably.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key
intersections operate in the long range (2025) total condition as
indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are
provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably
during the noon and afternoon peak hours.
Geometry
The short range (2005) and long range (2025) geometry is shown in
Figure 10. This is the same street geometry that exists today. In the
neighborhood meeting, a participant indicated that southbound to
eastbound vehicles negotiating the Dartmouth/Remington intersection
often "short cut" by crossing into the opposing travel lane. Southbound
vehicles are climbing a grade and visibility is limited. A center
stripe through this area and a "KEEP RIGHT" sign may correct this
practice.
Concern was expressed with regard to the location of the first
parking stall at the ingress access from College Avenue. Figure 19-6 in
LCUASS shows the minimum off-street parking setback distances for
various streets. Key to the determination is the daily volume of the
parking lot. The subject access is ingress only. The average weekday
traffic at this access will be 500 vehicles. Using Figure 19-6 in
LCUASS, the setback from the flowline of College Avenue to the first
parking space should be 75 feet. This will provide storage for, at
least, two' entering vehicles in the event that an "unparking" maneuver
is underway at the first parking space.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix G contains a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of
the Raising Cane's Restaurant site. There will be/are five pedestrian
destinations within 1320 feet of the Raising Cane's Restaurant. These
are: 1) the commercial corridor along College Avenue including the
University Mall, 2) the residential area south and east of the site,
3) Spring Park, 4) the residential area northeast of the site, and 5)
Creek Side Park. This site is in an area type termed "activity
corridor." The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G.
17
TABLE 3
Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation
College/Rutgers
(signal)
EB
E
E
WB
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
College/Spring Park/Johnson
(signal)
EB
D
D
WB
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
TABLE 4
Long Range (2025) Background Peak Hour Operation
'ILI .11-1f,4ervrce_11
EB
D
D
WB
D
D
College/Rutgers
(signal)
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
B
A
EB
D
D
College/Spring Park/John son
(signal)
WB
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
C
OVERALL
A
B
16
m
C
CD
0
D
U')
N
1
ch
O O LO
to
r' N � 50/45
�— NOM
y � 50/75
Johnson
NOM _ ` � Spring Park
NOM 11
15/25 N m N
to N O
N I N
O
Q�
O
N
35/25
4 Exit Only
LD
u')
LO
N
O
CO
r4
N
f r
Enter Only
LO LO
Ln N
In L j
N (h
O
O M
0 N
co 10/10
O N LQ
rn N v e— 20/20
i I ,— 5 0/3 50
210/180 ---14(
)
t
r Rutgers
20/20
O
O
to
65/65
o
0
O
f`
,
CV
v
N
LONG RANGE (2025) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
f 45/30
45/30 — D
a�mo11th
--dw- NOON/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
N
Figure 9
15
a>
0)
a)
0
J
0
LO
N
OLO
Lo
LoN `� 50/45
NOM
50/75
Johnson
20/10 Spring Park
NOM —�
15/25 N o N
Lo co o
C7 I N
C>
O
n
T
35/25
Exit Only
C)
0
T
N
N
m
T
Enter Only
o u'
O_ N_
N Lo
C'7
LO
N
O m
W T
N
T LO
Lo o0)o �10/10
°' TI v e 20/20
+ � 50/35
210/180 ) f r Rutgers
20/20 — O LO Lo
65/65 o o
t` o N
v
T
44
--w— 45/30
45/30 i
DamoUth
SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL NOON
AND AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
14
-�— NOON/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
A&
N
Figure 8
m
SITE GENERATED NOON AND
AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
' 13
Figure 7
RV
L0
ch
cY)
0
LO
N M
`— 50/45
e NOM
,— 40/65
Johnson
Spring Park
20/103CLON
,/
NOMI(
15/25N
N N
N
U.) O
N N
LO
O
N
O
N
OItt
� 22
`
`-10/10
CDN U)
m NI r)
�— 20/20
20/15
University Mall
210/180
t r Rutgers
20/20
o Co Ln
65/65
o Cl) o
t'— O N
M
T
N
--.— NOON/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2025) BACKGROUND NOON Figure 6
AND AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
12
Johnson
University Mail
m
m
0
0
m
LO
N
OLO
LON
Mo
50/45
�- NOM
40/65
20110 �
�
Spring Park
t r
— NOM, �
15/25
N rn N
Lo O
N N
LO
co
O
O
O
N
7 Lo
L
oco� �10/10
°' " 20/20
f 1 20/15
2101180 t
20/20 —n-- o LO Lo
65/65 o rn o
f` N
LO
N
r`
---w— NOON/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
Kutgers
Rk
SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND NOON Figure 5
AND AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
Background Traffic Projections
Figures 5 and 6 show the respective short range (2005) and long
range (2025) background traffic projections. Background traffic
projections for the short range and long range future horizons were
obtained by reviewing the "North Front Range Regional Transportation
Plan" and reviewing other traffic studies for developments in this area
of Fort Collins. Traffic on College Avenue and Drake Road is expected
to increase at 1.0 percent per year. Rutgers Avenue, west of College
Avenue, is being redeveloped for Whole Foods Market. Traffic on the
east leg of Rutgers Avenue, Spring Park Drive, and Johnson Drive is not
expected to change significantly, since this area of Fort Collins is
fully developed. Traffic will only change as properties are
redeveloped.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are
expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the
resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 7 shows the site
generated noon and afternoon peak hour traffic assignment. Negative
values reflect the passby traffic that is expected to patronize this
site. Figure 8 shows the total (site plus background) short range
(2005) noon and afternoon peak hour traffic at the key intersections.
Figure 9 shows the total long range (2025) noon and afternoon peak
hour traffic at the key intersections.
Signal Warrants
No additional traffic signals are likely to be warranted at any
of the intersections in the vicinity of the Raising Cane's Restaurant
site.
Operation Analysis
Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The
' operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis,
reflecting a year 2005 condition. The long range analysis reflects a
year 2025 condition.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the key intersections
operate in the short range (2005) background condition as indicated in
Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix
C. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the noon and
afternoon peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key
intersections operate in the long range (2025) background condition as
indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are
10
CD
rn
Jot
ark
20%
—s
c
0
rn
c
m
w
�a\
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4
9
4 Schematic Site Plan
Scale: 1'=50'
SITE PLAN
Figure 3
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Raising Cane's Restaurant is a commercial development located
along College Avenue, just north of Rutgers Avenue, in Fort Collins.
Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Raising Cane's Restaurant. The
Raising Cane's Restaurant will consist of 3,533 square feet with a drive
through window. The short range analysis (Year 2005) includes
development of the Raising Cane's Restaurant and an appropriate increase
in background traffic, due to normal growth. The long range analysis
year is considered to be 2025.
The site plan shows three primary accesses to the Raising Cane's
Restaurant site. One of the accesses to College Avenue is an enter
only access and the other is an exit only access. The access to
Remington Street/Dartmouth Trail is a full movement access.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a
development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system.
Trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 7th Edition,
ITE is customarily used to estimate trips that would be generated by the
proposed/expected uses at this site. However, trip generation from a
Raising Cane's Restaurant in Louisiana was provided by the owner. The
trip generation rates were calculated based upon this information.
Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour
basis. Passby traffic rates were applied using techniques in The Trip
Generation Handbook, ITE.
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
u=��'
'1sy
n
AYfiDIE v
_1�10011 PeeiC tIOUF
P'IIh,P8$k IitlUi } M
��
rta
rta�e
j
r ��. �_
bra.
,_m�� beak
Rafe �►� _ Mate ti.;
Raising Can's Restaurant
3.533 KSF
336.82
1190
21.79 77 21.79 77
15.00 53 15.00 53
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined
for the Raising Cane's Restaurant site using the existing traffic
counts, knowledge of the existing and planned street system,
development trends, and engineering judgment. Figure 4 shows the trip
distribution used in the short range (2005) and long range (2025)
futures.
7
Transit Facilities
' Transfort currently serves this area of Fort Collins with Routes
1 and 63. The nearest stops for these routes are just north of the
College/Spring Park/Johnson intersection and just south of the
College/Rutgers intersection. Route 1 provides 20 minute service on
College Avenue. Route 63 provides evening service.
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
111Eer52C17OT1Z s R r.��3 { �4" I
Lµi q9=t: •�--f''�'31-IY �ii.;t Y cif-. {% tS1 �T ('1
zh
'Mf'sL'fi
ulw� y :'�Y . R�
)i tF+'\a1h fr'm ..hd at'uF•� �M.N.:C`
S.x+A
P'
`,�,t'3Levg'Q
...
d'n`"�Y�
College/Rutgers
(signal)
EB
D
D
WB
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
College/Spring Park/Johnson
(signal)
EB
D
D
WB
D
D
NB
A
A
SB
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
6
Johnson
University Mall
m
m
0
0)
rl-
NT
N
c
M
`
`—
47/44
J
0/0
f
37/61
10/0
Spring Park
14/23 ---4
N 'LTD °'
N 6)
N
00
V
CO
N
N
O c r
co r 7/7
"I a' 3/3
17/13
82/50 t
4/2 m a o
19/20 co
rn
cD
-aNOON/PM
Rutgers
N
RECENT NOON AND AFTERNOON Figure 2
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
5
' Both Dartmouth Trail and Remington Street are to the east of the
Raising Cane's Restaurant site. Both are designated as local streets.
tA rear access to the site will connect to these two streets.
Existing Traffic
Recent noon and afternoon peak hour traffic counts at the key
intersections are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic data is provided in
' Appendix A. The traffic data for the College/Spring Park/Johnson
intersection was collected in October 2003. The traffic data for the
College/Rutgers intersection was collected by the City of Fort Collins
' in January 2002. New counts could not be obtained for the
College/Rutgers intersection due to construction.
Existing Operation
' The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in
the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the noon and afternoon peak
hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the noon and afternoon peak hour
operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in
' Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and
unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a
table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards
' (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections
operate acceptably during both the noon and afternoon peak hours.
Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours
' is defined as level of service D or better, overall. In a commercial
corridor, acceptable operation is considered to be level of service E
on any leg or any movement at a signalized intersection. At
' unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is not applicable for
any approach leg for an arterial/collector or arterial/local
intersection.
' Pedestrian Facilities
' Sidewalks exist adjacent to most streets in this area of Fort
Collins. Along College Avenue, a number of properties do not provide
defined sidewalks. Pedestrians generally walk through parking lots.
This will likely remain this way until these properties redevelop or
the City institutes a sidewalk program. Sidewalks will be
incorporated within this development.
Bicycle Facilities
' Bicycles are not allowed on College Avenue. The Spring Creek
Trail exists adjacent to Spring Park Drive and Johnson Drive.
4
Pros ect
Johnson
Raising
Canes
I
m
CD
0
U
Drake
Stuart
Spring
park
C
_O
C
E
12 Dart rrbuth
Rut ers
SCALE: 1 =1000'
' SITE LOCATION Figure 1
3
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
' The location of the Raising Cane's Restaurant is shown in Figure
1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing
conditions be presented.
Land Use
' Land uses in the area are primarily either residential or
commercial. The site is occupied by the shell of a building that was
damaged by the Spring 2003 snow storm. This building will be razed.
' The site is located on a segment of College Avenue that increases in
grade from north to south. Within the study area, key streets have less
than a 2% grade. The site is the approximate centroid of the Fort
' Collins population. This area is considered to be a Commercial
Corridor.
Roads
The primary streets near the Raising Cane's Restaurant site are
' College Avenue (US287), Rutgers Avenue, Spring Park Drive, Dartmouth
Trail, and Remington Street. College Avenue is adjacent to the west
side of the Raising Cane's Restaurant site. It is classified as a six -
lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan and an NRA highway
by CDOT. Currently, College Avenue has a six -lane cross section near
the Raising Cane's Restaurant site. At Rutgers Avenue, College Avenue
' has three travel lanes in each direction, northbound and southbound
left -turn lanes, and a southbound right -turn lane. The College/Rutgers
intersection has signal control. At Spring Park Drive/Johnson Drive,
' College Avenue has three travel lanes in each direction, and northbound
and southbound left -turn lanes. The College/Spring Park/Johnson
intersection has signal control. The existing speed limit in this area
is 40 mph.
Rutgers Avenue is south of the Raising Cane's Restaurant site. It
is an east -west street designated as a local street on the Fort Collins
Master Street Plan. Rutgers Avenue has a two-lane cross east of College
Avenue. West of College Avenue, Rutgers Avenue provides access to the
University Mall. At College Avenue, Rutgers Avenue has an eastbound
left -turn lane, a eastbound and westbound combined left-turn/through
lanes, and eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes.
Spring Park Drive, east of College Avenue, is an east -west street
designated as a collector street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan.
Johnson Drive, west of College Avenue, is offset with Spring Park Drive
at College Avenue. Therefore, signal at this intersection has separate
phases for Spring Park Drive and Johnson Drive. At College Avenue,
Spring Park Drive has a westbound left -turn lane and a combined
through/right-turn lanes. Johnson Drive has all movements combined in a
single lane.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
This transportation impact study addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed development
of the Raising Cane's Restaurant. The proposed Raising Cane's
Restaurant site is located along College Avenue, just north of Rutgers
Avenue, in Fort Collins, Colorado.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made
with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley), the owner/developer
(Brad Sanders, Raising Cane's), the project engineering consultant
(Northern Engineering Services, Inc.), and the Fort Collins Traffic
Engineering staff. This study generally conforms to the format set
forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines
contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS)."
A Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix
A. The study involved the following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
- Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
- Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key
intersections;
- Analyze signal warrants;
- Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit modes of transportation.
1
G
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
1.
Site Location ........................................
3
2.
Recent Noon and Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..........
5
3.
Site Plan ............................................
8
4.
Trip Distribution ....................................
9
5.
Short Range (2005) Background Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..........................
11
6.
Long Range (2025) Background Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..........................
12
7.
Site Generated Noon and Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..
13
8.
Short Range (2005) Total Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..........................
14
9.
Long Range (2025) Total Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Traffic ..........................
15
10.
Short Range (2005) and Long Range (2025) Geometry ....
19
APPENDIX
' A Base Assumptions Form/Traffic Counts
B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort
Collins LOS Standard
C Short Range Background Traffic Operation
D Long Range Background Traffic Operation
E Short Range Total Traffic Operation
' F Long Range Total Traffic Operation
G Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I.
Introduction ..........................................
1
II.
Existing Conditions ..................................
2
LandUse .............................................
2
Roads................................................
2
Existing Traffic .....................................
4
Existing Operation ...................................
4
Pedestrian Facilities ................................
4
Bicycle Facilities ....................................
4
Transit Facilities ...................................
6
III.
Proposed Development .................................
7
Trip Generation ......................................
7
Trip Distribution ....................................
7
Background Traffic Projections .......................
10
Trip Assignment ......................................
10
Signal Warrants ......................................
10
Operation Analysis ...................................
10
Geometry.............................................
17
Pedestrian Level of Service ..........................
17
Bicycle Level of Service .............................
20
Transit Level of Service .............................20
IV.
Conclusions ..........................................
21
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
' 1. Current Noon and Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ....... 6
2. Trip Generation ...................................... 7
' 3. Short Range (2005) Background Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ........................ 16
' 4. Long Range (2025) Background Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ........................ 16
' S. Short Range (2005) Total Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Operation 18
' 6. Long Range (2025) Total Noon and
Afternoon Peak Hour Operation ........................18
1
RAISING CANE'S CHICKEN FINGERS RESTAURANT
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
JANUARY 2004
Prepared for:
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
1212 South Acadian Thruway
Baton Rouge, LA 70806
Prepared by:
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
a" 15M ': i