The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEASTGATE PDP - 10-04 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)• 0 3. City standard erosion control plan notes have been revised. Please replace those currently on the plan with the new notes (available from Stormwater Development Review). 4. Please put a note on the erosion control sheet indicating where the details and E.C. notes are. 5. Please indicate in your notes that all disturbed areas are to be reseeded and mulched (per your report). Department: Transportation Planning Topic: General Number: 23 [3/16/04] No comments Department: Water Wastewater Topic: General Number: 29 [3/18/041 Place meter pit and curb stop adjacent to the water main. Issue Contact: David Averill Created: 3/16/2004 Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Created: 3/18/2004 Number: 30 Created: 3/18/2004 [3/18/04] Provide insulation on the sanitary sewer lines which have less than 4 feet of cover. Include all details associated with the insulations (i.e. Manufacture, Model, Width, thickness Etc.). Number: 31 Created: 3/18/2004 [3/18/04] Include a copy of the offsite utility easements for our review. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 3 Created: 3/12/2004 [3/12/04] Seven parking spaces are required. The Land Use table on the site plan indicates that 8 parking spaces are provided. However, I count only 4 legal spaces. I assume they are counting the driveway behind the garage as a parking space. However, Section 3.2.2(D)(2), each parking space has to have unobstructed access to the street. In other words, tandem parking (one space behind another) is not allowed. Therefore, they only have 4 parking spaces. Number: 4 Created: 3/12/2004 [3/12/04] The Land Use Data on the site plan should include a statement as the proposed use. In this case the use is a 4-plex. Even though they may be sold as condos, the building is classified by the LUC and the Building code as a multi -family dwelling. Redline drawings are available at the Current Planning front desk. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Bob Barkeen City Planner Page 4 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 5 Created: 3/15/2004 [3115/04) ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable) 1997 UFC 901.4.4 NOTE: There shall be one(1) address for this building with individual unit numbers (1-4). The units shall be identified on two sides - the street side and open space side. Number: 6 Created: 3/15/2004 [3/15/04] WATER SUPPLY: No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 Department: Police Topic: General Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Number: 2 Created: 3/11 /2004 (3/11/04] Will need lighting plan, also, larger scale site plan would help in evaluating landscape plan. Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Drainage Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Number: 32 Created: 3/19/2004 The detention pond requires one foot of freeboard, which is not provided. Due to this site being at the lower end of the basin, a higher release rate could be used. Please increase the release rate of the pond until the one -foot of freeboard is accomplished. This will result in an orifice for the outfall some where between 6 and 12 inches, which is the outlet pipe size. This can be done only if the release rate from the pond is not increased from existing conditions. Please call Wes Lamarque at 416-2418 if you have any questions. Number: 33 Created: 3/19/2004 The 35-foot drainage easement in front of the property needs to remain for possible future drainage improvements. Site improvements can be built over the easement as long as no structures are in the easement. Number: 34 Created: 3/19/2004 Please use the actual C-factors for the lots that are not developed to the north and drain to the detention pond. These can be obtained from the previously approved project's drainage plan. Also, the proposed grading for these lots needs to be followed as well to determine the exact contributive area of these lots that were planned to drain to the detention pond in the developed condition. Number: 35 Created: 3/19/2004 A drainage easement is required for the existing outfall pipe from the detention pond to the right-of-way. Number: 36 Created: 3/19/2004 A spillway needs to be designated and shown on the drainage plan, along with calculations in the report showing that no buildings will be inundated in the 100-year storm if the inlet plugs. If an existing low area serves as a spillway currently, than please designate this area on the plan and provide the calculations in the report. Number: 37 Created: 3/19/2004 Please see other comments on the redlined plans. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 38 Created: 3/19/2004 1. Your plan indicates wattles on a concrete pan or other hard surfaces. This does not work (they just float). Please replace with gravel filters. 2. Your escrow calculations contain a $655/acre revegetation cost. The new cost to the City to do this work is now $775/acre for areas less than 5 acres, and $725/acre for more than 5 acres. Please use these figures on this and future projects. Page 3 0 [3116/04] The soils report submitted is 32 years old. Please submit an updated soils report. Topic: Grading Number: 19 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04) It appears that offsite grading is shown to the north of this site. Please obtain offsite easements for this grading. See comment 14 for more information. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 10 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please enlarge the site portion of the drawing so that it is legible and understandable, and be sure to show the utilities on the landscape plan so that landscape separation requirements are being met. Topic: Plat Number: 8 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16104] Please see redlined plat for changes needed to the plat language. Also, please see attached plat language. Number: 9 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04) Wouldn't separately dedicating additional area for a utility easement be redundant, since all area outside of the building envelope is already dedicated as a utility and drainage easement? Topic: Site Plan Number: 11 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please call out the ROW location, and the widths of all sidewalks and driveways on the site plan. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 15 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please add the standard street cut note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 17 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/041 The overall utility plan needs to clearly show and provide dimensions for the ROW on Montgomery. The dimensions of the sidewalks, parkway, and driveways also need to be provided. Number: 18 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please label driveways as concrete to the ROW. Number: 20 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] The indemnification statement is only required on the cover sheet. The font shown for the statement does not meet LCUASS scanability requirements. Please adjust the font and/or font size so that the it is scanable. Number: 21 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please provide the standard driveway detail. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Number: 1 Created: 3/5/2004 [3/5/04] Developer will need to coordinate electric development charges, and power and meter locations with Light & Power (221-6700). Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 24 [3/16/041 No issues. Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 3/16/2004 Page 2 • M STAFF PROJECT REVIEW CitvoE Fort Collins HATTMAN ASSOC. RIC HATTMAN 145 W. SWALLOW RD. FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 Date: 03/22/2004 Staff has reviewed your submittal for EASTGATE PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following comments: b*111L1 Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: General Number: 26 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] The building design does not meet the design standards in Section 3.5.2(E)(1)-Garage door setback from the building. This section requires street facing garage doors to be setback 4 feet behind either the face of the house or front porch. As an alternative design approach, vehicle access could be taken from the adjacent access drive west of the site, with the garages placed in the rear of the building. This would also limit crossing the drainage easement along Montgomery Street with vehicle driveways. Number: 27 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/041 Canopy street trees should be planted along Montgomery behind the existing sidewalk (if permitted by Storm drainage). Number: 28 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Will architectural details be provided on the sides of the building? Windows, change in materials should be considered along the sides of the building. Building materials should be included on the building elevations. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 7 Created: 3/16/2004 (3/16/04] This project name is already taken. Please re -name with an original name or use Eastgate, 2nd Filing. This applies to all plans. Number: 12 Created: 3/16/2004 [3/16/04] Please see redlines and redlined utility plan checklist for any additional comments. Number: 13 Created: 3/16/2004 (3/16/041 Please ensure that the site, landscape, utility plans and plat all match. i.e. Certain easements are not shown or are labeled incorrectly on the site plan and utility plans, and sidewalks shown on the site plan are not shown on the utility plans. Number: 14 Created: 3/16/2004 (3/16/04) Is the easement shown for the sewer line offsite an existing easement? If not, a letter of intent from the adjacent property owner will be required prior to hearing, stating that they intend to grant an easement for this line after the hearing. And prior to mylars being signed by the City, this easement will have to be complete. Number: 22 Created: 3/16/2004 (3/16/041 Is the open space intended to be a public park? If so, should it not be in a public access easement? Number: 25 Created: 3/16/2004 Page 1