Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutADRIAN ODP - 42-03B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW10. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the Project Development Plan and the Final Compliance phases of development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. 11. This development proposal is subject to the requirements as set forth in the City's LUC, specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and Article 4.4 - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District. 12. The City's Current Planning Department will coordinate the development review process. The required submittal package will be submitted to this department and distributed accordingly to other City departments and outside reviewing agencies involved in development review. 6. Tom Reiff of the Transportation Planning Department offered the following comments: a. A TIS, addressing all modes of transportation, may be required with your PDP submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Operations Department (224-6062) and Tom Reiff of the Transportation Planning Department (416-2040) to determine what information may be needed in the TIS pertaining to LOS for vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. b. Annexation of this property into the City of Fort Collins should include the entire width of adjacent streets. C. This development request will be subject to the orientation to a connecting walkway standard set forth in Section 3.5.2(C) of the LUC. Please contact Tom, at 416-2040, if you have questions about these comments. 7. The Parks Planning Department will require parkland fees, for both neighborhood and community parks, which apply to each new residential dwelling unit. The fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits and are based on the square footage of each dwelling unit. 8. If any existing structures on the property are 50 years old or older then the City's Historic Preservation Planners in the Advance Planning Department will have comments. Please contact Karen McWilliams, at 224- 6078, or Carol Tunner, at 221-6597, if this is the case. 9. It may be beneficial to hold a neighborhood meeting for this development proposal prior to formal submittal of the request to the City for review. The addition of 11 new residential dwelling units in this area may be a cause for concern by neighbors and it is better to inform them of the possibility before the item goes to public hearing for a decision. Please contact Steve Olt of the Current Planning Department to assist you in scheduling this meeting. Also, he will provide you with a map showing the "area of notification" for Affected Property Owners that the applicant is responsible for providing to the City. The notification requirements, including distances from the subject property to notify within, are set forth in Section 2.2.6 of the LUC. Steve can be reached at 221-6341. Please contact Roger, at 221-6854, if you have questions about these water/wastewater-related comments. 4. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. The site is located in the West Vine Drainage Basin, where the development fee is $7,004 per acre, which is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. b. The standard drainage and erosion control report and construction plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. C. On -site detention will be required for this development and it must be contained in a common tract or parcel. It cannot be in a private lot. d. It has not been determined if this property is in a floodplain. Please contact Glen for this information. He will have to research the situation. Please contact Glen, at 224-6065, if you have questions about these comments. 5. Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments: a. There is an existing electric vault at the northeast corner of the property. Electric service will be down Impala Drive. b. The normal charges, both development and system charges, will apply to this request. C. The property must be annexed first before the City will provide electric service to it. Please contact Bruce, at 224-6157, if you have questions about these comments. The minimum street separation distances must be maintained with this development. Please contact Engineering for the required distances. j. A Development Agreement and a Development Construction Permit will be needed for this development. k. Letters of intent from affected property owners for any necessary off -site easements must be submitted to the City for review before the PDP will be scheduled for a public hearing. The actual signed easements must be submitted with the final compliance plans. Please contact 5usan, at 221-6750 or 221-6605, if you have questions about these comments. 3. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. There is an existing 8" water main in West Vine Drive and an existing 20" water main in a northwest - southeast alignment near the southwest corner of the property. b. There is an existing 12",sanitary sewer main in West Vine Drive and an existing sanitary sewer main part way up Impala Drive from the south. C. Install an 8" water main in Impala Drive from West Vine Drive to the 20" main that crosses Impala Drive. d. Water and sanitary sewer mains serving the proposed development can then be extended into the subdivision from these mains in Impala Drive. e. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply to this development request. They will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits; however, if the project qualifies for affordable housing status, a deferral program is available. f. The City's water conservation standards for landscaping and irrigation systems may apply to this development request. 2. Susan Joy of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. The standard utility plan submittal requirements will apply to this development request. b. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development request. The fees are based on vehicle trip generation for the proposed land use in the development plan. Please contact Matt Baker of Engineering (224-6108) for detailed information on the fees. The fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. C. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS), addressing all modes of transportation, will probably be required with your Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Operations Department (224-6062) and Tom Reiff of the Transportation Planning Department (416-2040) to determine what information may be needed in the TIS pertaining to Level of Service (LOS) for vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. d. This development will be responsible for street improvements on both West Vine Drive and Impala Drive. e. This development must dedicate necessary rights -of -way (ROW) for both West Vine Drive (ultimate width of 84') and Impala Drive (ultimate width of 51' or 53') adjacent to the property. Also, all necessary easements must be dedicated behind the ROW. f. This development will be subject the Lorimer County Urban Area Street Standards. g. The Lorimer County Road Impact Fees will apply to development on this property. h. A private drive may not be used for this number of residential dwelling units. A private drive may serve up to 4 isolated single family lots, as set forth in Section 3.6.2(L)(1)(b) of the LUC. A public (or possibly private) street is required. C. The proposed single family residential land use is permitted in the LMN District. If the development request complies with all applicable sections of Article 4.4 in the LUC then it would be subject to an administrative (Type I) review and public hearing. d. The development request will be subject to the applicable Land Use Standards and Development Standards as set forth is Sections 4.4(1)) & (E) of the Land Use Code (LUC). These sections deal with density, street system block size, maximum residential building height, etc. e. The maximum building height permitted in the LMN District is 2.5 stories, as set forth in Section 4.4(E)(3) of the LUC. f. The development request would be subject to the minimum required parking for the proposed single family residential use as set forth in Section 3.2.2(K)(1)(b) of the LUC. g. The development request would be subject to the residential building standards as set forth in Section 3.5.2 of the LUC. h. Residential building setbacks are set forth in Section 3.5.2(D) of the LUC. Residential garage door placement and orientation requirements are set forth in Section 3.5.2(E) of the LUC. j. If annexed, the property would be in the City's Residential Neighborhood Sign District and would be subject to the requirements and restrictions set forth in that section of the Sign Code, which is administered by the Zoning Department. k. The property has not previously been subdivided and platted in the City; therefore, a subdivision plat must be part of the Project Development Plan (POP) submittal to the City for review. Please contact Gary, at 416-2338, if you have questions about these comments. MEETING DATE: February 10, 2003 ITEM: Annexation of the Property and an 11 Lot Residential Subdivision on Approximately 1.6 Acres Located at the Southeast Corner of West Vine Drive and Impala Drive APPLICANT: Mikal Torgerson 223 North College Avenue Fort Collins. CO. 80524 LAND USE DATA: Request for 11 affordable single family residential lots, plus one existing residence on a new lot, on approximately 1.6 acres. The gross residential density would be approximately 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The property is located at the southeast corner of West Vine Drive and Impala Drive and is in the FA - Farming Zoning District in Lorimer County. COMMENTS: Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department stated that the property is in Lorimer County. He offered the following comments: a. The property is in Lorimer County, however, it has contiguity to City limits by virtue of a recent West Vine Drive annexation. Because of this, any development request for the property will require that the property owner/applicant submit a petition for annexation to the City of Fort Collins. This action and process must proceed forward before the City can accept a development proposal for the property. b. The City's adopted Structure Plan gives direction for this property to be placed in the LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District when annexed into the City. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970) 221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Adrian PDP Response to Conceptual Review Comments: La.) The property has been annexed. I.b.) The property has been zoned RL. I .c.) Acknowledged. I.d.) Acknowledued. Le.) Acknowledged. 1.1'.) Acknowledged. I .g.) Acknoxv Icd«ed. I.h.) All building envelopes specified are in conformance with the building setbacks. Li.) :Ackmm led'-'ed. I.j.) Acknov\ ledued. I.k.) A plat i� included in the submittal. ?. .) A utilit} plan set is included in the submittal. 2.b.) acknov, ledaed. 2.c.) I.:ric 4,racke has indicated that the impacts of the development do not trigger a TIS. 2.d.) Ackno.v ledg>ed. 2.c.) The necessary rieht-of-way is being dedicated. 2.1'.) Ackno\rledged. 2.�,.) Acknkmledged. 2.h.1 The In om has been revised so that the private drive is only serving the primary access for 3 lots. 2.i.) Aekno\, Icd ted. Acknov, iedsed. 2.k.) Acknomledged. J.a.) Ackn(,\\ lcd"ed. 3.b.) Acknu•,<lcdged. 3.c.) A nc\� .ater line is included in utility plan design. 3.d.; Ackn(„ ledLed. ?.l'.) Al]kaoil Itdged. 3.1.) Acknw, %!cased. =4.a.) A1ck: or %lodged. see drainage report. 4.1).) Ackm..\.\ iedged. see drainage report. 4.c.) An ownlot has been provided for the detention pond. 4.d.) A.knm\ Ic(bzed, see drainage report. 5.a.) Acknowled,ed. see utility plan. 5.6.) Acknkmledsed. 5.c.) the pioperly is now annexed. 6.c.) I_:ric Biacke and Tom Reiff are have been contacted. Eric waived the TIS. 6.h.) I'he annexation included the adjacent streets. 6.c.) Ackmwv�led. 7.) AcknmNled,sed. 9.) \Arvc met with the neighbors durim_ the annexation process. They are informed. 10.) The proiccl is 100% affordable. therelore no PDP fee applies. A sign posting and -APO fee is provided. 1I.) Acl<nov.!cdged. 12.) Acknov�icaged.