HomeMy WebLinkAboutADRIAN ODP - 42-03B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - PLANNING OBJECTIVESODP Accompanying Information
(Item 3 on Submittal Requirements Sheet)
3a) Property Owners: William John Adrian & Julian K. Adrian
3b) No partnerships, LLCs or Corps are involved.
3c) See the attached mailing labels.
3d) See the attached 26 copies of the statement of planning objectives.
3e) See the attached copy of the conceptual review letter and
explanation of how the issues have been resolved.
3f) See the attached legal description of the site.
3g) The detention pond will be owned and maintained by the Home
Owner's Association.
3h) Parcel A is intended to be developed right away, hoping to break
ground in fall 2003.
3i) See the utility plan set that was previously provided for the Adrian
PDP application.
3j) See the overall drainage plan that was previously provided for the
Adrian PDP application.
3k) We will provide a rendered set of ODP plans prior to the P & Z
hearing.
31) We will provide an 8.5"xl1" sheet of the ODP drawings.
(v) Written narrative addressing each issue raised at the
neighborhood meeting(s), if a meeting was held.
A neighborhood meeting was held last week. The primary
controversial issue is the fact the definition of "neighborhood
compatibility" is viewed differently, depending on whom you
ask. Section 3.5.2 of the LUC regulates neighborhood
compatibility. The neighbors feel that a total of 9 residential
units on this property isn't compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood. We feel that 9 units can be compatible as long
as we satisfy the minimum lot size requirements of 6000
square feet in the RL zone, and we stay within the height limits
of no more than 2 stories.
(vi) Name of the project as well as any previous name the
project may have come through conceptual review with.
The project is called "Adrian PDP." During the annexation
process it was called "Adrian Annexation."
(vii) Narrative description of how conflicts between land
uses or disturbances to wetlands, natural habitats and
features and or wildlife are being avoided to the maximum
extent feasible or are mitigated.
Because this is an infill site, there is already existing
development in every direction from this site. Some existing
development is small lot single family residential, some is
rural residential. We propose a density that is consistent with
the zoning on the property, which is RL.
2
Statement of Planning Objectives
Adrian O.D.P.
(i) Statement of appropriate City Plan Principles and
Policies achieved by the proposed plan.
Principle HSG-1, Policy HSG-1.2, Principle HSG-2, Policy HSG-
2.5, Principle HSG-3, Policy HSG-3.1, Principle EXN-1, and
Policy EXN-1.4 all are achieved by the proposed plan.
(ii) Description of proposed open space, buffering,
landscaping, circulation, transition areas, wetlands and
natural areas.
A detention pond is proposed at the southeast comer of the
site. No wetlands or natural habitats and features exist on the
site. Street trees are provided. Each individual house will
have foundation plantings as required. The existing Impala
Drive and Vine Drive will provide circulation. Also a private
drive is proposed internal to the site to give primary access to
3 lots. The lots are proposed to be no smaller than 6000
square feet as per the RL zone district, and such lots abut
other residential, so the back yards are the only proposed
buffering.
(iii) Estimate of number of employees for business,
commercial, and industrial uses.
N/A
(iv) Description of rationale behind the assumptions and
choices made by the applicant.
The City of Fort Collins Comprehensive Plan (City Plan) states
that providing affordable housing throughout the community
is a goal of the City. This project is a 100% qualified affordable
housing project. Additionally, in City Plan, the goal of
promoting infill over the development of virgin farm land a the
periphery of the community is also a goal of the City. This
project is on and infill site. We see this development as a win -
win between the developer and the City.
1