Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE HUMAN BEAN COFFEE DRIVE THRU - FDP - 28-04B - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Eros/on/Sediment Control Number. 67 Created: 4/5/2005 [415/05] 1. The project schedule must be on the erosion control plan. 2. There is no plan legend indicating the BMP's to be utilized. 3. What is the protection for the pipeline installation in College Avenue? 4. Plan indicates straw bales on hand (asphalt) surfaces. This doesn't work, please choose a different BMP. 5. What is to protect the concrete installations to the east of the College Ave. silt fencing? Topic: Floodp/ain Number. 66 Created: 4/5/2005 [415/05] FYI 1. A hold has been placed on the building permit pending approval of the floodproofing design for the building. Please submit a set of plans and all required floodproofing documentation directly to Marsha Hilmes-Robinson in Stormwater. 2. A floodplain use permit and $25 permit fee are required for both the building and the other site work. 3. A FEMA floodproofing certificate and as -built certification of the dryland access will be required prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number. 74 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] No comments Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding .these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen City Planner Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fod Collins CITYSCAPE URBAN DESIGN, INC Date: 04/11/2005 JOE CARTER 3555 STANFORD ROAD, SUITE 105 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for THE HUMAN BEAN COFFEE DRIVE THRU -PDP- FINAL COMPLIANCE, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: General Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Number. 69 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] The following departments have indicated that they have no problems or concerns with this round of the plans: Building Inspection, Zoning, USPS, and Water Conservation. Number: 70 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Mocha may or may not be enough contrast with asphalt for the sidewalk crossing. Please provide a sample sheet with an accurate rendition of the color. Number. 71 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] There is pretty substantial light spillage onto neighboring property to the north and south. Please tweak the fixtures with sharp cutoff shielding, for example, to eliminate this spillage. A color copy of the redline was given to Joe Carter at Staff Review. Number: 72 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] 1 recommend that you relocate the site lighting fixture that is to the west of pedestrian connection closer to the crossing so that it highlights the crossing for enhanced safety. This is not a requirement. Department: Engineering Topic: General Number. 75 [4/8/05] Engineering offers no additional comments presented for final compliance review. Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 73 [416/05] No issues. Department: Police Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number. 68 [4/5/05] No comments Issue Contact: Marc Virata Created: 4/8/2005 specific to the plan set and information Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 4/6/2005 Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created: 4/5/2005 Page 1