Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2300 W. ELIZABETH, EBERL / SIMPSON - PDP - 22-04 - CORRESPONDENCE -[7/14/04] Per Sec 3.2.1(E)(4), there needs to be a 6' high wood fence along the east lot line adjacent to the parking area, which includes the entire driveway length. However, per Sec. 3.8.11, the maximum height of the portion of the fence that extends between the front wall of the existing home and the street is limited to a maximum height of 4'. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen City Planner Page 10 Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 39 Created: 7/14/2004 (1/14/05] The revised plan does not contain the requested information. In fact the revised plan no longer contains any site data. At least the previous plan had a "site areas" table. Need to show some sort of land use table indicating such things as lot size, proposed use, # of bedrooms, # of parking spaces, etc. i [7/14104] Since the number of parking spaces required is based on the number of bedrooms per unit, they need to indicate number of bedrooms. Number: 40 Created: 7/14/2004 [1/14/05] All site/land use data has been removed on latest plan. There is no information at all now. Also, the revised plan still shows the lot to be 176' in depth. It must reflect the actual lot dimensions as per the plat, which would appear to be only 148' after the ROW dedication. The plat should also show that the lot depth dimension is 148', not 176'. The lot won't include the area dedicated by the ROW dedication, but the plat seems to indicate that it is still contained within the boundaries of Lot 1. 1 realize that note #3 on the plat exlains this, but that's not good enough. The plat map should clearly reflect the lot lines, dimensions, and area of what is actually Lot 1. The original plan showed many dimensions for such things as setbacks, parking stalls, etc. These parking stall dimensions no longer appear on the revised site plan. They must be shown. The revised site plan has a note that there are 5 buffalo juniper in the handicap parking space. Obviously, that must be an error. [7/14/04] Their "site areas" info on the site plan states that the site is 14,080 sf. However, after the dedication, the lot area is 12,478 sf. Therefore, the info should reflect the accurate lot size. Also, the lot depth dimension on the site plan should clarify that the lot is 156' in depth, not 176'. The new front lot line should be bolder so that it's clear where the lot line is. The "site areas" box perhaps should be renamed to "land use data" and include the number of bedrooms in addition to the uses and lot size. Number: 42 Created: 7/14/2004 [1/14/05] The previous plan showed landscaping on the site plan. The new landscape plan still needs to show the dimension of the stip in question. Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(a) requires trees every 40' along the perimeter parking lot landscape strip. I see that there are numerous trees along the side lot line in the front portion of the lot, but they really don't add anything to the rear portion of the lot adjacent to the actual parking area. A couple of trees should be planted in this area. Section 3.2.1(E)(5) requieres 6% interior parking lot landscaping. That means that just over 200 square feet of such landscaping is required and they don't show any. [7/14/04] Per Sec. 3.2.2(J), a 5' wide landscape strip is required along the east lot line adjacent to the driveway and parking area. What's shown scales out to only 3'. Indicate what the ground cover is or is going to be in this landscape strip. Number: 43 Created: 7/14/2004 [1/14/05] The original plan stated that there was an "existing 42" high wire fence", now the new plan states that there is an "existing 6' cedar fence". I just want to make sure which fence actually exists. Page 9 Number: 98 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] A drainage easement is needed for the limits of the detention pond up to an elevation of 86.67. Number: 99 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] Please see drainage plan for other concerns and errors on the plan. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 97 Created: 2/2/2005 [2/2/05] There is no project schedule, please provide on the latest version. 2.The pond outlet does not show protection on the plan as indicated in the report. Please add. t i 3.There should be a note on the plan indicating the pond is to be revegetated or sodded. 4.1 did not find a surety calculation, please provide. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number: 102 Created: 2/7/2005 [2/7/05] Walkways that are adjacent to head -in parking need to be 6' in width, or if wheel stops are to be used show us that a minimum 4' of clear space will be maintained. Thanks. Number: 103 Created: 2/7/2005 [2/7/05] Is the walkway adjacent to the drive aisle grade- separated by some means, or are they at the same grade? Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 31 Created: 7/13/2004 [1 /31 /05] [7/13/04] Provide off site utility easement for proposed sanitary sewer services for our review. Number: 32 Created: 7/13/2004 [1 /31 /05] [7/13/04] Provide a 10 foot wide utility easement around the existing structure centered on the proposed water service. Number: 33 Created: 7/13/2004 [1 /31 /05] [7/13/04] Show and label all proposed and existng water and sewer lines on the utility plans. Provide the invert at the connection point of the existing sanitary sewer main. Number:35 1 Created: 7/13/2004 [1/31/05] Relocate the existing curb stop out of the proposed drive isle. Provide a detail for the relocation of the existing curb stop. [7/13/04] See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments Page 8 [7/20/04] KNOX BOX: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 1997 UFC 902.4; PFA POLICY 88-20 Number: 66 Created: 7/20/2004 [2/4/05] [7/20/04] TURNAROUND REQUIREMENT: Turnarounds are required when the roadway exceeds 150 feet in length. Minimum inside turning radius shall be 25 feet inside 50 feet outside. PFA Policy 85-5(2) Number: 67 Created: 7/20/2004 [2/4/05] [7/20/04] REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 46 Created: 7/15/2004 [2/2/05] Repeat Comment - The water quality orifice is so small it will clog. We will discuss within our department the best measure to take and I will let you know. The flow spreader is also in conflict with the existing trees. The separation shown is not sufficient. The spreader will have to be moved or trees removed to have the spreader work properly. The WQ outlet structure will not work as shown. The City's standard WQ outlet structure will not work either due to the shallow detention pond. Coordination will need to take place to develop a modified outlet structure that will work. This can be done after the hearing during final compliance review. The flow spreader also needs to be coordinated with City staff the develop a design that will work with the least amount of maintenance. Number: 47 Created: 7/15/2004 [2/2/05] Repeat Comment. If the ditch owner can sign off and approve abandoning the flow to the north, The City will approve it as well. More coordination on the tailwater piping needs to take place. [7/15/04] Please provide a design to handle the irrigation ditch flows through the site and provide documentation on what the flow rate will be per existing water rights. Also, please provide a irrigation ditch owner signature block on the plans for approval by the ditch owner. Number: 49 Created: 7/15/2004 [2/2/05] [7/15/04] Project is ready for a hearing regarding to stormwater related issues. Other comments may follow during final compliance review when more information is presented. K Page 7 [1/31/05] Please use detail D-10 from the stormwater manual for the under -walk drain detail. Number: 83 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05) Eileen Bayens from Street Oversizing has said that the sidewalk configuration for this property's frontage may need to change due to proposed reconstruction of the attached walk to the west of this property. Please accommodate a detached walk, full width, located along the edge of the ROW along this property with a transition to the proposed walk detached at the edge of existing ROW to the west of this property. Number: 84 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please clarify what private irrigation items might be located in the ROW, where they are, their design, etc, so I can show the City Engineer what is proposed and determine whether an encroachment permit for the items would be appropriate. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 37 Created: 7/14/2004 [2/4/05] [7/14/04) Please contact me to determine whether tree mitigation will be required.. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 62 Created: 7/20/2004 [2/4/05] [7/20/04] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 A. In Multi -story buildings the following requirements shall pertain. 1. The first floor units shall be designated with 100's. 2. The second floor units with 200's 3. The third floor units with 300's, and so forth. B. All brass letters and numerals shall be posted on a black background. C. Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front of the buildings. D. A counter clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained when ever possible. E. An addressing scheme shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to being posted on the building. Number: 64 Created: 7/20/2004 [2/4/05] [7/20/04] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. 1997 UFC 1003.2.9 NOTE: When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more then 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility it shall be fire sprinklered. 1997 UFC 902.2.1 Number: 65 [2/4/05] Created: 7/20/2004 Page 6 [1/31/05] No easement(s) provided for the irrigation ditch. Please clarify what's going on. Please provide designs for any new connections/pipes needed. Also, as resulted from a meeting with Stormwater and one of the City Attorneys, the storm pipe should be extended from the manhole on the east edge of the lot east of this project to the west edge of this project, and at the west edge is where the pipe for the irrigation water should tie in. The roadside ditch should only cant' street flows in the interim condition, not any irrigation water. [7/9/04] Please research the ditch running through this property. Who owns it? Who maintains it? It will need to be relocated outside of the ROW and city utility easement, probably piped, and the ditch owner will need to sign the utility plans. Please provide a signature line for the ditch owner. Number: 24 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] Where are the next closest driveways in each direction on both sides of the street? Are driveway separations being met? Will Traffic support a driveway here? An engineering variance is most likely required to have a driveway in this location. Number: 73 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please show how proposed grading ties to existing grading within the property's boundaries. Currently, proposed grades appear to tie to nothing in several locations. Number: 74 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please provide a Crownline profile for Elizabeth. Number:75 1 Created:1/31/2005 [1/31/05] Please note on the Elizabeth plans that, while the sawcut line may stop north of the crown in Elizabeth, the remainder of the street between the sawcut and the crown will need to be milled/ovedayed to create a consistent cross -slope meeting minimum 1.5% grade. Number: 76 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please provide 100' radius, large arc curves instead of angle points for the curb transition on Elizabeth. Number: 77 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] The minimum sag vertical curve length on Elizabeth is 150' per fig 7-18 in LCUASS. Number: 78 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Cross -sections -please keep grades adjacent to sidewalks at 2% for 2' minimum, then grades can drop off at max 4:1 slope. Number: 79 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Cross -sections - it would be helpful to provide one cross-section as typical, then remove all the repetitive labels from the other cross -sections. Number: 80 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Cross -sections - please provide crown elevations so that cross -slopes can be checked. Number: 82 Created: 1 /31 /2005 Page 5 Number: 105 Created: 2/8/2005 [2/8/05] Please make plans more legible/understandable. Topic: Plat Number: 6 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] Repeat. Please coordinate ROW dedication and ensure that the standard ROW dedication is being met. [7/9/04] The ROW dedication shown on the plat does not match the other plans. Please coordinate. Number: 7 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] After the utility coordination meeting, it was found that a 7' utility easement as shown on the utility plans will be sufficient. Please match this on all plans and the plat. [7/9/04] Please dedicate the standard 15' utility easement along the Elizabeth ROW. Number: 68 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please show all easements on Lot 1 and match easements and ROW to other plans. Please add a city clerk signature line underneath the planning approval. Please add a signature line for the ditch owner. Please focus the plat on the property being platted. Topic: Utility plans Number: 15 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] The City signature block should always be in the lower right corner of the sheet. Number: 16 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] Two cross -sections were provided - which one is accurate? [7/9/04] Please provide a cross-section for Elizabeth (typical). Number: 18 Created: 7/9/2004 (1/31/05] Please note this project's soils report on the utility plans, and add a note incorporating the soils report for the West Elizabeth Project. [7/9/04] The soils report submitted does not meet the standards set forth in LCUASS. Please submit 2 copies of a soils report that meets these standards. At least one boring should be located within the ROW. Number: 19 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] Please provide ties to 2 benchmarks. Number: 20 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] Please provide a completed LCUASS utility plan checklist with each submittal. Number: 21 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] Please provide dimensions of new and existing ROW and easements. Number: 23 Created: 7/9/2004 Page 4 Number: 9 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] Some sheets don't have titles at all. [7/9/04] Please match the titles on all of the plans. Number: 11 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] As was discussed at the utility coordination meeting, Matt Baker of Street Oversizing wants this project to build its sidewalk and pipe the irrigation flows as necessary, and escrow for the curb, gutter, and paving on Elizabeth. [7/9/04] Since the conceptual review for this project over a year ago, the situation with improvements to West Elizabeth has changed somewhat. This project will be required to design and construct its frontage improvements: curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, street trees, and any needed transitions on Elizabeth. Street Oversizing (contact Matt Baker) has 50% plans for West Elizabeth, which may be utilized for the offsite 1 000'of design required for arterials. Number: 12 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] Please use different line weights to clearly identify all existing items vs. proposed items. Generally, darker lines should indicate proposed items and dashed lines should indicate existing ones. Number: 44 Created: 7/14/2004 [1/31/05] [7/14/04] Please use a radius -style driveway connection to Elizabeth per LCUASS. Number: 69 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please see LCUASS Appendix e-6 regarding scanability requirements. It is the responsibility of the applicant to submit plans to standard that are scanable and reproducible. Number: 70 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] All plans must use an engineering scale 1:10, 1:20, 1:30, etc. Currently the site plan is not at an engineering scale. Please revise. Number: 71 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Multifamily driveways are required to be minimum 24' wide within the ROW. Please revise. Number: 72 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] The sidewalk adjacent to the drive aisle needs to be grade separated from the drive aisle (curbed). Number: 85 Created: 1 /31 /2005 [1/31/05] Please ensure that redlines are submitted with every (re)submittal. I did not receive plat or site or landscape redlines. Number: 104 Created: 2/8/2005 [2/8/05] Please list a variance approval for the 7' utility easement in the last item on the general notes on the utility plans. Page 3 your Administrative Hearing to be heard concurrently with your PDP application. The Hearing Officer has indicated that he would support such a modification. There will be a short (probably one week) review period for the modification request. Let me know if you have questions about how to make such a request. You may want to retain the loading area and ramp for renter's ease of moving furniture, bike access, etc. Number: 91 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] The photometrics submitted are not very legible and are not at the same scale as the plans or scaled in any way so it is difficult to determine whether the lighting meets the standards. Number: 92 Created: 2/1 /2005 [2/1/05] There are a couple of places on the plans that I have highlighted that are a concern with regard to the standard that 20 feet outside the property line, lighting levels must not exceed .1 footcandle. Number: 93 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] The lighting proposed is pretty bright for residential uses. The guidelines are as follows: parking: 1 fc stairs:.3 fc walkways:.5 fc You might want to tone down the lighting to be more residentially appropriate. Number: 94 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] Label the species of the trees proposed for the front yard. The street trees must be species that have been approved by the City's Forester. Please ask me if you need a copy of this list. Number: 95 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] During construction, you will need to adhere to the tree protection Specifications found in Section 3.2.1 (G) of the Land Use Code. Number: 96 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] The details you've scribbled onto the elevations enhance the building's compatibility with the surrounding neighbors. Are they intended to be built? Staff hopes you will provide the porch overhangs and decorative shingles in the gables and the porch overhangs. Number: 100 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] Each of your plan pages should have a title block on the right which indicates the project name and address. Number: 101 Created: 2/4/2005 [2/4/05] Please contact Mike Chavez at PFA to review your plans before you resubmit to ensure that the plans are acceptable for fire fighting purposes. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 8 Created: 7/9/2004 [1/31/05] [7/9/04] See redlines for additional comments. Page 2 6a STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins EBCON, INC. JIM SIMPSON P.O. BOX 428 MEAD, CO 80542 Date: 02/04/2005 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 2300 W. ELIZABETH, EBERUSIMPSON PDP - TYPE I (LUC), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Topic: General Number: 56 Created: 7/15/2004 [2/1/05] You've still got problems here with your dimensions east to west: from east to west, your landscape buffer is OK, the drive aisle needs to be 22 feet if you use the smaller stalls and curbstops, the walkway needs to be 4 foot CLEAR, which means 6' if you use curbstops and the shorter stall dimensions, the landscape bed needs to be 5 feet, and the west side setback needs to be 5 feet. [7/15/04] Your East West dimension in the back is tight and must be modified. From East to West: landscape buffer needs to be 5' not T, access drive needs to be 20' as shown, parking stalls must be 19' long not 17' unless you provide a curb or curb stops and sufficient space in the sidewalk for 4' clear of walkway. Number: 86 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] 1 did not receive my redlines back with this submittal. Please be sure to resubmit redlines with each submittal. I may have additional comments if any redlined comments were not addressed the last time around. Number: 87 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] Building Inspection commented that this project is an R-3 Occupancy regulated with 2003 IRC and Amendments. Contact Rick Lee in Building and Zoning if you have any questions. Number: 88 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] Streets, Comcast and Post Office indicate that they have no concerns with this submittal. Number: 89 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] In the future, please do not organize your response letter by comment number. These numbers merely indicate the chronological orderin which the reviewers entered their comments. Instead, request that I email you the comments and then respond right under the original comment, using bold or italics to distinguish your comments from ours. Number: 90 Created: 2/1/2005 [2/1/05] Since the Building Inspection Department has determined that the proposed structure is an R-3 Occupancy which does not require ADA accessibility, and since both the proposed and existing building have stairs at their entrances, a handicap accessible parking spot will probably go unused if provided. Staff suggests you submit a request for modfication of the standard contained in Section 3.2.2 (K)(5)(d) invoking 2.8.2(H)(1) prior to Page 1