The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHOME INSTEAD PLAZA - PDP/FDP - FDP130042 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATIONPlanning & Zoning Board September 21, 2006 Page 5 study be completed to determine if a stoplight can be installed at the intersection of Landings and Boardwalk. End of Public Input Eric Bracke, the City's Traffic Engineer, stated that the City is currently reviewing that intersection and discussing a possible roundabout. He stated it is a slow process to get the post office to agree to do something with the intersection. Staff Bracke thinks it is inappropriate to delay this development while the City is negotiating with the post office. Member comments are: (1) Member Rollins is still concerned about the driveway; (2) Chair Lingle stated he is concerned about traffic flow; (3) Member Stockover stated he thinks it will be self- regulating. Member Smith moved to approve the Fox Pointe Plaza, Project Development Plan (PDP) - #16- 06 and adopted the findings of fact and conclusions on page 7 of the Staff Report. Member Fries seconded the motion. Motion was approved 5-2 with Members Schmidt and Rollins the dissenting votes. Project: Front Range Village Amended Overall Development Plan and Front Rang Village Regional Shopping Center Major Amendment, #5-94L. ption: This is a request for a 101-acre regional shopping center in the H ony Corridor located generally at the northwest corner of East Har y Road and Ziegler Road. The site contains 850,000 square feet of groseleasable floor area divided among 17 buildings. Of these 17, four are ge retail tablishments. In addition, there are eight pad sites be developed in wally in future phases. An amendment tot Overall Development Plan is inclu d. There are three requests for Modi ' ations of Standard. Staff is recommen ' g 12 conditions of approval. Recommendation: Approval of the A nded O.D Approval of the Three odificatio as Conditioned Approval of the Major Am d nt with 12 Conditions Director Gloss provided contextu ite information. Three year go the Planning & Zoning Board considered and approved the mmit Lifestyle Center PDP near H ony and Ziegler Road. One year ago, the applicant ele d to not go forward with the plan and pur ed an amendment to the Harmony Corridor Plan hich would allow a regional shopping center on site as opposed to the lifestyle center conc t they had brought forward. Now, they are requesting t mend the Overall Development PI and also make a major amendment to the PDP that was prev s�sly approved. This 101-a,pKe parcel is bordered by Harmony on the south and Ziegler on the east. Ap�l'cant is requesti an 850,000 square foot center with seven buildings. There will be eight addition pa sites at are not part of this particular request. There is a pedestrian -oriented main street wit Planning & Zoning Board September 21, 2006 Page 4 Project: Fox Pointe Plaza, Project Development Plan (PDP) - #16-06 Project Description: This is a request for a Convenience Shopping Center on 1.2 acres located at the southeast corner of Boardwalk Drive and JFK Parkway, just north of the main U.S. Post Office. The proposed uses are retail, office, and restaurant in a 2-story building at the corner and a drive-thru coffee shop in a one-story building interior to the site. Access to the development would be from both adjacent streets. The subject property is in the E — Employment Zoning District. Recommendation: Approval. Hearino Testimonv. Written Comments and Other Evidence: Member Rollins stated that her concern is the access drive that comes into and out of the mail drop- off lane. She asked how that would function, and stated she thinks it will add congestion to that area Applicant Ed Zdenek with ZTI Development Group introduced traffic engineer, Matt Delich. Matt resides at 2272 Glen Haven Drive in Loveland. He stated that since peak hours for the coffee kiosk will be in the morning and peak hours for the post office will be in the afternoon, there should not be congestion issues. Member Rollins asked who has the right of way if someone is dropping off mail and another individual is getting coffee. Delich responded there is a stop sign after the mail drop, so the other vehicles would have the right of way. Member Schmidt questioned other uses. Matt Delich responded that there are some retail and other offices. He stated that the square footages on those areas are fairly small and so are the number of trips in and out. Not everyone will use the intersection in question as Boardwalk is also available. Chair Lingle asked if that connection could be moved further east to move some of the bottleneck away from the JFK Parkway. Ed Zdenek with ZTI Development Group, stated that it is 70 feet between that access and out. There needs to be enough room after leaving the post office to get past it and stop before making a turn. Shortening that space would inhibit that ability. There are also drainage concerns that will not allow that movement. Chair Lingle questioned the drainage at the post office parking lot. He stated there is a five to six foot drop into a depressed area near the parking lot. He asked if the spot would be filled and what the grading transitions are between all the elements of the site plan. Applicant Zdenek responded that the site will be filled about three and a half feet. Lingle then asked if there are retaining wall structures between the parking lot lane and the applicant's parking lot. Mr. Zdenek responded that there are retaining walls. Chair Lingle asked for input from the Engineering Department regarding this design. Randy Maizland responded that engineering does not see any situations that might create a hazardous situation for traffic coming off Boardwalk. He also stated he does not see any drainage issues. Public Input Jim Gore, 374 High Pointe Drive. Mr. Gore stated that Boardwalk is being used as a short cut for people traveling west on Harmony to avoid the Harmony/College intersection. He requested that a Planning & Zoning Board September 21, 2006 Page 2 6. #38-OOA Arbor South Second Annexation & Zoning Discussion Items: 7. #5-94L Front Range Village Amended Overall Development Plan and Front Range Village Regional Shopping Center Major Amendment 8. #1-06A Harmony and Shields Revised Structure Plan Amendment and Rezoning 9. #58-86J Water's Edge at Richard's Lake — Project Development Plan 10. #20-06 Front Range Second Rezoning and Structure Plan Amendment Member Schmidt moved that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the consent agenda consisting of Item 2, Resolution #PZ06-10 — Easement Dedication, Item 3, Resolution #PZO6-11 — Easement Dedication, Item 7, #19-04A, a Recommendation to City Council for Minor Wording Amendments to the Larimer County and City of Fort Collins Intergovernmental Agreement to the Fort Collins Growth Management Area, Item 8, #23-06, the North Weld County (NWCWD) and East Larimer County (ELCO) Water Districts Water Transmission (NEWT) — Site Plan Advisory Review, Item 9, 56-98AL, New Dawn Fort Collins (Rigden Farm) Rezoning and Structure Plan Amendment, Item 10, #38-OOA, Arbor South Second Annexation and Zoning, #38-OOA, #38-OOA. Member Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. Member Fries moved for approval of Item 11, #24-06, Recommendation to City Council for a Text Amendment to the Land Use Code. Member Meyer seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0. (Member Schmidt had a conflict of interest and did not vote.) Member Schmidt moved to approve Item 12, Recommendation to City Council for Amendments to the Land Use Code and City Code Implementing Mitigation Measures of the Southwest Enclave Annexation. Member Fries seconded the motion. Motion passed 6-0. (Member Rollins had a conflict of interest and did not vote.) Project: 412 E. Pitkin Change of Use — Project Development Plan (PDP) - #21- &_ Project Des tion: This is a request to convert an existing single-family-r i ence located at 412 East Pitkin Street into a two-family dwe,�liag- f e proposal includes conversion of the existing unfinished basement -into a legal dwelling unit, a 424 square foot addition to the north (rear) side of the house, remodeling of the existing front entryway to a fr rch, a new paved parking space off of the alley and enhanced im scapin he property is located on the north side of East Pitkin Street, east of Peterson Street and west of Whedbee Street, and is in the NCM Neighborhood Conservation MedlOnslZensity Zoning District. R mendation: Approval. \_ Chairperson Lingle called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Roll Call: Smith, Stockover, Schmidt, Lingle, Rollins, Meyer, Fries Staff Present: Gloss, Eckman, Moore, Jackson, Sommer, Maizland, Virata, Bracke, Olt, Waido, Langenberger, and Deines. Citizen participation: None. Director of Current Planning, Cameron Gloss, reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agendas and recommended the following changes: • Remove Item 1, April 20, 2006, May 18, 2006, June 15, 2006, and August 17, 2006 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing minutes. • Table Item 6, 3955 S. Taft Hill Road Out -of -City Utility Request. Director Gloss stated that the applicant is not sure if they want to move forward with this request at this time. • Member Schmidt has declared a conflict of interest on Item 11, #24-06 Recommendation to City Council for a Text Amendment to the Land Use Code to add Health Clubs as a permitted use to the River Downtown Redevelopment zone district (RDR). • Member Rollins has declared a conflict of interest on Item 12, Recommendation to City Council for Amendments to the Land Use Code and City Code Implementing Mitigation Measures of the Southwest Enclave Annexation. Chair Lingle asked the Board and members of the audience if there were any other agenda change requests. The results were: • Member Rollins requested that Item 4, #16-06, Fox Pointe Plaza — Project Development Plan be moved to the discussion agenda. . • An audience member asked that Item 5, #21-06, 412 E. Pitkin Change of Use — Project Development Plan be removed for discussion. • An audience member asked that Item 16, #20-06, Front Range Second Rezoning and Structure Plan Amendment be removed from the consent agenda. Consent Agenda: 1. Resolution PZ06-10 Easement Dedication at 1800 S. Lemay Avenue 2. Resolution PZ06-11 Easement Dedication at 1800 S. Lemay Avenue 3. #19-04A Recommendation to City Council for minor Wording Amendments to the Larimer County and City of Fort Collins Intergovernmental Agreement to the Fort Collins Growth Management Area. 4. #23-06 North Weld County (NWCWD) and East Larimer County (ELCO) Water Districts Water Transmission (NEWT) —Site Plan Advisory Review 5. #56-98AL New Dawn Fort Collins (Rigden Farm) Rezoning and Structure Plan Amendment JFK & Boardwalk Office & Restaurant w/ Drive Thru No Text r6V, F6rt of General Information Development Review Guide - STEP 2 of 8 CONCEPTUAL REVIEW: - _ a 2Sl ZD V2 APPLICATION All proposed development projects begin with Conceptual Review. Anyone with a development idea can schedule a Conceptual Review meeting to get feedback on prospective development ideas. At this stage, the development idea does not need to be finalized or professionally presented. However, a sketch plan and this application must be submitted to City Staff prior to the Conceptual Review meeting. The more information you are able to provide, the better feedback you are likely to get from the meeting. Please be aware that any information submitted may be considered a public record, available for review by anyone who requests it, including the media. Conceptual Reviews are scheduled on three Monday mornings per month on a "first come, first served" basis. One 45 meeting is allocated per applicant and only three conceptual reviews are done each Monday morning. Conceptual Review is a free service. Complete applications and sketch plans must be submitted to City Staff no later than 5 pm, two Tuesdays prior to the meeting date. Application materials must be e-mailed to currentplanning aC ..fcgov.com. If you do not have access to e-mail, other accommodations can be made upon request. At Conceptual Review, you will meet with Staff from a number of City departments, such as Community Development and Neighborhood Services (Zoning, Current Planning, and Development Review Engineering), Light and Power, Stonnwater, Water/Waste Water, Advance Planning (Long Range Planning and Transportation Planning) and Poudre Fire Authority. Comments are offered by staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. There is no approval or denial of development proposals associated with Conceptual Review. At the meeting you will be presented with a letter from staff, summarizing comments on your proposal. 'BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED' 'The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be." Contact Name(slApd Role(s) (Please identify whether Consultant or Owner, etc) iV/ L .:!MN' T Business Name (if applicable) AOZ657_Z7//V LENZei -6 T011142r_x �,/4L rrw�+ //C, Your Mailing Address 1461 lv/e .�I1�_ VEA[u.E FQK7_ OLLIN_S C U �v�Zq Phone Number.? X,2Email Address fl 1 ` 71- � Pr / , C_ 6 M Site Addr ss or Description (parcel # if no address) �� d� O A� WA LX f K/ VZ_ 1 FL /2, ULrvA2 Description of Proposal (attach additional sheets if necessary) 15E /41 _/7/qC//ZVLV T Oft N 46E/tN7-0/ j k t r✓� A �c.�0ETC-A 74 d,d L ck HPy AI 42 Proposed Use G rn GE bkj f ti�r/&j Exlsting Use 4 C /, Ig �/c Total Building Square Footage �/(�'�' " F. Number of Stories Lot Dimensions-5 Q J Age of any Existing Structures Info available on Larimer County's Website: httv//www co.lanmer co us/assessor/query/search cfm If any structures are 50+ years old, good quality, color/hotos of all sides of the structure are required for conceptual. Is your property in a Flood Plain? ❑ Yes M(No If yes, then at what risk is it? Info available on FC Maps: httDJ/aisweb fcqov.com/redirect/default.aspx?IaVerTheme=Floodplains. Increase in Impervious Area ! !3 1 S.F. (Approximate amount of additional building, pavement, or etc. that will cover existing bare ground to be added to the site) Suggested items for the Sketch Plan: Property location and boundaries, surrounding land uses, proposed use(s), existing and proposed improvements (buildings, landscaping, parking/drive areas, water treatment/detention, drainage), existing natural features (water bodies, wetlands, large trees, wildlife, canals, irrigation ditches), utility line locations (if known), photographs (helpful but not required). Things to consider when making a proposal: How does the site drain now? Will it change? If so, what will change? Community Development & Neighborhood Services — 281 N College Ave — Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580