The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE LEARNING EXPERIENCE AT MIRAMONT OFFICE PARK - PDP - PDP130023 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)shown on the builonig elevation drawings needs to be removed. > 1, the alphabet block and the number block "column" signs don't comply with the sign code. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 08/14/2013: A child care center use is classified as a secondary use in the HC zone district. As a secondary use, it can't occupy more than 25% of the gross area of the development plan. The applicant should provide the data to show that the use complies. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 08/1412013: The Land Use Table on the site plan needs to include a description of the use. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 08/14/2013: For the proposed enrollment capapcity of 170 children, the outdoor play area needs to be a minimum of 7,750 square feet (Sec. 3.8.4(A) of the LUC). The play area proposed is only 4,524 square feet. The minimum indoor floor space required for 170 children is 6800 square feet. The required floor space excludes bathrooms, offices, kitchens, closets and the like. Only the common floor area devoted to school purposes counts towards the required 6800 square feet. The applicant should provide the amount of such floor space in the Land Use Table. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 08/14/2013: Are all of the parking spaces existing? A minimum of 20 parking spaces are required for the center based on 30 employees. We will require that "reserved for child care center parking" signs be installed at the head of at least 20 spaces. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/14/2013 08/14/2013: The setback of the building from Boardwalk needs to comply with the build -to -line standards in Sec. 3.5.3(C) of the Land Use Code. This means that the building should be within 15of the Boardwalk right-of-way line unless it is determined that one of the listed exceptions is satisfied. included in the U,....y Plan set. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please include the NGVD 1929 unadjusted elevation for NGS Y402. If the elevations on these plans are based on the NAVD88 elevation, add a note stating that they are based on this elevation. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet C1.0 & C2.0. See redlines. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Aaron Iverson, 970-416-2643, aiverson(a)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/23/2013 - Provide sidewalk along north side of Oakridge Dr (shown as Private Dr on site plan) - Suggestion: Consider putting the playground area on the west side of the building, rather than along Boardwalk Dr. Keeps kids away from a big, busy street. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington at7fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Add note on Sht C1.0 regarding abandonment of the 3/4" water service (see redlined plans). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Show the existing, active irrigation service on the utility plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Label water main fittings, accessories and lengths of pipe on the udtility plan. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Adjust tree placement to meet required separation distances from water/sewer lines. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970.416-2355, pbarnes(Mcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/21/2013 08/21/2013: Signage is not part of the development plan process. Therefore, the signage 08/27/2013: The uetention pond will need to meet the landscap- standards including a maintenance access. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcountyC�fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please make the lines marked a heavier lineweight. These will get lost in copying and when scanned to our archive. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please mask all text that is within hatched areas. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please include the NGVD 1929 unadjusted elevation for NGS Y402. If the elevations on these plans are based on the NAVD88 elevation, add a note stating that they are based on this elevation. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please correct the spelling of "Details" in the Index Of Drawings on sheet C0.0. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets C1.0, C2.0, C3.0 & C4.0. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please rotate the marked text on sheet C1.0 to read from the bottom and/or right side of the plan sheet. Please make sure the text on all sheets read this way. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 1-1.0. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08127/2013: Please mask all text that is within hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please rotate the marked text on sheet 1-1.0 to read from the bottom and/or right side of the plan sheet. Please make sure the text on all sheets read this way. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 10 08/27/2013: No comments. Topic: Site Plan Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please change the sheet numbering on these plans. This numbering conflicts with the Utility Plans sheet numbering. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Is there a need for a Grading Plan in the PDP/FDP plan set? There is a plan accessible to a ut,...j line truck. Other minimum clearance requirements will also apply. Please coordinate the transformer location with Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2013 08/15/2013: Electric utility development charges will apply. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2013 08/15/2013: After the plans are finalized, please send an AutoCad (version 2008) drawing of the utility site plan to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Robert Rulli, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/13/2013 08/13/2013: Access pedestals at both ends of the property will need entrance conduit by Builder preferably 2x2" (1 For copper and 1 For Future Fiber). Robert Rullin, Century Link Field Engineering Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970-221-6618, cforemanRfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/12/2013 08/12/2013: No comments Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, ischlam(a.fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Erosion Control Report needs to address and describe the following; Management of Contaminated soil (if it is not expected say so), Loading and Unloading Construction operations, Equipment Maintenance, Significant Particulate Generation, Onsite waste Management, Dedicated Asphalt or Concrete Batch Plant (if it is not expected say so), Non industrial Waste Sources, Seed Mix, Soil Amendments (they are required), Crimping and mulching seeded areas. Please Correct Redlines from Page 6 of the Erosion Control Report. Please show erosion control Calculations for the site, i.e. how did you arrive at $3,000. A spread sheet is sufficient. Please Correct Redlines on the Erosion Control Plan (include a sequence chart similar to the one returned in the packet as an example) Please add an Erosion Control Detail Sheet for each BMP to the Utility Plan set. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: The detention seems to be a little under the required amount by about .1 ac-ft. Please provide a C-factor calc for the entire site to verify quantity detention. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 details sheet (C4) Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: On the sheet C2 you call out a 1 ft sidewalk chase drain. Please refer to the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Construction Detail D-10B for the current chase drain detail and revise. Add current detail to the details sheet (C4) Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please label the removal of the existing chase drain along Boardwalk Dr on the Overall Utility Sheet (Cl) Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please add our standard sidewalk note to the Overall Utility Plan (Cl) and the Site plan: Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please add the standard not to the Overall Utility Plan (Cl): Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lexMcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/26/2013 08/26/2013: On the landscape plans, you indicate wetland seed with the detention area - do you know if you have the groundwater regime to support wetland plantings? If not, I might recommend a different seed mix for that area that is less dependent on this type of hydrologic regime. Let me know if I can help on this one. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russ Hovland, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: See comment letter from Building Department Plans Reviewer Russ Hovland, Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartineapfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/15/2013 08/15/2013: The electric transformer location shown on the utility plan will likely need to change. The transformer will need to be located within 10 feet of an all-weather surface that is 08/22/2013: On . ,,eet C0.0 the signatures certification will neea to be changed to reflect that the Planning Director grants approval. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: On site plan the Land Use Table Parking Summary the parking spaces totals do not match the total labeled on the site plan. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: The landscape plan will need to include the entire lot and its' conditions. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013 08/22/2013: Mechanical/utility equipment (Vents, flues, ac/rtu, meters, boxes, conduit...) locations need to be identified on the plans with notes on how such equipment is screened and painted. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/2212013 08/22/2013: A light should be placed on the south side of the building to illuminate the sidewalk on that side. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221-6573, slangenbergera(afcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/12/2013 08/12/2013: The project owes an additonal $403.50 for the TDRF for the PDP. Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970.221.6501, tiegmund &fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please add our General Notes (Appendix E-1 FC/Lar in LCUASS) and Street Improvement Notes (Appendix E-2(b)(c)(e)) to the cover sheet/ general notes section. Contact me for an updated copy of the General Notes Appendix Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please add our standard signature block to all sheets in the Utility Plan Set. Contact me for our standard signature block. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: Please show the east side of Boardwalk Dr and the intersection of Oakridge Dr on all utility plan sheets Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: The Learning Experience building extends into an existing access/drainage/utility easement per the current Miramont Office Park Plat. The existing easements will need to be vacated and the new easements dedicated prior to project approval. You can vacate and dedicated easements by replat of the property or by a separate document process. Contact me for more information on the process to vacate/dedicate easements by separate document. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/27/2013 08/27/2013: The existing handicap ramp adjacent to the site (north side of the entrance into the site) does not meet current ADA standards. This ramp will need to be removed and rebuilt to current standards as part of this project. Please refer to LCUASS detail 1606 and add to the Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/develo pmentreview August 28, 2013 Adam Rubenstein Fort Colls Development Co., LLC 5150 E. Yale Circle, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80222 RE: The Learning Experience at Miramont Office Park, PDP130023, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/21/2013 08/21/2013: On the West side of the building where the main entrance is the Landscape standards require foundation plantings. Currently the site plan and landscape are showing none along this side. The elevation drawings are showing some shrubs. To achieve compliance with the code 50% of the building face excluding the entrance should incorporate some plantings areas. Does the 4ft fence need to be opaque, can it be more of a transparent fence type? Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/21/2013 08/21/2013: The sidewalk that runs along the west side of the building will need to be continued on to the drive aisle and the connection needs to include a ramp and painted cross walk to the existing west ramp across the drive aisle. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/21/2013 08/21/2013: The additional sidewalk connection on the North is appreciated but it does not alleviate the code requirement for the side walk along the North side of the south drive aisle. Plans will need to be revised to include this sidewalk connection. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/22/2013