The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2314 LAPORTE AVENUE REPLAT - PDP - 29-04 - CORRESPONDENCE - (7)The following comments were expressed at City staff review meeting on March 9"': Stormwater: 1. The Stormwater Analysis is inaccurate. Detention will be required. 2. The stormwater flows could potentially be detained within the parking area. Light & Power: 1. The existing electric vault is not shown on the utility plans. 2. Provision of 3-phase power to the site will be problematic; single phase will be much easier to serve. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Some red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. This proposal is not ready for a public hearing and another round. of staff review has been determined to be necessary because of several significant issues expressed in this comment letter. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal .requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being March 17, 2005) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all of your red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of copies' of each' dotument'to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, St�lt, . City Planner cc: Susan Joy, Engineering Cameron &loss, Current Planning Director Dick Rutherford, Stewart & Associates Current Planning File #29-04 Page 5 Number:32 - Created:3/10/2005 [3/10/05] The c-factor for lot 2 is .64, not .32, which was stated in the drainage report. This will also increase the required water quality volume. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Utility P/oas Number. 30 Created: 3/9/2005 [3/9/05] No comments - aside from reiterating engineering staff's comments above (#25) we need to discuss how we want to handle frontage improvements at this time. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Utility Pons Number: 28 Created: 3/9/2005 [3/9/05] Label size of water mains and services. Number: 29 - Created: 3/9/2005 [3/9/05] Show curb stop and meter pit locations for existing house and for the proposed church. Provide stationing on sewer service. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 3 Created: 8/5/2004 [3/15/051 [8/5/04] Is the "loyd property" part of this subdivision? It's hard to tell. If it isn't, then perhaps it should state "loyd property - not part of this subdivision". If it is part of the subdivision then need to show lot area. Number. 4 Created: 8/5/2004 [3/15/051 [8/5/04] What is the sliver of land between the "loyd property" and Tract 1? The square footage of it is shown, but what is it. It should be labeled as a lot or tract if it's part of the subdivision. Number: 5 Created: 8/5/2004 [3/15/051 [8/5/04] The lot line that goes through the garage creates a nonconforming setback for the garage: Minimum side setback is required to be 5' per 3.5.2(D)(3) of the Land Use Code. We can't approve a plat that creates a violation of the code or increases the degree of an existing nonconforming situation. Page 4 Number: 33 Created: 3/15/2005 [3/15/05] From Technical Services: Typo in legal. See redlines. Number: 34 Created: 3/15/2005 [3/15/05] From Technical Services: Question - The "Parent" parcel (97091-03008) by our records has more area and a frontage of 174'. Where is the difference? Topic: Site Number: 21 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Remove the contours. Topic: UN11ty Pons Number: 24 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Please see the attached Appendix E6. All highlighted items must be complete before going to hearing. At this time the plans are missing the majority of the required information and will need another round before going to hearing. The remaining items must be completed in Final Compliance. Number: 25 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] This project is responsible for designing and constructing their frontage to our current 2 lane arterial standards plus 1000' of preliminary design on either side of the property boundaries. We may want to escrow the money in lieu of the actual construction of the street but that has not been determined at this time. I will need more information shown on the plans before I can take this project to Transportation Coordination to make that decision. Number: 26 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Where will the detention go? Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: 6Wreml Number: 6 Created: 8/16/2004 [3/15/05] PFA will need to be routed the utility plans for comment. [8/16/04] PFA has no comment on the replat, but reserves the right to comment on any future construction on these new lots. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: O O/five Number: 31 Created: 3/10/2005 [3/10/05] Quantity and quality detention is required for lot 2 due to the new impervious area Page 3 Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: 6WWJV1 Number: 11 Created: 8/17/2004 [3/8/05] PFA may require a 50' radius turnaround at the end of the public access drive. Please contact Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) immediately. [8/17/04] A Public Access Easement must be dedicated on the plat for the shared access between the two properties. No new access will be granted off of LaPorte Avenue. Number:13 Created: 8/17/2004 [3/8/05] [8/17/041 Need to contact PFA for their emergency access requirements as soon as possible. Number: 18 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] 25' curb returns are required off an arterial, 15' are shown. Number: 19 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Change the 24' Wide Access'Easement to "24' Public Access Easement", all plan sets, all sheets. Number: 20 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Need to show all existing features within 150' of the property boundary, all plan sets. Number: 23 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] A 6' detached walk is required on 2 lane arterials. Topic: Landscape Number: 22 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] It does not appear that you are meeting the minimum number of street trees. Topic: Plat Number: 9 Created: 8/17/2004 [3/8/05] Corrections required to the Statement of Ownership and Subdivision. Please provide the Notice of Other Docs and the Private Drive Notice. [8/17/04] Please email me at sjoy@fcgov.com so that I can email you back the correct plat language/dedications/signature blocks that must appear on this plat. Number: 27 Created: 3/8/2005 [3/8/05] Label adjoining property owners. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Ted Voelker Date: 03/17/2005 2610 Cherry Street Fort Collins, CO. 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 2314 LAPORTE AVENUE, VOELKER SUBDIVISION - Type I (Land Use Code), and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic. 6 wrai Number: 37 Created: 3/17/2005 [3/17/05] Due to significant questions and concerns created by this latest development plan submittal, it is important that the property owner and owner's consultant meet with relevant City staff as soon as possible to discuss the concerns associated with this development proposal. Please contact Steve Olt, at 221-6341, to assist in scheduling this meeting. Topic: Landscape Number: 36 Created: 3/17/2005 (3/17/05] Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan for required street trees, per Section 3.2.1(1))(2)(a) of the City's Land Use Code. Topic: Not Number: 35 Created: 3/17/2005 [3/17/05] The Technical Services Department offered the following comments: a. The outside boundary and legal description do close. b. There is a typographical error in the legal description (see red -lined plat). c. The "parent" parcel (#97091-03008) versus this Voelker Subdivision plat, by our records, has more area and a frontage of 174' on LaPorte Avenue. Where is the difference? Page 1