HomeMy WebLinkAbout1310 LAPORTE AVE., MCKINLEY COTTAGES SUBDIVISION - PDP - 35-04A - CORRESPONDENCE -Number: 29 Created: 5/26/2005
[7/13/05]
[5/26/05] See utility and plat for other comments.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Anne H. Aspen
City Planner
Page 4
width of the alley ROW. Please widen the alley to fit the ROW. Please provide preliminary
offsite design to a location north of the curve in the alley (to the east of this site). Please
show clearly how this will affect the lot to the north of the alley - will any of their landscaping
have to be removed? Driveway altered? Will the north edge of the alley tie in exactly to
existing grades or will easements be needed for grading. Provide spot elevations,
especially along the north edge of the alley, to show what is going on.
Number: 15 Created: 5/12/2005
[7/8/05] Please provide more detail for the swale, especially as it rounds comers.
[5/12/05] Please provide minimum 50' offsite grading, especially for the property to the east.
It appears that the swale needs to be better designed around the comers to prevent flows
from entering the neighbors property.
Number: 16 Created: 5/12/2005
[7/8/05] Please provide the standard city detail for sidewalk widening. Repeat of last part of
comment below. LCUASS 25-01
[5/12/05] Please add a detail for sidewalk widening. Also, the existing drive -over curb does
not match the current detail. Please provide a detail for the existing drive -over curb.
Department: Light & Power
Topic: General
Number: 32
[7/1/05] No comments.
Department: Stormwater Utility
Topic: Drainage
Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Created: 7/1 /2005
Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Number: 50 Created: 7/15/2005
[7/15/05] Please show on the grading plan the amount of impervious area for each lot per
drainage report calculations. The plat should only have a note referencing the grading plan.
Number: 51 Created: 7/15/2005
[7/15/05] At final plan review, review will take place for the detailed grading and other final
compliance issues.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag
Topic: General
Number: 47 Created: 7/13/2005
[7/13/05] Repeat Comment #39 from Engineering: Label and dimension all ROW, parkways,
sidewalks, driveway widths, and easements on the utility plans.
Number: 48 Created: 7/13/2005
[7/13/05] Need to provide directional sidewalk ramps crossing McKinley at Laporte and
Leland.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
Number: 28 Created: 5/26/2005
[7/13/05] Will a conflict occur between the existing water main and the proposed sanitary
sewer service in Laporte? Provide concrete encasement of sewer lines which cross above
or within 18-inches vertically of the water main.
[5/26/05] Provide a detail for the relocation of the existing curb stop located on lot 2 for lot 1.
Page 3
Number: 36 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please provide a city signature block on every sheet of the utility plan set.
Number: 37 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please complete and submit a utility plan checklist. IT will cover some items not
specifically mentioned on the redlines or in these comments.
Number: 38 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please add notes to remove the existing sidewalk on Laporte, and the drive cut on
Laporte.
Number: 39 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please label and dimension ROW, parkways, sidewalks, driveway widths, and
easements on the utility plans. This item is required prior to hearing.
Number: 40 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please relocate the existing vault on Leland outside of the widened sidewalk area,
rather than matching surfaces.
Number: 41 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please note the removal of the low rock walls on the plans.
Number: 52 Created: 7/15/2005
[7/15/05] Please remove the note from the plat regarding impervious surface/stormwater
issues and cover these issues on the utility plans.
Number: 53 Created: 7/15/2005
[7/15/05] Please use detail 1603 for corner ramps, but modify it to have 90-degree
directional ramps using the truncated domes and slopes in the new ADA ramp details.
Topic: Plat
Number: 33 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05]
Please re -label the pedestrian easements as public access easements.
Number: 34 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please clarify whether the access easements over the shared driveways are public
or private, and if private, who owns them.
Number: 35 Created: 7/8/2005
[7/8/05] Please see plat redlines for additional comments.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 13 Created: 5/12/2005
[7/8/05] Please show the encroachments in the ROW by the property owner to the north as
a justification for not paving the full width of the alley. Please pave the alley to the southern
ROW line of the alley. Please provide a profile of the north edge of the alley - it is needed to
verify cross -slopes. Please provide'off-site design as required below. Please label the
proposed width of the alley. This item is required prior to scheduling a hearing.
[5/12/05] An engineered plan and profile design for the alley is required prior to hearing.
Please provide alley design per LCUASS. Also, the width of alley paving should match the
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
M TORGERSON ARCHITECTS Date: 07/15/2005
MIKAL TORGERSON
223 N COLLEGE AVE
FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 1310 LAPORTE AVE, MCKINLEY COTTAGES
SUBDIVISION PDP, TYPE I, Round 2 and we offer the following comments:
TW11*3
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Number: 43 Created: 7/12/2005
[7/12/05] The following agencies have indicated that they have no issues or concerns with
this submittal: County Assessor, and Comcast.
Number: 44 Created: 7/12/2005
[7/12/05] Forestry comments:
"The applicant should contact the City Forester to set up an onsite meeting to evaluate
existing trees located on the project.
Number: 54 Created: 7/15/2005
[7/15/05] Pre -hearing requirements are to address the alley design issues including offsite
design, site distance triangle easement and to call out dimensions. As these issues are all
from Engineering, another formal round is not necessary. Address the issues directly with
Katie and Katie will alert me when you are ready to schedule the hearing.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: General
Number: 12 Created: 5/12/2005
[7/8/05] Repeated until soils report is received.
[5/12/05] Because alley improvements are required, a soils report is also required. Please
submit a geotechnical report per LCUASS.
Number: 17 Created: 5/12/2005
[7/8/05] Lines need to be solid, not dithered, and certain items are too light to read even
prior to scanning. See redlines.
[5112/05] Please review plans for scanability (appendix E, LCUASS) and revise as
necessary. This comment applies to all plans, not just the utility plans.
Number: 18 Created: 5/13/2005
[7/8/05] Please provide an explanation/justification for how the sight distance easement was
calculated, so that it can be determined whether it is adequate as shown. This item is
required prior to scheduling a hearing.
[5/13/05] Concerns about sight distance from the proposed driveway on McKinley have
been raised. Please address sight distance from this driveway, especially to the north. At a
minimum, a sight distance easement across lot one will be needed for drivers at the
driveway and southbound drivers turning onto Leland to see each other.
Page 1