HomeMy WebLinkAboutSERRANO TOWNHOMES - PDP - 41-04 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYMultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual
LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle
Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet
level of service - connectivity
mudnnnn actual F
osed
base connectivity: C A A
specific connections to priority sites:
description of applicable
destination area within 1,320'
including address
destination area
classification
(see text)
0
0
0
p. 20
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
Multimodal Transportation. Level of Service Manual p. 18
LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian
Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
project location classification, CR.� Sc ta- _ WALWAA AQEA (enter as many as apply)
11fl
IC
description of applicable
destination area within 1,320'
including address
nn
KES(D@NTrAL TC
Tots` A)o 2 Tll
L.&StUeNI(AL TO74C---
1�C—S"C � •X�UTkF
WeeNE2
QESIDGw)T(AL �AS�
aF LGFMAy A-v&.
destination area
level of service (minimum based on project location classification)
classification
(see text)
Nrnlnes.
mtl6YJly
am nes
n1e a15
se"ity
rurbau..
nwdnua)
(J
t`
3
�Ns(oexlt(a
achlal
A
proposed
proposed
mn�rnan
JMSY(Tul raJ
achml
proposed
pp mildnuun
f;.ESl0E+U1iA�
actual
proposed
Pi
LAI
G
City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan
N
Harmony
�a
a O
J
^/ T
O L
m
J
I
SCALE: 1"=1000'
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
APPENDIX E
• HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.
Date Performed: 7/1004
Analysis Time Period: am Qpmj
Intersection: Boardwalk/Site Access
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: short total
Project ID: 0366me01
East/West Street: Boardwalk Drive
North/South Street: Site Access
Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume
167
2
5
100
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
196
2
5
117
Percent Heavy Vehicles
--
--
0
-- --
Median Type/Storage
Undivided
/
RT Channelized?
Lanes
1 0
0 1
Configuration
TR
LT
Upstream Signal?
No
No
Minor Street: Approach
Northbound
Southbound
Movement
7 8
9
10
11 12
L T
R
L
T R
Volume 1 2
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 2
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade (o) 0 0
Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No
Lanes 0 0
Configuration LR
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
EB WB Northbound Southbound
1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12
LT I LR
5
3
1387
780
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
7.6
9.6
A
A
9.6
A
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Analyst: Michael
Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich,
P.E.
Date Performed: 9/2004
Analysis Time Period: am pm
Intersection: oardwalk/Site Access
Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
Units: U. S. Customar
Analysis Year: short tota
Project ID: 0366me01
East/West Street: Boardwalk Drive
North/South Street: Site Access
Intersection Orientation: EW
Study
period
(hrs): 0.25
_ Vehicle Volumes and
Adjustments
Major Street: Approach Eastbound
Westbound
Movement 1 2
3
4
5 6
L T
R
L
T R
Volume 73
0
1
67
Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 85
0
1
78
Percent Heavy Vehicles --
--
0
-- --
Median Type/Storage Undivided
/
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 0
0
1
Configuration TR
LT
Upstream Signal? No
No
Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 2 4
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 4
Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0
Percent Grade M 0 0
Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No
Lanes 0 0
Configuration LR
Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service __
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Config LT LR
v (vph) 1 6
C(m) (vph) 1524 924
v/c 0.00 0.01
95% queue length 0.00 0.02
Control Delay 7.4 8.9
LOS A A
Approach Delay 8.9
Approach LOS A
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
004 Jurisd: Fort Coll
Period: Year recent ort bkgrd total
Date: *:Y-366meOl
Project
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I_
No. Lanes I 0
1 1
I 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I
LGConfig I
LT R
I LT R I L TR 1 L TR I
Volume 125
17 127
177 20 30 134 462 3B 135 583 51 1
Lane Width 1
12.0 12.0
I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I
RTOR Vol 1
0
I 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25
Area
Type: All other areas
Signal Operations__
Phase Combination
1 2
3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left
A
1 NB Left P
Thru
A
I Thru P
Right
A
1 Right P
Peds
X
I Peds X
WB Left
A
I SB Left P
Thru
A
I Thru P
Right
A
I Right P
Peds
X
I Peds X
NB Right
1 EB Right
SB Right
I WB Right
Green
20.0
60.0
Yellow
3.0
3.0
All Red
2.0
2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0 secs
Intersection
Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane
Adj Sat
Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group
Flow Rate
_
Grp Capacity
(s)
V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 337
1516
0.15
0.22
28.3
R 352
1583
0.42
0.22
30.9
Westbound
LT 305
1374
0.38
0.22
30.5
R 352
1583
0.10
0.22
28.0
Northbound
L 445
657
0.08
0.68
5.3
TR 2333
3499
0.24
0.67
6.2
Southbound
L 548
808
0.07
0.68
5.2
TR 2331
3497
0.31
0.67
6.6
C 30.2 C
C
C 29.9 C
C
A
A 6.1 A
A
A 6. 6 A
Intersection Delay = 11.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
• HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/19/2004 Jurisd: Fort Coll' s
Period: aamm%Pm Year recent short bkgr total
Project-': 0366me01
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
I I I I
No. Lanes ( 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0
LGConfig I LT R I LT R( L TR I L TR
Volume 144 7 26 132 6 26 148 616 47 I10 265 14
Lane Width i 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 20.0 60.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate _
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 312
1404
0.19
R 352
1583
0.09
Westbound
LT 319
1434
0.14
R 352
1583
0.09
Northbound
L 702
1036
0.08
TR 2335
3502
0.33
Southbound
L 414
611
0.03
TR 2342
3513
0.13
0.22
28.7
C
28.4
C
0.22
27.9
C
0.22
28.3
C
28.1
C
0.22
27.9
C
0.68
5.2
A
0.67
6.8
A
6.7
A
0.68
4.9
A
0.67
5.6
A
5.6
A
Intersection Delay = 9.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
secs
APPENDIX D
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/19/2004 Jurisd: Fort Colli s
Period: am pm Year recent shor bkgrd total
Project ID. 366me01
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
1 Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1
LGConfig 1 LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 124 17 126 177 20 30 132 462 38 135 583 48 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 i 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A 1 Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 20.0 60.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0 secs
_ Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 338
1523
0.14
0.22
28.3
R 352
1583
0.42
0.22
30.8
Westbound
LT 306
1375
0.38
0.22
30.5
R 352
1583
0.10
0.22
28.0
Northbound
L 447
660
0.08
0.68
5.3
TR 2333
3499
0.24
0.67
6.2
Southbound
L 548
808
0.07
0.68
5.2
TR 2333
3499
0.31
0.67
6.6
Intersection Delay = 11.2 (sec/veh)
C 30.2 C
C
C 29.9 C
C
A
A 6.1 A
A
A 6. 6 A
Intersection LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/19/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: m Year recent shor bkgrd total
Projectam 0366me01
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I
I I I I I
No. Lanes I 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1
LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I
Volume 142 7 24 132 6 26 148 616 47 110 265 13 1
Lane Width I 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I12.0 12.0
RTOR Vol I 0 i 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 20.0 60.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0 secs
_ Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 314
1414
0.18
R 352
1583
0.08
Westbound
LT 319
1437
0.14
R 352
1583
0.09
Northbound
L 703
1037
0.08
TR 2335
3502
0.33
Southbound
L 414
611
0.03
TR 2343
3515
0.13
0.22
28.6
C
28.4
C
0.22
27.8
C
0.22
28.3
C
28.1
C
0.22
27.9
C
0.68
5.2
A
0.67
6.8
A
6.7
A
0.68
4.9
A
0.67
5.6
A
5.6
A
Intersection Delay = 9.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
APPENDIX C
Table 4-3
Fort Collins (City Limits)
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (intersections)
Land Use (from structure plan)
Other corridors within:
Intersection type
Commercial
Mixed use
Low density
mixed use
All other
corridors
districts
residential
areas
Signalized intersections
D
E
D
D
(overall)
Any Leg
E
E
D
E
Any Movement
E
E
D
E
Stop sign control
N/A
P.
F"
E
(arterial/collector or local —
any approach le
Stop sign control
N/A
C
C
C
(collector/local—any
approach leg)
mitigating measures required
" considered normal in an urban environment
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level -of -Service
Average Total Uelay
sec/veh
A
<10
B
>10and <15
C _
> 15 and < 25
1>
> 25 and < 35
L
> 35 and < 50
> 50_
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
ervice
Average ToW Delay
Scelveh
<10
> I 0 and < 20
LD
> 20 and < 35
> 35 and < 55
> 55 and < x0
> 80
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/19/2004 Jurisd: For Collins
Period: am m Year recent short bkgrd total
Project ID. 366me01
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_
I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1
I I I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I
LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR 1
Volume 122 16 118 172 19 28 130 432 36 133 545 45 1
Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1
RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A I NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
WB Left A I SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A I Right P
Peds X I Peds X
NB Right I EB Right
SB Right I WB Right
Green 20.0 60.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 342
1538
0.13
0.22
28.2
C
30.0
C
R 352
1583
0.39
0.22
30.6
C
Westbound
LT 306
1378
0.35
0.22
30.2
C
29.7
C
R 352
1583
0.09
0.22
27.9
C
Northbound
L 474
699
0.07
0.68
5.2
A
TR 2332
3498
0.22
0.67
6.1
A
6.0
A
Southbound
L 571
842
0.07
0.68
5.1
A
TR 2333
3499
0.29
0.67
6.5
A
6.4
A
Intersection
Delay
= 11.1
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS = B
HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d
Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas
Date: 7/19/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins
Period: am pm Year ecent short bkgrd total
Project ID: 0366me01
E/W St: Boardwalk-Keenland N/S St: Lemay Avenue
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound
I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R
i I I I
No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0
LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR
Volume 139 7 22 130 6 24 145 576 44 19 248 12
Lane Width i 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0
RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left A 1 NB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
WB Left A 1 SB Left P
Thru A I Thru P
Right A 1 Right P
Peds X 1 Peds X
NB Right 1 EB Right
SB Right 1 WB Right
Green 20.0 60.0
Yellow 3.0 3.0
All Red 2.0 2.0
Cycle Length: 90.0
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
Lane Group Flow Rate
Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
Eastbound
LT 317 1428 0.17 0.22 28.5 C 28.3 C
R 352 1583 0.07 0.22 27.8 C
Westbound
LT 323 1454 0.13 0.22 28.2 C 28.1 C
R 352 1583 0.08 0.22 27.8 C
Northbound
L 716 1056 0.07 0.68 5.1 A
TR 2334 3501 0.31 0.67 6.7 A 6.6 A
Southbound
L 441 650 0.02 0.68 4.8 A
TR 2343 3515 0.12 0.67 5.5 A 5.5 A
Intersection Delay = 9.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
secs
APPENDIX B
Default Titles
Change These in The Preferences Window
North/South Street: Lemay Select File/Preference in the fKilNkffm : Lemay & Boardwalk 8-19-03
East/West Street Boardwalk Then Click the Titles MAe Code : 00000001
Time: AM Start Date : 08/19/2003
Weather: Sunny Page No : 1
_ Groups PNrted- unarmed
Lemay Boatdmik I Lemay-
ri
_ From Nora. From East From South From West
Time RApi
h Thu Left A p .. MTT u Left - �s Total RIMg T u lPt1 ed App. Rig 0 Left Pea �ttl� Tot I s Total ht
04:30 PM
10
112
9
1
132
5
3
14
5
27
12
113
9
0
f34
27 2 3 0 32
325
04:45 PM
12
129
10
2
IS5
4
16
1_
26
6
90
8
0
134
Z5 3 4 1 33
316
Total
22
241
19
3
2851
10
7
30
_
6
53
18
203
170
2381
52 5 7 1 651
041
05:00 PM
13
144
6
1
164
7
7
19
0
33
8
109
6
0
123
28 6 8 0 42
362
05:15 PM
10
160
8
4
182
11
5
23
0
39
10
120
7
0
137
38 5 7 0 50
408
Grand
45
545
33
a
631
28
19
72
6
125
36
432
30
0
498
118 16 22 1 157
1411
Total
ApprCh %
7.1
8
5.2
1.3
22.
15.
57.
4.8
7-28
.
6.0
0.0
75.. 10.. 14. 0.6
4
4
6
Total %
3.2
38.
2.3
0.6
44.7
2.0
1.3
5.1
0.4
8.9
2.6
3 .
2.1
0.0
35.3
8.4 1.1 1.6 0.1 11.1
Lemay
W4e3
61 r+a?.i
.s sas a9 e
R" M Tnry LON PW$
L►
n
T
as
o
�s
NOM
� �
a
119r1009 i:3090 PM
7912003 9:79:00 PM I
iO
= V
— ; a
.
'm
0 y
L
�
_N
g
d
O
Left Thru _ Peck
735 496 1_ 12331
OW In Told
MAY
7An/7nnra, Can '1Ta.TvwT 7o7aT77nia 7JVa Oe:IT %IT 6AA7/PT//A
Default Titles
Change These in The Preferences Window
NordVSouth Street: Lemay Select File/Preference in the IfilillinNh m : Lemay & Boardwalk 8-19-03
East/Vllest Street: Boardwalk Then Click the Titles MI B Code : 00000001
Time: AM Start Date : 08/19/2003
Weather. Sunny Page No : 1
Lemay
8omdwalk
Lemay
Boardwalk
From
NorthFrom
East
From South
From West
_
Start
Time
Rig
ht
Thr
u
Left
Ped
s
App.
Total
Rig
ht
TM
u
eft
� eft
-
[P,�.
App.
Total
Rig
ht
Thr lR(1 Ped A W.
u s Total
Rig
ht
Thr
u
Lclt
Ped
s
App.
Tofel
IrN.
Total
Factor
_
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
.0
1.0
-
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
07:30 AM
1
53
2
0
56
9
2
11
0
_
22
9
_1.0 _
153 6 -0 �168
4
2
13
2
21
267
07:45 AM
4
64
2
0
70
6
2
8
1
15
21
164 10 0 195
6
4
7
1
18
298
Total
_ _
5
117
4
0
126
15
4
17
1
37
30
_
317 16 0 363
_
10
6
20
3
39
565
08:00 AM
3
64
2
2
71
5
1
10
0
16
8
129 15 0 152
4
0
7
1
12
251
0&15AM
4
67
3
0
74
4
1
3
1
9
6
130 14 1 151
8
1
12
3
24
258
Grand
12
248
9
2
271
24
6
30
2
62
44
576 45 1 566
22
7
39
7
75
1074
Total
Apprch %
4.4
91.
3.3
0-7
38.
9.7
48-
32
6.6
86. 6.6 02
29.
9.3
52.
9.3
0
Total %
1.1
23.
0.8
02
252
2.2
0.6
2.8
02
6.8
4.1
53. 4.2 0.1 62.0
2.0
0.7
3.6
0.7
7,0
emey
OW In TOW
® 211 910
..- tL"..,��
wpm ,m+ kaA V[Of
4 1 �.
ti
NaM
y
00 MTkI.WWO:815`*
C
ft ...
oY
NM
T r'
Len TIxYRiON_ Pods
l_57-978� {t 1
eae C�
uw N Yowl
Lem
Post-tt® Fax Note 7671
Date
peges;
To ^Q
Fro"
Co./DepL
CO'
Phone 0 .-/C 4
Phone k
Fax a
Fax r
c-In nT.TjvvT 7070777nla VVd OC:LT-ail.T. 6nn7./CT/Ln
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO $0538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: �8.19-03 Observer: City of Fort Collins
Day: 'Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R = right turn Intersection: Lemay/Boardwalk-Keeniand
S = straight
L = left turn
Time
Northbound: Lemay
Southbound: Lemay
Total
Eastbound: Boardwalk
Westbound: Keenland
Total
Total
L—T
S
FR
Total
L
8
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
Begins
north/south
east/west
All
7:30
6
153
9
168.'�
2
53
1
224
13
2
4
11
2
9
22
41
265
7:45
10
164
21
2
64
4
265
7
4
6
6
2
6
31
296
8:00
--.15—
15
129
8
2
64
1 3
1
221
7
0
4
10
1
5
16
27
248
r8
14
130
6
3
67
4
224
8
3
1
4
8
29
253
7:304:30
665
A
269
934
-3
I'M 9
W
4
60
128
1062
PHIF
0.85
0.91
0.81
0.68
4:30
9
113
12
134,
9
112
10
131
265
3
2
27
14
3
5
54
319
4:45
8
90
6
q
10
129
12
255
4
3
25
2
16
4
5
2 5
57
312
5:00
6
109
8
123
6
144
13
286
6
6
28
42
19
7
7
33.,.
75
361
5:15
7
120
10
137
8
160
10
1j8
315
7
5
23
5
11
39
89
404
4:30-5:30
:.X"
498
623
1121
156
72
9,
18.1
119
275
1306
.
PHF
0.81
0.88
0.78
0.76_
4 — Attachments
Attachment A
Transportation Impact Study
Base Assumptions
Project Information
Project Name 6oARDwAL< 4BMAY Iowa ruEs
Project Location :51A) (&UAD(LAk)T FoAP-WAL4 14aMAV
TIS Assumptions
Type of Study
1'
Study Area Boundaries
North: p W Ac K
South: &AIeDwAt ed
East: (-egAt(
West: StT6 Access
Study years
Short Range: 2 pp $-
Long Range: -' 2 A
Future Traffic Growth Rate
Selz n(F (L
Study Intersections
1. All access drives
5.
2•$dA9bwA1.e 4AVMA le
6.
3.
7.
4_
S•
Time Period for Study
AM• :00-9:0
PM :00 6:0
Sat Noon: ,�d
Trip Generation Rates
2 J,� -rE t t'ACbFt'sD
Trip Adjustment Factors
Passby: /A
(
CaptiveA.u��
Market:
Overall Trip Distribution
5EE ATTACHE
Mode Split Assumptions
AjIA
Committed Roadway Improvements
�oN 6
Other Tramc Studies
Areas Requiring Special Study
Date: 0C-rn B GF 8. 2 0C3 3
Traffic Engineer:
Local Entity Engi
tarimer County Urban Area Street Standards - Repeated and tteenaaeo v LVv 1,
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins
APPENDIX A
Boan
-as - Denotes Lane
T
(0
N
land
SHORT RANGE (2006) GEOMETRY Figure 8
73/167 —�
0/2
N N
w
m
U
U
D
67/100
1/5
AM/PM
cn
co
r In In
v m o
r N
44/25
7117 —�
26/127
m
E
m
J
26/30
6/20
32177
V fV co
co (0 c'o
.It
v ( 0 v
SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL Figure 7
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
TABLE 3
Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation
IMIN
k-. -WR
RIM�
Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
(signal)
EB LT/T
C
C
EB RT
C
C
EB APPROACH
C
C
WB LT/T
C
C
WB RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
C
C
NB LT
A
A
NB T/RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
A
A
SB LT
A
A
SB T/RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
A
A
OVERALL
A
B
TABLE 4
Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation
N`.y.waLip,
R.
POW It
PM
Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
(signal)
EB LT/T
C
C
EB RT
C
C
EB APPROACH
C
C
WB LT/T
C
C
WB RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
C
C
NB LT
A
A
NB T/RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
A
A
SB LT
A
A
SB T/RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
A
A
OVERALL
A
B
Boardwalk/Site Access
(stop sign)
NB LT/RT
A
A
WB LT
A
A
cc
E
m
J
Keenland
--a— AM/PM
A&
N
SHORT RANGE (2006) BACKGROUND Figure 6
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
eoan
-�*— AM/PM
a
ca
A&
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5
T
m
BOan
po
land
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4
� I
N
L
1111111
BOARDWALK DRIVE
4
IRRIGg7ION Of r
SCALE: 1"=60'
SITE PLAN Figure 3
TABLE 1
Current (2003) Peak Hour Operation
ae M
Pe, W
Lemay/Boardwalk-Keeniand
(signal)
EB LT/T
C
c
EB RT
c
c
EB APPROACH
c
c
WB LT/T
c
c
WB RT
c
c
WB APPROACH
c
c
NB LT
A
A
NB T/RT
A
A
NB APPROACH
A
A
SB LT
A
A
SB T/RT
A
A
SB APPROACH
A
A
OVERALL
A
B
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
t;yg%
_7
st
ON
230
Townhome
18 DU
5.86
105
0.07 1
0.37
7
0.35
1 6
10-17 1 3
N
J
Lo
c� v m 24/28
TI CV M 6/19
J l _ 30/72
Boardwalk
39/22
7116 i O N co
22/118 v v
--a*- AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
i�
N
Harmony
o Serrano
Town
l Homes
Keen\aad
J
ca
m
J
SCALE: 1 "=1000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
turning volumes at this intersection. Table 3 shows the short range (2006)
background peak hour operation at the Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
intersection. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The Lemay/
Boardwalk-Keenland intersection will operate acceptably with existing
control and geometry.
Figure 7 shows the short range (2006) total peak hour traffic at the
key intersections. Table 4 shows the short range (2006) total peak hour
operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in
Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak
hours. Figure 8 shows the short range (2006) geometry at the key
intersections. The geometry shown is the existing functional geometry at
the Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland intersection.
Boardwalk Drive and Keenland Drive are classified as a collector
streets on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Using conventional peak
hour versus daily traffic relationships, the current daily volume on
Boardwalk Drive is 2130 and on Keenland Drive is 1870. These volumes fall
into the connector street category. However, it is likely that traffic
volumes would continue to increase, since there are vacant parcels on both
sides of Lemay Avenue. The collector street classification for these
streets is proper. The distance between the Serrano driveway and Lemay
Avenue is approximately 290 feet, on -centers. The distance between the
Hamlet driveway and the Serrano driveway is approximately 155 feet, edge to
edge. Neither of these driveways are considered to be high volume
driveways. Both of these dimensions exceed the access management criteria
for a major collector street per Table 7-3 in the "Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards." The location of the site access was agreed to by
the City of Fort Collins. The turning volumes do not require either a
left -turn lane or a right -turn lane at the site access.
The Serrano Townhomes site is in the area within which the City
requires pedestrian and bicycle level of service evaluations. Appendix E
shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Serrano Townhomes
site. There will be three pedestrian destinations within a quarter mile of
the Serrano Townhomes site. The pedestrian influence area for schools is
one mile. These destinations are: 1) the residential area north of the
site; 2) the residential neighborhood west and south of the site; 3) Werner
Elementary School; and 4) the residential areas on the east side of Lemay
Avenue. This site is in area type termed "other" and "school walking
area." The minimum level of service for the school walking area type is B
for all measured categories, except for visual interest which is C. As
indicated on the Pedestrian LOS Worksheet, the minimum level of service is
acceptable.
Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no
destination areas within 1320 feet of the Serrano Townhomes site. There
are bike lanes on Lemay Avenue and Boardwalk Drive, which would place the
bicycle connectivity at level of service A. The bicycle LOS worksheet is
provided in Appendix E.
This area of Fort Collins is not served by transit. Since this is an
intermediate transportation impact study, the long range transit system or
level of service is not relevant. Transit level of service will be the
same as that which currently exists.
It is concluded that, with the Serrano Townhomes, the future level of
service at the key intersections will be acceptable. The level of service
for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes will be acceptable.
MEMORANDUM REG'e
00
¢pp0
•
.�'
<c7'A�a
CD
v
TO: Steve Slezak, Amshel Corporation
CO
o
Jim Birdsall, The Birdsall Group, LLC I`� U
•
'n
City of Fort Collins 1
O
Q
Q
CO
CO
FROM: Matt Delich
O
J
o
S/CNAL�
U
r
rn
DATE: July 29, 2004
•
o
X
Q
LL
SUBJECT: Serrano Townhomes transportation impact study
z
J
(File: 0366ME01)
w
O
J
This memorandum addresses the transportation impacts of the
oN
proposed Serrano Townhomes. The Serrano Townhomes is proposed to be
m
located in the southwest quadrant of the Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland
0
�
intersection in Fort Collins. The site location is shown in Figure
w
o
1. Currently, there is a single family dwelling unit on this lot.
a
The Serrano Townhomes will consist of 18 townhome dwelling units.
=
The scope of this study was discussed with the Fort Collins Traffic
wOperations
Engineer. A brief memorandum was requested. The base
C7
assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. There are sidewalks
d
along developed parcels of land within 0.25 miles of the site. There
�
N
are bike lanes on Lemay Avenue and Boardwalk Drive and Keenland
N
Drive.
Figure 2 shows recent peak hour counts at the Lemay/Boardwalk-
Keenland intersection. The count data was obtained in August 2003 by
the City of Fort Collins. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix
A. Table 1 shows the current peak hour operation of the Lemay/
Boardwalk-Keenland intersection. Calculation forms are provided in
Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and
unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a
table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards
(Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. The Lemay/Boardwalk-
Keenland intersection operates acceptably during the peak hours.
W
Figure 3 shows the site plan for. the Serrano Townhomes. The
('
z_
Serrano Townhomes is proposed as 18 townhome dwelling units. Access
^Ui
cc
to the site will be via a single driveway access to Boardwalk Drive.
w
Trip Generation 7t" Edition, ITE was used as a reference in
(�
Z
a
calculating the trip generation. Table 2 shows the trip generation
—
Z
w
for the Serrano Townhomes.
J
W
o
The trip distribution for this site is shown in Figure 4. The
I
trip distribution was determined using the existing traffic counts,
knowledge of the existing and planned street system, development
a
trends, and engineering judgment. Figure 5 shows the site generated
atraffic
assignment of the Serrano Townhomes.
fcc '
Figure 6 shows the short range (2006) background peak hour
W
traffic at the Lemay/Boardwalk-Keenland intersection. Background
traffic volume forecasts for the short range (2006) future were
U.
'L
obtained by reviewing historic counts in the area and the North Front
a
cc
Range Regional Transportation Plan. It was determined that peak hour
Q
F-
through traffic along Lemay Avenue would increase at a rate of 2.25
percent per year. This rate of increase was also applied to the