Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutROMERO HOUSE (425 TENTH STREET) - PDP - 43-04 - REPORTS - CORRESPONDENCEPlace. They were constructed at the time the subdivision was built in the 1990's.) While this "development" is responsible only for providing sidewalks along its frontage, there are valid concerns about how the pressing need for sidewalks in the rest of the neighborhood will be met. • Cam McNair stated that the funds that would typically be escrowed for future alley improvements can be waived since there is such vocal public opposition to paving the alleys in this area. • Cam McNair asked why the public improvements were not planned for as a part of the original grant application. Karen McWilliams explained that the Historical Society grants do not ever cover infrastructure needs. Pete Wray added that it was unfortunate that the full specifications of this project were not identified and thought through properly at the outset of this project but that it was important to do it (the sidewalks) and do it right or else it would be another blow to the neighborhood. • Cameron Gloss said there has been recent interest in the Andersonville area by private developers and that we must be careful that this City project doesn't set a bad precedent for future private developers. • Katherine Woods pointed out that the Museo does not intend to open until early 2006 and wondered if the intervening time can be used to assemble the needed funds. • Pete Wray suggested that a cost estimate needs to be created for the public improvements for the project. • In response to a question about the limits of the required public improvements, Cam McNair suggested that the sidewalks and curb and gutter extend around the boundaries of the site along Romero and Tenth Street and that a concrete apron be constructed at the intersection of the alley with Romero Street. • Chris Koziel suggested that this process could be seen as a confidence building project, that sidewalks at this project be framed as a first step for getting sidewalks into the rest of the neighborhood. • Karen McWilliams warned that the sidewalks at the project could be seen by the neighborhood as preferential treatment for a City project (the City gets sidewalks for their building but not for the rest of the neighborhood.) • Chris Koziel and Katherine Woods described plans for an ADA accessible walkway and entrance to the back of the building which would tie into the public sidewalk. There are also plans for the front walk to be paved with fundraising pavers. These plans will be reflected on their landscape plans. • As a group we discussed that the project could receive a demolition permit prior to final plan review but that they would receive a building permit only after Final Plan review and completion of a Development Agreement. Memo of Meeting Proceedings Meeting: Museo de las Tres Colonias/City Coordination Date: November 29, 2004 Topic: Public improvements to the Romero House Site Attendees: Anne Aspen, Project Planner, Current Planning Department Ken Mannon, Director of Operation Services Jack Gianola, Facilities Operation and Planning Manager David Averill, Transportation Planner Katherine Woods, Assistant Project Planner on behalf of PLF Chris Koziel, PLF Development Team Member Cameron Gloss, Director of Current Planning Cam McNair, City Engineer Pete Wray, Senior City Planner, Advance Planning Deprartment Summary of outcome: After a brief discussion we agreed that sidewalks, curb and gutter need to be built with this project in an attached configuration in order to meet City Land Use Code and Municipal Code requirements and to do the least amount of harm to the historic nature of the site. The curb and gutter is necessary to protect pedestrians by buffering the sidewalks from cars, and to protect the surface of the street. It was agreed around the table that the sidewalks need to be built not funds escrowed since the sidewalks are necessary for adequate access to the site to serve the public. The remaining question is, Which department within the City will be the responsible party that will pay for the design and construction of these improvements? After the meeting, Ken Mannon agreed to do some investigating into the origins of this project. He has since worked with Deputy City Manager Diane ]ones to come up with a creative solution for Facilities to fund the public improvement work. The result is that Facilities will be the responsible department within the City that will provide the design and construction of the sidewalks, curb and gutter. Other topics and issues raised at meeting: • Concerns were raised about the provision of sidewalks in the rest of the Anderson Place (Andersonville) subdivision, where none have ever been built. (Sidewalks exist in the San Cristo subdivision directly to the east of Anderson