HomeMy WebLinkAbout2337 S. SHIELDS ST., HOME STATE BANK - FDP - 8-05A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -3. Please show how Raintree Drive was dedicated.
4. Is the 24' cross access existing or proposed? Add: "To be dedicated by" if it is
proposed.
Response: 63.19' revised to 63.20'. Different linetypes have been used, recording info has
been included on the plat for Raintree Drive R.O.W. dedications, and Cross access is by
separate document and has been so noted on the plat.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Utilities
Number: 8 Created: 3/20/2005
[3/20/05] Existing house is not billed for sewer and is believed to be on a septic system.
Sewer televising reports indicate no service connections in the run of sewer north of Shields
and Raintree. Installation of a new sewer service will be required.
Response: New sewer service is being proposed and is shown on the plans
Number: 9 Created: 3/20/2005
[3/20/05] If existing water service is to be abandoned, it must be abandoned at the main in
Shields.
Response Existing water service will be used as an irrigation tap
Number: 26 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Show location of septic tank on plans. Check with Larimer County Dept of Health
& Environment on proper abandonment procedures and add appropriate notes to plans.
Response: Septic system is cared out to be removed.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Anne H. Aspen
City Planner
Page 5
Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Topic: General
Number: 28 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Lighting: Area around building should be @ 1.Ofc. Also, parking and drive areas in
NE are below 1.Ofc requirement.
Response. Wall sconces have been added around building perimeter to bring lighting levels
up to 1.Ofc. Parking lot lights from Senior Center and Vet Clinic provide overlap to bring light
levels up to 1.Ofc requirement.
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 10 Created: 3/22/2005
[3/22/05] The 2-year historic flow that releases from the pond into the existing storm sewer
has to be less than what drains into that storm sewer currently. If the flow is greater, an
analysis of the system will need to take place.
Response. A storm sewer analysis has been completed and there is capacity in the pipe.
Number: 29 Created: 3/25/2005
[3/25/05] At final plan review, water quality outlet structure will need to be modified. See
redlined plans.
Response The structure has been modified.
Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Eric Bracke
Topic: traffic
Number: 1 Created: 3/3/2005
[3/3/05] No problems. A variance will be required regarding the sb right turn lane. I will
support the request.
Response- According to the Engineering reviewer, this is not a variance issue.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Kurt Ravenschlag
Topic: Transportation
Number: 11 Created: 3/22/2005
[3/22105] Need to show access ramps at Raintree Drive and Shields Street intersection on
all plans.
Response: Access ramps exist at this intersection and are shown on plans.
Number: 12 Created: 3/22/2005
[3/22/05] 1 am unable to locate the bicycle facilities on any of the plan sets.
Response: Bicycle facilities are shown on the resubmittal
Number: 13 Created: 3/22/2005
[3/22105] Need to remove the existing drive entrance from Shields Street on the Site Plan
and Landscape Plan.
Response The existing drive entrance on Shields has been removed from the plans
Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: J.R. Wilson
Topic: Technical Services
Number: 20 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Comments from Technical services:
1. Boundary and Legal close. Distance on plat does not match legal. 63.20 vs. 63.19
2. Please clarify the easements along the west side of the Sub - Different line types?
Page 4
Number: 18 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/051 How is emergency access being addressed? I see no emergency access
easement for a fire lane.
Response: Emergency access easement is now shown and has been shown to Poudre
Valley Fire. They have indicated they are okay with the proposed easement.
Number: 19 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Please include the new ADA ramp details in the plans.\
Response: This detail should not be necessary as we are not constructing any ramps within
the right-of-way.
Number: 23 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Please show clearly how parking will work (dimensions, striping) in the Senior
Center with the proposed changes.
Response: A drawing was provided to Engineering indicating the dimensions and striping
for the Senior Center parking lot. That information will be shown on the resubmittal.
Number: 24 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Please work on all drawings to ensure that scanability requirements are met prior
to submittal of mylars. Technical Services may reject drawings that do not meet the
standards.
LCUASS Appendix E-6.
Response: See response to Comment Number 31
Number: 25 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Please see redlines and utility plan checklist for any additional comments.
Response: Noted
Topic: Landscaping
Number: 21 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] Please remember to show all utilities on the landscape plan and ensure that
required separations are met.
Response: Utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Utilities
Number: 2 Created: 3/7/2005
[3/7/05] The developer will need to coordinate locations for electric facilities (including a pad
type transformer), and electric development charges with Light & Power (221-6700). Light &
Power will also need the developer to provide a completed Commercial Electric Service
Information (C-1) form. The source of power to the site will be from the existing electric vault
at the N.E. corner of the lot (this corrects information given at Conceptual Review).
Response. Electrical nas oeen coorainatea ana is snown on the Jtiiity Plar,
Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: General
Number: 27 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] No issues.
Response.Yea.li
Page 3
Response: Pre -submittal code review meeting has been held
Number: 6 Created: 3/18/2005
(3/18/05] Xcel Energy comments:
+The owner or developer may need to have gas main relocated in proposed 5' Utility
Easement;
+Existing 4" PE Gas Main lays in existing along Shields St. Proposed gas meter for the bank
will need to be located along the south wall of the proposed building; and
+No trees may be planted within four feet of gas lines.
Response: Existing gas main is located within the right-of-way dedication along Shields
Street. Xcel is okay with proposed 12' easement.
Number: 7 Created: 3/18/2005
[3/18/05] Banks are required to have walk-up ATM facilities if they provide drive through
ATM facilities. I do not see any indication on your plans for where the walk-up ATM will be
located. It must be accessible 24 hours, so it can be in a building foyer or near the drive up
ATM for example. If it is located near the drive up ATM, a connecting walkway and safe
area for the pedestrian are required.
Response: There are plans for a walk-up ATM within the main entrance lobby of the
building.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: General
Number: 15 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] As previously discussed with the engineering consultant for the project, the
variance request to not dedicate ROW for a right turn lane on Shields most likely is
unnecessary. Please show the dimension from the existing Shields Street centerline to the
proposed edge of ROW on Shields, and this can be resolved.
Response: Existing Shields Street centerline is shown on plans and right-of-way widths
labeled. Variances have been removed from General Notes sheet.
Number: 16 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] When the utilities were routed to determine whether a 5' utility easement on
Shields would be sufficient, two utilities had problems or concerns with that:
Comcast said that a 15' utility easement along Shields would be required.
XCEL's comment is as follows: We currently have a 4" PED stubbed into this 15' UE for
approximately 50' from Raintree Drive. If you change this easement to 5' the customer
would be required to make sure this stub lays within this 5' UE. Any relocation would be at
customer's expense. The new (proposed) gas meter would need to be placed at south end
of project. It would be very difficult to extend 4" PED in the proposed 5' UE. - Len
Hildebrand.
P'c-s..:,c-,se Both Comcast and Xcel are okay with the proposed 12' easement.
Number: 17 Created: 3/23/2005
[3/23/05] It appears that a number of offsite easements will be needed to construct this
project as shown. Because a number of those easements require City Council approval,
this project will be approved with conditions, and prior to hearing, a letter from Real Estate
Services will be needed stating that the City is amenable to granting the easements needed
for this project.
Response. Offsite easements have been forwarded to Kathy Valdes at City of Fort Collins
Real Estate Services.
Page 2
6aSTAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Date: 6/22/05
BHA DESIGN INC. Date: 03/31/2005
SCOTT SINN
4803 INNOVATION DR.
FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 2337 S. SHIELDS ST. - HOME STATE BANK PDP,
TYPE I, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Number: 30 Created: 3/30/2005
[3/30/05] Lighting is deficient in some areas. Please see redlines for details. Refer to LUC
3.2.4 for more detail also.
Response: Site lighting has been revised to more closely meet LUC 3.2.4. Wall sconces
have been added to the perimeter of the building and canopy lighting has been decreased.
Number: 31 Created: 3/30/2005
[3/30/05] As we discussed on the phone, your site and landscape plans need to be cleaned
up. There is a fair amount of overlapping lines and generally more information than we
need on them. I've made some suggestions on the redlines and over the phone. Let me
know if you have further questions.
Response. The site and landscape plan drawings have been cleaned up per suggestions.
Number: 32 Created: 3/30/2005
[3/30/05] As discussed on the phone, we will get together on March 31 to explore the
possibility of a safe walkway between the Senior Center and the bank.
Response: Since we are keeping the existing evergreens along the western border, the
placement of a walkway to connect the Bank and the Senior Center between the existing
evergreen trees felt unsafe and difficult to construct.
Topic: Utilities
Number: 3 Created: 3/18/2005
[3/18/05] 1 received a letter from the City's Recreation Administrator regarding the shared
parking. At this time it appears that the concept is well received by the Senior Center. They
will review the plans again at the final plan site and there will need to be an appropriate
signature block for the City on the final plans.
Response. We will add the appropriate signature Diocks
Number: 4 Created: 3/18/2005
[3/18/05] The following departments have indicated no problems or concerns with the plans:
Park Planning, Streets and Water Conservation.
Number: 5 Created: 3/18/2005
[3/18/05] Building Inspection has forwarded me a listing of the building codes which they
will enforce with this project. I will include this information with your redlines.
Page 1