HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAVEN VIEW - FDP - 12-05B - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 246 Created: 6/7/2006
[6/7/06] Please add the property line and the road flowline to the cross section details on
sheet D10. See redlines.
Number: 247 Created: 6/7/2006
[6/7/06] The existing inlet modification detail shows filling in the inlet in front of the existing
outlet pipe. Will this create a bottle neck? The capacity of 2 1/2 pipe openings has to be
greater than the inlet grates.
Number: 248 Created: 6/7/2006
[6/7/06] The text in the report does not match the calculations for the water service
elevations. Please revise.
Topic: WaterMastewater
Number: 221 Created: 4/20/2006
[6/6/06]
[4/20/06] All multifamily buildings require meter pits for the water service. Please draw to
scale the meter pit on the utility plans. 4 feet is the required separation between the pit and
any structure. A
Number: 222, Created: 4/20/2006
[6/7/06]
[4/20/06] The curb stops for all water services are required to be within the utility easement,
normally 1 foot inside of the boundary.
Number:245 Created: 6/7/2006
[6/7/06] On sheet SD1, the water line, which crosses the storm sewer, needs to be ductile
iron and the pipe section does not need to be centered under the storm sewer.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Anne Aspen
City Planner
Page 3
[6/7/06] Please submit the completed easements along with the TDRF application and fees.
There will be Larimer County filing fees as well depending on the total number of pages to
be recorded. I'll give you that amount as soon as I receive the documents.
Topic: Scanning Requirements
Number: 10 Created: 3/28/2005
[6/6/06] Please see redlines from Technical Services.
[4/17/06] The plans still do not meet the scanning requirements set forth in Appendix E6.
No mylars will be approved until they do so.
[9/30/05] This is more a Final Compliance issue but I'll just keep the comment open until
resolved.
[3/28/05] Please see Appendix E6 for our scanning requirements. Shaded areas and arial
photos will not scan. Please correct all overlapped labeling. Please see Jr/Tech Services if
you have any questions.
Topic: Site/Landscape
Number: 243 Created: 6/7/2006
[6/7/06] Add "by separate document" to the offsite easement labels.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Drainage
Number: 213 Created: 4/20/2006
[6/7/06] Repeat comment
[4/20/06] Please provide one stage -storage table ' water quality included in with quantity
detention. t\
Number:214 � Created: 4/20/2006
[6/7/06] The larger the holes the bettp� d o e column can be designed rather than 3, the
better the chance of the orrifices not clogging.
[4/20/06] The water quality orifice sizing calculations do not seem to be correct. Please see
redlined drainage report. The number of columns should be 2.
Number: 228 Created: 4/20/2006
[6/7/06] The water quality outlet structure can still be shortened to reduce costs. See
redlines.
[4/20/06] Please revise water quality outlet structure detail per redlines.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: General
Number: 101 Created: 9/29/2005
[6/6/06]
[9/29/05] Provide offsite easements for the water and sewer lines.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 107 Created: 9/29/2005
[6/7/06]
[4/21 /06]
[9/29/05] Separation distance between water/sewer MAINS and trees is 10 feet. (Land Use
Code is incorrect.)
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Cif of Fort Collins
TOM PETERSON Date: 06/07/2006
3555 STANFORD RD. #204
FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for RAVEN VIEW PDP AND FINAL PLANS, TYPE I, and
we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
\ Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Numb er• 241 Created: 6/6/2006
[6/6/06] Since unit count has changed by more than 1 %, a major amendment will be Srw
needed. Staff views -as an improvement but the Code language requires this
amendment. We are..ifrthe pro ess of changing that section of the code. I will let you know
if this will change the requirements for you. Meanwhile, you will need to fill out an
application for the major amendment and pay the fees for review.
Topic: Light and Power
Number:240 Created: 6/6/2006 AUK ondtJ
[6/6/06] Light and Power has no concerns remaining with this submittal., fiy,�
Topic: Lighting Plan "''
Number: 242 Created: 6/6/2006 lNkkf�a) aI
[6/6/06] Thanks for adding the cut she an re cing the lighting levels next to the
residential neighbors. There are a couple remaining minor issues: fixture color is not�y�
specified and there appears to be a couple of possibilities for the refractor --the one that�/�h/w
does not hang down below the cover is acceptable, the other is not. Please specify color
and that the refractor will not hang below the cover.k
aj-"ky •�/flury:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 114 Created: 10/5/2005
[6/6/06] This comment has been addressed. All we need now is the estimate (see below)
for review and approval so we can put that amount in the DA. This amount will not need to
be paid until the first building permit is needed.
[4/17/06] Repeat comment.
[10/5/05] Final Compliance. The street stub to the south needs to be designed and
constructed to the property line and a type III barricade is required (please show on all plan
sets). This development has the option of building the stub and the curb return to the PCs
and ramps and then cash in lieu of the rest. If this option is chosen, the plans would need to
show interim and ultimate and an estimate for the remaining portion of the street has to be
submitted for our review and approval. The estimate must include the removal of any
landscaping in the row of the future street. Only grass will be allowed in the row, however,
no shrubs or trees of any kind. We need it to be very clear to the future and existing
residents that the street is absolutely going through.
Number: 244
Created: 6/7/2006
Page 1