Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAVEN VIEW - PDP - 12-05 - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDY (4)Multimodal Transportations Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: SGh0d WcLlk AreUt (enter as many as apply) a n ❑© description of applicable destinalion area within 1,320' Including address Mooed 4�, s. .v,vD $2rvtDB.UrrAt- ro rtfa* ,sour* e&,stbs,A)rfAf- To &s(wiurrAL ro Try L�,4, T destination area level of service (minimum based an project location classification) classification (see NO Jirn•m,u cmllbmlq , Ps, +,r,l Imuwl4 ,Mv1y unaJau LUSTITUTAVA n,ldnaun 8 $ $ C S R&SIb&A)OAL acuwl c— proposed C g C. tg �WiYWYIi�ffmi = 1 = 10101 '�I�I[•�I��c+�Ir�ll n — ;;iz n 1�CgeUtrtlL octual mUinun» nctnal i_l01_01_ ©1�7101� P. 18 , guu r u�i'ba2 P2&,V1ov5 XG f <3rANbAlet 5 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA W o: w Q -iI W _L i C0 O LO 10 co CD r rn z LL 0 N 6 ro CD 0 rn zz 0 x 0_ CS z RE W W z 5 Z W O O a z z a 1- 03 U LL LL cc MEMORANDUM To: Anne Aspen, Fort Collins Planning Susan Joy, Fort Collins Engineering Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer Russ Wells, Anchor Development Corporation Tom Peterson, Stanford Real Estate LLC From: Matt Delich 4 Date: October 7, 2005 Subject: Raven View Development Transportation Impact Study - Response to staff comments (File: 0477ME03) This memorandum responds to transportation related comments contained in Staff Project Review for Raven View PUP, Type 1, dated October 5, 2005. The comments are: #108 - Pedestrian LOS; and #90 - Traffic Study. The pedestrian level of service comment is being addressed in a separate letter requesting a modification of standard. I had a conversation with David Averill, Transportation Planner. He requested the modification letter. I am sending five copies to Anne Aspen and one copy directly to David Averill. The traffic study comment requests another copy of the updated TIS. The traffic study was not updated, but an amendment memorandum (dated April 27, 2005) was prepared and submitted. This memorandum provided updated pedestrian level of service analysis and a request to accept the TIS and the memorandum, rather than revising the entire TIS for a few minimal changes. It is respectfully requested that these two documents (the TIS and the Memorandum) be accepted as they currently stand. Thank you.