Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRAVEN VIEW - PDP - 12-05 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY�f t------7 v N C c i v d � � O Y y a+ y � U y V3 � O a cn O $ c _ v rd= v a w C R �LbOU O o �� U d O v � w ••`` u op nano N N a v V V ti L� Laporte Road N 0 Mulberry Street ® " a� Orchard Place v O N 5 000000/ t", 3') R enview D elopment Elizabeth Street Prospect Road SCALE: 1 "=1000' 1. BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA -?, Z, - F M. h Laporte Road N 0 Mulberry Street 1 3 a� Orchard Place v O � m 2 R envieew D elopment Elizabeth Street Prospect Road SCALE: 1 "=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA 30 APPENDIX F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or long bkgd ota Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 595 7 4 908 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 646 7 4 1068 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT-Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 17 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R v (vph) 4 19 7 C(m) (vph) 930 179 670 v/c . 0.00 0.11 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.35 0.03 Control Delay 8.9 27.5 10.4 LOS A D B Approach Delay 22.9 Approach LOS C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.:. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 'Analysis Time Period:(Z> pm Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction:- Fort Collins 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor long bkgd ota Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place 'North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 802 65 34 470 Peak-HourFactor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 891 72 39 552 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration L Approach Movement Lane•Config v (vph) C (m) . (vph) v/c 95% queue length 'Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 14 0.85 16 2 0 0 1 / R r Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 .4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I L R 1 39 19 16 711 148 530 0.05 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.43 0.09 10.4 32.9 12.0 B D B 23.3 C t �� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections.Release 4.1d. , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 9/29/2004 Analysis Time Period: am ® Intersection:. Taft Hill / Site Access ' Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or long bkgd- 0 1 ' Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Site Access North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 , Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound , Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 603 13 12 926 ' Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 655 14 14 1089 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 ' Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0- 2 ' Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 . L T R 1 L T R ' Volume 6 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ' Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 LR 1 ' v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 14 15 917 276 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.17 9.0 18.8 A C 18.8 C 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 'Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Taft Hill / Site Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or long bkgd of Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Site Access iNorth/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 799 4 3 500 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 887 4- 3 588 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? 'Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 T R I L T R 'L Volume 13 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Approach: Exists?/Storage No 'Flared Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 'C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length 'Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ■ 3 29 757 268 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.36 9.8 20.1 A C 20.1 C 24� HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le Analyst: Joseph Inter.: Mulberry / Taft Hill Agency: Matthew J.Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/29/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am (jR� Year :recent hor long bkgd ota Project ID: 0477- Anchor Development E/W St: Mulberry Street N/S St: Taft Hill Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig. I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 147 209 88 1389 357 90 1106 362 169 151 499 53 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 i Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A A 1 SB Left P Thru A A 1 Thru P Right A A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 6.0 11.0 28.0 41.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 345 1770 0.15 0.34 22.7 C TR 949 3389 0.35 0.28 29.0 C 28.1 C Westbound L 579 1770 0.79 0.49 25.4 C TR 1341 3439 0.39 0.39 22.2 C 23.7 C Northbound L 244 594 0.51 0.41 29.5 C TR 1385 3377 0.45 0.41 22.4 C 23.6 C Southbound L 254 620 .0.24 0.41 21.4 C TR 1433 3496 0.45 0.41 22.4 C 22.3 C Intersection Delay = 23.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 2: ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e. Analyst: Joseph Inter.: Mulberry /-Taft Hill Matthew J.Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 'Agency: Date: 9/29/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year. : recent long bkgd ota Project ID: 0477- Anchor Development ' E/W St: Mulberry Street N/S St: Taft Hill Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R 1..L T R I L T R 1 I No. Lanes 1 1 i I I I 0 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 11 2' I L TR I L TR I L TR I.L TR 1 'LGConfig Volume 150 320 98 171 202 36 I101 378 308 167 352 72 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Operations 'Signal Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P ' Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right Right I WB Right 'SB Green 6.0 25.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 2.0 2.0 ' Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 347 1770 0.17 0.35 22.3 C TR 856 3422 0.57 0.25 33.8 C 32.5 C 'Westbound L 251 1770 0.33 0.35 23.8 C TR 867 3467 0.32 0.25 30.8 C 29.2 C ' Northbound L 458 832 0.26 0.55 13.2 B 1819 3308 0.44 0.55 14.2 B 14.1 B 'TR Southbound L 299 543 0.26 0.55 14.0 B ■ TR 1901 3456 0.26 0.55 12.2 B 12.4 B Intersection Delay = 20.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C APPENDIX E HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 'Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction: Fort Collins 'Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or long total Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place 'North/South Street: Taft Hill Road. Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ' Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? ■ 582 7 0.92 0.92 632 7 Undivided 2 0 T TR No 4 902 0.85 0.85 4 1061 2 -- -- 0 2 LT T No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 'L T R L T R Volume 17 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 'Flared Approach: Exists?,/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vph) 'C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ■ 4 19 7 941 184 676 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.03 8.8 26.8 10.4 A D B 22.4 C 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 Analysis Time Period: Q pm Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent(shoD long total Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 798 65 34 457 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly.Flow Rate, HFR 886 72 39 537 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 17 14 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R I v (vpn) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 39 19 16 714 151 533 0.05 0.13 0.03 0.17 0.42 0.09 10.3 32.2 12.0 B D B 23.0 C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le Analyst: Joseph Agency: Matthew J.Delich, P.E. 'Date: 9/29/2004 Period: am Project ID: 0477- Anchor Development ' E/W St: Mulberry Street Inter.: Mulberry / Taft Hill . Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent shor long kgi total N/S St: Taft Hill Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1' I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 ( 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 'LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 147 209 87 1379 357 90 1105 361 164 151 498 53 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 ( 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left P Thru A I Thru P ' Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A 'A I SB Left P Thru A A I Thru P Right A A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right 'SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 11.0 28.0 41.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 ' All Red 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 'Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 345 1770 0.15 0.34 22.7 C TR 949 3390 0.35 0.28 29.0 C 28.1 C Westbound L 580 1770 0.77 0.49 24.1 C TR 1341 3439 0.39 0.39 22.2 C 23.1 C ' Northbound L 244 595 0.51 0.41 29.4 C TR 1386 3381 0.45 0.41 22.3 C 23.5 C Southbound L 257 627 0.23 0.41 21.4 C TR 1433 3496 0.45 0.41 22.4 C 22.3 C Intersection Delay = 23.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le . . Analyst: Joseph Inter:: Mulberry / 'Taft Hill Agency: Matthew J.Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date 9/29/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins.. Period < pm Year recent <or long tg total Project ID: 0477- Anchor Development E/W St: Mulberry Street N/S St: Taft Hill Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound i Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 150 320 98 168 202 36 1100 377 298 167 352 72 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination. 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A 1 SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 6.0 25.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 347 1770 0.17 0.35 22.3 C TR 856 3422 0.57 0.25 33.8 C 32.5 C Westbound L 251 1770 0.32 0.35 23.7 C TR 867 3467 0.32 0.25 30.8 C 29.2 C Northbound L 458 832 0.26 0.55 13.2 B TR 1822 3312 0.44 0.55 14.1 B 14.0 B Southbound L 304 553 0.26 0.55 13.9 B TR 1901 3456 0.26 0.55 12.2 B 12.4 B Intersection Delay = 20.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C IV APPENDIX D !�7 Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Land Use (from structure plan) Other corridors within: Intersection type Commercial Mixed use Low density mixed use All other corridors districts residential areas Signalized intersections D E' D D (overall) Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control N/A P. P* E (arterial/collector or local — any approach le Stop sign control N/A C C C (collector/local—any approach leg) mitigating measures required considered normal in an urban environment I& ' UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS [ cvcl oFticrvicc AverageTotal Delay scdvch B - >10and <15 c > 15 alxl < 25 — C)^ > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and <_ 50 P > SO SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS uvet-or-Service Average Total Delay sedvch A - 10 _ B _ > 10 and < 20 c _ > 20 and < 35 D > 35 and _< 55 L' > 55 and < 80 t; -- — > 80 --- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: ._ Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 Analysis Time Period: am.(::E> Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: cen hort long bkgd total Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound. Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 548 7 4 850 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 595 7 4 999 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 0 2 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R , Volume 17 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ' Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 ll 12 Lane Config LT L R , v (vph) 4 19 7 C(m) (vph) 971 204 695 ' v/C 0.00 0.09 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.30 0.03 Control Delay 8.7 24.5 10.2 LOS A C B ' Approach Delay 20.6 Approach LOS C _ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Joseph Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 9/29/2004 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Taft Hill / Orchard Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: <jece short long bkgd total Project ID: 0477-Anchor Development East/West Street: Orchard Place 'North/South Street: Taft Hill Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement 752 0.90 835 Undivided 2 0 T TR No Westbound 7 8 ' L T Volume 17 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 'Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration L Approach 'Movement Lane Config 65 34 431 0.90 0.85 0.85 72 39 507 -- 2 -- -- 0 2 LT T No Eastbound 9 10 11 12 R I L T R 14 0.85 16 2 0 0 1 / R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I L R v (vph) 39 19 16 'C(m) (vph) 746 168 553 v/c 0.05 0.11 0".03 95% queue length 0.17 0.38 0.09 Control Delay 10.1 29.1 11.7 LOS B D B Approach Delay 21.2 ' Approach LOS C ' 13 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le Analyst: Joseph Inter.: Mulberry / Taft Hill Agency: Matthew J.Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/29/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am cpmm Year : re short long bkgd total Project ID: 77- Anchor. Development E/W St: Mulberry Street N/S St: Taft Hill Road.-. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1 1 .2 0 i 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 144 197 82 1357 336 85' 199 340 155 148 469 50 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 i Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A A 1 SB Left P Thru A A 1 Thru P Right A A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 .11.0 28.0 41.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 352 1770 0.14 0.34 22.6 C TR 949 3390 0.33 0.28 28.8 C 27.9 C Westbound L 589 1770 0.71 0.49 21.6 C TR 1341 3439 0.37 0.39 21.9 C 21.7 C Northbound L 260 635 0.45 0.41 26.8 C TR 1386 3380 0.42 0.41 22.0 C 22.8 C Southbound L 274 668 0.20 0.41 20.7 C TR 1433 3495 0.43 0.41 22.0 C 21.9 C Intersection Delay = 22.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 12 ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.le Analyst: Joseph '..Inter.: Mulberry / Taft Hill Agency: Matthew J.Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 9/29/2004 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recen short long bkgd total Project ID: 0477- Anchor Development ' E/W St: Mulberry Street N/S St: Taft Hill Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' 1 Eastbound i Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I 'LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 147 302 92 164 190 34 194 355 281 1.63 332 68 .1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol 1 0 i 0 1 0. 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas 'Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A i NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A 1 SB Left P ' Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right 'SB Right 1 WB Right Green 6.0 25.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 ' All Red 1.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 'Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 'Eastbound L 356 1770 0.15 0.35 22.2 C TR 856 3423 0.54 0.25 33.2 C 32.1 C Westbound ■ L 263 1770 0.29 0.35 23.4 C TR 867 .-3466 0.30 0.25 30.6 C 29.0 C Northbound L 475 863 0.23 0.55 12.8 B 1822 3312 0.41 0.55 13.8 B 13.6 B 'TR Southbound L 325 591 0.23 0.55 13.2 B ' TR 1901 3456 0.25 0.55 12.0 B 12.2 B Intersection Delay = 19.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B u APPENDIX C is U = v .J m Li c V _ w m m O � 0 O - > LL O c O c _ !E CQ G � U Q J GL o N � y m Q H � C w � � 0 o a OU.) A M t0 a~•- ro FO- ti M M n c 0 y 3 J N N M O� 0 N W J H lM M M N c O Z ti c 3 Q N pco p n 0o3 C Z c0 n 0� M 7 N N OMi N N N e- zIJ w� E 01 E CDC N cmif m M 1� A OD OO Er (/i J I .U) z I C w �.2 CL Lu > © § 3■Gs — w gS � a 2 2 � 2 0 §0© O � LU \c §Sa " . U) � A � d� m . 0:m � � — — — 12 -6 a, — © s to � � \ a g LU § a o Cc F.- o S . $ � § m cogo, G _ 2 - § a $ G m k S = a G 2 m # wil r.- r� co co \ � |2|K|2I co 2to co co �k|k|2|2| m co s 2 /to co cn CD It APPENDIX B Gravitv Model Data NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp., 1 /4 55 250 48 4038 1 /4 65 88 3/4 51 82 56 220 1/4 51 28 3/4 66 161 3/4 55 752 57 192 52 128 3/4 67 450 3/4 58 807 1 /4 58 269 53 530 1 /4 84 190 1 /2 59 225 61 148 54 152 1 /4 85 37 62 135 1 /2 59 225 1 /2 86 99 63 280 60 589 87 784 64 133 1 /4 67 150 88 1034 3/4 65 265 68 595 89 390 1 /4 66 54 73 545 90 1513 69 65 74 561 91 1418 70 8 75 805 92 200 71 185 76 2520 94 2101 72 689 77 750 95 1947 3/4 84 ' 570 78 1197 96 255 3/4 85 110 79 1404 97 2270 1 /2.86 98 80 684 98 0 1 /4 104 65 81 4862 99 281 1 /4 109 32 82 1316 100 89 1 /2 314 1 83. 1500 101 222 315 6 93 1487 102 4381 115 1375 103 528 116 739 3/4104 195 117 5000 105 2329 119 2612 106 691 120 3873 107 170 121 2315 108 2500 122 129 3/4109 95 123 670 110 187 129 3080 111 373 130 1154 112 .119 131 1419 113 121 132 4692 114 160 133 291 118 2610 134 100 124 4517 135 7559 125 1390 136 1700 126 22 139 583 127 340 140 1730 134 100 135 7559 137 284 138 790 141 1346 142 153 143 4223 144 350 145 931 146 1348 313 0 1/2 314 0 Total Emp. 3,775 Total Emp. 63,087 Total Emp. 51,341 Total Emp. 1,866 Distribution 3.14% Distribution 52.54% Distribution 42.76% Distribution 1.55% m erry Street SITE -14 and Place TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 TABLE 2 Trip Generation ga ode 2Use ��� AVVnTE �� aiNPea ..fit �Rate� ur �pYMG1£ �, ante Ind M PRiFPe Rate au ,: , et0 Mt 210 Single Family Housing 19 D.U. 9.57 180 0.19 4 0.56 11 0.64 12 0.37 . -7 230 L£Xfs SiaglefamilAGwiW 38D.U. 5.86 225 0.07 3 0.37 14 0.35 13 0.17 6 TOTAL 405 7 25 25 13 9A z z e a � THE MILLER BROTHERS THIRD SUBDIVISION F yy5 th xw+n .aT x f L Z � ❑ � a S xF os �E 0 eS s.oth 3vz. E ❑ f O Y o North 2Da.It' x � � - a O O .W'Cal !♦ .00.11O0 5 s fq = r l 9ou1h O so+n Mir � South Taft Hill Road O 3 C/� Chapter — Attachments Attachment A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name �� project Location So� TIS Assumptions Type of Study Study Area Boundaries Study Years Future Traffic Growth Rate Study Tnterseclions Time Period for Study Trip Generation Rates Trip Adjustment Factors Overall Trip Distribution Mode Split Assumptions Committed Roadway bWovtmients Other Areas Requiring Special Study /<A ,CNvs in/ E Or L Full Nv lutumwdiate: YES Nor!Range: vL=0 c EastF r- ,rrt L west Fr ilsz c Sho;too Long t?ertge: R 1. All ass drives 5. 2.vtB �T r 6. 7. d 8- AM: 7 00-9:00 : 4:Oa6� Sat Noon: Passby. Al SEE ATTACHED SKMVH ivOuE SHOW-r i?A.IX-E Alo" E kNowA✓ Date: TMff'ic Engineer: Local Entity Engi L arirner Cowdy IhrUen Area Street Ste— and Rmwded October 1. 2002 gdopted by Larhrre► CM"*, Coy of Loveland, CRY of Fort CoO M Page 4-35 2 APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS ' This intermediate transportation impact study assessed the impacts of Ravenview Development on the short range (2007) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: The development of Ravenview Development is feasible from a ' traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, Ravenview Development will generate approximately 405 daily trip ends, 32 morning peak hour trip ends, and 38 afternoon peak hour trip ends. - Currently, the key intersections operate acceptably with current control and geometry. - In the short range (2007) future, signals will not likely be warranted at any existing stop sign control intersections. In the short range (2007) background traffic future, the key intersections will operate acceptably. ' - In the short range (2007) future, given full development of Ravenview Development and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range (2007) geometry is shown in Figure 8. - Acceptable the level of service is achieved for pedestrian and transit modes. Level of service C connectivity can be achieved ' for the bicycle mode. The sidewalks adjacent to existing streets were built under previous street standards and, as such, do not meet the current standards. This is typical in older, established ' areas of the City. 1 18 practical. The only reasonable way to have a center left -turn lane would be to restripe Taft Hill Road with one lane in each direction. ' This would reduce the carrying capacity of Taft Hill Road. This decision should be made by the City of Fort Collins. ' Pedestrian Level of Service ' Appendix F contains a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Ravenview Development. The Ravenview Development is located within an area termed as a "school walk area," which sets the level of service threshold at LOS B for all measured categories, except visual ' interest which is C. There are three destination areas within 1320 feet of the proposed Ravenview Development: 1) the residential/Moore Elementary School area to the south, 2) the residential area to the ' west, and 3) the residential area to the east. Sidewalks are completed within the pedestrian influence area. Appendix F contains a Pedestrian LOS Worksheet. Bicycle Level of Service ' Appendix F contains a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of Ravenview Development. The only bicycle priority destination is Moore Elementary School to the south. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, the minimum level of service threshold for a public school site destination is LOS A. There are bicycle facilities along Taft Hill Road and Orchard Place. The Ravenview Development will be ' directly connected to the bike lanes on Taft Hili Road, which satisfies the LOS C criteria. Level of service A connectivity cannot be achieved. ' Transit Level of Service ' Currently, this area is served by transit route 4 on Mulberry Street. The Ravenview Development is located along a future "feeder route." In the future, transit service will be improved as depicted ' on the Fort Collins Transit System Plan. This site has acceptable connectivity (<1320 feet) to the existing transit system. Since this is an intermediate transportation impact study, the long range transit ' system and long range transit level of service is not relevant. 17 -we - Denotes Lane m 0 o' V 9 ' P- Mulberry Street Site Access Orchard Place �7 SHORT RANGE (2007) GEOMETRY Figure 8 16 TABLE 4 Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Lever of Service AM PM Taft Hill Road/Mulberry Street (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT C C EB APPROACH C C WB LT C C WB T/RT C C WB APPROACH C C NB LT B C NB T/RT B C NB APPROACH B C SB LT B C SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL C C Taft Hill Road/Orchard Place (stop sign) SB LT A A WB LT/RT C C T aft Hili Road/Orchard Place (stop sign) SB LT B A WB LT D D WB RT B B WB APPROACH C C 15 TABLE 3 Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Taft Hill Road/Mulberry Street (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT C C EB APPROACH C C WB LT C C WB T/RT C C WB APPROACH C C NB LT B C NB T/RT B C NB APPROACH B C SB LT B C SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL C C Taft Hill Road/Orchard Place (stop sign) SB LT B A WB LT D D WB RT B B WB APPROACH C C 14 70 co 0 2 c0 F- rn M a)N U) ^ 36/90 — 2021357 71 /389 50/47 320/209 —•- cn N rn 98/88 00 00 0 ram. o I m CM M N O O N `D Cl) 1 � �— 13/6 no ?) M v 00 . 0 rn o V M 1 A I% ---aAM/PM SHORT RANGE (2007) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 17/17 Mulberry Street Site Access Orchard Place Figure 7 13 0/1 0 co M •Ie-- 1 co 0 c� x—3/10 0 I)�r— 13/6 AM/PM O v o! 2 co F- SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Mulberry Street Site Access Orchard Place 61 Figure 6 12 0 0 M Co rn _ Lo 36/90 N Lo m C° T 202/357 68/379 50/47 320/209 Lo 98/87 o M cO o ti rn M N N O O V L0 V V M IAla 1 11-17/17 --w-- AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2007) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Mulberry Street Orchard Place N Figure 5 11 Background Traffic Projections ' Figure 5 shows the short range (2007) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future ,horizon were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP, reviewing traffic studies ' for other developments, and reviewing historic count data for this area of Fort Collins. The 2004 traffic counts were increased at the rate of 2 percent per year to the year 2007. ' Trip Assignment ' Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 6 shows the site ' generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 7 shows the total (site plus background) short range (2007) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants ' As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based upon the short range (2007) peak hour ' traffic forecasts, signal warrants will not be met for the existing stop sign controlled intersections. ' Operation Analysis and Geometry Capacity analyses were performed at the Taft Hill/Mulberry, Taft Hill/Orchard, and Taft Hill/Site Access intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis future, reflecting u leua [..vv. dry.. vaalAl 1.1 Vii• Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5 and the existing geometries, the key intersections operate in the short range (2007) ' background traffic future as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 and the existing geometries, the key intersections operate in the short range (2007) total traffic future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably. ' The short range (2007) geometry is shown in Figure 8, which reflects the existing geometry at the key existing intersections. By definition, arterial streets customarily have center left -turn lanes. ' In this segment of Taft Hill Road, a center left -turn lane is not ' 10 5° T a Cu 0 N %� erry Street SITE >s ird Place TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 9 j I ------ ------ GIPPOM3-s Z C) U) SITE PLAN South Tall Hill Road FTT -FFFFFFFL--:. :,l[.00 S � o j 1, Z Figure 3 Lj III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Ravenview Development is a proposed residential development, located east of Taft Hill Road between Mulberry Street and Orchard Place in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Ravenview ' Development. The short range analysis (Year 2007) includes development of the Ravenview Development and an appropriate increase in background traffic. Since this is an intermediate level transportation impact study, a long range analysis is not required. The site plan shows one ' access to the Ravenview Development via a full -movement site access, which will be approximately 400 feet north of Orchard Place. Trip Generation ' Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. Trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 7tn Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. TABLE 2 Generation Code Use Size AWUTE AM Peak Hour P,M Peak.:Hour ". Rate ;;Trips .`:.Rate' : In ' Rate. :`'Outs Rate In ':Rate"Out:' 210 Single Family Housing 19 D.U. 9.57 180 0.19 4 1 0.56 11 0.64 12 0.37 7 230 I Townhomes TOTAL ' Trip Distribution 38 D.U. 1 5.86 1 225. 10.07 1 3 10.37 1 14 10.35 I 13 10.17 1 6 405 I 17 1 I 25 1 I 25 1 I 13 Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for Ravenview Development based upon the existing traffic patterns and future trip productions for this type of land use. Figure 4 shows the trip distribution used for the short range (2007) analysis future. The trip distribution calculations are provided in Appendix A. The trip distribution was discussed in the scoping meeting. 7 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection " movement` Level of Service Awll',, PM Taft Hill Road/Mulberry Street (signal) EB LT C C EB T/RT C C EB APPROACH C C WB LT C C WB T/RT C C WB APPROACH C C NB LT B C NB T/RT B C NB APPROACH B C SB LT B C SB T/RT B C SB APPROACH B C OVERALL B C Taft Hill Road/Orchard Place (stop sign) SB LT B A WB LT D C WB RT B B WB APPROACH C C Existing Operation The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. The Ravenview Development site is in an area termed "low density mixed use residential corridor." In low density mixed use residential corridors, acceptable operation at a signalized intersection during the peak hours is defined as level of service D. At arterial/local unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg. Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks exist adjacent to existing developments on all area streets. This site is within 1320 feet of: Moore Elementary School and adjacent residential uses. Sidewalks were built prior to the current street standards. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle facilities along Taft Hill Road and Mulberry, Street. Transit Facilities This area is r_nrrentl ger ed h tranSlt S?rV1^ + n 1-1 U l �c rVUt.c -1, w1111.11 is on Mulberry Street to the north. 0 m Co oIQ- 00 M m 34/85 Co `IO ``' C° -e— 190/336 64/357 47/44 1 � r 302/197 92/82 rn O 'o Cn v i `o rn Lo m eM N O Co Co M V 1®®1 V m p� lnia t 'i-17/17 no -0 00 n oto v Lo N �- AM/PM = Co RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Mulberry Street Orchard Place N Figure 2 11 Laporte Road N ca 0 o! Shelton MulberryStreet Lake Ravenview Development Orchard Place L w Elizabeth Street M _m L Prospect Road r97 ' SITE LOCATION SCALE: 1"=1000' Figure 1 c3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Ravenview Development is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential. The center of Fort Collins lies to the southeast of the Ravenview Development. Streets The primary streets near the Ravenview Development site are Taft Hill Road, Mulberry Street, and Orchard Place. Taft Hill Road is west of the Ravenview Development. It is a north -south street designated as a four -lane arterial street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a four -lane general cross section with no center turn lane. The Taft Hill/Mulberry intersection is a signal control. At Mulberry Street, Taft Hill Road has northbound and southbound left -turn lanes and two through lanes in each direction. The Taft Hill/Orchard intersection is stop sign control on Orchard Place. At Orchard Place, Taft Hill Road has two through lanes in each direction. The posted speed on this section of Taft Hill Road is 35 mph. Mulberry Street is north of the Ravenview Development. It is a ' east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a four -lane general cross section with no center turn lane. At Taft Hill Road, Mulberry Street has eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes and two through lanes in each direction. The posted speed on this section of Mulberry Street is 35 mph. Orchard Place is south of the Ravenview Development. It has a two-lane cross section and is designated as a local residential street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. At the Taft Hill/Orchard intersection, Orchard Place has a left and right turn lanes. Existing Traffic Recent peak hour traffic volumes at the keyintersections are shown in Figure 2. The traffic counts at the key intersections were obtained in September 2004. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. 2 I. INTRODUCTION This intermediate transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Ravenview Development. The Ravenview Development is located south of Mulberry Street and east of Taft Hill Road in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the owner/developer (Anchor Development Corporation), the project planner (Steve Schroyer), the project engineer (Stewart & Associates), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. This intermediate transportation impact study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines as contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards" (LCUASS). The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 8 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 9 5. Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 11 6. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 12 7. Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 13 8. Short Range (2007) Geometry .......................... 16 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form B Recent Peak Hour Traffic C Existina Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards D Short Range Background Peak Hour Operation E Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation F Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 Land Use ............................................. 2 ' Streets.............................................. 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 Existing Operation ................................... 5 ' Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 5 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 5 Transit Facilities .......................:........... 5 ' III. Proposed Development ................................. 7 Trip Generation ...................................... 7 Trip Distribution .................................... 7 ' Background Traffic Projections ....................... 10 Trip Assignment ...................................... 10 Signal Warrants .... ....:............................. 10 ' Operation Analysis and Geometry ...................... 10 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 17 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 17 ' Transit Level of Service ............................. 17 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 18 ' LIST OF TABLES Table Aage 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 6 ' 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 7 3. Short Range (2007) Background Peak Hour Operation .... 14 ' 4. Short Range (2007) Total Peak Hour Operation ......... 15 RAVENVIEW DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO OCTOBER 2004 Prepared for: Anchor Development Corporation 1338 Catalpa Drive Fort Collins, CO 80521 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX 970-669-5034 PP�p REC'�`ST < U:�