HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIRPARK VILLAGE - ODP - 16-05A - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONSeptember 30, 2004
As
,— 2:1 Transitional Surface
— TLOF
n
�C{ 8:1 Approach/Departure Surface
r
�Safety Area
— FATO
I
2:1 Transitional Surface —
AC 150/5390-2B
—2:1 Transitional Surface
2:1 Transitional Su ace _
— ---
Surface
8;1 ApProa- Chioepaytu,e ------ — -
FATO — -- —
Protection Zone
280 ft [85 m]
At Ground Level
Figure 2-9. Protection Zone:
GENERAL AVIATION
38
AC 150/5390-2B
retration(s) of A ORB area but not both areas alto%
if marked or lighted and if not considered a hazard
- 100 ft [30 m]
FATO -
c - 8:1 Approach/Departure Surface - -
B-, 100 ft [30 m]
2,000 ft [610m] -
- -4,000 ft [1,219m] -
Plan View
2,000 ft [610m] -
September 30, 2004
500 ft [152m]
— __j
roachlDeparture Surface
T
8:1 ApP - - 500 ft [152m]
FATO 250 ft [76m] '
Figure 2-8. VFR PPR Heliport Lateral Extension of the 8:1 Approach/ Departure Surface:
GENERAL AVIATION
37
September 30, 2004 AC 150/5390-2B
51-ME WE'
UPON IN PEa'IYIN>tE "D EMi CTM
—T
UEDMURE 1,
WWXE
3T
8:1
$URFR[E
Note: Not drawn to
scale. I
Figure 2-7. VFR Heliport Approach/ Departure and Transitional Surfaces:
GENERAL AVIATION
36
AC 150/5390-213
start at the edge of the FATO opposite the
8:lapproach/ departure surfaces and extends to the
end of the approach/ departure surface. See Figure
2-7.
NOTE: The transitional surface is not applied on the
FATO edge opposite the approach/ departure
surface.
The Approach/ departure Surfaces should be free of
penetrations. Any penetration of the transitional
surface should be considered a hazard unless an FAA
aeronautical study determines that it will not have a
substantial effect upon the safe and efficient use of
this airspace. Paragraph 108 provides guidance on
how to identify and mitigate such hazards.
For PPR facilities, transitional surfaces need not be
considered if the size of the 8:1 approach/ departure
surface is increased for a distance of 2000 ft. (610 m)
as shown in Figure 2-8. The lateral extensions on
each side of the 8:1 approach/ departure surface starts
at the width of the FATO and is increased so that at a
distance of 2000 ft (610 m) from the FATO it is 100
ft (30 m) wide. Penetrations of obstacles into area A
or area B, but not both, may be allowed providing the
penetrations are marked or lighted and not considered
a hazard.
NOTE: When the standard surface is incompatible
with the airspace available at the heliport site, no
operations should be conducted unless helicopter
performance data supports a capability to safely
operate using an alternate approach/ departure
surface. The site should be limited to those
helicopters meeting or exceeding the required
performance and approved by the FAA.
c. Marking and Lighting of Objects that Are
Difficult to See. See paragraph 211.
d. Periodic Review of Obstructions. Heliport
operators should reexamine obstacles in the vicinity
of 8:1 approach/ departure paths on at least an annual
basis. This reexamination should include an
appraisal of the growth of trees in close proximity to
approach and departure paths. Paragraph 108b
provides guidance on how to identify and mitigate
obstruction hazards.
e. Curved VFR Approach/ Departure Paths.
VFR approach/ departure paths may curve to avoid
objects or noise -sensitive areas. Heliport designers
are encouraged to use the airspace above public
lands, such as freeways or rivers.
September 30, 2004
NOTE: In the next revision of this AC, the FAA
intends to provide details on the minimum dimensions
of curved approach/ departure airspace.
205.PROTECTION ZONE. The protection zone is
the area under the 8:1 approach/ departure surface
starting at the FATO perimeter and extending out for
a distance of 280 feet (85.3 m), as illustrated in
Figure 2-9. The heliport proponent should own or
control the property containing the protection zone.
This control should include the ability to clear
incompatible objects and to preclude the
congregation of people. For PPR heliports, a
protection zone is optional. For GA heliport, air
easement rights may be one option to control use of
the ground within the protection zone.
206.WINDSOCK.
a. Specification. A windsock conforming to
AC 150/5345-27. Specification for Wind Cone
Assemblies should be used to show the direction and
magnitude of the wind. The windsock should
provide the best possible color contrast to its
background.
b. Windsock Location. The windsock should
be located so it provides the pilot with valid wind
direction and speed information in the vicinity of the
heliport under all wind conditions.
(1) The windsock should be sited so it is
clearly visible to the pilot on the approach path when
the helicopter is at a distance of 500 feet (152 m)
from the TLOF.
(2) Pilots should also be able to see a
windsock from the TLOF.
(3) To avoid presenting an obstruction
hazard, the windsock should be located outside the
safety area, and it should not penetrate the approach/
departure or transitional surfaces.
(4) At many landing sites, there may be no
single, ideal location for the windsock. At other
sites, it may not be possible to site a windsock at the
ideal location. Consequently, more than one
windsock may be required in order to provide the
pilot with all the wind information needed for safe
operations.
c. Windsock Lighting. For night operations,
the windsock should be internally lighted or
externally illuminated to ensure that it is clearly
visible.
19
September 30, 2004
d. Mobile Objects Within the FATO and the
Safety Area. The FATO and Safety Area design
recommendations of this AC are based on the
assumption that the TLOF/FATO is closed to other
aircraft if a helicopter or other mobile object is within
the FATO or the associated Safety Area.
e. FATO/FATO Separation. If a heliport has
more than one FATO, the separation between the
perimeters of the two FATO, should be such that the
respective Safety Areas do not overlap. This
separation is based on the assumption that
simultaneous approach/ departure operations will not
take place.
NOTE: If simultaneous operations are planned,
greater separation will be required.
E FATO Gradients. Recommended FATO
gradients are defined in Chapter 8.
203. SAFETY AREA. A Safety Area surrounds a
FATO and should be cleared of all obstacles except
small frangible objects that, because of their function,
must be located there.
a. Safety Area Width. The minimum
recommended width of a Safety Area is dependent
upon the heliport markings. The Safety Area width is
dependent upon the use of the TLOF markings
(paragraph 209a), the FATO markings (paragraph
209a), and the standard heliport identification
marking (i.e., the H, paragraph209b(1)). The
recommended size of the Safety Area in Table 2-1 is
increased if the TLOF perimeter is not marked. The
minimum recommended width of the Safety Area is
the same on all sides. The Safety Area may extend
into clear airspace.
b. A Precision Approach Safety Area Width
for operations under Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR). RESERVED.
c. Mobile Objects within the Safety Area.
See paragraph 202d.
d. Fixed Objects Within a Safety Area. No
fixed object should be permitted within a Safety Area
except for frangibly mounted objects that, due to their
function, must be located there. Those objects whose
functions require them to be located within the Safety
Area should not exceed a height of 8 inches (20 cm)
above the elevation of the FATO perimeter nor
penetrate the approach/ departure surfaces or
transitional surfaces.
18
AC 150/5390-2B
e. Safety Area Surface. The Safety Area need
not be load bearing. Figure 2-6 depicts a Safety Area
extending over water. If the Safety Area is load
bearing, the portion abutting the FATO should be
continuous with the FATO and the adjoining edges
should be at the same elevation. This is needed to
avoid the risk of catching a helicopter skid or wheel.
The Safety Area should be treated to prevent loose
stones and any other flying debris caused by rotor
wash.
f. Safety Area Gradients. Recommended
Safety Area gradients are defined in Chapter 8.
204.VFR APPROACH/ DEPARTURE PATHS.
The purpose of approach/ departure airspace, shown
in Figure 2-7, is to provide sufficient airspace clear of
hazards to allow safe approaches to and departures
from the TLOF.
a. Number of Approach/ Departure Paths.
Preferred approach/ departure paths should be
aligned with the predominant wind direction so that
downwind operations are avoided and crosswind
operations are kept to a minimum. To accomplish
this, a heliport should have more than one approach/
departure paths and the preferred flight approach/
departure path should, to the extent feasible, be
aligned with the predominate wind. Other approach/
departure paths should be based on the assessment of
the prevailing winds or when this information is not
available, the separation between such flight paths
and the preferred flight path should be at least 135
degrees. See Figure 2-7.
PPR facilities may have only one approach/ departure
path although a second flight path provides additional
safety margin and operational flexibility.
b. VFR Approach/ Departure Surfaces. An
approach/ departure surface is centered on each
approach/ departure path. Figure 2-7 illustrates the
approach/ departure and transitional surfaces.
The approach / departure path starts at the edge of the
FATO and slopes upward at 8:1 (8 units horizontal in
1 unit vertical) for a distance of 4000 ft (1219 m)
where the width is 500 ft (152 m) at a height of 500 ft
(152 m) above the elevation of TLOF surface.
The transitional surfaces start from the edges of the
FATO parallel to the flight path center line, and from
the outer edges of the 8:1 approach/ departure
surface, and extend outwards at a slope of 2:1 (2 units
horizontal in 1 unit vertical) for a distance of 250 ft
(76 m) from the centerline. The transitional surfaces
CniW--5E)
21
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
Advisory
Circular
Subject: 14ELIPORT DESIGN Date: 09/30/04 AC No: 150/5390-213
Initiated by: AAS-100 Change:
1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides recommendations for heliport design and describes
acceptable requirements to develop a heliport. This AC applies to anyone who is proposing to construct, activate or
deactivate a heliport.
2. APPLICABILITY. This AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation except when Federal funds
are specifically dedicated for heliport construction.
3. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date is September 30, 2004.
4. CANCELLATION. AC 150/5390-2A, Heliport Design, dated January 20, 1994, is canceled.
5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The modem helicopter is one of the most versatile transportation vehicles known
to man. Typically, a heliport is substantially smaller than an airport providing comparable services. The helicopter
has the capability of providing a wide variety of important services to any community that integrates this aircraft
into its local transportation system.
a. Service. In addition to their service in the transportation of people, helicopters have proven to be useful to
their communities in the following ways:
(1). Disaster Relief. Natural disasters often result in the breakdown of ground transportation systems.
Helicopters are able both to bring in response teams and supplies and to evacuate injured people during the critical
period before ground transportation is restored.
(2). Air Ambulance Services. For an injured or critically ill person, time is life. Helicopters can provide
high-speed, point-to-point transportation without being constrained by the limitations of the ground infrastructure.
(3). Police Services. Many municipalities consider their police services helicopters vital force multipliers
in carrying out search and rescue, chase, and surveillance.
(4). Moving High -Value Assets. High -value or time -sensitive cargo, such as canceled checks, and people,
including the President of the United States, frequently travel on helicopters because this mode of transportation is
fast and flexible. Companies use helicopters as an invaluable part of an in-house transportation system to connect
the office with various plants, job sites, and the local airport. Utility companies use helicopters to construct and
inspect high -voltage electrical lines and to monitor underground gas transmission lines. The petroleum industry
uses helicopters to support exploration and production operations. Newspapers and radio/TV stations use
helicopters for onsite news gathering, taking photos, and airborne reporting of rush hour traffic conditions.
b. Facilities. The most effective way for a community to realize the benefits of helicopter services is by
developing or permitting the development of places where helicopters can land and take off. While heliports can be
large and elaborate, most are not. The basic elements of a heliport are clear approach/ departure paths, a clear area
Front Range Helicopters, LLC
P.O. Box 685, Fort Collins, CO 80522
April 4, 2008
Mr. Ted Shepard, Chief Planner
City of Fort Collins Planning Department
P. O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
PH.970.472.0123 FX.970.472.1345
RE: Airpark Village Overall Development Plan, #16-05A
Dear Mr. Shepard:
EGO �OpB
fIL- B r
Front Range Helicopters operates a commercial and flight training helicopter
business from the North Arrow Heliport (FAA designation CD46) located at 404
North Link Lane in Fort Collins adjacent to the Downtown Airpark.
An overall development plan for the Downtown Airpark area must consider the
presence of one public and two private heliports along the south-west boundary
of the Airpark property. I have enclosed several pages from FAA Advisory
Circular 150/5390-2B which provides recommendations for heliports. Note that
our heliport originally met and currently meets these recommendations due to the
open airspace above the Airpark.
Development of the Airpark as proposed may violate these guidelines and
present an elevated risk for our operations and to the general public. Allowance
for adequate approach/departure paths is critical. Residential development
should be kept as far away as possible to mitigate noise disturbance.
Please consider this FAA Circular in your review of the Airpark Village Overall
Development Plan and feel free to contact me.
SinggLCely,
Robert M. Dean
Enc.