Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM - PDP - 6-10 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY4: Site Access & Mason : 2115n010 t 1 l �► I e; Lane Configurations ►y► unre vehtfr '10 0 0 2 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourt =flow rate't 12 2 PMPCIl1PI Q - :•' •1 • - - •• 100 100 r. � , x.�``-.—�,€ • 1 '� 1 . " • 1 . , �.. d�.5z�': .art x-.. �_.. . ..� FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - PM Peak Hour 5: Site Access & Mason 2/15/2010 Sign Control StoD Free Free Peak Hour. Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Pedestrians ml tum flare (van) Mei)randtgpe None - None , Median storage veh) - p) . platoon unblocked 15 _ .. ;eooflictingLv,Dlum �,97a Y VIYIIIG LGII YV V V ' �cu one 17nn iJ;," Lane LOS A Approach LOS A Average Delay 2.4 intersection Cepao°ty ttUl¢aUon N13.7%.�r�� � , ICUCU Levet ofSernce, ""� �''A �:� -� m ° Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - Ft Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - Noon Peak Hour No Text 40: Cherry &College (US 287 & State 14) I i 2115/2010 Lane Configurations olerme' �h) 21 iota 109 0 5Q 8 2U4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 -1900 1900 1900 : 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19M 1900 1900 haniN' idth; _ 12 'L 1�1 1� 12 1 1>- 12 1` 12 'f� Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0, 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 - 3.0 ` L Factor 0'.9 1:00 1. 00 0 i:DO 1tOD 0`95, 4:0 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 " 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 OU ie00a 1F00�'E00� 1.00 � i�00 1:._ z Frtb;p,,,ed/bikP� 1.00 - • 1.00 0 85 1.00 0.95 1.00. 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 5 Flt E etl 0�'95 k00 100 -_,OW 'ka00 0:95 1t f . 1>00 095 Is00 1?06 Satd. Flow (prot) •- 3090 1676 1350 1593 1592 1562 3008 1326. 1562 3008 1357 Fft Pem dted : 0. 1 1.00 dffi 00 0:319P 1 is00 0 20 00 1rQtt-_ t Satd. Flow (pens) 1222 1676 1350 1132 1592 304 3008 1326 328 3008 1357. Adj. Flow (vph) 240 128 107 53 128 65 80 '862 57 100 900 227 RTOR€Reductiorc(vph Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 128. - _ 31.. 53 . 170 :. 0, 80 862 ` _ .. 37 7.100 900 _. 132 Coni�l?eils. (ifltic)r 15 's Heavy Vehicles (%) - 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% : 4% 8% 4% 4% 8% 4% TL��YRe pm�pt - Pe P.,Pt p m+pt "erm pm�pt,�_ Rem Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Retmmed;Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 28.2 - 20.0 20.0 17.8 .13.6 36.2 30.7 30.7 36.4 30.8 30.8 Eve Gree' n�gs(s) �30 2 23'.0;• 23.0 �2`F ` i6:6 402 335�2 33�2 4Q$�4=t _ 33�3 33�3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.2.1 0.50 0.42 0.50 0.42 0.42 Clea n"'{1ce Tine (s) y5 0 6:0 : 6 0 4} 4 0 5 ;- .0.42 5 5 4�0 5?5 5N f Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 L ap (v'�ph) 73 482 388 33D 27x1 12' 65Q 28 252 565 - j v/s Ratio Prot - c0.05 0.08 0.01 00.11 0.03 0.29 c0.03 c0.30 I /s�Ratio enn OaD 0:02 �0:,12 D:03 014 . - �0."��t0 � vlc Ratio 0.33 0.27 0.08 0.15 0.52 0.30 0.69 0.07 0.35 0.72 0.23 CJnlFom„D`elay, d1 17z q0 8 2.9 28:1 1=1.8 13 2, 41' 1F17 _ �19 5 15 k Progression Factor 1.00.. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Iricrerneniat Delay d2 _ D:3' •. D 3 0:1 0=2= 1_4 0:6 3 " , D°=2 0?8t p • 3 60 Delay (s) 17.5 22.3 20.9 22.1 29.5 12.4 22.3 14.3 12.5 23.0 16.1 Level_otService g HC : C_ Ge C- g Approach Delay (s) 19.5 27.9 21.1 20.9 F c Critical Lane Group FH##10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - Noon Peak Hour 40: Cherry & College (US 287 & State 14) 2/15/2010 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 FIttR ctetl r 095 1=00 1600 t}:95 i_00 OJ5 1Ofd a 1.00 095 1-60 Oct Said. Flow (prot) 3090 1676 1350 1593 1602 1562. 3008. . 1326 . 1562 3008 . .1357 FPermitted Or2 D0 100 0€64 1.00 0x1 1'., 1:0000 9,•0,0 Satd. Flow (perm) 817 1676 1350 1067 1602 284 3008 1326 294 3008 1357 Flow 415 145 96 65 236 100 82 897: 2% 2% 2% .2% 2% 4% 8% 4% 4% 8% . 4% Protected Phases _ Peed Phases 7 4 4 -, 3. 4 -: _ 8 8 1 6 6 6 5 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.3 19.3 19.3 22.9 18.1 35.4 29.9 29.9 35.4 29.9 29.9 Effec""tiv""Fe G eengz(s) 29�3 72�3 22'°3"269 21.1 39:4 32 A; 32.4 3 2-�4 32`4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.34 0.26 - 0.49 0.40 0.40 0.49 0.40 0.40 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.09 .0.01 .. 020 c0.03 0.30 _ 0.03 c0.30 �isRatioPerm c02�1 0.02 -�-0:04 013 �0!03 13 WWAW&0 '; v/c Ratio 0.79 0.31 0.07 0.16 0.75 0:32 0.74 0.07 0.31 0.75 . 0.28 - - t)niform Delay, d1 ' -- 19 7 22'8x 212� 18:4 ' 27tD 424 2°' 14 6 12 3_20.3 1C7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1200 1.00 1.00 1.00 trtcremenfa� �Delay€d2 Z.60`4 0.1 ' ' "02 - Zry1 0)7 40 Q2 _ 0 42 13 Delay (s) 27.3 23.2 21.3 18.6 34.1 13.1 24.2 14.8 13.0 24.5 17.3 Levefof Service C C ,: C. T `B C B BB C B -- Approach Delay (s) 25.5 316 22.8 22.2 Approach LOS- ' , C;. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio �_ - AivateaGycle Lengths) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.72 ICU Level of Service FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - PM Peak Hour 40: Cherry & College (US.287 & State 14) 2/15/2010 a;y ,gar>€aT.,cr-.uBL .. �,. Lane Configurations ►j►j �, f" !j �!� #lolf�me- v_�ki)130 85 55 2 85 7 78 5 75 82 - NO Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 l~aneN/idth i 12 1�1 1- 1 1- 12 13 t2 1 -12= =t 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3:0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 aL e Ut- aeror - 0 97 1M 1.00 it00 _ 0 M00 695 10, t€00 0 95 t. El Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 .1.00 1..00 0.97 Flptipedibikes 1F00'' 1:00 100 1.00 1:00 1'00 1.00 t.OQ : '100 1(10g0 Frt 1.00. 1.00 0.85 1.00. 0.96 1.00 . 1.00 0.85 1:00 1.00 0.85 FttaProtertieed - 0:9 ; "1`00 .OU 0- 'F�UO � 1��� flu Q'�95 �1`00 1t00 Satd. Flow (prat) (lt'Peffn 3090 025 1676. s1@00 1350 _ 100 15.93 0:64 1601: 1a00 1562 017 .3008: 1.00 1326 :OQ 1562 3008 1357 0=16 1'00 -- 1 Q0 Satd. Flow (perm) 822 1676 .1350 1073. 1601 284 3008 1326 294 3008 1357 Peakro ur, PkIF Adj. Flow (vph) t1'91 412 0.91 143 D 91 ` 93 0785 65 0?85 085� 235 . 100 '087 ' 80 �0?87'a,[6#87 897 57 U�9!) 83 911 267 . RT�„0, R�;Red,,,, uctiona(gP� Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 412 A 143 67 26 0 65 _ 19 316 0 0 . 0 80 0 897 20 37 0` - 1a12 83 911 155 Heavy Vehicles (%) 20/6 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 8% 4% 4% 8% 4% TumType Pm+pt' .. 'PerrnPt P*Pt Pe'�rrn PPt , `Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Actuated WC Ratii Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 LaneGtpCap. 528 467 376 405 4 26Q 12,1 53 12i'8 550 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.09 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.30 c0.03 .c0.30 v s'R�o P c0.21" 0 02 0.04 0 t Olp 0 3- 0t ;f v/c Ratio 0.78 0.31 0.07 0.16 0.75 0.31 0.74 0.07 0.31 0.75 0.28 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 In emenyd2 7 3- 0'4 01 02 7.1 0.>7 4- 02 0 7, r4 2�n3 Delay (s) 27.0 23.1 21.3 18.6 34.1 13.0 24.2 14.8 13.0 24.5 17.3 LevetofFService='' ..0 C C B C11 I'll B B B C B Approach Delay (s) 25.3 31.6 22.8 22.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 kct tiled Cycle Lengths 80 0 Sum of lostiime s) '11'.O Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C Ar�atys�s�Pertotl mm u r ?5 c Critical Lane Group FH#10002 - FL Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - PM Peak Hour 40: Cherry & College (US 287 & State 14) 2t1512010 Lane Configurations �. �.. �tolume° _v�i 05 110 105 5 6Q 75p 5 810 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900". 1900 :. 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 , 1900 1900 ane Width 2 12 1b 1 12 13 12 12 2 1} 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 .2.0 3.0 3.0" 2.0 3.0 3.0 tsneb' .I?ador 0.97 1.00 1.:00 1#00 1�00 :00 0:95' 1:0 1t0➢ b:�5 :0 Frpb, pedibikes 1.00 1.00 . _ 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 .0.97 Flp' bpedtbikes 100 1:00 1.00 1.0 DU 1:00 --00 1,00 1-00 ,� 60 .OU Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 it,F'roter3i:d 0.95' Satd. Flow (prot) 3090. 1676 1350 1593 1590 1562 3008 1326 1562 3008 1357 1$Itt rm 0 - 1c00 J 0�.68 1�00' 0�19 1�00 1€00' Q24 1�0t) 1`=.Ott Satd. Flow (Derm) 1246 1676 1350 1136 1590 306 3008 1326 330 3008 1357 Lane Group Flow (vph) 230 124 27 53 165 ,0 .' Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% T,ype : Pnr±Pt Penn m+ tI ffifflMOMPEr Protected Phases 7 Pe mitted,Pha�'ses �:;�..�^}.... 4 --_ 4 3 F• 8 . �`� (_ Actuated Green, G (s) 28.1 . Eff a Gg (sJ ` 301 19.9 229' 19.9 228 17.8 Z;iT8 13.6 16:6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.29 Clearance'Fme,( ),% 0.29 0.27 0.21 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 "t'•anGrp<Eap,�(vph) ��'734 � 480� 38 345 330 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.07 0.01 c0.10 v�'Eerm-: OE07 0:0 0:03 We Ratio 0.31 0.26 0.07 0.15 0.50 . Uiilform�t3etaydl, i7f2 22:0 �;20=8 .2�i.9 28.0; _ 1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1 incremetrtalDelay,_d2 0� 03 0:1" , Oe2 1.2 Delay (s) 17.4 22.3 . 20.9 22.1 29.2 1 [ev�of„Service• B' G C C C ? ,. Approach Delay (s) 19.5 27.7 36.3 30.8 30.8 36.5 - 30.9 30.9 40�3 �r'3 33�3 40?5 a33�4�'�3'.'4 0.50 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.42 0.42 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 272 1252 5 284 256 '567 0.02 0.29 c0.03 c0.30 0.25 0.69 0.07 0.35 0.72 0.22 1:6 19�1 4:0 1;1�7 i9 4 15 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 65 3:1` 02 0=.8 5 '0 9 2.1 22.2 14.2 12.4 22.9 15.9 B A, & B C 40 21.1 20.8 c Critical Lane Group FH#10002 - Ft Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - Noon Peak Hour c Critical Lane Group FH#10002 - Ft Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - Noon Peak Hour 40: Cherry & College (US 287 & State 14) 2/15/2010 Lane Configurations Vnlume;(vph)." 352 1 82 51 19 8; 67 7 ' 45 782 229 ' Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900: 1900 1900 1900 1900 is Width. " 12 12" 1w112 1 12 k12 " 1" 2 1 12 F2 Total Lost time (s): 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0- 3.0 RED Frpb, pedibikes 1.00: 1.00 " 0.98 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb:Ped/btk _ _00 "00: 00 „ 1g00 1 UQ I QO 100 00 1 OE) 1.00 1 a0 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 ; 0.85 1.00. 1.00. 0.85 fit<Froteded 0�95 i�U.: " 1`00 �(i�95 ' 9.00 Q_95 1.U0 x 0:9 100 't�Ofl Satd. Flow (prot) 3090 _ " 1676 1350 1593 - 1602 11562 " 3008 1326 1562. 3008 : 1357' fkPem tamed 027 k 1r00 Q67 IUQ OtO 1?00 _ "00 0 9 100 1i�0 Satd. Flow(perm) 891" 1676 1350 1125 1602 305 3008 1326 316 3008 1357. Peak hour�facr, PHF "'0;91 0°9` 9 `Qrr85 4�85� Q85 0�8 0.87 � a U 9U 00 0=9D Adj. Flow (vph) 387 " 134 90 60 225 95 77 . 855 52 79 869. " 254 Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 .134 .27 60 301 0. 77 855, 33 . 79 " 869 140 06M. Reds,�.LAW*, 6 15 Heavy Vehides (°%) 2°% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4°% 8% 4% 4% 8°% 4% T:rTyF' `pPt "'' r Perrn Drn±Pt PmP'r- emt s mpt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.2 . 21:2 21.2 22.4 18.8 34.7 29.2 29 2 .. 341 29.2 29.2 Effe Uye Greeng(s) 312 242 242 264 218 38 7 317 - 31x738T% 31I� , 377 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.27 0.48 0.40 0.40 0.48 0.40 0.40 Cie raa nice Time sF 5 0 6 $6'0 ME 1 S,, '1U Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3:0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lanee�Grp,,CaeC 567 - - 5fl7 " 408 404 m 26§ 1192. 52 7�0 �1192 m v/s Ratio Prot CON 0.08 0.01 0.19 0.03 0.28 cO.03 cO.29 VISNatio=Perm. c020 0:02 f1:04- 01i 0t02 0.1= 010 v/c Ratio 0.68" . 0.26 ON 0.15 0.69 0.29 0.72 0.06 0.29 0.73 0.26 Uniform Deta d1 182 , ' § 19< 18 7 6 1 �, 12-5 20.4 y i 9 12 2Q:5 16 3 �1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Trtcremenfa, I;�,DeFaq, iY1 �3.4 0:3 01 `02 4.5= �, 0:6" = 3�7 Q2 Or6� 3:9 12 Delay (s) 21.5 21.4 19.9 18.8 30.6 13.1 24.1 15.2 13.1 24-4 17A Lev..„,. elof 5er'P C Ca B B <✓�8"'�G ti6:U RIM 8 Approach Delay (s) 21.3 28.7 22.8 22.2 . I HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated CyderLength (�F , � 80 0 Sum oft`lost time (s) ���i;1=U �``-<a. • Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3°% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group FH#10002 -, Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Existing - PM Peak Hour 40: Cherry & College (US 287 & State 14) 2/15/2010 Lane VVo uiur Ideal Lost time Fit. Fft Proteai Satd. Flow Adj.1 RT01 Lane C=onfl Hem Actuated a/C Ratio v/c Ratio 196 1.03 82 _ 41 i 52 717 96 84 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 097 100": 1.00 -1t00 1.0 100 0!95, 1 Q0 1'Ot? 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1,00 1.00 - . 10 0.95. 1.00 1:00 1:00 100 1=00 1700 .; =0o , i.OQ i ®0 1 DQ' 1-00 1-00 0.85 100 0-95 1 1 4 3 tS B ON 4 4 0w 27.7 . 19.5 .19.5 17.5 . 13.3 �29�7 225 22' i521=5 1fi 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.20 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 q 734 �'d�1 360�' 342 32 co.04 0.07 0.01 C0.10 - "0:07 �02 vot03 0.30 0.25 0.07. 0:14 0.48 € of241` 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.6 22.5 21.1 222 29.3 00 1.00. 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 495 . 1 MJMi' ";0:9 • 1F00 160 562 ' 3008 1326 1562 3008 1357 21. i�`00 ioo o:i2 i�oo 1-QQ . - P13 3008 1326 363 3008 1357, 87 .87 .. g.. ..... _ :87 0 9 0 90 0;9fi 62 824 53 93 856 204 20 0 88 62 824" 33 93 856 116 1 6 5 2 . �6`f 3��aTrWy6 36.7 . 31.3 .. 31.3 36.9 31.4 31.4 407 ; 338=�33?8 4Q933'9 33`9 0.51 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.42 0.42 4-4U =d 5�5 � 5t5 R 5?5 5 5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 f28' 12T1 560: 9 ' 1275 575. 0.02 0.27. c0.03 c0.28 aQ9 Q<o3 aki 010 0.22 0.65 0.06 0.31 0.67 0.20 h11 18t4 317 11$ "18y6 i45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 "os'4 2t6 -.•,20'2 Ot6 -:: 22§, 08 11.5 20.9 13.9 11.8 -21.4 153 19.9 19.5 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle`=Le gth{s}:_:- (.)s �v a� 80 >' O��Sumof lost time s � ��10 0 •,� �. Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B c Critical Lane Group FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Existing - Noon Peak Hour No Text 4: Cherry & Howes St 2/15/2010 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85. Walling Speed (fUs) PecenkBlockage `` Right turn flare (veh) Volume Lett 0 89 0 6 0 'JoYume.Right; 4 0 0� 0 Z cSH .1700 1190 1700 991 688 Approach Delays} 0:0 Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.9 Ih rseotion;Capaaty'IJGIiiaUon ` :. � 34 2% :f ICU,L,evel ofSerrvice A w Analysis LSPeriod (min) 15 - - - ��`` FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - Noon Peak Hour tc, 2 stage (s) pO queue free % 93 98" 89 INca a ' vehlh 1r194 "' 691 Volume left 0 88" 0 6 0 WNP24MR10 t7 0 cSH 1700 1194 1700 296 691 Lane LOS A C B roach Dela s 2 O Approach LOS B 1.9 Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - R. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - Noon Peak Hour 4: Cherry & Howes St 2/15/2010 Lane Configurations % .. `'' ?. rill .i olume= vehfli 265 2a- hf3 2 6 - Sign Control free Free -Stop Grade OP% 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 .0.85 . 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 tlourlYRflow is Ivaph) 12 133, 331 6 Pedestrians Urn eWidtht(1�: - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percenge Right turn flare (veh) '. M ian type tilone ne tC, 2 stage (s) (s�ROM INUE11,11122 35 p0 queue free % 89 98 90 cM�pacity vetJhj _ - i214 266 713 �, �Iume Totat 345 133 '� 331 6 ir2 �"'� ` Volume Left 0 133 0 6 0 J(olume�Right` 33 D 0 72 cSH 1700 1214 1700 266 713 Yolk,, um�,,, e,�,to,Gapaafy Q2 " 0.11 -� �OF19 0.0 10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 9 0 2 8 ,,...�gntr D Wyj@) _ D0� 8"B :- A 1$8 = 106 `'- Lane LOS A C B Appycacnllwelay(sf Approach LOS B t ont5u Average Delay 2.2 Intersechon Capacity,ll¢ation ' 352'%t ' ICU Le£gv ofSerncee A ..a. Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - R. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Existing - Noon Peak Hour No Text 1: Cherry & Mason * 211512010. Sign Gontrol Free . Free Stop, Stop Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.85 Houri rate gph) Pedestrians 11 460 1 UPstream:�(JI `a65 A platoon unblocked uC„c'ontlrcGngvbfume 476 77 1058 ff 239 82 106 455 vC1, stage 1 co1 vol Lane LOS A A C D Approach LOS C D 4.6 Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 + Site - Noon Peak Hour 1: Cherry.& Mason 2115/2010 Peak Hour Factor U.Bb U.bb U.Bb U.81 Ut U.8/ U.bb U.8b U.Bb U.bb. U.Bb U.Bb Ho ftov�frah - � 18 40 7�1 19 65 2 2 7 Pedestrians La,-,,,ne;�VVidthz{ 19111111111841441 I r i r1' �• •• -.. •..I m r1• yume� Eapaaty = 0.0; - 015 0[09 0iO4 0?33 Oa50: 020Imillaul Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 3 0 70 19 Lane LOS A A C D - Approach LOS C D Average Delay 5.5 Intersec6ortGapac�tyUUl¢ation. _ , 44�4a% IC�LevelSernce q Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - Ft Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report . Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Site - PM Peak Hour 1: Chevy & Mason 2t15/2010 v Lane Configurations ►j a Goltune�'a%�fki � � 33 t. � ?#�0• 'i0 °` •80,,'f5 140 2 0 -�. Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop . 0"k OPk_ Peak Hour Factor 0.85 : 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87. 0.87 0.85 0.85. 0.85 0.85 0.85 :. 0.85 Eo 'owsrate �vphj " 12 :�: R i 540 1. 11 1`B Pedestrians —III E FAIMI11 ., fa • 1. e iO • .•:« �2'� �2' iMIN • B FH#10002 - FL Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - PM Peak Hour 1: Cherry & Mason 2/15/2010 vr;1; stage 1 cont vol aiC2t5�s g =sue Volume Left 6 0 0 54 0 32 24 cSH 1106 1700 1700. 1081 1700 - 681 .262 Lane LOS A A C C Approach LOS C C. Average Delay 3.3 intersection-Capaaaly,U41¢a6orr , 439°%�_� �ICtisLevel�OtiSemce � �-�'� � ��> A �� , ��`'���� Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC 2015 Background - Noon Peak Hour 1: Che" & Mason - 2/15/2010 vC1, stage 1 conf vol. vCu. unblocked vol a 379 941 941 189 747 M935 522 100 70 94 81 91 �100 99 Volume Left 11 0 0 0 62 0 21 _ cSH 1003 1700 1700 1700 207 902 254 �• Lt a`c 4X i a3 s Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 30 17 9 Lane LOS A D B Cm Approach LOS C C INA Average Delay 3.7 Analysis Period (min) 15 FH#10002 - FL Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Existing - PM Peak Hour 1: Cherry & Mason 2/15/2010 pX, platoon unblocked fir. C-contikcttng�vofuRre vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCs 2�t��v4 vCu, unblocked vol tC mstng tC. 2 stage (s) 486 441 96 86 91 100 IWIM 98 Volume Left 6 0 0 0 31 0 24 - cSH 1073. 1700 1700 1700 212 860 317 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 13 12 9 Lane LOS A C B C Approach LOS B C . Average Delay 25 Intersection Capakty U61¢ahkn-.-WN 38°fa, atGU Eevel,ofg3ennce Analysis Period (min) 15 _-.,c szFi�&'�S�e- :54 Est c-s��,.�'4w s P �':'e �..x.-`�`rM `�'•-'�`Ta z' i`?,..s FH#10002 - Ft. Collins Discovery Museum TIS Synchro 7 - Report Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Existing - Noon Peak Hour No Text No Text FOX TRANSPORTATION GROUP - LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS In rating roadway and intersection operating conditions with existing or future traffic volumes, "Levels of Service" .(LOS). A through F are used, with LOS. A indicating very good .operation and LOS F indicating poor operation. Levels of service at signalized and unsignalized`intersections are closely associated with vehicle delays experienced in seconds per vehicle.: More complete level of service definitions and delay .data for signal and: stop sign. controlled intersections are contained in the . following table for reference. level Delay In seconds per vehicle (a). of Service Rating Signalized Unsignalized Definition - Low vehicular traffic volumes; primarily free flow operations. Density is low A 0.0 to 10.0 0.0 to 10.0" and vehicles can freely maneuver within the traffic stream. Drivers are able to maintain their desired speeds with'little or no delay. Stable vehicular traffic volume flow with potential for some restriction of B 10.1 to 20.0 10.1 to 15.0 operating speeds due to traffic conditions. Vehicle maneuvering is only slightly restricted. The stopped delays are not bothersome and drivers are not subject to appreciable tension. Stable traffic operations, however the abilityfor vehicles to maneuver is more c 20.1 to 35.0. 15.1 to 25.0 restricted by the increase in traffic volumes. Relatively satisfactory operating speeds prevail, but adverse signal coordination or longer vehicle queues cause delays along the corridor. Approaching unstable vehi6dlartraffic flow where small increases in volume D 35.1 to 55.0 25.1 to 35.0 could cause substantial delays. Most drivers are restricted in ability to maneuver and selection of travel speeds due to congestion. Driver comfort and convenience are low, but tolerable. Traffic operations characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one-half to one-third the free flow speed. Vehicular flow is E 55.1 to 80.0 35.1 to 50.0 unstable and there is potential for stoppages of brief duration. High signal density, extensive vehicle queuing, or corridor signal progression/timing are the typical causes of vehicle delays at signalized corridors. Forced vehicular traffic flow and operations with high approach delays at F > 80.0 > 50.0 critical intersections. Vehicle speeds are reduced substantially and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time because of downstream congestion. (a) Delay ranges based on 2000 Highway Capacity Manual criteria. No Text vaux eam.patiq .Nance .sae This is your address . Your City, State ZipCode North/South Street: College. .` Your 7agrne here. File Name :'College & Cherry 3-25-09. East/West Street: Cherry/Mllow Site Code .: 00000040 Timer. Start Date : 3/25/2009 ICU Number: 40 Page No 1 College L willow. W College ' N 8 Cherry r(1, CO From North ✓ From East From South From West S=Time Right Thru 1 Left I A .Taal - RiRht Thru I Left A .raw Ri ht Thru Left 1 Ap2.Tml Ri ht Thru Left --26 Arp_raa .tn�Toa1 .._466 07:30 47 -194 - - 12 253 5 13 4 22 9 84 12. 105 .28 - 32 �_.. 86 07.4 8 6 19 1 T 4 117 612 Total 126 386 30 542 - 19 29 5 53 1 16 233 31 280 1 65 73 65 203 1078 08:00 77 190 --18 285 8 27 -7 42 6 116 17 139 .36 38 37 111 ..577. - 08:15 I 75. 143 16. 234-I: 5 - .13 4 - -22 I 15 109 16 140 132 26 33 91 I 487 ... BREAK..• - Total 152. 333 34 - 519 1 .13� 40 11 �64 1 21 225 33 279 48 ... .64 -70 202 1 1064 - ... BREAK ..12A 53 162 18. 233 9 33 9 51 12 165 13 190 21 31 55 . 107 581 45 190 22 257 15 32 10 57 16 118 7 201. 20. 24 42 86 601 40 191 17 248 : 15 19 13 - 47 7 172 ' 20 199 18 23 48 89 583 27 - 300. 1- 17 9 39 11 202 . 4 227 23 2 51 TOW 194 770 84 Q1038 52 101 41 194 1 46 717 54 817 82 103 1% n381 2430 •.. BREAK •�•.D�V} - O•V�_ O.-1�t1"1 16:4�5.I 52 188 22 262I 20 32 18 0I 14 159 : 17 190I 19 30 99 148I 670 Total 95 391 36 522 . 37 70 29 136 27 340 28 ,�,,395 39 53 168 260 1313 17A0 65 206 18 O� I2819_ 21) 64 140-g�98 14 201 14�t 229. 19 34 WO,�i153 769 17:15 69 185 _ .17 271 24. 57 8 89 4 203 25 23 1 24 35 .84 14 735 Grand Total 691 2271' 219 3181 �165 361 108 63411128 ' 1919 185 2232 297 362 683 1342 7389 Apprch % 21.7 71.4 6.9 26 56.9 17 5.7 86 8.3 22.1 27 50.9 Total % 9.4 30.7 3 43.1 2.2. 4.9 1.5 8.6 1.7 _26 2.5 30.2 4 4.9 9.2 18.2 35Z i o Navjoy Consulting Services Inc: 1385 S Colorado Blvd, Suite A-707 Denver, CO 80222 303-688-0676 File Name.: Cherry & Howes-1 1-6 Site Code : 1 Start Date : 1 /28/2010 Page No 1 . Rmune Prinfcrr_ F HOWES CHERRY HOWES CHERRY Southbound Westbound Northbound 'Eastbound Start Time Leftj Thrul Rightl Peds Left I Thru I Right.I Peds Left Thru I Right Peds Left I Thru I Right T Peds Int.Total 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 22 40 0 0 2 0 7 0 2 39 3 0 115 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 25 54 0 0 2 1 13 0 0 53 6 0 154 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 22 40 0 0 1 0 14 0 2 45 3 0 127 11:45 AM 0 0 0: 0 23 49 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 46 5 0 130 Total 0 0 0 0 92 183 0 0 6 1 40 0 4 183 17 0 526 12:00 PM 0 0 0 1- 32 61 0 0 2 0 .11 1 0 84 8 0 260 12:15 PM 0 0 0 1 30 56 0 0 1 0 21 0 1 53 7 0 170 F 1230 PM 0 0 0 0 22 94 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 62 5 A 194 E 12:45 PM 0' 0 1 0 29 70 0 0 1 0 19 0 0 66 8 :0 194 Total 0 0 1 2 113 281 0 01 5 0 61 1 1 265 28 0 758- r. 01:00 PM 0 0: 0 1 21 61 0 0 1 0 7 1. 0 75 7 1 175 = 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 23 56 0. D 4 0 9 0 _ 0 63 4 0 159 01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 22 78 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 66 3 0 188 01:45 PM 0 0 0 1 34 52 0 0 4 0 18 0 0 38 2 0 149 Total 0 0_ 0 2 100 247 0 01 13 0 49 1 0. 242 16 1 671 02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 34 56 0 0 3 0 7 0 0 59 7 01 166 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 21 52 0 0 5 0 14 0 0 46 8 0 146 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 30 98 0 0 3 0 10 1 0 65 .5 0 212 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 38 77 0 0 2 0 9- 0 0 55 5 0 186 Total 0 0 0 0 123 283 0 01 13 0 40 1 0 225 25 01 710 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 45 134 0 0 10 0 12 2 0 51 7 1 262 f: 03.15 PM 0 0 0 0 23 72 .0 0 2 0 10 0 0 44 6 1 158 �. Grand Total 0 0 1 4 496 1200 0 0 49 1 212 5 5 1010 99 3 3085 Apprch % 0 0. 20 80 29.2 70.8 0 0 18.4 0.4 79.4 1.9 0.4 90A 8.9 0.3 Total % 0 0 0 0.1 16.1 38.9 0 0 1.6 0 6.9 0.2 0.2 32.7 3.2 0.1 F F. Navjoy Consulting Services Inc. 1385 S Colorado Blvd, Suite A-707 Denver, CO 80222 303-688-0676 File Name cherry & mason-1 1-6 Site Code : 2 Start Date : 1/28/2010 Page No : 1 " MASON CHERRY MASON CHERRY Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Tlme Left I Thru Right Peds Left I Thru I Right . Peds Left I Thru I Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total 11:00 AM 4 0 5. 1 0 57 2 0 4 1 22 0 0 53 0 1 150 11:15 AM 3 0 1 1 0 81 2 0 8 2 19 0 2 69 0 0 188 11:30 AM 5 0. 1 0 0 52 0 0 8 3 25 0 2 74 0 0 170 11:45 AM 7 0 4 0 0 77 3 1 4 7 23 2 0 44 0 1 173 Total 19 0 11 2 0 267 7 1. 24 13 89 2 4 240 . 0 2 681 1200 PM 3 0 0 2 0 104 5 0 9 2 26 0 2 110 0 1 264 1215 PM 4 0 1 1. 0 99 2 0 3 1 24 6 2 107 0 0 .250 12:30 PM 2 0 2 0 0 112 3 0 9 1 28 0 == 0 80 0 0 237 1245 PM 11 0 7 2 0 117 5 0 8 6 24 0 1 87 0 0 268 Total 20 0 10 51 0 432 15 0 29 10 102 61 5 384 0 1 1019 " 01:00 PM 4 0 1 6 0 99 3 0 8 0 27 .0 1 100 0. 2 251 01:15 PM 1 0 2 2 0 87 3 0 7" 3 28 1 2 71 .0 0 207 01:30 PM 2 0 1. 0 0 113 3 0 8- 2 22 0 1 91. 0 0 243 01:45 PM 5" 0 4 3 0 104 4 0 7 1 17 1 1 51 0 0 198 Total 12 0 8 11 1 0 403 13 0 30 6 94 - 21 313 0 2 899 0200 PM 2 0 7 2 0 86 9 2 7 2 19 0 5 58 0 0 199 02:15 PM 5 0 7 3 0 93 2 0 6 2 29 0 3 56 0 2 208 02:30 PM 5 0 3 0 0 130 4 1 10 3 34 0 4 98 0.. 4 296 02:45 PM 9 0 3 0 0 123 7 1 7 5 33 0 8 71 0 1 268 Total 21 0. 20 51 0 432 22 4 30 12 115 01 20 283 0 7 971 03:00 PM 7 0 3 0 0 213 3 0 19 1 32 1 10 87 1 1 378 03:15 PM 6 0 6 0 1 106 3 0 12 3 14 0 0 63 0 0 214 03:30 PM 3 0 1 0 0 93 6 1 12 2 27 0 2 74 0. 0 221 03:45 PM 8 0 3 0 .0 90 7 0 13 4 30 1 0 75 0 0 231 Total 24 0 13 01 1 502 19 1 56 10 103 21 12 299 1 1 1044 04:00 PM 10 0 5 1 0 99 3 0 1 7 2 28 3 4 64 0 0 226 04:15 PM 9 0 3 1 0 121 2 0 19 3 34 0 1 70 0 0 263 04:30 PM 6 0 2 0 0 120 3 0 15 1 37 0 2 79 0 0 265 04:45 PM 3 0 3 0 0 135 4 0 16 5 37 0 2 105 0 0 310 Total 28 0 13 21 0 475 12 0 57 11 136 3 9 318 0 0 1064 05:00 PM 6" 0 0 0 0 105 3 0 12 3 31 0 4 59 0 0 223 05:15 PM 3 0 0 0 0 115 1 2 10 4 26 0 1 79 0 0 241 05:30 PM 2 0 1 0 0 108 3 0 13 2 21 -0 5 59 0 0 214 05:45 PM 2 0 2 0 0 81 1 1 12 0 31 0 4 53 0 0 187 Total 13 0 3 01 0 409 8 3 47 9 109 01 14 250 0 0 865 Grand Totall 137 0 78 25 1 2920 96 9 273 71 748 15 69 2087 1 13 6543 Approh % 57.1 0 3; 10.4 0 96.5 3.2 0.3 24.7 6.4 67.6 1.4 3.2 96.2 0 0.6 Total % 2.1 0 1.2 0.4 0 44.6 1.5 0.1 4.2 1.1 11.4 0.2 1.1 31.9 0 0.2 No Text �.,.' _ '; i4.� T.�., rir •i ¢F3 '' `'u3c.`-Jv ,+ .+ _ :. `s z c+. .t�-5te ask 4t�; A; a Wo .,, •.. ..i fv � G fy X�k s - o-� E i f Y h- Project Information ProjectName Project Location TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: Intermediate: Study Area Boundaries North:, r- South: /6 East: West: Study Years Short Rarige: LonRange: Future Traffic Growth Rate Ux S w ffAA �z f Study Intersections I: All ac ss drives 5.. 2. v5 6. 4• C^ot!�R#67p 8. Time Period for Study Noon: Trip Generation Rates + /,Sib t It 6hrli botu Trip Adjustment Factors. Passby: A10 Captive Market: 410 Overall Trip Distribution SEE ATTACHED.SKETCH — - Mode Split Assumptions A�� Committed Roadway Improvements . IVPYK Other Traffic Studies 0,6V Areas Requiring Special Study ! D ►) OVIVRr. /Mo'/ CY/ 019�/ Date: /— �S Traffic Engineer: Local Entity Engi GG,n� Lipp. tWICOM S r191 A% ' 3 Page 4-34 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards — Repealed and Reenacted April 1, 2007 Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins No Text No Text w •� ... r .4. 6 W • 1. h 1u. { jj g' gyp. lit TS p, n LNtr T`,�) t V �u ✓ q � ,5 w. 1 4 o ii 7V Y 5d t r, {j) [[ $ � ;1Y>-L... Y 3 i i t ill ... y�4 ' x a '' ,1.;1 t r` x R � A 4n� ! fe e4 NIL HIGGINS t 4 jr. i P 7� t1PC si', �1 ' !. 4 Ji iff ! t'b fit. it 11� � f{ w yy `l�r { ��r e'✓ d ,� �g. a Off ,try'*• •a.'1 R S lip r F f nP b„ ro* � �� E �by�eg tt' w' r a � k LYf. Y y.. M hE i<.fi "•E m f�,y%f i r�p Q� .��p i .#4{.:CO"Y ��fk �etlIC88 tl. �v,�A �attfr ^MJIr�,ie� �0 - roO\ 00 N d N N 00 tr) 1 /0 sro (Pemmnent Open SPace) I• �! ... N v O 0 O . N 00 rn /i 34/10 :. 214/378__,/j 55/85 1 14/132 8 109/201 �.4.5/55: \ "0' Z 95/87ti . _� `\}}Ile -- 293�-�1sro 20- - SITE. 00Lo76 / on� \ �ct 0 .o Ln Cherry St. N \ ` a� . N... p - .. - N 10/11 1`400/470 400/335� sro KEY 15/.15 If,-50/35;. xx / xx-- Noon/PM Peak Hour Volumes 0 . O o FOX TRANSPORTATION o ROU P FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY .. YEAR 2015 + SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FH Project # 10002 Original Scale 1'=250' Date 02/25/10 Drawn by JAH Figure # 7 0/--� sro r 3�-- �r O N I 00 •�TLI . °NO>1/0 O (Nmaaent OW space) -Cnac�, V),C14/2 34/10 0 \\ iCD \ ` MoS SITE oy \�`II . i Cherry St. ...... J 04. . CO a1 O 1 O \\M N Kr0/3 0/00 0/0�/0EY xx / xx Noon/PM Peak Hour Volumes \\\ o o FOX T R A N B P o R T A T 1 O N 13 R G U P - FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FH Project # 10002 Odginal Scale 1"=250' Date 02/25/10 Drawn by JAH Figuie # 6 . FOX TRANSPORTATION GROUP FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SITE DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES FH Project # 10002 Original Scale 1"=200' Date 02/25/10 Drawn by JAH Figure # 5 290/---,T sTo — 295/-- 20/-' /'75/-- i l u\-' Ln LO / Cherry lip V) N I. N I 3 O ! 2 1 KEY XX / XX— Noon/PM Peak Hour Volumes FOX I I (Pem+anent Open Space) 00 00 Ncc p p. Ln tl) O \ -*.I, w D 7 205/375� 55/850 110/130—105/2 0 85/8545/55 L.._. 0SITE co o St. _ . — 0O\ \\Oto \NO� .O . , S O oSO 1 5/10 1p 40000/53 4470 10/35/157 %55 . 00 n C TRANSPORTATION GROUP FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY YEAR 2015 BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FH Project # 10002 Original Scale 1 "=250' Date 02/25/10 Drawn by. JAH Figure # 4 / N 00 00o� ao r -t �noo. i52 • L52/81 2.2101/191 '82� • r 41 /51 Nv n u� L un r` a- FOXaim TPA NO P OR TAT] O N GI R O UP FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC. VOLUMES FH Project # 10002 Original Scale 1 "=250- Date 02/25/10 Drawn by JAH Figure # 3 (Site continues to the north as permanent open space). , i N 0 _ Cherry St. FOX TRANSPORTATION GROUP FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SITE PLAN FH Project # 10002 Original Scale 1"=120' Date 02/25/10 Drawn by r JAH Figure # 2 FOX T RAN 8 PC R TAT.1 ON o RD UP FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SITE VICINITY F H Project# 10002 Original Scale 1 -=600- Date 02125/10 Drawn by JAH Figure# FOX Table 4. Bicycle Level Of Service Worksheet Project: Fort Collins Discovery Museum and Science Center Level of Service - Minimum Connectivity Specific Connections to iority Sites: Actual . Pro osed Destination Number Description of Destination within 1320' Destination Area Classification Base Connectivi : C A q 1 Poudre Trail and Park Recreation Site B . A A 2 Mason St. Corridor and Civic Campus Un luding Transit Center Community and Neighborhood Commercial Center - B A A 3 College Ave. Retail, Office, etc. B A A 4 Residential neighborhoods to the West and Southwest Residential Area g A A 5 Heritage Park Area East of College Ave. and surrounding Industrial area Recreational Site B A A 6 s 7 FOX ..... .,,....,........ Table 3. Pedestrian Level Of Service Worksheet Project: Fort Collins Discovery Museum and Science Center Prnlart I neatinn rinqu iratinn- PedBstrian.DistriCt Destination Number Description of Destination within 1320' Destination Area Classification Level of Service minimum based on project location classification Directness Continuity Street Crossings Visual Interest and . Amenities Security 1 Poudre Trail and Park Pedestrian District Minimum A A B A A Actual A A A A A Proposed A A A A A 2 Mason St. Corridor and Civic Campus Pedestrian District Minimum A A B A A including Transit Center Actual A A' A A A Proposed A A' A" A A 3 College Ave. Retail, Office, etc. Pedestrian District Minimum A A B A A. Actual A A' A A A Proposed A A' A A A 4 Residential neighborhoods to the West Pedestrian District Minimum A A B A A and Southwest Actual A A` A A A Proposed A A' A A A 5 Heritage Park Area East of College Ave. Pedestrian District Minimum A A B A A and surrounding Industrial area Actual A A' B A A Proposed A A" B A A 6 Minimum Actual Proposed . 7 Minimum Actual . Proposed The existing historic sidewalk grid system is largely complete throughout the area and will be enhanced with additional development and redevelopment. Some sidewalk widths and detachments do not meet current City standards but are very servicable and part of a well connected system. Thus LOS A There currently are signed and marked pedestrian crossings of Cherry Street at the Mason intersection, but there are no raised median refuge islands. This crossing would benefit from a raised refuge island on the east leg of the intersection to improve pedestrian safety. This will be especially helpful for those accessing the transit plaza. .. .R..,�..', r..:'' ': �.'..T..^T!"?.Rr••CVWAvI�:Wt>u!.K1)�.'�M`*w�T:"R!.•!ll•:f^!IRff!� .. . '^^r M,._ FH#10002 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project Intermediate Traffic Impact Study 2115/2010 Tnhin 9 Wnallrrin%, Trim 4 k 'o! Avers a Dail ig IT MMOWRIt"T w p A HourzTripsu IV —, K Rdtei� fff a . "Out 7, - �Aite,L T I vw 1 v x M ,,<4,, %.I Rate .... ... ..... ... Museum 55.0 1,000 S.F. 283 142 141 70 35 TL 15 5 10 283 142 141 70 35 35 15 5 10 10002 tgen.XLS 12:F.Rfik-IN FOX Table 1 - Intersection Level Of Service Summary (Wppkdavl ='M -.Existing is ti Ing pm Intersection and EN66WI aW PM P Peak -ciriti-c-aUmo-VehialtK -N66fi!PeakgMMW-,N66WIN-eakAMPIl 1130my 11)61iy 'LOS .Delay l;110& LOS `Delay- -ayffi iwv -Delay. :LOS Met STOP SIGN CONTROL Cherry St / Mason St (4-way) 2;5 A 3.7 A .3.3 A 5.2 A 4.6 A 5.5 A Eastbound Approach Leg 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 .,A 0.2 A 0.3 A. Eastbound Left 8.4 A 8.6 A 8.3 A 8.6 A 8.4 A 8.6 A Westbound Approach Leg 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.9 A 0.6 A 0.9 A 0.6 A Westbound Left 8.5 A 8.3 A 8.5 A 8.3 A Northbound Approach Leg 14.0 B 16,2 C 16.0 Q 21.9 C -47-6 C 22.5 C Northbound Left 24.9 C 29.7 D - Northbound Through 11.2 B 11.3 B - Northbound Left -Through 16.0 C 21.9 C 17.6 C 22.5 C Northbound Right 11.2 B 11.3 B 16.0 C 21.9 C 17.6 C 22.5 C Southbound Left -Through -Right 17.8 C 20.9 C 21.3 C 25.3 D, 28.9 D 27.4 D Cherry St / Hawes St (3-way) 2.2 A nia 1.9 A - n1a 1.9 A n/a Eastbound Approach Leg 0.0 A n1a 0.0 A - rVa 0.0 A n1a Westbound Approach Leg 2.4 A n1a 1.7 A - Wa 1.7 A n1a Westbound Left 8.3 A rVa. 8.3 A - rVa 8.3 A n1a Northbound Approach Leg 11.2 B n1a 11.3 B - Wa 11.4 B n1a Northbound Left 18.8 C n1a 17.4. C - n1a 17.6 C - n1a Northbound Right 10.6 B F I rVa 10.9 B - rila 10.9 B - n1a Mason St / Site Access (3-way) - 2.4 A 1.2 A Westbound Approach Leg 9.2 A 8.9 A Northbound Approach Leg O:O A 0.0 A Southbound Approach Leg 0.0 A. 0.0 A SIGNAL CONTROL Cherry -Willow / Colleg Ave (4-way) 20.4 C 23.0 C 21.3 C 24.1 C 21.3 C 24.2 C Eastbound Left 17.6 B 21.5 C 17.4 B 27.0 C 17.5 B 27.3 C Eastbound Through 22.5 C 21,4 C 22.3 C 23.1 C 22.3 C 23.2 C Eastbound Right 21.1 C 19.9 B 20.9 C 21.3 C 20.9 C 21.3 C Westbound Left 22.2 C 18.8 B 22.1 C 18.6 B 22.1 C 18.6 B Westbound Through -Right 29.3 C 30.6. C 29.2 C 34.1 C 29.5 C 34.1 C Northbound Left 11.5 B 13.1 B 12.1 B 13.0 B 12.4 B 13.11 B Northbound Through 20.9 C 24.1 C 22.2 C 24.2 C 22.3 C 24.2 C Northbound Right 13.9 B 15.2 8 14.2 B 14.8 B 14.3 B 14-8 B Southbound Left 11.8 B 13.1 B 12.4 B 13.0 B 12.5 B 13.0 8 Southbound Though 21.4 C 24.4 C 22.9 C 24.5 C 23.0 C 24.5 C Southbound Right 15.3 B 17.4 B 15.9 B 17.3 B 16.1 8 17.3 B (a) Delay represented in average seconds per vehicle. Stop Sign Control Delay LOS Criteria: LOS A = 0-10, LOS B = 10.1-15, LOS C = 15.1-25, LOS 0 = 25.1-35, LOS E = 35.1-50. LOS F> 50.1; Signal Control Delay LOS Criteria: LOS A=0-10. LOS B= 10.1-20, LOS C=20-1-35, LOS D= 35.1-55, LOSE =55."O, LOS F>80.1. Notes: Cherry St / Mason St intersection converted to 2-way traffic by Year 2010 Cherry St / Howes St intersection analysis for noon peak hour peroid only Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FW0002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study trip generation estimates are most likely higher than will actually be generated by the site due to bussing and carpools, the minimal traffic additions to the section of Cherry Street west of Howes Street will not create any measurable impacts to the street section. 11.0 CONCLUSION The Fort Collins Discovery Museum and. Science .Center :project is planned.for.the development of -approximately 42,000 square feet of museum and science center space on a currently vacant parcel of land. The northern half of the site will never be.developed as it is designated as permanent open space. The site is located on the northeast comer of the Cherry Street / Mason Street intersection. Forthis project, an intermediate study has been completed to address existing and future traffic conditions within the site area per City standards. Because of the unique land use proposed,'the site traffic characteristics were estimates based on forecast visitors to the museum. It was estimated that the site would generate approximately 285 daily one-way trips with 70 trips occurring during the noon peak hour . period and 15 trips occurring during the evening peak hour period. The surrounding street network was reviewed to identify existing and future year 2015 operations. The Year 2015 traffic scenario was analyzed with and without the site generated traffic volumes to determine future roadway capacity operations of the surrounding street network. It was determined that the site generated traffic volumes associated with the Ft. Collins Discovery Museum project can be served by the existing adjacent roadway, network. The adjacent street network will adequately accommodate the minimal traffic increases associated with the development of the land use on site. The site development will.be served by the existing roadway system and all intersections will continue to operate within' . City level of service standards for motor vehicles. South of the site along Cherry Street and Mason Street, missing sidewalk links exists adjacent to parcels that are planned for development or redevelopment. With the Penny Flats project buildout, the missing sidewalks along these roadways will be constructed. For the museum project, a pedestrian improvement that should be considered is the installation of additional pedestrian crossing improvements across Cherry Street in the eastern crosswalk of the Cherry Street/ Mason Street intersection. This location will serve a pedestrian traveling between the museum and the Downtown Transit Center and will improve the safety of crossing Cherry Street. This location also will serve the pathway spur that connects to the Poudre River Trail. No Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 12 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study 8.1 Existing.Bicycle Facilities The museum site is directly served by existing on -street bicycle lanes on both Mason Street and Cherry Street. The site is alsoaccessed directly by a spurfrom the Poudre River Trail. These facilities provide connectivity to the city-wide system of bicycle facilities. 8.2 Potential Bicycle System Improvements As noted under potential pedestrian system improvements above, the pedestrian spine through the Penny Flats project and the enhanced path along the east side of Mason Street from Cherry Street to Maple Street will enhance the grid of off-street connections that could be.used. by.bicyclists to access the museum. 8.3 Bicycle Level of Service A bicycle LOS evaluation was completed using procedures - in -the Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual for both existing and future conditions in the area. Connectivity is the primary criteria used in this process; and it has been applied to the same five destinations identified above in the pedestrian LOS evaluation. The results of this LOS evaluation are summarized in Table 6. It can -be seen that the existing and future bicycle system in the area exceed the minimum standards established by the.City. 9.0 PUBLIC TRANSIT ACCESS The FortCollins Discovery Museum and Science Center will be easily accessible .by Transfort bus service. The site is one block north of the Downtown Transit Center. The pathway and pedestrian crossing improvements described above will improve the pedestrian access between the museum and the transit center. While this study did not require a transit level of service evaluation, it is clear that it is well connected to the City's transit system and transit access will be available. 10.0 SPECIAL STUDIES The daily traffic volume currently traveling on the section of Cherry Street west of Howes Street exceeds the City's collector street volume thresholds. The thresholds for collector streets is 5,000 vehicles per day. Just over 9,000 vehicles per day are traveling on this section of Cherry Street. Site traffic additions to the section of Cherry Street west of Howes Street are anticipated to be minimal at less than 25 vehicles in a 24-hour period. Any site added traffic would account for less than 1/4 of a percentage point to the traffic. Considering that the museum Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 11 February 25, 2010 Ft. Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study This crossing.enhancement will need to be carefully coordinated with the reorganization of this intersection when Mason Street is converted to a two way roadway. 7.3 : Pedestrian Level of Service A pedestrian LOS evaluation .was completed. using procedures. in the Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual for both existing and future conditions in the area.. As noted above, the study area is in an area defined as a Pedestrian District. Key pedestrian destinations within the pedestrian study area that will link with the museum . include: - Poudre Trail.and Martinez Park • The Mason Street corridor with its mix of civic buildingw-and the Downtown Transit Center The College Avenue corridor with its mix of retail and office uses Theresidential neighborhoods to the west•and southwest . The Heritage Park area east of College Avenue LOS criteria applied to connections in this evaluation include directness, continuity; street, crossings, visual interest and amenities, and security. The results of this LOS evaluation are summarized in Table 4. It was determined that current levels of service meet or exceed the minimum standards established by the City for pedestrian districts. Pedestrians can currently access all of the destinations from the museum using the existing system of sidewalks, pathways and pedestrian crossings described above. The pedestrian LOS will be further enhanced by the addition of the pedestrian system improvements described above as the museum project is completed and adjacent parcels continue to develop or redevelop. 8.0 BICYCLE ACCESS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE This study has completed a bicycle LOS evaluation for bicycle access to the Fort Collins Discovery Museum and Science Center using procedures outlined in the City of Fort Collins Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 10 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study A sidewalk or shared use path sps connection will also likely be added tothe,east side of Mason Street from bra Maple Street: to Cherry Street when = � this. vacant parcel develops. This -_ connection will replace the existing sidewalk that is attached to the east side of Mason Street in this block. This new pathway link will. improve the access from the museum to the Downtown Transit_ Center for pedestrians. It will also improve the crossing of the .railroad tracks in this block for off-street bicyclists by creating a perpendicular crossing of the tracks. Completion of the northern half of the Penny Flats projectwill provide the completion .,of a mid -block pedestrian connection between Cherry Street and Maple Street which will add to the pedestrian grid in the area. it will also add a sidewalk to the south .side of Cherry Street. • Another pedestrian improvement that should be considered as. part of the museum project development is the installation of additional pedestrian. crossing improvements across Cherry Street in the. eastern crosswalk of the. Cherry 'Street / Mason Street intersection. This location will serve a pedestrian traveling between the museum and the Downtown Transit Center and will improve the safety of crossing Cherry Street. This location also will serve the pathway spur that connects to the Poudre River Trail. This crossing improvement at a minimum should consider the addition of a raised pedestrian refuge island and improved crossing signs (including median mounted signs). The City may also want to consider some form of pedestrian actuated enhanced crossing signage or signalization such as rectangular rapid flash pedestrian beacons or a HAWK pedestrian signal. The refuge island would in effect be the western extension of the existing railroad signal island. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 9 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study 7.1 Existing Pedestrian Facilities The museum site is located in an area that is currently well served by pedestrian facilities. It is at the north.end of downtown Fort Collins, adjacent.to Martinez Park and a trail spur connection to the.Poudre River trail system. The.museum site is directly adjacent to the intersection of'N. Mason. Street and Cherry Street which connects to the grid of roadways in the area. Figure 8. illustrates a circle with a '/4' mile radius centered on the southwest comer of the museum site which defines the study area for pedestrian access to the museum. All roadways in the area have sidewalks (or a portion of a trail) along both sides with the exception of -the south side of Cherry Street east of Howes Street and these missing links will be installed with adjacent development/redevelopment. The. existing sidewalks were installed over time, using previous City standards, and have varying width and landscaped area between them .and the roadway edge. These sidewalks are generally in good condition and provide a serviceable, well connected pedestrian network. A number of pedestrian crossings have been signed and marked across Cherry Street in the area, including the east and west crosswalks of the Mason Street / Cherry .Street intersection. There is a mid -block crossing of Cherry: between Mason Street and Howes Street that includes a pedestrian refuge island. There are pedestrian signals at the College Avenue J Cherry Street intersection to facilitate pedestrian crossings at that busy intersection. 7.2 Potential Pedestrian System Improvements A number of future improvements to the pedestrian system in the area are likely with the development or redevelopment of nearby parcels as follows: Sidewalks will be added along the south side of Cherry Street east of Howes Street when the adjacent parcels develop_ Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 8 February 25, 2010 Ft. Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study 6.2 Site Circulation and Access The site access and circulation proposed is consistent with City standards for safe ingress and egress for all modes of'transportation. The site will be served by access connections to the existing external multi`modal system.. The roadways will .sufficiently serve the projected land use traffic. Pedestrian.and bicycle access to / from the site is planned via sidewalk connections to adjacent roadways and on -street / off-street bike lanes. More detailed discussion of alternative travel mode analysis is contained in Sections 7-9. 6.3 Year 2015-plus-Site Intersection. Analysis The projected 2015 background volumes were added to the site generated volumes and are illustrated on Figure 7. The level of service criteria discussed in prior sections was applied to the study area intersections to determine impacts with the addition of Year 2015- plus-site generated volumes. The results of the LOS calculations for the intersections are summarized in Table 1. The intersection level of service worksheets are attached in the Appendix. The data contained in the LOS table illustrates that all of the study area intersections will operate acceptably overall and per approach -in the LOS A-D range. With the minimal site peak. hour traffic traveling on the internal street system within the site, all internal intersections and private access points are projected to operate well within their capacities with little to no vehicular delays. Vehicle queuing at the stop sign controlled approaches average less than a vehicle length at most intersections with the exception of the northbound left -turn movement on Mason Streetat Cherry Street during the P.M. peak hour where a 951' percentile queue of 2-3 vehicles are projected. Any vehicle queues clear quickly with gaps created along:Cherry Street from the College Avenue signal. The site adds very little traffic (one Vehicle, if that) to this movement. The overall intersection LOS is projected to operate in the A range (very good)_ Thus, mitigation measures are not warranted. 7.0 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE This study has completed a pedestrian LOS evaluation for pedestrian access to the Fort Collins Discovery Museum and Science Center using procedures outlined in the City of Fort Collins Multi -modal Transportation Level of Service Manual. The museum is located in the Pedestrian District area defined in the City of Fort Collins Pedestrian Plana Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 7 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) . draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study Based on the above assumptions, the anticipated peak daily trip generation estimates for the site are summarized in Table 2 and below. Site Trip Generation: 283 average daily one-way trips • 70 weekday noon peak hour one-way trips • 15 weekday P.M. peak hour one-way trips 5.2 Trip Distribution The estimated traffic volumes presented in Table 2 were distributed onto the adjacent street network based on existing land use. and traffic patterns in the City, and existing/ future traffic volumes in and around the study area, according to data contained in the previous studies completed for the general site area. The table shows=site trip distribution estimates.based on land use data and travel patterns anticipated. The site trips noted. above are seen at all the roadway sections adjacent to the site. As part of the traffic impact study requirements, approval of trip distribution assumptions by City engineering staff is required. Trip distribution for the site received approval in February 2010. The City's base assumptions data sheet for this project is attached in the Appendix for reference. The trip distribution percentages formulated for this project are illustrated on Figure 5. . 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT This scenario analysis has been conducted in order to determine impacts associated with development and occupancy of the proposed museum land use. The site generated peak hour volumes were assigned to the adjacent street network according to the distribution percentages and are presented on Figure 6. 6.1 Site Specific Roadway Improvements The adjacent street and alternative transportation mode networks are developed within the site area. The intersection of Mason Street / Cherry Street will provide primary access to the site. The north leg of Mason Street is builtout to its ultimate cross section. A driveway cut exists along the north leg of Mason Street which will serve as access to the museum. Sidewalks exist on both sides of Mason Street adjacent to the site. With development of this site, the project will tie onsite pedestrian and vehicular access to the existing facilities that exist adjacent to the site. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 6 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study The intersection LOS are summarized for each location in Table 1. The data in the level of service summary table illustrates that, with the forecast Year 2015 peak hour volumes, the study area intersections will continue to operate acceptably in.the LOS A-C range overall and LOS A-D for side street approaches. The intersection approaches will continue to meet or exceed the City's motor vehicle level of service standards. 5.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 5.1 Trip Generation A trip generation estimate was made to determine the traffic characteristics of. the anticipated site land use. Museum trip generation data is not available through the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual2. Therefore, the proposed museum land use traffic characteristics are based on market studies completed for the site and discussions with museums future operator. This study analyzes weekday noon and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at adjacent intersections: In order to estimate the peak hour traffic generated by the museum, the number of anticipated visitors to the site were applied. School and shuttle buses will also access -the site on a daily basis with an average of 2-4 passengers per vehicle experienced overall. It should be noted that the client believes the annual visitors used in this study are conservatively high, particularly in the early years of operation. The methodology and assumptions for the site traffic characteristics are summarized below. annually = 1.00;000 visitors monthly.= 81333 visitors (12 months per year) • peak month factor of 1..2 applied = 10,000 visitors per month • daily = 333 visitors (monthly divided by average of 30 days. month) • 15% bike / ped / transit reduction applied = 283 average daily visitors in cars • 2 passengers per vehicle = 142 vehicles per day (client believes this is more likely to be 3-4 passengers per vehicle especially considering school buses) • total trips ends (vehicle arriving and leaving the site) = 283 vehicles per day 25% of the daily traffic will occur in the noon peak hour with 50% arriving and 50%leaving the site during this period; equates to 35 trips in and 35 trips out during noon peak hour • 5% of daily traffic will occur in the P.M. peak hour with 1/3 inbound and 213 outbound; equates to 5 trips in and 10 trips out in the P.M. peak hour • . other peak hours are late morning and early afternoon, but these are not high traffic periods on the adjacent roadways/intersections- 2 Trip Generation 8° Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLc Page 5 February 25, 2016 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study The data in the table show that the study area intersections are currently .operating acceptably (LOS A-C range overall) with side street approaches in the LOS A-D range. All of the intersections, and their approach legs currently meet or exceed the City's motor vehicle level of service standards. 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 4.1 . Annual Traffic Growth Rate The TIS guidelines require an analysis of the site traffic impacts for conditions one year after proposed buildout and occupancy. It is anticipated that the site will be constructed and occupied within the next 3-4 years or by 2015. The short term planning horizon for site specific analysis is Year 2015.- Based on discussions with City staff, an annual traffic growth rate of 1 % was approvedior use in this study. In addition, traffic associated with buildout of the Penny Flats site located south andwest of the Cherry Street./ Mason Street intersection is to be included in the background _traffic for this study.- The south portion of the Penny Flats parcel was developed at the time. traffic counts .were collected on Howes and Mason Streets.. Therefore, a portion of the Penny Flats traffic was added to the background .volumes. Based on the future.volume forecast methodology discussed above, Year 2015 background traffic volumes were projected and are illustrated on Figure 4. The volumes assume conversion of Mason Street to two-way traffic. A slight diversion in existing traffic will occur from the adjacent corridors with the addition ofsouthbound traffic flows to the Mason Street corridor. This diversion was considered in the background traffic volumes for Year 2015. 4.2 Roadway Network The Year 2015 roadway street network is essentially the same network shown on the existing network Figure 3 with the exception of Mason Street converted to a 2-way arterial street from a 1-way (NB) street. 4.3 Intersection Levels of Service Intersection level of service calculations were conducted with the Year 2015 background peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 4 at the study area intersections. The LOS methodology and assumptions discussed previously was applied to the Year 2015 background volumes to project short term capacity at the study area intersections. The Year 2015 intersection LOS calculation worksheets are attached in the Appendix. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 4 February 25, 2010 Ft: Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study one=way northbound. Mason Street is in the process of being converted to two-way north - South traffic. Intersections along this corridor are stop sign controlled within the site vicinity. The speed limit .on this roadway is .25 mph. North of .Cherry Street; Mason Street meanders to the northwest serving residential, recreational and other uses. The north side of Mason Street at Cherry Street will serve as primary access to the museum site. . Howes Street is a two-lane minor arterial roadway with a 25 mph speed limit. On -street parking and bike lanes exists on both sides of this roadway. Attached sidewalks are present along this corridor. 3.3.. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic count data was collected during the noon and evening peak hour periods on . a typical weekday in January 2010 for this project. The Howes Street / Cherry Street intersection was observed during the noon peak hour only based on City requirements for this study.. Traffic volumes at the College Ave [Cherry St intersection were collected by the City in'March 2009. The existing average weekday peak traffic volumes for the study area intersections are illustrated on Figure 3. Existing intersection count sheets are attached in the Appendix for reference. 3.4 intersection Levels of Service The surrounding site access intersections were reviewed to determine baseline or existing operations and identify any capacity constraints. in determining the operational characteristics of an intersection, "Levels of Service" (LOS) A through F are applied, with LOS A indicating very good operations and LOS F indicating congested operations. The intersection LOS is represented as a delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole and for critical turning movements. A more detailed discussion of LOS methodology is contained in the Appendix for reference. Criteria contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)' was applied to the study area intersection in order to determine existing levels of service during peak hour periods. Existing signal timing plans for the noon and P-M. peak hour periods at the College Ave. / Cherry St. intersections were obtained from the City. Existing peak hour volume approach factors were applied to the intersection scenarios for this study.. The results of the LOS calculations for the intersections are summarized in Table,1. The City motor vehicle standards for unsignalized arterial/collector intersections apply to the Cherry Street / Mason Street and Cherry Street / Howes Street intersections. The signalized motor vehicle standards apply to the Cherry Street / College Avenue intersection. The intersection level of service worksheets are attached in the Appendix. Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2008. Synchro v. 7 software utilized. Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 3 February 25, 2010 Ft. Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study permanent open space and will never be developed. Access is planned from an existing driveway cut along Mason Street roughly 120 feet north of the Cherry: Street north flowline. A site plan showing proposed access and parking is contained on Figure 2. Pedestrian, bicycle and transit access is provided via internal sidewalk connections to the adjacent trails and sidewalks along the site's perimeter. A mix of land uses surround the site. 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFICCONDITIONS 3.1 Study Area The study area boundaries were established for.the site based on discussions with City staff. These boundaries took into consideration the amount of site. traffic added tothe surrounding street network. A base assumptions works heet is attached in the Appendix for reference. The primary study area is limited to Maple Street on the south, the site boundary on the north (essentially Cherry Street), Howes Street on the west and College Avenue on the east: 3.2 Circulation Network The existing study area circulation network consists of arterial, collector, and local streets. The primary roadways that serve the project site are discussed in the following text. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities exist throughout the study area adjacent to the site either along roadways or off-street on trails. A more detailed discussion of pedestrian, bicycle and transit conditions in the study area is contained in Sections 7-9. The existing intersection geometry and traffic control is illustrated on the scenario peak hour traffic volume figures. College Avenue is a 4-lane major arterial roadway with turn lanes adjacent to the site. Bike lanes exist north of the site and sidewalks exist along both sides of College Avenue. This roadway is a primary access corridor through the City and to outlying communities. The posted speed limit along this roadway is 35 miles per hour (mph) within the site vicinity. The intersection with Cherry Street -Willow Street is controlled by traffic signals. Cherry,Streetand Willow Streetare two-lane collector roadways extending west and east from College Avenue, respectively. On -street parking on Cherry Street exists from Mason Street west. On -street bike lanes and sidewalks are present along these roadways, with the exception of a missing sidewalk section on the south side of Cherry Street between Howes Street and College Avenue. The posted speed limit on these roadways is 25 mph. Cherry Street west of Mason primarily serves residential uses. Mason Street is a two-lane minor arterial roadway with on -street bike lanes and attached sidewalks. A railroad runs down the center median of the street. Currently, the street is Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page 2 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION This intermediate traffic impact study has been prepared by the Fox Higgins Transportation Group for the Fort Collins Discovery Museum Project proposed onthe northeast corner of the Cherry Street / Mason Street intersection. A vicinity. map with the site location is illustrated on Figure 1: The information contained in this study is anticipated to be used by the City in identifying anyroadway needs on the site or adjacent to the site in the near term scenario. For this study, criteria set forth in the most current. Latimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS) were applied. The City has identified an intermediate traffic study for this site based on the forecast traffic characteristics. The site parcel is planned for museum uses which will serve the City and adjacent areas. Because of the unique use of the site as a museum, the following was identified for analysis for this traffic study. bE_ • Study area intersections: — Cherry Street / Mason Street . — Cherry Street /College Avenue (US 287) Chevy Street / Howes Street — Mason Street / Site Access . • Weekday noon and PM peak hour periods required for analysis at study area intersections with the exception of the Howes Street intersection where only the noon peak hour is required • Year 2015 is near term traffic scenario when site is anticipated to be constructed and occupied • Mason Street will be converted to two-way traffic by near term scenario • Trip generation estimates for the site use will be based on projected annual visitors • Mode split of 15% to account for bike, pedestrian and transit (system wide) • Future traffic growth rate used is 1 % per year • Include any traffic from the adjacent Penny Flats development traffic study • Review any site added traffic increases to the section of Cherry Street west of Howes Street • Pedestrian and bicycle level of service evaluation are required 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Discovery Museum and Science Center is proposed in the north portion of .the downtown area in Fort Collins. The site is located on the northeast corner of the Cherry Street and Mason Street intersection immediately west of the College Avenue (US 287) corridor. The site is currently vacant. The museum is planned for approximately 42,000 square feet of space in the building. The entire northern half of the site is dedicated to Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLc Page 1 February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Summary Table 2 Trip Generation. Estimate Table 3. Pedestrian Level of Service Worksheet Table 4 . Bicycle Level of Service Worksheet LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map F' 2 St PI Igure Figure 3 I e an Existing Traffic Volumes Figure 4 Year 2015 Background Traffic Volumes Figure 5 Site Trip Distribution Figure 6 Site Generated Traffic Volumes Figure 7 Year2015 + Site Generated Traffic Volumes Figure 8 Pedestrian Access Study Area APPENDIX City Base Assumptions Worksheet Existing Intersection Count Sheets Level of Service Definitions Intersection Capacity Worksheets 10 Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page ii February 25, 2010 Ft Collins Discovery Museum Project (FH#10002) draft Intermediate Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............. ........................... .. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... .:.......................... 1 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................ 2 3.1 Study Area ................:.. 2 3.2. Circulation Network ........ ........................... ...2 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes ................................... 3 3.4 Intersection Levels of Service ... ........... _ .... 3 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 4 4.2 Roadway Network ........................................... 4 4.3 Intersection Levels of. Service ........ _ .......................... 4 5.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC .... ............ 5 5.1 Trip Generation ..............:......... ................ 5 5.2 Trip Distribution .............. ....... ..................... 6 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT ........... 6 6.1 Site Specific Roadway Improvements ........................... 6 6.2 Site Circulation and Access . .......................... 7 6.3 Year 2015-plus-Site Intersection Analysis ......................... 7 7.0 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE..... .................. 7 7.1 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ...................... 8 7.2 Potential Pedestrian System Improvements ....... . .... . . . .. . . .. . 8 7.3 Pedestrian Level of Service ............................... 10 8-0 BICYCLE ACCESS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ...................... . . 10 8.1 Existing Bicycle Facilities ................................... 11 8.2 Potential Bicycle System Improvements ........................ 11 8.3 Bicycle Level of Service ........................... 11 9.0 PUBLIC TRANSIT ACCESS ....................................... 11 10.0 SPECIAL STUDIES ............................................. 11 11.0 CONCLUSION ................................................. 12 Fox Higgins Transportation Group, LLC Page I February 25, 2010 FT. COLLINS DISCOVERY MUSEUM PROJECT Draft TRAFFI C 1 M PACT STUDY Vine Dr. If Lee Martinez Park 1 (open Space) PROJECT SITE ' on - Ct Museum Cherry St. a Mo le St. \ \ till a - to Transit r` 10 . . c Center 00N \ o o o .. - Cfierry•St. a s ID! _ In Laporte Ave. < Mountain Ave. �S �� PREPARED FOR: Oz ARCHITECTURE 1.805 29TH ST, SUITE 2054 BOULDER, CO 80301 F'0 X DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 201 O FH PROJECT # 1 0002 TRANSPORTATION GROUP P.O. BOX 19768, BOULDER, CO 80308-2768 PHONE: 303.485.01.14 FAX: 303.772.2329