Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIRPARK VILLAGE - ANNEXATION & ZONING - 16-05 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES (3)It Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 29 it already has there and that is where the compatibility issue becomes much more important. Member Schmidt to not recommend approval of the annexation with the amendment to the East Mulberry Corridor Plan. They recommend that the annexation should stay with the present zoning. Planner Shepard added that the Board needed to define that they were referring to the Overlay Framework Plan which presumes the scenario that the airpark is closing which allows the southern 1/3 to go E and the northern 2/3 to remain in the I, Industrial. Member Craig seconded the motion. Member Craig clarified the motion to be an amendment to the East Mulberry Corridor Plan to the proposed amendment under the quotes of the Overlay Framework Plan. We are allowing the employment there at the intersection of Highway 14 and Timberline and the other section being left as Industrial. Member Schmidt clarified that they were amending the East Mulberry Corridor Plan and the Structure Plan to what is in the Overlay Plan. Member Craig seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. There was no other business. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. These meeting minutes were approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on January 19, 2006. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 28 pay for this parkway, but they need to start to sell property in order for that equation to keep rolling along. The north end of the property is the thing that is going to help that infrastructure take off and be able to be put in so when the national marking they are doing for the R and D park; they can come out and kick the tires and say they have the infrastructure in place. The north end of the development is proceeding nicely and it needs to happen in the chronology according to their calculations in order to make it work. Member Craig stated that there is a lot of vacant land around there that they could be involved in getting residential without them having to rezone this particular area. Have they looked at that at all? Mr. Jones replied they don't own any land there. They need to get this critical momentum going to pay for the infrastructure to get to draw their R and D park and they need the development itself to be diverse and have the initial sales of the north part of the development to pay for the infrastructure to put in the south part. Member Craig asked about the overlay employment and why could they not start putting residential in that to pay for the infrastructure. Mr. Jones replied that they asked the neighbors a lot of questions and one of the questions was residential appropriate. They got mixed answers and they got a lot of some residential was appropriate. They asked the neighbors what percentage of residential would be appropriate. They got some answers that some residential would be fine and some answers that said not residential. The majority said about 40% residential. Member Carpenter asked Mr. Jones to point out where the heliports were located. Mr. Jones responded by showing a slide of the heliport locations. Member Carpenter commented that there are some exciting things here but when you start marketing residential with the kind of helicopter traffic, she believed there would be a problem there. Member Lingle stated that with the intent to maximize the number of residential units that you can get on the site because they become primary uses instead of secondary uses smacks against the whole compatibility issue to the point where it does become a zoning issue not necessarily an ODP issue. He stated that it would be in the best interest of the city to have a mixed of residential and commercial uses would be ideal if this was not adjacent to county industrial development that already has the kind of uses Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 27 Member Schmidt asked if their R and D plan that they have described mostly fit into the employment that is already there in the overlay plan. It looks like the R and D was going to be the first portion and the residential was going to be in the back. It sounds like the R and D is going to be the main economic driver. Mr. Jones replied that the R and D are intended to be on that end where it shows employment. R and D could go into Industrial to some degree but you could not put the hotel and convention center which needs to be a big component of that in Industrial. It is different but the same concept as Rigden Farm. You could not build the King Soopers first and expect the residential to come in. You need the critical mass of the other part of the development to get your anchor later. They need the employment all the way because they need the north end of their development to create the momentum to bring along the south end of their development. It can't happen in Industrial on the north end to get that momentum going. Member Craig asked Mr. Jones that without the residential rooftops, the R and D Center will never come to fruition. Mr. Jones replied no, he thought they needed momentum. The momentum will happen in both the north end and the south end. To some degree yes, but to some degree he thought that was over simplification to say without the north end it will not happen. Ms. Durkin added that the market study that was done for this project indicates that right now there is no market. In order for them to get at least started to at least create this new R and D Center, is to start with some type of residential on the end that they are asking to be rezoned. From there they can build up the momentum and they are hoping that the majority will be the type of research and development that provides new jobs, the additional employment and the economic generator that we so desperately need right now in this community. Member Craig said so the market needs residential, so we fill the area with residential so people are already are there and then we create jobs for people who aren't there that need residential. To her this is backwards; to her you create the jobs first and then the area around that develops with houses, so the people can then have a place to live. Ms. Durkin replied that it is a balancing act right now. What they are looking to do is create the vision and the opportunity for people to understand that this is the type of development where you can work and live at the same time. It is hard to describe until we get down to the ODP as to where they are going to put that kind of emphasis. Mr. Jones added that they need this momentum early because they have all this infrastructure to pay for. They intend to establish a metro district or some sort of way to Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 26 giving input and participating meant something. He was not sure what is going on here. He did not see many people here tonight, but there were a whole bunch of people who showed up at those meetings. He thought what was presented here was the culmination of what they as a group said what they wanted as neighbors. He thought that the Board's job would be to say that the people spoke. PUBLIC INPUT Member Lingle asked the Helicopter owners that based on the applicants presentation of some ideas on how to allow for continued helicopter access with the safety zone and are they uncomfortable with that process. Mr. Hansen replied that they were still uncomfortable with the ideas. They show up at their doorstep at 3:30 this afternoon with this proposal and this is what we think we are going to do. That was three hours before this meeting. He found that to be a knee jerk reaction. Also, in the East Mulberry Corridor Plan there was a lot of foresight and a lot of effort and a lot of study put into the fact that this should be zoned industrial. The city of Fort Collins spent a lot of money doing this. They spent a lot of time and blood, sweat and tears trying to make this plan work. We need industrial, there was a plan put forth and there was a lot of effort put into it and we should stick to that plan. With industrial they feel they can operate within what the city has already put down what they would like to see this developed as. Member Carpenter asked if it was at all possible to have an employment district here and the kind of development we are talking about and still allow a way for them to operate, or to him, the two are completely incompatible. Mr. Hansen replied without being an expert at the employment zoning, he thought that the thing that concerns them about the employment zoning is the residential capacity that is being proposed, 1600 units. That is 1600 telephone calls he could get everyday and that is 1600 phone calls the city is going to get everyday. Their issue is the residential portion of the employment zoning. That is why the industrial zoning was put there because it is the most compatible with the neighboring land uses that already exist. The city foresaw that and that is why it is part of the East Mulberry Corridor Plan. Member Schmidt commented that she thought the plan has some innovative ideas and she thought that the concept is creative and part of that is good — if the helicopters and the other industrial were not there, if there were just employment adjacent to it something might work out very well, it just makes her nervous about where it is right now. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 25 cash flow. The opportunity with the developer has arisen and the stock holders have chosen to accept their offer for the facility. Michael Hansen, General Manager of Century Helicopters and Avian Technologies, which is the manufacturer of aircraft accessories located at the airport as well. He stated that this was discussed at a previous meeting that the noise is a big complaint of theirs and that will continue as they build and expand their business. They have expanded the employment of their companies by 20% in the last month. Two years ago they doubled the size of their building and they hope to double the size of their building again. That will continue to add more helicopter traffic. The aviation industry is stronger than ever particularly since the terrorist attacks on 9/11. People no longer want to go to the airport and stand in line and go through security searches. Those people who can afford it start buying helicopters and airplanes. Avian Technologies is the number one leading supplies for infra red surveillance integration equipment with an aircraft. Their supplies include the FBI, Boarder Patrol and those types of entities. They fly their helicopters in from all over the United States to be worked on again increasing the amount of air traffic that they will have coming in and out of their facility as well as increasing the noise. As they expand their business he hoped the Board would recognize the fact that they are there and they are continuing to grow and this is not something that is just going to go away and they want to mitigate the noise complaints that they have already seen over the years. AJ Glaser, property owner at 200 Rome Court which is to the northeast of the airport. He was there to talk about process, he did not ultimately care that much about what was being proposed here, but he also really did not care that much about helicopters. What he did care about is his property. Over the 10 years he has been an owner out there, he has gotten a lot of post cards in the mail from the city saying that stuff is going on. He has gone to almost everyone of those meetings and some of the worst have been the East Mulberry Corridor Plan and also Dry Creek. What happened at those meetings is that you show up and they show you a plan and they say "oh this is the deal and if you want to complain we will listen to a couple of things" and the rest is a done deal. What was unique about this process what that he got his card and he thought `oh great here we go again", showed up and basically it was a blank piece of paper. There were forty or fifty people in the room and the developer says "what would you like us to do?" That started the process and from there the process developed for six months and over the course of time there seemed to be no agenda other than you as the neighbors saying what they would like to see this be. It was, in his opinion, a phenomenal process and is something that should be the rule for everyone to do. It bothered him to see this tonight which is almost negating everything that he thought they did. He went to everyone of those meetings because he thought what they were doing as the neighbors Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 24 He believes that someone on the Board made the comment that residential units cost more than they contribute through fees. If that is true then these residential units may not pay their own way. The reason they are down there at the airpark is because it was for aviation use. They are also down there because it is relatively inexpensive land and that is why many of the businesses are down there. The fact that it is industrial is not negative, it is positive in terms of attracting many businesses that serve the community. It is very difficult to get a new heliport. It may allow it, but if you try and run a heliport through the planning process, you will find out how many people want one next to them and it is not very many. The fact that they have heliports in existence means that they will continue to operate from them because the cost of relocating and the difficulty is considerable. He believes the city is charged with protecting their rights to operate their businesses. He thought they can continue to operate no matter how it is zoned, it is a matter of obstructions, egress and ingress, whether it is industrial or employment they can address those issues at the time of planning. He thought the issue with employment is protecting their rights to operate in terms of complaints that they are going to receive and protecting people who will move in there from the noise effect. Larry Hansen, founder and CEO of Century Helicopters stated that he came here in 1970 and brought the helicopter industry. They located at that time at the airport because it was an airport. All along he has never had many concerns about if the runway would go away that they would still have the ability to operate helicopters. With what they see now with the decisions that may be made by what is going to be placed next to them, it could create some problems and could put them out of business. They currently operate a multi -million dollar business and they employ 30 or more people at their facility. What is being proposed is "we think we can do this and we think we can do that'. We know what we can do, we are there and we are doing it. There are others there that are the same way. All they are asking that what ever decision that is going to be made, that they be accounted for and that some provision be made that will allow them to continue to operate without being hassled by their neighbors and forced out of business. In the last two weeks they have received multiple calls from the low income housing on the north side of the airport complaining about the helicopters. They have received calls over the years from a hotel located on Highway 14 owned by one of the principles of the airport for the helicopters making noise and bothering the people staying there. If you are going to try and put a hotel next to them, it probably will not work. Loren Maxey, Vice President of Community Airpark Corporation and the owner of the airpark. This is a privately owned facility and it was started in 1966 by a group of local aviators and has fortunately has been able to stay around for 40 years. For the last several years it has been declining and now has a negative cash flow and now has an opportunity to sell the airport to a developer. There are many factors for the negative Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 23 Goals, Principles and Policies of City Plan. Is it necessary, and they have gone through the list of changes that would happen. There is an airport that is not longer going to be feasible after 40 years of operation. Heavy industrial is very unlikely on this site because of proximity to neighborhoods. This would allow a residential use that we see in other areas. Why do we need additional residential; look at Rigden Farms, they needed that residential in order to gain the momentum and the dollars it needed to put in the rest of it, it is no different here. We are talking impact to Airpark Village, what is it going to do for us if these amendments go through. We will be able to expand uses to include more residential, compatibility with the neighborhoods and uses that are essential to this new economic generator that we really need. It also permits uses that support the expansion of the city's central core, the downtown. This is a mixed use revitalization and economic growth project in a transitional area. It promotes public welfare by creating jobs and housing in balance with each other. It integrates with existing residential and it places new residential in proximity to shopping, recreation and employment. Does it meet the needs of the community; when they did the East Mulberry Corridor Plan, these are the things people talked about, better overall appearance in the area, more employers, and avoidance of big box developments, storage yards and industrial uses. New development that looks good based on sound design, principles and lots of landscaping. This is not a development that is looking to the city for handouts, they are going to be refining the site design and continue outreach to primary stake holders and they have a track record of going above and beyond that. The development will also include a financing plan in working in concert with other business owners along Mulberry to come up with ways to create that Mulberry Corridor that we have all dreamed about for so many years. PUBLIC INPUT Robert Dean, owns Front Range Helicopters spoke to the Board. He stated that there were many points about this and the first is the East Mulberry Corridor Plan assumed with the airport leaving that there would be no air traffic. That is not true and there will be a considerable amount of air traffic remaining. The employment zone allows schools, lodging and a considerable amount of residential with the plan that they are promoting. The other aspect is the intent is not the issue here; it is the zoning of the parcel. What they say may not come to pass, but it will be zoned employment with all these uses available. The consideration is how this air traffic is going to relate to the residential and other public intensive uses. They mentioned residential stacked so that would mean several floors up. If the Board saw the pictures of the industrial park they are one story buildings, maybe two. If start stacking building up it becomes more of an obstruction issue and certainly a noise issue. That will be an enhanced annoyance to anyone who lives there. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 22 helicopter neighbors and started to figure out what are their needs and what are our needs. It did not occur to them that it was going to be as big of an issue with regards to changing to employment from industrial. They were not prepared to talk about helicopter issues last time and that is one of the main reasons they wanted to come back before the Board to follow up on what they have done since then to try and figure out how they can co -exist with the helicopter operators and what is the best solution for that. Obviously they are not going to make them 100% happy because they are used to being next to an airport, which is ideal if you are a helicopter operator. If there is any sort of development next to it, there is going to be some growing pains. They are gong to try and minimize that. Mr. Jones discussed the plan and stated that they were looking at right along the edge that is adjacent to the existing business and industrial park. They have analyzed where the three heliports currently out there are, two to the south and one to the north. They interviewed all three operators and tried to figure out what would make it easier for them to operate and co -exist with them. They came up with the idea of a safety zone where they don't put any buildings in and they don't put any big canopy trees in and they minimize the things that would conflict with helicopters taking off and landing. They do that along the areas where the helicopter pads would have access to. They want to work out a win win and they think that there is a workable solution, but because employment zone and industrial zone both allow heliports and helipads, they think it is more of a project development plan issue, or even an Overall Development Plan issue of how do you mitigate between the two. They feel that it is not a zoning issue at all since it is allowed in both zones and they wanted to represent that they are making all the efforts they can to come up with a win win. Alan Krcmarik, for the applicant testified that the proposed use could be a very viable economic generator for the community. The economy is going through a rough patch and for the past several years the city has been studying the ideas of economic vitality and sustainability. They took a look at the report put out by the EVSAG and this project as proposed ties right into that. They are looking at a research and development use relatively high density, a lot of jobs fit into this site. It could also fit into the concept of being a business cluster as outlined in the EVSAG report. The idea is to be a hub of transportation oriented research. He was also asked to develop financing tools, but that would be further down the road, they did include in the packet an appendix that summarizes potential economic activity. Mr. Krcmarik reviewed the appendix for the Board. Suzanne Durkin, representing the applicant stated that what they were talking about tonight is the first steps in the process and the questions before the board whether or not to amend the Framework Overlay Plan and City Structure Plan; is the amendment necessary and will it promote the public welfare, consistency with the Visions and Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 21 of the secondary uses that qualify as such can be no more than 25% of the development plan. Mr. Jones explained that the Board received a copy of all their meeting minutes and all the stuff that the public sent in, the sign in sheets and everything of the multi -meeting process that they had. They rented a public room at the Ramada Inn and hosted meetings that they really tried to engage the public. They sent out mailings to 250 business owners in the vicinity and had a web site they encouraged people to go to and had a topic every month that they tried to engage the neighbors in to try and help shape the input of what was wanted next to them as they moved forward with this development. The East Mulberry Corridor Plan was an excellent effort as well, but it was more of a broad brush for a larger area. In their plan they are only talking about 150 acres out of the plan so they dived into a finer level of public participation, specific to a lot smaller area and that is why they feel they are not disregarding the East Mulberry Corridor Plan and there if much more information now because they have engaged the neighbors to the degree they have. They would like to call it a refinement of the East Mulberry Corridor Plan rather than saying that it was wrong in the first place. Mr. Jones talked about the amount of industrial land in the GMA and it totaled 1,901 acres. There is the airpark area, the New Belgium area; there is some off of North College, Riverside and quite a bit out by 1-25, some of which is Anheuser Busch property. Out of the 1900 acres, they are asking that 80 acres be taken out of Industrial and that represents about 4.2% of the Industrial designated land. Advanced Planning provided the information that 928 acres out of the 1900 acres are vacant right now, and their 80 acres represents about 8.7% of what is vacant. Mr. Jones spoke about the intensity of jobs. Industrial type jobs seem to be less concentrated than what you can do in employment. Their intent is to have mixed use buildings with some of them having residential on the upper floors and some of them having employment type uses on the ground floor. By going to employment allows them more efficient use of the land, more urban type of environment. The other thing is housing and jobs balance; ultimately with their development they want to have a research and development park as the primary anchor for this development, but at the same time they want to have a lot of mixed use residential units. Within the project they want to have this housing and job balance; having housing close to jobs is doing their part in reducing vehicle miles traveled. Mr. Jones stated that the last time they were before the Board there was quite a bit of discussion about helicopters and it ended up being a surprise what the issues related to helicopters were. Prior to that meeting, they had gone and talked to some of the Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 20 If the 80 acres were to be designated employment and not industrial, the ability to do some uses will be lost as a result of this change; heavy industrial, recycling facilities, recreational vehicle, boat and truck storage, outdoor storage, resource extraction processes and sales, junkyards, airport and airstrips, transport terminals and farm implement and heavy equipment sales. By making the change there are new uses that were not permitted in the industrial zone. Out of those he made a list that they would intend to do; private and public schools, convention and conference centers, lodging establishments and personal and business service shops as part of the ultimate development that you could not do in industrial. He also noted that there were more residential uses allowed in employment zone than in the industrial zone. They were only intending on doing mixed use dwellings units. There were several uses that are overlapped in what they intend to do that you could do in either one of the zones; mixed use residential units are allowed in both industrial and in employment. That is the only residential type that they are planning to use. He would be getting into the difference of how you can use them in each zone and that is part of the main reason why they want employment rather than industrial. It is also worth mentioning the last item on the list and that is heliports and helipads that are available in both zones. A lot of conversation previously was about whether it was appropriate to put employment to helipads and the impact that would have on the development. It was lost site of that you could put a new helipad in employment that is permitted and it was not really a zoning issue so much as a site planning issue of how do you buffer against that. Why do they want employment versus industrial? It boils down to two basic reasons. The first is that as part of the development, they would like to include a hotel and convention center and that is not allowed in industrial and it is allowed in employment. The second is that the mixed use dwellings are treated differently between the two zones. Mixed Use dwelling units in industrial; you can do them but you have to have fifty percent of your building or more be the non-residential use. The mixed -use dwelling unit has to be above the non-residential use on the ground floor. Basically you have a two-story building that has the first story non-residential, the second story residential. In employment it works differently and it works a lot better for what they intend to do. Residential is a secondary use in the employment zone. However, mixed use residential depends on how it is done to determine whether it is a primary or secondary use. If the mixed -use residential unit is above a primary use such as an office, that residential above it is counted as a primary use. If the residential use is above a secondary use, such as a restaurant or retail store or a convenience shopping center, then that residential counts as a secondary use. It is an equation that needs to be closely followed as the development goes through as to how much of that has qualified as primary and how much is secondary. The way that the intend to do it is quite a bit of their residential will be over primary uses, they were basically limited to all Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 19 Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence: Member Torgerson excused himself due to a conflict of interest. Ted Shepard, Chief Planner gave a staff presentation. He stated that this was a reconsideration of the Structure Plan Amendment request and subsequent recommendation to City Council for the zoning. It is not a continuation of the annexation and that is not an issue. That was recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board to indeed be annexed. No one is contesting the annexation, what is up for consideration is the Structure Plan Amendment which would lead to the applicant's request that the entire site be placed into the Employment Zone versus the Industrial zone, which is what was recommended back in May. Chairperson Lingle asked if the annexation is proceeding, it has to have a zoning attached to it, so would it be I, Industrial. Deputy City Attorney Eckman replied that it has to be zoned 90 days following the annexation. Unless the Structure Plan is amended, it would have to be zoned in accordance with the Structure Plan. Troy Jones, MTA Architects gave the applicant's presentation. He stated that they were here tonight to present an amendment to the East Mulberry Corridor Plan. Last time they were in front of the Board they did not dive into a lot of detail because they had the annexation and zoning on the table at the time, as well as the Plan amendment. They tried not to show too much design that would be down the line in the development type of detail at the time of annexation and zoning. They thought that it would be important to clarify some things that they did not present last time the Board heard this project that is very relevant to why they feel it should be re -designated employment rather than industrial. Mr. Jones showed on a map the portion of their property that they would like to zone Employment rather than Industrial. He stated that in 2002 the East Mulberry Corridor Plan was adopted and in that Plan a Framework Plan was adopted. There were two scenarios; the first being the Framework Plan that assumed that the airport would stay in operation. The second plan acknowledged that if the airport were to stop operation, that the area should be treated as employment and not industrial. Mr. Jones showed the Framework Overlay Plan which showed in the event that the airpark would close and redevelop the area that would be appropriate for employment. He stated that their request was to piggyback onto that; the East Mulberry Corridor Plan already established that down by the intersection of Mulberry and Timberline that it would be appropriate for employment. What they wanted to do is include the 80 acres on the north part of their property that they would like to be employment rather than industrial. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 18 ember Lingle commented for the record that the findings are very clear on what ev ate an annexation on and it does not include whether bringing a property ' is bene i ' I to the city in terms of tax generation on a drain on tax services. thought that was arly an area that should be left for City Council to discuss he thought it was irreleva at the Planning and Zoning Board level for this anne ion and all the ones that may coming forth in the future. Member Craig commeqted that with all the issues that are oing to come up with the Southeast enclave, we a going to end up taking the iece by piece because they are going to come to the B rd. What bothers her out this piece of property and she sees it also down in the south st is yes, they y impact fees, but it is proven when it is residential, for every dollar th ay to th ity, it costs the city a dollar and a quarter to maintain them. What we are goi t un into in the southeast as well what she really feels this little piece sitting out here ' maintain services out there is going to be more than the dollar and quarter. Sh ondere when we start taking in these little pieces of residential what the benefit o ur doing it, so a is not going to support this. Member Carpenter w d be supporting the motion. he appreciates all the residents coming out and a uraged them to talk to Council as II. When and if we end up with a develoKlike plan, come back and talk to them, they want to here from them. She would ' he residents to understand that they certai riteria to go by and in this cas ' does meet all the criteria. motion was approved 6-1 with Member Craig voting in the Project: Recommendation to City Council for an Amendment to the East Mulberry Corridor Plan. Project Description: On May 19, 2005, The Planning and Zoning Board voted to approve the annexation of the Airpark Village but with a recommendation of Industrial zoning versus the applicant's preference for Employment zoning. The applicant has re -submitted a request for Employment zoning which requires an amendment to the East Mulberry Corridor Plan Overlay Framework Plan. Council Liaison: Karen Weitkunat Chairperson: Judy Meyer Vice Chair: Dave Lingle Staff Liaison: Cameron Gloss Phone: (W) 490-2172 Phone: (W) 223-1820 Vice Chair Lingle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call: Meyer, Schmidt, Craig, Torgerson, Carpenter, Stockover and Lingle. Staff Present: Wray, Eckman, Shepard, Gloss, Buffington and Deines. Citizen Participation: None. Director of Current Planning Pete Wray reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agendas: Consent Agenda: 1. Minutes of the May 19th and June 16, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board Hearings. (Continued) 2. Resolution PZ05-09 — Easement Dedication. 3. Resolution PZ05-10 — Easement Dedication. 4. #32-981 Poudre Valley Health System — Harmony Medical Campus, 5th Filing, Healthy Living Center — Project Development Plan. 5. Choice City Business Park — Out of City Service Request. 6. #18-05B Kingdom Hall — Overall Development Plan. 7. #36-96N Mulberry and Lemay Crossings, Filing Two, Centennial Bank — Major Amendment. 8. #20-00B State Highway 14 — East Frontage Road — Annexation and Zoning. Discussion Agenda: 9. #17-04A Interchange Lands First — Annexation and Zoning. (Continued) 10. #18-04A Interchange Lands Second — Annexation and Zoning. (Continued) 11. #27-05A Waterdale First — Annexation and Zoning. 12. #16-05 Airpark Village — Annexation and Zoning and Structure Plan Amendment. Items 4, 5 and 8 were pulled for discussion. Member Lingle moved to approve consent items 2, 3, 6 and 7. Member Schmidt seconded the motion. The motion was approved 7-0.