The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About210-212 W. MAGNOLIA ST., URBAN LIVING LOFTS - PDP - 24-05 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Number: 23 Created: 5/31 /2005 [8/24/05) Curb stop location is approximately 8 feet north of curb and 2 feet west of west edge of entry walk. Meter is currently in basement. Move meter to meter box on service out front. [7/11/05] [5/31/05] Our records indicate an existing 3/4-inch water service to this site. Show and label both proposed and existing curb stops/meter pits and maintain a 2 foot clear separation between pits. Maintain a 4 foot clear separation between meter pits/curb stops and all other permanent structures. Number: 65 Created: 7/11/2005 [8/24/05] On utility plan, add note on each existing water service to reconnect to new main. [7/11/05] Include a general note to coordinate the relocation of the existing water services with the city utilities at 221-6700. Number: 67 Created: 7/11/2005 [8/24/05] There is an existing tree between the new sewer services. Is this tree being removed? Should sewer services be moved? [7/11/05] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distances on the landscape plans. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 16 Created: 5/24/2005 [8/17/05] [7/12/05] [5/24/05] Add a note to the landscape notes regarding installation of landscaping prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen City Planner Page 4 Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 83 [8/24/05] No remaining issues. Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 8/24/2005 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Drainage Number: 30 Created: 5/31/2005 [8/23/05] Repeat comment [7/14/05] The 4-inch pipe on the Edwards property is utilized for detention. A request and approval would have to be granted to abandon the pipe and detention for this property. [5/31/051 Please explain in the report where the alley drains. Is the 4-inch pipe in a sump location adequate? Is the pipe private or public? Number: 85 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] A letter of intent is required for the off -site work to the west of the property. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 68 Created: 7/11/2005 [8/24/05] Have prices been received regarding the replacement of the water main? If City is going to participate in this cost, the details need to be worked out before development agreement. [7/11/05] If a cost sharing is proposed for the extension of the 8-inch water main in Magnolia, coordinate with Roger Buffington at 221-6854. Number: 69 [8/24/05] Created: 7/11 /2005 [7/11/05] See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Site/Landscape Plans Number: 81 Created: 8/24/2005 [8/24/05] Coordinate site and landscape plan with utility plan (sidewalk chase in front of building). Topic: Utility Plan Number: 80 Created: 8/24/2005 [8/24/05] We will research the existing water main configuration at Magnolia and Howes and provide more information on how connection to be made. Number: 84 Created: 8/25/2005 (8/25/051 It is suggested that we meet to discuss the water main replacement to outline the sequence of the work (to be added to the plans). Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic., Utility Plan Number: 21 Created: 5/31 /2005 [8/24/05] [5/31/05] Show and label location of existing sanitary sewer service and define if it is to be used or abandoned. Page 3 Number: 99 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] On your north elevation, there is a wall that is longer than is allowed to be blank. Please remedy. One idea is to provide some sort of permanent trellis and vines to grow over it. This would be attractive and inexpensive for the back side of the building. Number: 100 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] Thank you for choosing a better lighting fixture for the garage lighting. The garage lighting is very bright. It should be toned way down so that eyes can adjust easier from darkness and also to minimize adverse impacts on the Edwards house. Topic: Site/Landscape Plans Number: 82 Created: 8/24/2005 [8/24/05] Technical Services comments that the shadow analysis is not going to scan well. Please enlarge and use a different method for shading. While you are at it, please add a scale to these drawings. Other comments on redlines. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 89 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] A letter of intent is required from the Edwards (property owners to the west) for offite work shown on their property. Number: 90 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] Given the amount of street cut work now shown on the construction plans, a rough estimate of the pavement impact fees was estimated to be $3,500. In lieu of most of the pavement impact fee, the developer has the option (in consultation with the Pavement Management Engineer) of a mill and inlay of half of the street. There will likely still need to be a patch and associated street cut fee with the sewer connection extending past the centerline of the street. Topic: Utility Plan Number: 86 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] The Vicinity Map on the cover sheet is incorrect in the location of the site (west of Howes). Number: 87 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] Please specify the design of the driveway north of the curb return. Is there a concrete edge proposed? Number: 88 Created: 8/26/2005 [8/26/05] Provide more spot elevation details for the concrete channel east of the driveway to verify adequate slope is being maintained. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Utility Plan Number: 79 Created: 8/16/2005 [8/16/051 There is an existing underground power line bisecting the parking lot area east to west, approximately under the dumpster location. Provisions will need to be made to either maintain this line in its current location or an alternate location provided and relocation costs would be at the expense of the developer. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins ALAN STROPE Date: 08/31/2005 3201 E MULBERRY ST. SUITE B FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 210-212 W. MAGNOLIA ST., URBAN LIVING LOFTS AT MAGNOLIA ST. PDP, TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 91 [8/31/05] Still some minor scanability issues SO much better. Thank you. Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Created: 8/31/2005 Please see redlines. The plans overall look Number: 92 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] Thanks for including the elevations of the parking lifts. You show the height of the lifts being 13' and your floor level above to be 14'. Do you have enough room for structure between floors? Number: 93 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] In your Development Planning Notes, you should make it clear that you are adaptively resusing the existing one-story commercial building. Number: 94 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] You have miscalculated the parking requirements. For the 2 bedroom units, you need 21 not 20 spaces. Your net total is correct, but by my count, you are providing 30 not 31 spaces as required. If you are unable to provide the required number of spaces, you will need to request a modification. I think it would have staff support under the nominal and inconsequential rationale. Number: 95 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] 1 understand that the columns shown on your plans include the structural piers below grade which are much larger in diameter so I am not concerned about most of them. However, there is a structural column in the midst of the lifts that may prevent someone from being able to get out of their car and around the lift. Please look at this condition and see if there is a way to resolve. Number: 96 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] Clearly identify water and sewer lines on the landscape plan. Number: 97 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] The shadow analysis images will not scan. Please use a different, sharper graphic and add a graphic scale for measuring. Number: 98 Created: 8/31/2005 [8/31/05] The elevations still appear to be over 56'. Please ensure that the building is under 56' or you will need to go before the Planning and Zoning Board as a Type II project. Page 1