HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPRING CANYON COMMUNITY PARK - FDP - 20-05/A - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)�♦ -
item:
Date Received: Planner: d52L,;7V Engineer:
6lrgl�-7
REVISION ROUTING SHEET
�J CURRENT
Items. .Redlined
Items Being'Retumed
I'V1111,
miles
Natural Resources
Poudre Fire Authority
• • ' ' ' =
■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■
Street Oversizing
Technical Services
Water & Wastewater
Water Conservation
Schools: Poudre
Thompson
................
TOTAL To be Submitt
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related
to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
AU)0)�
Steve Olt
City Planner
cc: Susan Joy
Kathleen Benedict
Nolte
Ayres & Associates
Current Planning Me #20-05A
Page 15
Light & Power:
1. Please show the electric duct bank design on the utility plans.
2. Where are the electric meter locations? They can be no more than
10' from a paved surface where an electric line truck can park.
3. There is a big issue with the electric line locations as they relate to
water lines. At least a 10' separation is required and this must be
shown on the utility plans.
Stormwater:
1. The applicant must document the modeling used for the park. The
proposed plant materials do not jive with the modeling. A meeting is
needed with Parks Planning's engineer to discuss this issue.
2. The drop structures are not shown on the plans but they are talked
about in the drainage report.
3. There is lots of missing information from the plans.
Engineering:
1. There still are scanability issues with the plans.
2. Please check with Kathleen Bracke of Transportation Planning
regarding the design of the handicapped ramps at West Horsetooth
Road.
3. The PV&L Canal Company will need to sign the utility plans,
subdivision plat, and Landscape Plan.
4. Parking dimensions are not shown on the plans.
5. The plans are missing lots of details. They look more like a 50%
submittal.
6. The check list has not been carried out.
This completes staff (and outside reviewing.agencies) review and comments
at this time. Red -lined plan from City departments are included with this
comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be
forthcoming. Another round of staff review is necessary. This proposal is
subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date
of this comment letter, being November 8, 2005) as set forth in Section
2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined plans
when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit
is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet.
Page 14
Number: 137 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 The 20-inch water main is cathodically protected; therefore, all
connections to this main must be isolated. Include appropriate notes and
details on the utility plans.
Number: 138 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 Define all fittings, connections and pipe lengths on public mains.
Number: 139 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 The distance between the 60-inch and 20-inch mains will
prevent the use of thrust blocks at the connections to the 20-inch;
therefore, it will be necessary to restrain joints on the lines connecting to
the 20-inch. Provide calculations for the required restrained lengths and
note it at the points of connection.
Number: 140 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 At the point of connection to the existing sewer, show the ex.
sewer and ex. service into the MH. Also, list existing and proposed invert
elevations at this manhole.
Number: 141 Created: 11 /3/2005
111/3/051 Show alignment of 60-inch and 20-inch water mains on the West
Horsetooth Road street plan.
The following comments/concerns were expressed at staff review on
November 2, 2005:
Natural Resources:
1. Please show the required buffers correctly on the plans.
2. Natural Resources must be added to the signature blocks on the
plans.
3. This development plan is scheduled to go to the Natural Resources
Advisory Board on November 16, 2005.
Water/Wastewater:
1. Some previous comments have not been addressed.
2. Roger Buffington would like to schedule a meeting with Parks
Planning and AYRES & Associates to discuss Water/Wastewater
concerns.
Page 13
Topic: PV and L crossing
Number: 25 Created: 5/3/2005
[11/7/051 Approval of PV & L needed prior to plan approval.
[5/3/05) Please show the proposed crossing of the PV and L Canal as
proposed in the Spring Creek master plan. Canal crossing structure will
need to be approved by the ditch company (PV&L).
Topic: Underdrain
Number: 91 Created: 10/31 /2005
[10/31/051 Why do the underdrain lines in the pond have a separate outlet
pipe into the Spring Creek channel why not tie these into the storm line
downstream of the outlet box.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 92 Created: 10/31 /2005
[ 10/31 /05) Please provide a manhole for Line F within the pond
embankment for maintenance access.
Why not tie line E from detention Pond C into the proposed manhole where
line D ties into the trunk line.
Please show the proposed drop structures in the Spring Creek channel on
the plans and provide a detail for these structures. on the plans.
Please reference a specific rip rap detail for all proposed riprap.
Department: Water Utilities Issue Contact: Roger
Buffington
Topic: Water/WW
Number: 133 Created: 11 /3/2005
111/3/051 Revise FH locations as shown on redlined plans.
Number: 134 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/05) No connections to the 2-inch water service are allowed upstream
of the meter.
Number: 135 Created: 1.1 /3/2005
[ 11 /3/05) Provide field data on the elevation of the 60-inch and 20-inch
water mains opposite of Horsetooth Circle to see if sanitary could be
extended in future. The 8-inch sewer may need to be installed at minimum
grade (0.4 %) to accomplish this. (This is a repeat comment that Jeff Hill
had made previously.)
Number: 136 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 Schedule a meeting with Craig Foreman and myself to review
project comments.
Page 12
BFE, regulatory BFE, lowest floor elevation (or floodproofing elevation),
type of foundation, and any HVAC elevation in the report AND ON THE
PLANS.
f. Please state in the report that an approved Floodplain Use Permit is
required for the structure and one for the other elements of the park
prior to the start of construction.
g. Please state in the report that an approved elevation certificate is
required for the structure prior to release of the CO.
Topic: Grading Plans
Number: 94 Created: 11 / 1 / 2005
[ 11 / 1 /05) Please add a note to the grading plan stating that all proposed
grading will be done on Park property and will not extend to neighboring
properties.
Provide a cross section showing a swale between the proposed berm on the
east side of Pond A and existing homes.
Runoff from a portion of Basin 21, directly north of basin 14 seems to be
directed at neighboring properties. Please capture these flows in a swale
and tie to the swale going north along the east park boundary.
Grading on Natural Resources property will require some written approval
from that department.
Show the proposed rock wall on the grading plans, clarify what the dark line
represents.
Why not provide a low flow channel within the proposed Spring Creek
Cross-section.
Topic: blaster Planning
Number: 144 Created: 11 /7/2005
[11/7/051 Stormwater Master Planning has received a set of updated plans
this past week. Comments from Master Planning will be given directly to
Anderson Consulting by the end of the week of the 7th of November.
Topic: Parking Lot Plan
Number: 95 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Please provide spot elevation for the parking lot grading, show
where curb and gutter will be used call out elevations on proposed and
existing contour lines.
Page 11
c. Please clarify where fencing will be located.
3. Drainage/Grading Plan
a. Please add the revised floodplain/floodway to the drainage plan.
Add cross-section locations and BFE lines. See comment below for
information about what information about the restroom in the
floodplain has to be shown on the drainage plan.
b. The bike crossing upstream of the box culvert crossing is not shown
in much detail. What is modeled in the revised model? It must be a
breakaway bridge if its not modeled.
c. Please note that all floatable features in the floodway, such as picnic
tables, must be anchored.
d. Please note where fencing will be located. Any fences in the floodway
must be designed to not block conveyance.
e. The report mentions three drop structures. These are not shown on
the plans, nor is there any detail for their construction. Please add to
the plans.
f. Please add a note that an approved F000dplain Use Permit is required
for the structure and one for the other elements of the park prior to the
start of construction.
g. Please add a note that an approved elevation certificate is required
for the structure prior to release of the CO.
4. Drainage Report
a. Please provide more discussion about the existing vs the proposed
floodplain and reference the drawings in the appendix. Explain why a
CLOMR is required and note the revised floodplain is subject to change
after submittal and review of the CLOMR to FEMA. State in the report
that a FEMA LOMR will be required after construction in order to
officially change the map.
b. Please cite the FEMA FIRM information and the City's Master Plan
information as your source for floodplain info.
c. Please describe in more detail the structures and other features
which will be built in the revised floodplain. For example: the
restrooms, courts, bike paths, utilities, landscaping, etc. Explain how
these features are meeting the floodplain regulations and how they were
incorporated into the model. State that all features in the floodplain are
in compliance with Chapter 10'of the City Code.
d. Please clarify the landscaping proposed for the large detention pond
berm. There appears to be a rock wall, and many trees on the berm. Is
this appropriate and acceptable to FEMA? Well need to discuss this in
more detail. ' ' '
e. The restrooms appear to be the only actual structure in the
floodplain (as shown on the revised floodplain drawing). This structure
will need to meet floodplain regulations by either elevating or
floodproofing the structure 18 inches above the BFE. Please provide the
Page 10
Topic: Details
Number: 97 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Please clarify on the Foothills Rundown detail how low flows will
be drained and how will the sump area be maintained as it will be holding
sedimentation on a regular basis.
Provide better rip rap details for pipe outlets.
Provide an overflow detail for all water quality ponds.
Provide a water quality outlet detail for all water quality ponds.
Please provide a reinforcing detail for Pond A across the spillway. Show a
spillway cross-section.
Topic: Erosion Control
Number: 143 Created: 11 /7/2005
[11/7/051 November 3, 2005
Current City notes for sediment/erosion control need to be on the plan, the
old set of notes must be deleted.
It would probably be easiest if we scheduled a meeting to go over this plan.
Please give Bob Zakely a call, 224-6063.
Topic: Floodplain Comments
Number: 96 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Floodplain Review Comments
Susan Hayes: 11-1-05
1. The park design is based on the proposed floodplain using the revised
grading changes and using the revised Spring Creek hydrology and
hydraulics. The floodplain modeling report has been submitted to
document this change. This information has been passed on to
Anderson Consulting Engineers to use in the preparation of a CLOMR
submittal to FEMA. Changes to the plan may be required based upon
FEMA's review of the CLOMR. An approved CLOMR is required prior to
the start of construction in the floodplain.
2. Landscaping Plan:
a. Please review and revise as necessary the placement of the revised
floodplain/floodway on the Landscaping Plan sheets. Some lines are
incorrectly called out, some aren't connected and some sheets don't
show the floodplain at all.
b. Please add a note that states changes to landscaping located in the
floodway must be approved by the Stormwater Utility.
Page 9
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez
Topic: General
Number: 16 Created: 4/25/2005
[10/25/05] [7/20/051 [4/25/051 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Corrosive, flammable liquids, reactive, or toxic materials (As defined in the
Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored or. handled on site must have a
Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the
Planning Department and the Fire Department. FCLUC 3.4.5 (C)
NOTE: Contact Ron Gonzales with information regarding the fuel tank
dispensing located in the North maintenance yard.
Number: 17 Created: 4/25/2005
[10/25/051 [7/20/051 [4/25/051 SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS:
If any welding will be done in the maintenance building the building shall be
required to be fire spririklered.
Number: 18 Created: 4/25/2005
110/25/051 17/20/051 (4/25/05] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved
numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in
such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road
fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4
NOTE: Address for maintenance building and main entrance (Horsetooth
Road entrance).
Department: Police
Topic: Plat
Number: 125
[11/2/05] No further comments
Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Created: 11 /2/2005
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Hurt
Ravenschlag
Topic: General
Number: 110 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Comments per Kathleen Bracke: Sheet S 11- Sidewalk on cul-de-
sac needs to connect directly to trail.
Number: 111 1Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Comments per Kathleen Bracke: Need striping and signing plan
for West Horsetooth Road.
Department: Water Utilities Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Channel Grading
Number: 113 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] There are areas in the channel that will experience high
velocities according to the provided HEC-RAS modeling. Provide turf
reinforcing mats at these locations.
Page 8
Number: 104 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] There is a LOT of information missing on this submittal that is
incorrectly marked "included" on the checklist E4. Please go through this
checklist THOROUGHLY and make sure all items are correctly shown on the
plans. Read LCUASS. See chapter 2, 7, 8,16, and 19 in particular. I could
not review this set in any kind of detail because the sheets were too hard to
read or too much info was left off. No scale, north arrows, or key maps were
shown and made it VERY hard to know what I was looking at and where it
was supposed to be located within the park. There was grading and
landscaping on every sheet which obscured the info that needed to be
presented. More comments to follow on the next round when the plans are
more complete and in better shape. Would you like a good example of what
a Utility Plan set is supposed to look like? I'd be happy to suggest a few to
help you get your submittal up to speed.
Number: 115 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05] Please provide atypical street section on the cover sheet for each
of the two different widths for West Horsetooth Road and label them as
"station xxx to station xxxx. Please provide a typical section through the
cul-de-sac.
Number: 116 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05] Please provide a design for the pedestrian underpass, bridges,
etc. See redlines.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 88 Created: 10/31 /2005
[10/31/051 Previous comment 51 still applies. Please show the electric
duct bank design on the UTILITY PLANS.
Number: 89 Created: 10/31/2005
[ 10/31 /05] Previous comment 52 still applies. Please show electric meter
locations and proposed transformer locations on the Utility Plans. The
transformer must be within 10' of a parking lot or roadway.
Number: 90 Created: 10/31 /2005
[ 10/31 /05] Previous comment 50 a request was made to move the water
and sewer lines near Station 14+54. These lines were moved slightly. The
electric duct bank will require the minimum of a 10' wide strip of flat ground
adjacent to the water and sewer easement. Please verify that this
requirement has been met.
Page 7
Number: 75 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] [7/ 12/05] Please show what the new Overland entrance drives
are connecting to. Is there a street there? What does it look like? How does
it transition to what is proposed?
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Street design
Number: 146 Created: 11 /7/2005
[ 11 /7/05] The cul-de-sac is showing Vertical Curb and Gutter around the
center portion and our standards require Outfall. Please change. Please
give spot elevations all around the center so that I can verify the cross slope.
The cross slope shown does not meet our 2% minimum requirement. What
are you constructing the middle out of? Is it rounded? Pointed? Flat?
Number: 147 Created: 11 /7/2005
[ 11 /7/05] The cross sections are missing a lot of information. Also, there
are several cross sections not meeting our 2% minimum cross slope
requirement.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 93 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Utilities/Water/Drainage Sheet C 1.2,3 -Please remove all
landscaping and contours. The legend is incomplete - are the heavy lines
representing retaining walls? If so, please provide more info (TOW/BOW,
design info, etc). Remove the grading for legibility. What's the scale?
Number: 98 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Please submit the plans in accordance with LCUASS. Please see
chapter 2 for submittal requirements.
Number: 99 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Need to show, dimension and label all easements and row.
Number: 100 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Please remove all landscaping and contours from all utility
sheets. Landscaping does not belong in the Utility Plan set unless you are
showing removals. Contours do not belong on the utility sheets, only the
grading and erosion control sheets.
Number: 101 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] The legend is incomplete.
Number: 103 Created: 11 / 1 / 2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Please provide a north arrow and key maps on each sheet. Can't
tell what is being shown on each sheet in relation to the whole project.
Page 6
Number: 131 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/051 From Technical Services: Please call to talk about flood
lines/easements/etc.
Number: 132 Created: 11 /3/2005
111/3/05] From Technical Services: Boundary monument Avery(?) 5th
filing (47.32' pin missing).
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 120 Created: 11 /2/2005
[11/2/05] Please provide a signature block for the ditch company (PV&L).
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: Street design
Number: 38 Created: 5/6/2005
[11/7/05] [7/12/051 [5/6/05] Please provide more data on the plan and
profile views of West Horsetooth Road, including elevation labels and
vertical curve information on the centerline proffie. For reference please
include the south flowline proffie - it is needed to determine whether cross -
slopes will be adequate when the centerline is altered.
Number: 39 Created: 5/6/2005
[11/2/05] Please provide more information on the cul-de-sac including
details. There is not enough info shown to build it (need spots around the
interior flowline, what's the middle look like?, etc).
[7/ 12/05] [5/6/05] Please design the cul-de-sac according to LCUASS
Chp. 7, and figure 7-19. Flowline grade minimum in cul-de-sac is 1%.
Additional elevation data is needed to determine whether cross -slopes will
be adequate. Show centerline proffie of West Horsetooth Road to the high
point in the cul-de-sac (see redlines).
Number: 40 Created: 5/6/2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] [7/ 12/05] [5/6/05] Please see utility plan checklist for
additional items.
Number: 73 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[11/2/051 Repeat. The transition does not meet our minimum standards.
[7/ 12/05] The transition shown on West Horsetooth Road is pretty short for
a 30' wide transition.
Number: 74 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ l l / 1 /05] Repeat. Please provide intersection details for all intersections.
[7/ 12/05] Since my previous comment to design the park entrance drive to
meet the driveway detail was ignored and it appears that it is being designed
as a street, please provide street intersection spot elevations as required in
LCUASS and show them on sheet c3.2, not on the detail sheet.
Page 5
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Plat
Number: 117 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05) Plat language needs corrections. Please email me at
sjoy@fcgov.com and I'll email you the most current language.
Number: 118 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05) The additional ROW to be dedicated along West Horsetooth Road
is not labeled correctly. Need to dimension and label with "...to be dedicated
with this plat." Same with the Utility Easement.
Number: 119 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05) The ditch company (PV&L) needs to sign off on the plat, please
provide a signature block.
Number: 122 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05) Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. This plat is
very hard to read in some areas.
Number: 123 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/051 All easements, etc, need to be locatable.
Number: 124 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05) Please label all existing easements, row, etc as "existing" and/or
label with reception number. Please label all NEW easements, etc, as "to be
dedicated by this plat."
Number: 126 Created: 11 /3/2005
[ 11 /3/05) From Technical Services: Boundary and Legal close.
Number: 127 Created: 11 /3/2005
[ 11 /3/05) From Technical Services: There is something wrong at Michener
Drive with found set pins.
Number: 128 Created: 11 /3/2005
[ 11 /3/05) From Technical Services: East line of W 1 /2 SW 1 /4 SE 1 /4 is
labeled incorrectly.
Number: 129 Created: 11 /3/2005
[ 11 /3/05) From Technical Services: Ownership and maintenance of Outlot
A?
Number: 130 Created: 11 /3/2005
[11/3/05) From Technical Services: Problem in legal - 5th filing, not
Subdivision.
Page 4
Number: 107 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Please show, label, and dimension ALL easements and ROW.
Number: 108 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Please show all utilities.
Number: 109 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 Trees are required all the way around the cul-de-sac.
Number: 114 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /051 The cul-de-sac needs to match the Utility Plans.
Number: 121 Created: 11 /2/2005
[ 11 /2/05] Please provide a signature block for the ditch company (PV&L).
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: Plat
Number: 29 Created: 5/3/2005
[11/2/05] Please see Technical Services for formatting suggestions and see
the plan set suggested below.
15/3/051 Please see the Fossil Creek Community Park Plat as a reference
and model this plat after it.
Number: 60 Created: 7/ 12/2005
111/2/051 Repeat but why "areas"? Shouldn't these be alignments or
easements?
17/ 12/05] Please label the "water areas" as "water utility areas'.
Number: 62 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 /2/051 Did PFA approve the 17' width? Their minimum is 20'. Also,
why "areas" - these should be alignments or easements.
[7/ 12/051 Please show/label/dimension all emergency access areas on the
plat.
Number: 63 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 /2/05] There are a LOT of un-labeled lines on the plat. What are they
and do they belong on the plat?
[7/ 12/051 Some items are un-labeled on the plat - I think it's another water
utility area - what is it?
Number: 82 Created: 7/ 15/2005
[ 11 /2/051 Has this been done? Can't really tell.
17/ 15/051 Please provide an alignment/area for the electric duct bank on
the plat.
Page 3
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: General
Number: 65 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] 17/ 12/051 Scanability is still a big problem -please read
LCUASS appendix E-6 and revise all plans accordingly. If you have
questions, please contact Technical Services.
Number: 72 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] [7/ 12/05] Please ensure that the plat, site, landscape plans,
and utility plans are all coordinated and match.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 102 Created: 11 / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Is this project being phased? If so, each phase needs to be
complete and function fully by itself AND you will need to phase all of the
plan sets (site, landscape, and utility).
Number: 112 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] No structures are allowed in any easement. A 34' x 34'
dumpster pad is shown within the easement on the northwest corner of the
site.
Topic: Grading Plans
Number: 145 Created: 11 /7/2005
111/7/051 The scale is too small. Needs to be 1"= 50' max. Please label all
slope ratios. The grade at the back of walk needs to be flat to nearly flat for
a minimum of 2'.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore
Topic: Landscaping Plans
Number: 64 Created: 7/ 12/2005
[ 11 /7/05] Trees need to be planted all the way around the cul-de-sac.
[7/ 12/05] Once the street is widened to allow parking, street trees should
fit in the parkway instead of behind the walk. Please show street trees
along West Horsetooth Road and around the cul-de-sac bulb.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: Landscaping Plans
Number: 105 Created: l l / 1 /2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] This set does not meet the scanning requirements set forth in
Appendix E6.
Number: 106 Created: l l / 1 / 2005
[ 11 / 1 /05] Please remove all contours.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
BHA Design, Inc. Date: 11/08/2005
c/o Russell Lee
4803 Innovation Drive
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for SPRING CANYON COMMUNITY
PARK - FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: PV and L crossing
Number: 148 Created: l l/8/2005
[ 11 /8/051 Ed Wendel of the Pleasant Valley & Lake C mal Company
offered the following comments:
1. The PV&L Canal has a 50' right-of-way (ROW) on the north portion of
this project for access and maintenance. The project does not appear to
affect their ROW as it is currently described.
2. The drainage off of this property might be of concern.. Perhaps a silt
fence or straw bale berm might be used.
3. Long-term drainage issues at Spring Creek crossing of the PV&L ditch
have been proposed in the past. Is any of this going to happen?
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 149 Created: 11 /8/2005
R 1 /8/051 Len Hilderbrand of %cel Energy offered the following comments:
1. 'Mere is an eidsting 2" gas main at West Horsetooth Road and
Horsetooth Court.
2. There is an e�dsting 4" gas main at the end of Blue Leaf Drive.
Topic: Building Plans
Number: 150 Created: 11 /8/2005
[11/8/051 Rick Lee of the Building Department indicated that there are no
apparent Building Code concerns with this submittal. All restrooms shall
satisfy the 1997 UBC and the Accessibility Standards of 1998 ANSI 117.1.
Page 1