Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPENNY FLATS (BLOCK 33) - FDP - 32-05/A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 -0 City Planner Page 12 M i 10 Number: 163 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Detail for 1-1/2 and 2 inch water meters has been updated. Use current detail. Acknowledged: See revised Utility Plans Number: 164 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] On Sheet C14, expand the horizontal scale of the profile to match the plan view and note the locations of the horizontal bends. Acknowledged: See revised waterline plan and profile Number: 165 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] See utility plans for other comments. Acknowledged Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 4 Created: 8/17/2005 [416/06] The revised Sheet SA2 still labels building 1 as townhouse. Acknowledged: See revised Sheet SA-2 [10/18/05] Building 1 is still labeled as townhouse. Since there's no such term, and since the entire building is on one lot (unless they've changed their mind), Building 1 should be labeled as multi -family on Sheet SA2. [8/17/05] There should be a Land Use Table that clearly specifies the uses. For example, list the types of commercial uses (the narrative states that there will be support -type retail and offices. Does that mean that restaurants won't be located here? Also, the table should list the residential use as "multi -family" since the units are not on their own lots and the land use code does not contain terms like "townhouse", "rowloft", or "loft". The proposed residential buildings are all legally classified as multi-famiy dwellings. The table should list how many 6-plexes, 14-plexes, etc.) Number: 9 Created: 8/17/2005 [4/6/06] 1 didn't get a copy of sheets EP1 and EP2. Perhaps Current Planning can check to make sure the note is there. Acknowledged: See revised Sheet EP-1 [10/18/05] 1 don't see the note added on any of the sheets I received. If it was added to an elevation drawing sheet, I'd like to get a copy of it. [8/17/05] A note should be added somewhere stating that any building mounted lighting will be shielded, down -directional. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne H. Aspen Page 11 • Will the construction of these ends involve any foundations? Please note that foundations, if any, need to be kept clear of that existing easement line. We do not plan any encroachments in this easement. Topic: Stormwater-inlet Sizing Calculations Number: 152 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] The hydraulic calculations sizing the revised inlet bank along Cherry Street is not located in the drainage report as indicated in the text of the report. Please submit calculations for all the proposed inlets as well as the revised inlet banks along Cherry Street. Please see the revised Drainage Report for this information. Topic: Stormwater-Trees in Pedestrian Spine Number: 151 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] It seems that several of the proposed trees along the pedestrian spine running north south are within the existing drainage easement and could potentially negatively affect the existing box culvert. It is our preference that trees be kept out of our easement if that can be accomplished by shifting them around. If not, then a meeting should be arranged to discuss alternative tree stocking or tree locations in order to minimize the impact on the existing storm sewer box. The planting in this area has been changed, See the revised Landscape Plan. Trees located over the box culvert have all been changed to Hawthorns because of their shallow root systems. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 28 Created: 8/23/2005 [5/2/06] [10/25/051 (Final compliance item) [8/23/05] Label all water main fittings and appurtenances including those at points of connection to the existing distribution system. Fittings and appurtenances have been labeled and additional references have been made to the Fort Collins Utility Details. Number: 40 Created: 8/23/2005 [5/2/06] This line has been increased to 8" for the fire sprinkler supply [10/25/05] Please double check with the mechanical engineer. If PFA is pulling 1500 gpm from the hydrant, the flows to the fire sprinkler systems may be significantly reduced. (Final compliance item) [8/23/051 What is the size of the proposed water main extending north of Maple? With all of the fire lines connecting to this main along with the fire hydrant, it should likely be bigger than a 6-inch. Number: 44 Created: 8/23/2005 [5/2/06] ,Acknowledged: See revised Utility Plans [8/23/05] Coordinate with the landscape plans. Move meter pits out of planting/shrub beds. Number: 115 Created: 10/25/2005 [5/2/06] Need detail for this special vault. The special vault has been eliminated by reducing the service size for the commercial spaces to a 1" service. The smaller meter pit for the 1" service eliminates the space problem created by two 1 %" pits. [10/25/05] Rotate the 4' x 6' meter vault 90-degrees and show curb stops outside of vault. (Final compliance item) Page 10 • Topic: Site Plan (SA3.2) Number: 150 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Sight distance concerns remain at the accesses, but Coburn has worked well to maximize the sight distance in their design and landscaping. Equally as good as other existing structures in the downtown area. We recognize their work while still needing to maintain our concerns. Traffic has no other comments. Acknowledged. Topic: Traffic Number: 26 Created: 8/22/2005 [5/3/06] Our understanding is that we have agreement in principle with Traffic Operations regarding the access conditions defined in the current plan [8/22/05] The current plan for on -street parking near the site access drives do not meet the minimum stopping sight distance requirements as provided in the LCUASS. Please review and mitigate this issue. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Site Plan and Landscape Plan Number: 39 Created: 8/23/2005 [5/2/06] Provide minimum 5 feet horizontal clearance between water main and kiosk, transformer and mailboxes. The kiosk location and water line alignment have been revised. See the revised Site, Landscape and Utility Plans [10/25/051 There are still too many obstacles that impact City's ability to maintain the water main in the ped spine. This area still needs work prior to hearing. [8/23/051 Location of kiosk, water feature and seat walls make it nearly impossible to maintain the water line and some of the fire lines at the south end of the pedestrian spine. The gas main also falls under these items. These problems relate to the utility coordination that's needed for that area. All of these items should be addressed at the utility coordination meeting. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Stormwater- Landscape Plan Number: 180 Created: 5/8/2006 [5/8/06] Please show the outline of the existing box culvert and the storm drainage easement on the Landscape Plan. Acknowledged: See the revised Landscape Plan. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater- Water Quality Number: 65 Created: 8/26/2005 [5/2/06] A meeting is recommended to discuss alternatives on how to meet water quality requirements. We are in general agreement with the terms for payment in lieu as outlined in the e-mail from Glen Schlueter to Dan Rotner, dated June 6, 2006. The specific details for payment and phasing will be worked out prior to construction. [10/28/05] Final Compliance item. See Above [8/26/05] The water quality measures will be reviewed by Kevin McBride to ensure they meet the alternative design previously agreed upon. Topic: Stormwater-Building Placement Along Howes Street Outfall Easement Number: 153 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] The ends of Building 3 and Building 7 seem to have extensions that come right up to the edge of the storm drainage easement for the existing Howes Street outfall box culvert. Page 9 0 • Number: 157 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] STANDPIPE: All buildings 4 or more stories in height are required to have a standpipe capable of supplying 100 psi to the highest habitable floor. A fire pump may be required to attain this psi. Acknowledged: Number: 158 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] FDC: The Fire Department Connections for automatic fire sprinklers and standpipes must be located in such a way to ensure fire department accessibility. Acknowledged: Number: 159 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION: Approved stairwell identification signs shall be posted at each floor level in all enclosed stairways in buildings four or more stories in height. Contact Carie Dann for specifics. Acknowledged: Number: 160 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] ADDRESS NUMERALS: PFA requires that each building have its address posted in two locations: the side that fronts the street, and also the side of the building that fronts the fire lane. Acknowledged: Number: 161 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] ADDRESSING OF BUILDINGS 2 AND 3: Based on FCLUC 3.5.2.C.1.b, the addressing of Buildings 2 and 3 must be off Maple Street. Acknowledged: Number: 162 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] MONUMENT SIGNS: PFA requires that monument signs be placed at the drive - aisle access points (one each at Mason Street and Howes Street) that show the proper addresses for Buildings 2 and 3. Acknowledged: Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Topic: General Number: 54 Created: 8/24/2005 [5/3/06] Our understanding is that we have agreement in principle with Traffic Operations regarding the access conditions defined in the current plan [ 10/31 /05] [8/24/05] The Maple Street and Mason Street accesses do not meet the Sight Distance at Intersection standards per figure 7-16 of the LCUASS. The drive locations proximity to the adjacent street corners create a safety issue between turning traffic and underground drive aisle traffic. The Traffic Department has concerns about the relationship of these drive aisles and the street corners. Number: 137 Created: 10/27/2005 [5/3/06] Our understanding is that we have agreement in principle with Traffic Operations regarding the access conditions defined in the current plan [10/27/05] Final: Traffic has continuing concerns with the lack of sight distance from the Maple St. corners and the Maple accesses. Please provide discussion about the vertical characteristics of the plantings along Maple and at the NE corner of the Maple and Howes intersection (minimum lower canopy height of the proposed trees, max height of the ground plantings, etc). Want to have a better sense that the proposed plantings will maintain maximum possible sight lines now and over time. Plant materials selected in proximity to the drive entrances and within sight lines have mature heights of less than 30". Page 8 M 0 looks like may not be occurring here. In that case, we wanted to explore the option of providing barrier curb with notches in the curb at location in order to provide the visual aspect of not being able to walk in this area unlike most other areas downtown where sidewalk grates are placed over the trees. Further discussion is needed. Number: 57 Created: 8/25/2005 [5/5/06] With the phasing plan for utilities now being shown, there is a general question as to how each phase as it develops will tie into existing conditions. Please provide more detailed phasing showing how each successive phase of development ties into the existing conditions. The demo plan should be shown in phases as well. See the Construction Phasing Plans prepared by Jim Sell Design. This series of sheets replaces the Utility Phasing sheet from the last submittal. [10/26/05] The construction drawings showed phasing on the grading plan with regards to buildings, pedestrian spine, and parking structure. The phasing plan should also show how utilities are installed per phase as well as access. Of concern for example, does PFA need the entire parking structure built across Lots/Phases 1 & 2 to ensure through access to Cherry Street? The building numbers should be shown on this sheet for clarity. (Perhaps a new sheet should be created instead of using the grading plan.) [8/25/05] With the project intending to be phased, a phasing plan for the public improvements is required to be created on the construction drawings. Topic: Plat Number: 122 Created: 10/26/2005 [5/5/06] If Coburn Development Inc. is comfortable with replacing "undersigned" with Coburn Development Inc. in the maintenance and repair guarantee language, we're satisfied and can consider this issue resolved. Acknowledged, see the revised plat: "the undersigned" has been replaced with "Penny Flats, LLC" the ownership entity for the project. [10/26/05] 1 am in discussion with the City Attorney's Office on whether the maintenance and repair guarantee language is appropriate to be included in the plat given that the "undersigned" can only be the City. If this language is removed from the plat, we would likely want to have it included in the purchase agreement as a restriction. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 140 Created: 4/3/2006 [413/06] No issues. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 155 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS: All proposed buildings shall be equipped with an approved, automatic -fire sprinkler system. Acknowledged: Number: 156 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] KNOX BOX: PFA requires that all buildings equipped with required automatic fire sprinklers have a Knox Box mounted near the front entrance. (This is the same comment as #89, but I'm unable to carry Mike Chavez's comments.) Acknowledged: Page 7 response to comment Number 173. The 82.36 spot was from the parking behind the building and not a subsurface elevation. Number: 175 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Given the work previously done with utilities, it may be of benefit for the developer/engineer to provide additional approval blocks for Comcast, Xcel, and Qwest, plus adding Light and Power to the City approval block. This is not a requirement but again may be of benefit to the developer and engineer as these facilities are being shown on the drawings. We would prefer avoid having to obtain additional signatures for our approval if they are not required. Number: 176 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] In verification with the Pavement Management Engineer, the series of patching along Howes needs to be expanded from each extent of the patching occurring fully across the street as the patches are less than 75 feet apart per our criteria in 25.7.2B.6 of LCUASS. In addition, the patching presently shown on Maple needs to involve the entire half width at a minimum per the same section. Further analysis of the patching will be made with the additional patching expansion for the previously mentioned fiber optic and gas lines. the Construction Phasing Plans prepared by Jim Sell Design. Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 8/19/2005 [5/5/06] Per discussion at staff review, please add a note on the building elevations regarding the inset doors along Maple. See note on Sheet SA-4 [10/26/05] The response indicated that plans have been modified to clarify that doors will not open in right-of-way. I'm not seeing this and would like to follow up on this item. Perhaps a note can be added to the elevations indicating that doors shall not swing out into right-of-way. [8/19/05] With buildings 5 and 6 being built to the Maple right-of-way, please clarify the intent with regards to door access from Maple as it is not evident from the building elevations as to whether the doors are recessed from the right-of-way and/or are inset. Doors are not allowed to swing out into the right-of-way. Number: 20 Created: 8/19/2005 [5/5/06] Given the discussion at staff review regarding the possible payment to Stormwater in -lieu of providing water quality, the comment is deferred at this time. Should the water quality planter be used along Maple Street, additional information on the detail dimensioning the depth and slopes of the soil from the sidewalk edge should be provided. We are in general agreement with the terms for payment in lieu as outlined in the e-mail from Glen Schlueter dated June 6, 2006. The specific details for payment and phasing will be worked out prior to construction. [10/26/05] The response indicated that a detail has been provided on the landscape plan with bike racks. The landscape plan shows the bike racks in plan view but no detail, instead a planting bed curb detail is provided. [8/19/05] Please provide more detail information (beyond C5 of the construction plan set) as to the vertical depth of the planting bed for the street trees. I'm not aware of a situation in which landscaping and street trees are situated in an urbanized setting (without a grass parkway) of attached sidewalks where grates are not utilized to help ensure a smooth walking surface. How is a pedestrian less likely to inadvertently step in this landscape bed and possibly turn an ankle, trip, etc? A similar concept of these water quality beds were proposed on another project where a 1 foot drop to the planting bed was proposed, which Page 6 Number: 169 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] For transitions from inflow to outfall gutter, please specify a transition length and indicate on the plan set (such as along Mason Street). Please demonstrate with spot elevations that positive flowline drainage is being maintained along this area to ensure no pooling of water can take place. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Number: 170 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Indicate the property line on the grading plan. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Number: 171 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] There are locations along Maple Street and Howes Street where cross slopes along the street do not meet our 2-3% requirement. Howes Street is notably out of compliance where the neckdown is being incorporated. Please look at the cross slopes along these two streets. Additionally, please provide cross slopes (existing and proposed) along these two streets at 50 foot intervals and at several points along each of the neck downs to help ascertain how much of the cross slope concerns are due to existing conditions verses caused by the design. Acknowledged: See Cross Section Sheets. Most cross slopes have been redesigned to conform with the 2-3% standard. Some cross slopes are still slightly above 3% and below 2%. A variance has been issued with this resubmittal to address these areas. Number: 172 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Storm Line #9 has inadequate cover from the top of the pipe. An acceptable remedy to this (in consultation with the pavement management engineer) would be to have concrete pavement over this area, extending the existing concrete section south of the pipe. The asphalt to concrete transition originally proposed would have caused some concern from our perspective, so the use of concrete over the pipe would accomplish two concerns. Acknowledged: See revised drawings -the surface above this pipe is now shown as concrete in the plans. Number: 173 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Please provide a construction drawing illustrating the subsurface area of the buildings to help illustrate how the parking structure area is situated in relation to right-of- way and easements as well as how elevations are continued from the entrances of the parking garage(s) to the basement. Acknowledged: See revised drawings for the Garage Floor Elevations Sheet. We have confirmed with our geotechnical consultant that any potential foundation drainage structures can be accomplished on the interior side of the garage/foundation walls. Number: 174 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] I'm not following the spot elevation shown for the underground parking access. For instance on Sheet C10, spot elevations at the entrance of the garage are shown at 83.45, then heading north (shown on C9) spot elevation are shown presumably further into the garage at 82.36, it doesn't appear that there is slope to head down into the basement (perhaps ID 174) will clarify this? See the Garage Floor Elevation Sheet provided in Page 5 [5/3/06] Elevations have been revised for buildings 3. 4 & 5 to reflect the design development of these buildings to date. [10/14/05] Final Plans: At some point we will want to review the remaining elevations. This isn't needed prior to hearing. Please see comments on redlines: there are still some remaining issues re base, top and materials. Topic: Photometrics (E1P) Number: 110 Created: 10/14/2005 [5/3/06] Didn't get redlines back. I contacted RJ McNutt & Associates, and their records show that the redlines were returned to Current Planning via UPS on 04-03-06. If needed they have a copy which they can duplicate. [10/14/05] Other minor comments on redlines. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Plans Number: 21 Created: 8/19/2005 [5/5/06] Carried over as noted in ID 20. [10/26/05] Carried over for reference to be addressed in detail after a public hearing. [8/19/051 Cutoff walls will be required for the use of the water quality basin areas in right-of- way to help reduce possible damage to the pavement subsurface caused by water infiltration into the pavement subsurface. Acknowledged: Water quality basins in the right of way will be eliminated through a "payment in lieu" agreement for off -site mitigation. Number: 49 Created: 8/23/2005 [5/5/06] Carried over pending resolution of ID 166. [10/26/051 A variance request was received and will be evaluated. It is not anticipated to be of concern, however there may be design details to be worked out with a final compliance submittal. The grading plan sheet should indicate the use of concrete for the inset parking along Maple as was indicated along Mason. [8/23/05] The street design of the parking along Maple on the west side of the pedestrian spine is not to standard with street flows being directed to a concrete pan behind the parking rather than to the curb and gutter section adjacent to the sidewalk. A variance requiest would be required for evaluation. This should be a further topic of discussion to consider design alternatives. Number: 166 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Please provide a concrete scoring and joint pattern detail for the concrete areas of inset parking along Maple Street and Mason Street. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Number: 167 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] The construction plans seem to show additional utility work (fiber optic and xcel) that results in additional street patching than what is reflected on the demo and grading plans. Please revise the patching limits accordingly. Utility routing for both Xcel and Qwest has been revised to provide a layout with fewer street cuts Number: 168 Created: 5/5/2006 [5/5/06] Provide a detail for truncated domes at access ramps--1607(a). Acknowledged: See revised drawings Paee 4 The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. " Acknowledged: These notes have been added to the Landscape Plan. Topic: Site Plan (SA 1) Number: 183 Created: 5/8/2006 [5/8/06] 1 am in the process of getting the proper sidewalk crossing detail. It may be a few days before I locate it. I'll send it along when I get it. The new crossing detail has been added to the civil engineering drawings. Topic: Site Plan (SA2) Number: 95 Created: 10/14/2005 [5/3/06] Please show on site plan. [10/14/05] Final Plans: Please show the proposed striping and curb alignment for the bike lane so that riders approach RR tracks at more of a 90 degree angle. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Number: 96 Created: 10/14/2005 [5/3/06] [10/14/05] Final Plans: The units of Building 1 should be designated as a multifamily fourplex not townhomes. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Number: 146 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Thanks for adding the crosswalk across Maple. Please also show the condition it will tie into on the south side, including curb line and nearby curbcuts. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Topic: Site Plan (SA 3.1) Number: 147 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Great job resolving the spine ramp offsets. Number: 148 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] See minor redlined comments. Acknowledged: See revised drawings Topic: Site Plan (SA3.2) Number: 149 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] See minor redlined comments. Acknowledged: See revised drawings. Note that we have revised the garage plan to eliminate the plaza condition at the raised sidewalk along Mason Street. The sidewalk is still raised, but the garage no longer extends below. As part of this reconfiguration, we have reduced the quantity of accessible parking spaces to a number closer to the code minimum. This allowed for the creation of additional standard spaces to compensate for the three spaces lost to the elimination of the plaza condition. Topic: Site Plan (SA4 and 5) Number: 111 Created: 10/14/2005 Page 3 location, manner of display, color, working, stereotyped design or otherwise attracts or is designed to attract attention to the subject or to the premises upon which it is situated, or is used as a means of identification, advertisement or announcement. The term sign shall not include the following: (3) works of art which in no way identify the name of a business and which in the judgment of a reasonably prudent person are not displayed in conjunction with a commercial enterprise for the purpose, or with the effect, of advertising a product or service offered by a business located on the property where such work of art is displayed..." According to that definition, it may be considered a sign if the businesses nearby/on the property have Penny Flats in the name, like Penny Flats News Stand. If not, it wouldn't be considered a sign since the rest is residential uses. This isn't an issue that needs to be resolved right now. I just wanted you to have a heads -up to the issues. We appreciate your looking into this. Right now, we are going to wait on the flattened penny idea until the other issues with the railroad are resolved to avoid confusing issues in this area of the site Number: 178 Created: 5/8/2006 [5/8/06] Carol Tunner comments as follows: "There are two items still of concern to historic preservation: One is the contour/swale lines starting against the east elevation of the trolley barn. Starting the ground downgrade at the building could undermine the foundation, and any change of land surface like that within the designated site would need Landmark Preservation Commission approval. They are unlikely to give approval so close to the building. Second, the large deciduous tree is planted close enough to the barn to place its canopy over the roof. This will be a maintenance problem with clogged gutters and tree debris dropping on the roof to shorten the roof lifespan there. Better to plant an ornamental tree that doesn't get so large as to cover the barn roof, or move the tree further away." Acknowledged: We have made some adjustments to the grading in this area and we are confident that the proposed topography will not adversely impact the trolley barn. The large deciduous tree has been replaced with a smaller ornamental tree. Topic: Landscape Plan (L1) Number: 179 Created: 5/8/2006 [5/8/06] Tim Buchanan in Forestry comments as follows: "The following notes should be added to the landscape plan: A permit must be obtained from the City Forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy. The developer shall contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as shown on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final approval of each phase. Failure to obtain approval by the City Forester for street trees in a phase shall result in a hold on certificate of occupancy for future phases of the development. Page 2 (Awal STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citv of Fort Collins COBURN DEVELOPMENT INC. Date: 05/08/2006 DANIEL ROTNER 1811 PEARL ST. BOULDER, CO 80302 Staff has reviewed your submittal for PENNY FLATS (BLOCK 33) PDP AND FINAL PLANS - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: Final Compliance Re -Submittal Action: June 21, 2006 ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Topic: General Number: 142 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] The following departments and agencies have indicated that they have no further concerns: Parks planning, Water Conservation, GIS, Neighborhood Services, and Xcel Energy. Number: 143 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Comcast comments that they would like to see a utility easement outside of the Maple Street right-of-way like was discussed in the past to avoid conflicts with existing facilities. On June 6, 2006, Dan Rotner had a telephone conversation with Dennis Greenwalt, of Comcast, regarding this subject. Dennis agreed that an easement along Mason St. would not be needed if their lines remain in their current location. This was confirmed in an e-mail to City staff on 06-07-06 which was copied to Comcast. Number: 144 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Building Inspection comments that a presubmittal meeting has been held and reminds you to verify compliance with Section 1003.3.3.11 of the UBC as you finalize your plans. Acknowledged Number: 145 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] USPS comments that you must provide mailboxes and has attached a letter, which is included in your redline packet. Acknowledged. Mailbox installation will be phased with one mailbox location per phase Number: 177 Created: 5/8/2006 [5/8/06] 1 checked with Peter about the possible flattened penny sculpture and whether it would trigger sign code requirements or not. Peter read me the definition of sign, including these excerpts: "Sign shall mean any writing (including letter, word or number), pictorial representation (including illustration or declaration), product, form (including shapes resembling any human, animal or product form), emblem (including any device, symbol, trademark, object or design which conveys a recognizable meaning, identity or distinction) or any other figure of similar character which is a structure or any part thereof or is written, painted, projected upon, printed, designed into, constructed or otherwise placed on or near a building, board, plate or upon any material object or device whatsoever, which by reason of its form, Page 1