Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPRING CANYON COMMUNITY PARK - PDP - 20-05 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)being July 26, 2005) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt, City Planner cc: Katie Moore Susan Joy Kathleen Benedict Nolte Ayres & Associates Current Planning file #20-05 Page 12 Number: 57 Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Clearly define all connections to the existing 20-inch water main. This main is cathodically protected and any connection to this main must be accomplished with a CP isolation connection. Clearly define this on the plan set and include the isolation detail. Field locate, show and label all CP test station within this projects boundaries. Clearly define any and all relocations necessary for the CP test stations. Number: 58 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Place the proposed fire hydrant on the south end of this project near the private entrance (see plan set for details). Maintain 4 feet of separation between the proposed fence and the proposed fire hydrant within the facility maintenance yard site. Provide a detail of the proposed PVC surrounding the facility site Number: 61 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Perhaps another meeting to discuss the outstanding issues would be warranted. If you would like to schedule a meeting please contact Jeff Hill at 221-6674 See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Topic: ZOAMN6 Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Number: 6 Created: 4/21/2005 [7/12/05] [4/21/05] What is the gravel storage area - It looks like there is a row of parking spaces in that area .... please clarify Number: 11 Created:4/21/2005 [7/12/051 [4/21/05] Proposed landscaping needs to be labeled on the landscape plan with types and counts noted. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Red -lined plan from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round of staff review is necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, Page 11 a financial partnership can be arranged between the two departments (if any improvements are needed). Regarding the TIS findings for the additional traffic projected_ to use the existing north/south residential streets (Windon and Platte), the projections are greater than a 10% increase but are still within the. standard level of traffic volumes expected on local streets so no neighborhood traffic mitigation is required per the TIS requirements. You may still want to work with these neighbors on some type of suitable mitigation, but its not an "official" requirement based on the TIS findings. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 41 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/05] No services may be located between the main and the meter pit. Show and label the location of the curb stop and meter pit. [5/6/05] Curb stop and meter pit may not be located in a traveled way (i.e. sidewalk, driveway, parking lot, etc.). Number: 42 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/05] [5/6/05] Show all water and sewer line crossings in storm sewer and sanitary sewer profiles. Remove all reference to the private sanitary sewer main. Sewer services are considered to be private however the main must remain public. Provide a sanitary sewer main extension to the south in Horsetooth Court. Provide information on the depth of the existing 20-inch and 60-inch water mains. Number: 44 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/05] [5/6/05] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. Include the standard general notes pertaining to landscape/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. Number: 56 Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Maintain 10 feet of separation between proposed storm sewer inlets/manholes and all existing/proposed water and sewer mains. Page 10 Number: 81 Created: 7/15/2005 [7/15/05] Some basins are draining to the east, these are minor in size generally. There should be no additional flows allowed to flow undetained onto neighboring properties. Please provide documentation in the report as to historical flows that drained to the east and compare those to post development flows. Topic: Offsite &wdiag Number: 54 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Plans show grading off -site for the channel in the area to the south of the site, this is apparently on Natural Resources property. Please provide a letter from Natural Resources whereby they allow the grading of the Spring Creek channel on their property. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: details Number: 78 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] entered into DMS for Kathleen Bracke: For the classification of Horsetooth Road, we're ok with the TIS recommendation of Horsetooth Road being downgraded from an arterial to a Collector street but it needs to be a Collector with parking along the Park frontage. Mark Jackson will incorporate this change to the City's Master Street Plan in a future MSP clean-up process later in the year so your project will not be held up by that process. Please work directly with Sheri and Katie in Development Review Engineering on the design details for the curb alignment and for the cul-de-sac. Regarding the TIS' findings for the Drake/Overland intersection, the current overall intersection functions adequately with the stop sign control. Transportation will take Matt's information into consideration if/when future improvements to that intersection are scheduled to be improved by the City as part of a larger capital project. There are other intersection designs that could also work besides the "sweeping curve" mentioned in the TIS. So, your project does not need to do any improvements to the intersection at this time based on the TIS. In the future, Transportation and Parks can work together to determine what type of intersection improvements should be constructed and if Page 9 Number: 35 Created: 5/4/2005 [7/13/05] [5/4/05] Emergency Phones: Call boxes should be installed in the parking lot near the tennis/hockey rink and another near the pavilion/basketball courts. The lighting in these areas should also create a sense of "safe harbor" for evening/night security. Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Channel Design Number: 80 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] How will the channel within the relocated Spring Creek channel be vegetated. Topic: Drainage Report Number: 79 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Please provide a modeling report for the Spring Creek flows. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 84 [7/19/05] Plans look good. Topic: Floodplain Comments Created:7/19/2005 Number: 55 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] We understand that due to coordination issues with the revised regional pond design, no floodplain modeling was submitted at this time. Please provide the modeling with next submittal. Topic: Grading Plans Number. 43 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/05] Show how the future regional pond grading will tie into existing grades. [5/6/05] Grading plans are incomplete, as they do not show the area of the park that will be used as a regional pond. We hope that with the next submittal, more detail will be shown for that area as the design of the regional pond is finalized. Page 8 Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department. FCLUC 3.4.5 (C) NOTE: Contact Ron Gonzales with information regarding the fuel tank dispensing located in the North maintenance yard. Number: 17 Created: 4/25/2005 [7/20/05] [4/25/05] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: If any welding will be done in the maintenance building the building shall be required to be fire sprinklered. Number: 18 Created: 4/25/2005 [7/20/05] [4/25/05] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 NOTE: Address for maintenance building and main entrance (Horsetooth Road entrance). Number: 85 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATION: The fire hydrant located next to the cedar fence in the North Maintenance Building lot needs to be relocated next to the Maintenance access road on the outside of the main gate. Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: 6enercl Number: 34 Created: 5/4/2005 [7/13/05] [5/4/05] Lighting and Landscaping: LUC calls for min of 1.0 fc throughout parking/drive areas. Also calls for 0.5fc along pathways. It will be important to provide adequate lighting to avoid some of the existing complaints we have received. Page 7 Number: 53 Created: 7/11/2005 [7/11/05] Show any future buildings on the Utility Plans. Department: PFA Topic: 6enerol Number: 14 Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Created:4/25/2005 [7/20/051 [4/25/05] REQUIRED ACCESS: This is for all parking lot turnarounds. A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be met. 1. The minimum width shall be 20 feet. 2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be 50 feet. 3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only. The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be required to support 40 tons 4. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access Easement" on the final plat. Number: 15 Created:4/25/2005 [7/20/05] [4/25/051 WATER SUPPLY: Commercial No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 NOTE: The fire hydrant located behind the maintenance shop on the East side of the cedar fence will not work in this location. Please contact Michael A. Chavez with PFA for relocation site. Number 16 Created: 4/25/2005 [7/20/05] [4/25/05] HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Corrosive, flammable liquids, reactive, or toxic materials (As defined in the Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored or handled on site must have a Hazardous Page 6 Number: 73 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] The transition shown on Horsetooth Road is pretty short for a 30' wide transition. Number: 74 ' Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Since my previous comment to design the park entrance drive to meet the driveway detail was ignored and it appears that it is being designed as a street, please provide street intersection spot elevations as required in LCUASS and show them on sheet c3.2, not on the detail sheet. Number: 75 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Please show what the new Overland entrance drives are connecting to. Is there a street there? What does it look like? How does it transition to what is proposed? Topic: Utility Plans Number: 69 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] The signature blocks on the utility plans should always be on the lower right hand quadrant of the sheet. Also, only the cover sheet needs the indemnification paragraph. Department: Light $ Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Topic: Utility Plans Number: 50 Created: 7/11/2005 [7/11/05] The sanitary sewer line at Manhole #4 located at Station 14+54 along with the water line have shifted approx 65' to the west. These lines are now in conflict with the location of the proposed electric duct bank. Can the water and sewer lines be shifted back to their original position? Number: 51 Created: 7/11/2005 [7/11/05] Please include the electric duct bank design on the Utility Plans. Number: 52 Created: 7/11/2005 (7/11/05] Please show all electric meter locations and proposed transformer locations on the Utility Plans. The transformer must be within 10' of a parking lot or roadway. Page 5 Number: 63 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Some items are un-labeled on the plot - I think it's another water utility area - what is it? Number: 82 Created: 7/15/2005 [7/15/05] Please provide an alignment/area for the electric duct bank on the plat. Topic: Street design Number: 38 Created; 5/6/2005 [7/12/051 [5/6/05] Please provide more data on the plan and profile views of Horsetooth Road, including elevation labels and vertical curve information on the centerline profile. For reference please include the south flowline profile - it is needed to determine whether cross -slopes will be adequate when the centerline is altered. Number: 39 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/051 [5/6/05] Please design the cul-de-sac according to LCUASS Chp. 7, and figure 7-19. Flowline grade minimum in cul-de-sac is 1%. Additional elevation data is needed to determine whether cross -slopes will be adequate. Show centerline profile of Horsetooth Road to the high point in the cul-de-sac (see redlines). Number: 40 Created: 5/6/2005 [7/12/05] [5/6/05] Please see utility plan checklist for additional items. Number: 70 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Please see redlines - the cul-de-sac design is confusing and doesn't meet LCUASS requirements, and I don't understand why certain segments of the profiles are labeled with lengths and slopes within vertical curves. What's going on? Number: 71 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] The vertical scale for the profiles must be 1:5 or 1:10, and it is labeled as 1:6. This is a repeat comment. Page 4 Number: 65 Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Scanability is still a big problem - please read LCUASS appendix E-6 and revise all plans accordingly. If you have questions, please contact Technical Services. Number: 66 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] On the site plan and utility plans - label and dimension street sidewalks and parkways. Clearly and boldly show, label and dimension existing and proposed road ROW/Alignment/Areas. Number: 67 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Since we know that people will want to park on the cul-de-sac, and we do not want them to park head -in on the cul-de-sac, please see redlines for the suggested treatment of the cul-de-sac. Number: 68 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] How can any of the utilities be marked private? Number: 72 Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Please ensure that the plat, site, landscape plans, and utility plans are all coordinated and match. Number: 83 Created: 7/15/2005 [7/15/05] Please see the utility plan checklist for all items required on the utility plans prior to hearing. Topic: Plot Number: 59 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/051 Why is the existing ROW for Horsetooth Road labeled as a tract? It should not be a tract. Neither should the proposed Horsetooth Road ROW be shown as a tract - it is a road area. Number: 60 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Please label the "water areas" as "water utility areas". Number: 62 Created: 7/12/2005 (7/12/05] Please show/label/dimension all emergency access areas on the plat. Page 3 Department: Engineering. Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: details Number: 76 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Please use the standard LCUASS details straight from the book. Also, please add the new details for ADA ramps. Call if you need them. Topic: General Number: 27 Created: 5/3/2005 [7/12/05] Horsetooth Road should have been designed as a collector with parking (a minor collector) as opposed to the major collector cross-section. Please re -design Horsetooth Road to minor collector standards. [5/3/05] Why was Horsetooth Road proposed as a two-lane arterial but designed only as a collector? Number: 32 [7/12/05] Created:5/3/2005 [5/3/05] Please see redlines for further comments. Number: 33 Created:5/3/2005 [7/12/05] [5/3/05] Street design comments are based on the premise that Horsetooth Road is ok as a collector street: The vertical curve length is too short. See LCUASS Figure 7-17 for required vertical curve lengths. Please provide a striping plan, including striping east of site on Horsetooth Road. This is needed to determine how the transition should take place, either similar to what is shown (but using curves since angle points are not permitted) or with a quicker transition if Horsetooth Road to the east will have parking and west will not. Number: 64 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Once the street is widened to allow parking, street trees should fit in the parkway instead of behind the walk. Please show street trees along Horsetooth Road and around the cul-de-sac bulb. Page 2 CRyof Fort Collins BHA Design, Inc. c/o Russell Lee 4803 Innovation Drive Fort Collins, CO. 80525 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Date: 07/26/2005 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SPRING CANYON COMMUNITY PARK - PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Topic: Plot Issue Contact: Steve Olt Number: 86 Created: 7/26/2005 [7/26/051 The Technical Services Department offered the following comments: 1. The outside boundary and legal description do close. 2. The east line of the West 1/2, SWi/4, SEi/4, Section 28 is not correctly labeled. 3. The "Set Monument" symbol @ Michener Drive is in an incorrect location. 4. Distances along Quail Hollow, 6th Filing do not match the Quail Hollow, 6th Filing plat. 5. The plat needs a note about the Ownership & Maintenance of Outlot 'A'. 6. Per a previous discussion Technical Services thought that the applicant would locate the Dixon & Canyon ditches on the plans. Number: 87 Created:7/26/2005 [7/26/05] Please see the attached Water Conservation Standards for Landscapes COMMENT SHEET from Laurie D' Audney, the Water Conservation Specialist. Page 1