The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHELLENIC PLAZA (635 S. SHIELDS ST.) - PDP - 30-05A - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)[5/2/07] Repeat Comment -The comment below can be addressed with an informal meeting at City Utilities. [3/16/07] After the amount of detention volume is agreed upon, the grading plan reviewed to show this volume is achievable, offsite flows shown to safely pass through the site, PDP can go to a hearing. Number: 88 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] The detention pond needs to have some freeboard. This can be discussed at Final Compliance. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 58 Created: 3/13/2007 [5/2/07] [3/13/07] Provide water service sizing calc's for the residential service for review. Number: 87 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Add to the note on the 1.5" water service on Shields indicating that that it is for commercial water service. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Zoning Number: 91 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Issues resolved ok Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, O t & w'*e Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 5 Number: 85 Created: 4/26/2007 -[4/26/07]—Please submit a revised plan for any scheduled hearings. Thank you. Topic: Tech. Services Number: 89 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] Many line over text conflicts on the Site and Landscape Plans. Please see redlines for clarification and correct with final plan submittal. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Topic: Electric Utility Number: 73 Created: 4/24/2007 [4/24/07] The developer will need to coordinate power requirements by providing a completed Commercial Service (C-1) form to Light & Power Engineering. The reply comments to the previous round of City staff comments indicated that the form was — --attached=to=the=resubmittal. The -form was not included in the Light & Power packet for the resubmittal. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann Topic: Fire Number: 90 Created: 5/2/2007 [5/2/07] STREET ADDRESSING: Please note that PFA is emphasizing consistency in addressing. Future projects shall comply with International Fire Code and PFA policy, which require that buildings be addressed off the street that provides access to the site. In the future, a project such as this will receive a Birch Street address, which is the actual, accurate street that provides access onto the site. The two lots in this project at one time had Shields Street access; however, the development is starting from scratch, the property is being redeveloped, and access is not off Shields Street. PFA's emphasis on consistent addressing requirements ensures accurate, clear addressing, which enables PFA to provide emergency services as expeditiously as possible. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Engineering Number: 56 Created: 3/13/2007 [5/4/07] 1 think the crossing of the drive aisle/exit might need to be slightly reconfigured for pedestrian safety. We will need to discuss this at final compliance. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 69 Created: 3/15/2007 [5/2/07] Reminder Comment [3/15/07] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention area. Number: 71 Created: 3/16/2007 Page 4 [3/13/07] You will need to submit a construction cost estimate for the Coy Street ultimate design for the frontage obligation. This cost will be collected as a cash in - ---- lieu payment -and -provided -in -the -development -agreement..------ - Number: 54 Created: 3/13/2007 [4/26/07] Please pay with final plan review $1,081.75. Thank you. [3/13/07] The PDP submittal review fee was not calculated correctly. An additional $81.75 is due. Please submit this payment prior going to hearing. Number: 64 Created: 3/13/2007 [4/26/07] Field meeting resulted in approval of 6 foot wide attached walk along Birch ... matches sidewalk on south side of street. [3/13/07] The sidewalk on Birch does not meet LCUASS standards for local residential streets. Minimum 6 foot parkway and 4.5 foot detached sidewalk. _— .Number:_65 __- - -- - ---C-reated:3/_13/2007- [4/26/07] Please show cross slope at cross walk on Shields Street access and provide a cross section or adequate elevation data on the plan to verify that a monolithic pan will be poured to carry flows south along Shields with a minimum of 0.5 percent fall. [3/13/07] Please calculate and show the cross slope on the access to Shields at the cross walk. 2% is the maximum cross slope allowed under ADA guidelines. Number: 81 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] The Plat is showing an existing 10 foot wide ditch easement running east - west from Shields Street. If you wish to vacate this easement by the Plat, the ditch owner will need to sign the final plat and a standard vacation note must be added to the plat. You may also record a termination of easement by separate document signed by the ditch owner. Either way, the City will need at a minimum, a letter of intent from the ditch owner stating that the ditch easement is no longer needed or desired. This must be resolved prior to scheduling a hearing for the project. Number: 82 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] Please provide addition spot - flowline elevation data at the Shields access to show drainage being conveyed at 0.5 percent min. in a monolithically poured pan. You can also provide a simple cross section at this location to show how this is to be constructed. Number: 83 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] Please extend arrows from standard street cut note to all areas in the ROW with proposed street cuts (access points) Number: 84 Created: 4/26/2007 [4/26/07] The north and south flow line sag curves for the Coy Street design do not meet LCUASS standards. Minimum K values must be 30 or greater. Lengthening the vertical curve should solve the problem. See LCUASS Table 7-3. Page 3 in the same locations as the lights, and when those trees mature they will most likely impact the lighting levels. This is not a requirement, but definitely something to consider. -- Topic: Shadow Analysis Number: 72 Created: 4/20/2007 [4/20/07] The shadow analysis is incorrectly labeled as the landscape plan. Number: 86 Created: 4/30/2007 [4/30/07] (Please address before hearing) The shadow analysis looks good - thanks for providing this. The visual analysis is on the right track but still needs some work before the hearing ... the photos are great, but please refer to Section 3.5.1(G)(1)(b) for specific information to include in the visual analysis. At a minimum you- need a visual analysis that: _a. identifies the -extent to. which existing views_ may be-blocked;-- b. depicts in graphic form views before and after the project, utilizing photographs of the area and neutral drawings derived from at least two (2) points from which the proposal will be commonly viewed, one (1) of which should be a vista towards the foothills; and c. indicates these points of observation on an inset map or plan of the area; and d. a summary of the key conclusions of the shadow and visual analysis, and steps to be taken to comply with the review standards set forth above. Topic: Site Plan Number: 78 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] The small text for the legal description probably won't scan well. You'll also need a vicinity map on the site plan. You may want to consider doing a separate cover page for the site plan and include all of the signature blocks, land use statistics, vicinity map and legal description on it, and it might give the site plan a little room to "breathe." A total of the land use statistics (NCB and MMN) would be helpful as well. Number: 79 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] Please see redlines for additional comments/typos on the site plan. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 35 Created: 3/13/2007 [4/26/07] Carry over comment. Design looks good, please prepare and submit local portion cost estimate for review. Page 2 r f� �i STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Don Brookshire Date: 05/04/2007 Eastpoint Studio, LLC 552 Kinnikinnik Ct. Windsor, CO 80550 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HELLENIC PLAZA PDP (635 S. SHIELDS ST.) - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Building Elevations Number: 80 Created: 4/25/2007 [_4/25/07]_Please-use_a.different-font-or-font size -for the dimensions -on -the -building - - elevations. It's a bit difficult to read now and I don't think it will scan clearly later. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 27 Created: 3/8/2007 [4/25/07] (Please Address Before Hearing) It is still unclear on the plans what landscaping is existing (if any) on the neighboring property's landscape setback area. Will you maintain this with this project? [3/8/07] Minimum width of any landscape setback area along a lot line is 5 feet. Please address this issue along the western property line by providing more information about what is existing on the adjacent property and/or a modification of standards request. Number: 74 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) Per LUC section 3.2.1(E)(5) landscape islands with a tree must be 8 feet in its smallest dimension. This is a problem for the landscape island area highlighted on the landscape plan. Can you shift that entire row of parking to the west 3 feet to satisfy this standard? Number: 75 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) The comment response letter states that 11 of the trees will be up -sized to mitigate the loss of existing trees. It is unclear on the landscape plan which 11 trees are specified for up -sizing. Number: 76 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] Since many of the existing trees will be preserved, please add tree protection notes (LUC Section 3.2.1(G) to the Landscape Plan). Number: 77 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] (Please address before Hearing) You may want to show the proposed lighting fixtures on the site and/or landscape plan. Several of the proposed trees are Page 1