HomeMy WebLinkAbout318 E. MYRTLE, ACCESSORY BUILDING - PDP - 31-05 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW2. Since the building will not be classified as a dwelling unit, water and sewer
service may be extended from the house. Location of existing sewer service
should be check to determine if there will be a conflict with the proposed
building footprint. Additional paperwork will be required prior to building
permit to document the situation with water/sewer service being extended
from the house.
Transportation Planning
Contact Info: Kurt Ravenschlag, kravenschlag@fcgov.com
1. No comments.
Natural Resources
Contact Info: Doug Moore, 224-6143, dmoore@fcgov.com
1. Consider using native plants and grass to help to reduce the amount of
water needed for landscaping.
2. Contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester at (970) 221-6361 to see if removal of
existing trees will be allowed and will be required to be mitigated.
Current Planning
Contact Info: Shelby Sommer, 221-6750, ssommer@fcgov.com
1. This development proposal is subject to all applicable standards of the Fort
Collins Land Use Code (LUC), specifically Article 3 General Development
Standards, and Division 4.7 Neighborhood Conservation Medium Density
District.
2. Please pay attention to the standards and review criteria within Division
4.7(F)(3) Carriage Houses and Habitable Accessory Buildings.
3. The entire Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC) is available for your review on
the web at http://www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/begin.htm
4. Please refer to the list we customized for you after your conceptual review
for submittal requirements.
5. Contact me if you have any questions about the code requirements or
submittal requirements.
6. You will need to set up an appointment to submit your application with
Current Planning at 221-6750. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
n
2. If a separate meter is needed at the carriage house, development charges
will apply.
Stormwater Utility
Contact Info: Glen Schlueter, 221-6700, gschlueter@fcgov.com
1. This site is in the Old Town drainage basin where the new development fee
is $4,150.00/acre which is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. This
fee is to be paid at the time the building permit is issued and is charged only
when there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 350 square feet.
2. A drainage and erosion control report and construction plans are required
and they must be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in
Colorado. In the Old Town drainage basin these are required if there is an
increase in imperviousness greater than 5000 square feet.
3. Onsite detention is required with a 2 year historic release rate for water
quantity and extended detention is required for water quality treatment. If
there is 5000 square feet or less of new imperviousness, water quantity
detention is not required nor is water quality extended detention. If there is
an increase in imperviousness greater than 350 square feet, but less than
5000 square feet, a grading plan is all that is required. If it can be shown
that the total imperviousness, including one-half any adjacent streets or
alleys, is equal to or less that the masterplan imperviousness of 55%, the
report and detention requirements are waived, but a grading plan is still
required.
4. There is a storm sewer in Myrtle if a lower outfall is needed for drainage.
This would be helpful if onsite detention is required since the pond could be
deeper and not use up as much land area.
5. The Floodplain Comments:
-The front portion of this lot is in the Old Town 100-year floodplain. The
existing garage is out of the floodplain, however, the new structure
appears to be larger than the garage and extends further south onto the
lot and possibly into the floodplain. The first step would be to verify if the
structure is in the floodplain by plotting the floodplain limits on the site
plan.
- If the structure encroaches into the floodplain then the following
floodplain regulations will apply based on the assumption that this is a
residential use.
- The lowest floor of the structure and all HVAC must be elevated 18
inches above the 100-year water surface elevation.
- No new basements are allowed in residential structures.
- No critical facilities are allowed in the 100-year floodplain.
- A Floodplain Use permit ($25) is required for any work (including the
proposed stoop on the existing structure) in the floodplain.
- A completed and approved Elevation Certificate is required for
structures in the floodplain prior to the release of the CO.
-Floodplain Administrator contact: Marsha Hilmes-Robinson, 224-6036
Water Wastewater
Contact Info: Roger Buffington, 221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
1. Existing mains: 4-inch water and 18-inch sewer in Myrtle; 8-inch sewer in
alley to north.
3
ITEM: Addition of an accessory building with habitable space to the rear
portion of the lot at 318 E. Myrtle St.
MEETING DATE: July 11, 2005
APPLICANT: Steve and Heidi Lovass Robert Sutter
318 E. Myrtle St. Architectural Horizons
Fort Collins, CO 80524 bobsutter3@comcast.net
LAND USE DATA: Request to add an accessory building with habitable space to the
rear portion of the lot at 318 E. Myrtle St. The property is within the City of Fort Collins
and is zoned NCM — Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density District.
COMMENTS: The following departmental agencies have offered comments for this
proposal based on a sketch plan and photos which were presented to the review team:
Zoning
Contact Info: Jenny Nuckols, 416-2313, jnucklos@fcgov.com
1. Changes of use of this sort are permitted in the NCM District, subject to a
Type 1 Administrative Review.
2. Maximum building height for an accessory building with habitable space is
one and one-half (1 '/2) stories, not to exceed twenty-four (24) feet.
Engineering
Contact Info: Susan Joy, 221-6605, sjoy@fcgov.com
1. Street Oversizing fees may apply to this development. Contact Matt Baker
at 224-6108 or mbaker@fcgov.com for more information.
2. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) may be required but will likely be
waived for this project. Please contact Eric Bracke in Transportation
Planning at 224-6062 for further information.
3. Applicant is responsible for dedicating right of way (ROW) and possibly
utility easements along the alley and along Myrtle St. ROW and easements
can be dedicated by Plat or by separate document.
4. A Development Agreement (DA) and Development Construction Permit
(DCP) may be required.
3. Applicant is responsible for repairing or replacing any damaged curb, gutter
and sidewalks in public ROW along their street frontage.
4. Any public improvements must be built according to Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards (LUCASS).
5. Applicant is responsible for undergrounding any existing overhead utilities.
6. It the project is an accessory building with habitable space, the applicant
may waive the alley improvement standards.
Light and Power
Contact Info: Janet McTague, 224-6154, jmctague@fcgov.com
1. The existing underground electric cable may be sufficient. If the carriage
house is fed from the house panel, the panel may need to be upgraded.
VA
July 15, 2005
Steve and Heidi Lovass
318 E. Myrtle St.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Robert Sutter
Architectural Horizons
bobsufter3@comcast.net
Robert, Steve and Heidi:
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff's comments for the proposed
accessory building with habitable space, which was presented before the
Conceptual Review Team on July 11"', 2005.
The comments are informally offered by staff to assist you in preparing the detailed
components of a project application. Modifications and additions to these comments
may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
The City's Current Planning Department coordinates the development review process.
I am the Project Planner for your project. I will be commenting as well as assisting in
the coordination process. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the
next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 970-221-6750.
Sincerely,
Shelby Sommer
Associate City Planner
cc: Project File
Project Planner
cc: (via email):
Jenny Nuckols
Susan Joy
Janet McTague
Glen Schlueter
Roger Buffington
Kurt Ravenschlag
Doug Moore
Shelby Sommer
August 1, 2005
Page Four
NATURAL RESOURCES
1. OK.
2. No existing trees are to be removed.
CURRENT PLANNING
1. OK.
2. OK.
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. Thanks.
6. OK.
We look forward to our further review process through the City. Please call me (225-2704) if you have
any questions.
Cordiall ,
Robert Sutter, AIA
Principal
RAS/rs
CC: Steve and Heidi Lovaas
Shelby Sommer
August 1, 2005
Page Three
ENGINEERING
1. Matt Baker has been contacted and has waived Street oversizing fees.
2. Eric Bracke has been contacted and has waived the requirement for a TIS.
3. All required ROW's have been dedicated.
4. A development agreement will not be required since all improvements necessary for the
development have been made.
3. We will replace any curb, gutter, and sidewalks in public ROW damaged to a condition
worse then they were before any construction begins.
4. Any public improvements constructed with this project will be constructed in accordance
with LUCASS.
5. OK
6. Alley improvement standards have been waived. The public will not be coming to this
project once it is constructed. This project will not generate additional traffic through the
alley.
LIGHT and POWER
1. OK.
2. OK.
STORMWATER UTILITY
i. Additional building square footage added equates to 264 s.f. Additional sidewalk equates to 84
s.f. Total impermeable square footage equals 348 s.f. (less than 350 s.f.) The new driveway
off of the alley is proposed to be gravel and will not add impervious square footage to the
existing conditions.
2. Not Required. See comments in paragraph 1. above.
3. Not Required. See comments in paragraph 1. above.
4. Not Required. See comments in paragraph 1. above.
5. The proposed new structure does not encroach into the flood plain. However, the new structure
has been raised approximately 1'-0" higher than the existing structure to create more positive
drainage from the new structure than currently exist with the old structure to be demolished.
The flood plain has been plotted on the site plan using information received from Marsha
Hilmes-Robinson.
WATER WASTEWATER
1. OK.
2. OK.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
DON
0
Shelby Sommer
August 1, 2005
Page Two
In spite of these externally imposed restraints, Steve and Heidi still have a strong desire to continue to
move forward with their original intended use of the property for their long term family residence.
Steve and Heidi's initial move is to demolish the existing garage structure and build a new building that
can accommodate their storage needs and provide for a laundry, study, and small hobby work shop so that
they can move those functions out of their existing home to allow for more living space.
This planned construction of an accessory use with habitable space supports Fort Collins City Plan
Principles in the following manner:
PRINCIPLE LU-1: The proposed project as an infill endeavor promotes growth within the City.
PRINCIPLE LU-2: The proposed project maintains and enhances its character and sense of
place as defined by the neighborhood of which it is a part.
PRINCIPLE HSG-3: The proposed project maintains and enhances neighborhood stability. It
improves upon the elements already in place by removing a dilapidated
structure and replacing it with a new structure in line with the character of
the neighborhood.
PRINCIPLE ENV-5: The new structure will be constructed in line with current energy code
requirements.
PRINCIPLE ENV-8: The new structure will be constructed out of the flood plain and elevated
above the fmish elevations of the existing structure.
PRINCIPLE GM-8: The project represents compact infill development in an area that if left
unchanged could continue to degrade and lose its value.
PRINCIPLE EXN-1: This project does not represent a significant change to the character of its
existing residential development area. If anything the project enhances and
preserves the character of the existing neighborhood.
Conceptual Review Regairements:
The following portion of this letter will be developed in the same format as the conceptual review
comments received from the City and attached.
ZONONG
1. OK.
2. The Height of the proposed structure is 23'-8".