HomeMy WebLinkAbout300 BLEVINS COURT BOARDING HOUSE - PDP - 46-05 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)..EVISION ROUTING SFL.ET
Item:
M,
Date Received:
Y .g115\�
Items
Requested
Redlined
Items Being Returne
bA
o
n
a
O
-
(
A.
]
o
ro
Q
cC
�D
h9
cC
F
sLam'
ty
c
a
O
-
cz
v
ti
m °.
File: Project Planner
Advance Planning
Building Inspection
Comcast
Engineering
Engineering Pavement
Forestry
GIS
Light & Power
Natural Resources
Neighborhood Services
Park Planning
Poudre Fire Authority
Post Office
Qwest
<
ROW Planning_
Stormwater
Street Oversizin
Technical Services
Traffic Operations
Transfort
Transportation Planning
Water & Wastewater /
Water District:
Water Conservation
Xcel Energy
Zoning
CDOT
a
Ditch Co.:
L
Railroad:
z
REA/DOE/PRPA
Schools: Poudre /
Thompson
TOTAL To be Submitted
277
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 11 /23/2005
[6/9/06] After a site visit, it is clear that while the on street space
requirement cannot be met on your frontage, the cul-de-sac as a whole
provides enough public parking to meet the requirement in our standards.
[11/23/05] Off -site parking is required per LCUASS. Requires 19' min plus
5' clearance from any driveway edge. If cul-de-sac frontage does not have
space required for on -street parking, a variance request by a professional
engineer will be required. This requirement is not applicable if you resubmit
under basic development review.
Number: 3 Created: 11 /23/ 2005
[6/9/06] Show, label and dimension. Repeat.
[ 11 / 23 / 05] Sidewalk along frontage must be dimensioned.
Number: 19 Created: 6/ 9 / 2006
[6/9/06] See redlines for additional minor changes
Number: 21 Created: 6/ 23 / 2006
[6/23/06] At the time of Final Compliance, a $1000 Transportation
Development Review fee will be owed to the Engineering Department.
This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments
at this time. Another round of staff review may be necessary before this
development request can be scheduled for a public hearing. This proposal
is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the
date of this comment letter, being June 26, 2006) as set forth in
Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined
plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re-
submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related
to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
S4X�
Steve Olt
City Planner
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
James Swanstrom
P.O. Box 271516
Fort Collins, CO. 80527
Date: 6/ 26/ 2006
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 300 BLEVINS COURT, BOARDING
HOUSE - PDP, and we offer the following revised comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: Electric Service
Number: 15 Created: 12 / 8 / 2005
[6/22/06] Carried over just to confirm that this boarding house will be
assessed the residential electric rate.
[12/8/05] After additional research and discussion, it has been concluded
that boarding houses can be on the residential electric rate. Rate ordinances
from several years ago stipulated that boarding houses would be on the
commercial rate; however, current rates are silent on boarding houses.
Since the expected electric use pattern is like that of a residence, it has been
concluded that the appropriate rate is residential. Anyway, there is very
little difference between the two rates.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 9 Created: 12 / 6/ 2005
[6/22/06] The revised Site Plan, as submitted, still does not show the
aforementioned concrete pad/parking space in the front yard. This
comment is still relevant. This 4-bedroom boarding is required to have a
minimum of 2 off-street, unobstructed parking spaces. Is this being met?
[ 12 / 6/ 05] Based on a site visit to Blevins Court, the Site Plan does not
correctly show the off-street parking spaces in the front yard of this
property. There is one additional concrete paved parking space to the
northeast of the parking as shown on the plan. It is over the sidewalk as
shown. Because of this additional space the allowable 40% parking in a
front yard may be exceeded. This must be verified.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dan
DeLaughter
Topic: fire
Number: 18 Created: 6 / 9 / 2006
[6/9/06] Dimension the existing access easement.
Page 1