The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIMBERLINE CENTER - FDP - 41-05B - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)grass away from a paved surface. The landscape plans use a more discernable bicycle rack symbol, and these look like they are to be installed on a hard surface - which the code requires. Can we coordinate these a bit better for future submittals. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 106 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] 1. There should be a note on the plan that any lot/area not immediately built on shall be seeded and mulched (or otherwise stabilized, if you have a better idea). What about the detention/WQ ponds? Are they to be seeded/mulched or landscaped. There should be a note on the plans reflecting this. 2. Your calculations include several acres of grass. Where is this, how does it tie into the previous comment? Explain with notes in the report and on the plan. 3. The reseeding costs in the surety calculation are incorrect. 4. The project schedule should be on the erosion control sheet. The project schedule should be on the new form, not the old one. 5. There should be a note on the erosion control plan that the ponds will be excavated as the first step of overlot grading. Topic: Stormwater Number: 43 Created: 11 /4/2005 [5/3/06] reminder [3/22/06] Signed easements are needed before signing of mylars. [11/4/05] A letter of intent for the off -site grading is required before a hearing. Stormwater is ready for a hearing after the letter of intent is received. Topic: WatedWW Number: 116 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] Please clarify the situation with the irrigation tap, which is using the existing FCLWD service. Is this line already abandoned? Is the City or FCLWD providing this service? A call is also being made to FCLWD to help clarify this issue. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 4 Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 111 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] ACCESS: Excellent labeling of the EAE on the site plan. There were three drive aisles where I assumed they were Emergency Access Easement; however, they weren't labeled. Just to ensure the correct EAE is designated on the plat, I am forwarding to Ted Shepard a copy of the plan that illustrates exactly what we want designated EAE on the plat. Previous comment #53 from Michael Chavez still pertains, that the fire lanes are required to have approved signage and painting, and are to be maintained unobstructed, etc. Number: 112 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] STORAGE FACILITY ACCESS: The electronic gate at the entrance to the storage facility is required to mount a Knox Box (with card key or some other means to open the gate) or Knox Lock, to ensure emergency access to the facility. Number: 113 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE: The storage facility owner is requested to put in individual customer contract, that bulk storage of hazardous materials is prohibited in the units. Number: 114 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] COMMERCIAL COOKING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM: If a restaurant cooking system produces grease -laden vapors, an approved, automatic fire -extinguishing system shall be provided for the protection of commercial -type cooking equipment. Number: 115 Created: 5/4/2006 [5/4/06] HMIA: Toxic, corrosive, or reactive materials, or flammable/combustible liquids (as defined in the Uniform Fire Code) if used, stored, or handled on site, must have a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (HMIA) completed and supplied to the Planning Department and the Fire Department. (What do you have? How much? How do you prevent it from being a public threat?) Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Landscape Number: 105 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] I'm a little concerned with the proximity of the proposed trees along the front walkways of buildings D, C, A, F, and B (Lots 6,4,13,9,8 respectively on the utility plans). The proposed placement does not seem to provide enough clearance between the trunks and the buildings themselves. In the case of building D, the center of the trunk will be only 4.5 feet from the building. I do not believe that adequate clearance will exist when the tree reaches maturity. Also wondering about where the branches begin on these trees - considering the need for vertical clearance for pedestrians. Can the trees in these locations be moved further from the building to ensure at least 5' of clearance between the trunk of a mature tree and the buildings themselves? Topic: Site Plan Number: 29 Created: 11 /1 /2005 [5/2/06] No bike parking shown on utility plans. Please coordinate locations and add those which are indicated on the site plan. Thanks. [11/1/05] Bicycle parking locations are a bit confusing when looking at the different plan sets. The site plans have a "B" for the location, which often looks like its sifting off in the Page 3 [5/3/06] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal ok. Number: 108 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] From Technical Services: 10' Telephone on lots 9 and 10 not locatable. Number: 109 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] From Technical Services: 4' San easement Lot 1 is not locatable, other easements not locatable. Number: 110 Created: 5/3/2006 [5/3/06] Please run another paper round by Tech Services prior to running mylars to make sure their comments have been addressed properly. Topic: Signing and Striping Number: 87 Created: 3/24/2006 [5/2/06] Striping is now being shown with the Street Oversizing project, however, there still remains the question of "who pays and how"? Per city code, this development is responsible for all offsite improvements (including striping) to make this development work and a repay can be filed against the undeveloped properties. This project may be able to work it out with Matt that the repay he's already filing can include the striping in front of the undeveloped lots. [3/24/06] 1 believe the Timberline project is not striping the streets with their project so the striping will have to be done with this development. See comment 78. Topic: Site Plan Number: 101 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] Remove the word "preliminary" from the title block. Number: 102 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] Can you squeeze in a note that this project is installing the temp attached asphalt sidewalk from the southern property line to Nancy Gray along JA Drive? Topic: Temp Sidewalk Number: 99 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] This project is responsible for the cost of constructing the temp asphalt sidewalk to Nancy Gray because its an interim improvement necessary to meet the ped level of service requirements for this project. Please see redlines and please submit an estimate for Matt's review and approval of the cost of this sidewalk and this number will go into the DA UNLESS Matt can bill you through his project. I'm flexible so whatever works best for everybody works for me. "Update - Matt will bill for the temp asphalt in their repay so we don't need the estimate or DA language. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: utility plans Number: 97 Created: 4/24/2006 [4/24/06] Adjust street trees along Bear Mountain Drive to accommodate clearances to proposed streetlights. Number: 98 Created: 4/24/2006 [4/24/06] Electric layout as coordinated and shown on landscape plan should also be shown on utility plans. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citv of Fort Collins VF RIPLEY ASSOCIATES Date: 05/16/2006 SANDY MCFERON 401 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE, SUITE 201 FORT COLLINS, CO 80521 Staff has reviewed your submittal for TIMBERLINE CENTER PDP AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 103 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] 1 have such minor comments that it's not even worth writing them out. Fantastic submittal Mike! Please see the redlines instead and I'm ready for mylars. Topic: Joe Allen Drive Number: 104 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] The offsite design for JA Drive just needs to ghost/grey the water/sewer lines being installed with the Stantec plans and change the sheet number to CS503b. This will allow us to insert them into the other set without changing too much. Thanks Mike for coming up with this design so quickly!! You really made this whole thing come together seemlessly and we all appreciate your efforts. Topic: Landscape Number: 25 Created: 10/31 /2005 [5/2/06] [3/21/06] [10/31/05] Show, label, and dimension all easements, rows, etc. Number: 64 Created: 3/21/2006 [5/2/06] This sheet may have to be broken into two sheets to get it to scan clearly but see JR first to see what he says. [3/21/06] Please see JR in Tech Services regarding scanning requirements. Number: 100 Created: 5/2/2006 [5/2/06] Remove the word "preliminary" from the title block. Topic: Offsite Easements and ROW Number: 21 Created: 10/31 /2005 [5/2/06] [3/21/06] All letters of Intent have been received. Now need to complete the process before the city will sign off on the mylars. See below. In addition, there is a new TDR filing fee of $250 per easement. [11/16/05) The Letter of Intent from the Hau property to the north has been received. Still require one from the property owner to the south for the Sagebrush extension. [10/31/05] Letters of intent must be provided for all offsite easements, row and construction prior to scheduling the public hearing. The actual easements and row dedications will need to be provided prior to plan approval. Topic: Plat Number: 107 Created: 5/3/2006 Page 1