HomeMy WebLinkAbout638 WEST PROSPECT ROAD BOARDING HOUSE - PDP - 52-05 - CORRESPONDENCE -F 7AL PLAN ROUTING S- SET
Item: �n�5F, W . -Yro Pec3- 13ODCO; ivQ HO osP
This project went to / has been'scheduled for Public 116ring on
The following table lists final plan submittal requirements for this project.
A final fee of S4;89@:0ff i required at the time of submittal unless otherwise waived or reduced.
Fee Waiver/Reduction Approval: Amount: ,S2D D Date: _
Planner: S.So�nrn,e r Engineer: S. uo
A"
Items Requested
Redlines
ti
N
a
o
>
c
o
v
a
?
o
r
a
r
c
�z
Q
G
a
/ `v^\
File: Project Planner
7
Advance Planning
Building Inspection
Comcast
Engineering
1
7.,
2
l
l
Engineering Pavement
Forestry
GIS
Light & Power
Natural Resources
Neighborhood Services
C4
Park Planning
Poudre Fire Authority
°
0.
Post Office
Qwest
Q
ROW Planning
Stormwater
2
Street Oversizin
Technical Services
Traffic Operations
Transfort
Transportation Planning
Water & Wastewater /
Water District:
Water Conservation
Xcel Energy
Zoning
County Assessor
CDOT
Ditch Co.:
Railroad:
z
REA/DOE/PRPA
Q
Schools: Poudre /
Thompson
TOTAL To be Submitted
3
3
2
J
away from structures and out to the street, not onto neighboring properties. The
applicant could be liable if the increased runoff causes damage to others.
Please be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
3416gR V—
Shelby Sommer
Associate City Planner
Page 3
Number: 27 Created: 6/23/2006
[10/3/06] The Final Compliance Fee has been reduced to $200 per the City
Engineer.
[6/23/06] At the time of Final Compliance, a $1000 Transportation Development
Review fee will be owed to engineering.
Department: Engineering
Topic: Plat
Number: 30
[10/11/06] From Technical Services:
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Created: 10/11 /2006
Boundary and legal close.
Number: 31 Created: 10/11 /2006
[10/11/06] From Technical Services: How was Prospect dedicated? Is the term "re-
dedicated proper in this case? From Susan Joy: No, it would not be, please remove
that sentence. Needs to show how it was dedicated originally.
Number: 32 Created: 10/11 /2006
[10/11/06] From Technical Services: Addition ROW needed? What about
easements? From Susan Joy: This development is responsible for dedicating an
additional 21' of row for its half of a constrained arterial. No utility easement is
required.
Number: 33 Created: 10/11 /2006
[10/11/06] From Technical Services: Need to see the final plat.
Number: 34 Created: 10/11 /2006
[10/11/06] Please email me at sjoy@fcgov.com for the current plat language.
Number: 35 Created: 10/11 /2006
[10/11/06) Please remove the word "preliminary' from the plat title.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Glen Schlueter
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 29 Created: 10/10/2006
[10/10/06] It is not clear on the site plan how much "new" impervious area is being
added. As discussed at the conceptual review meeting, there is a fee for any new
imperviousness over 350 sq.ft. The fee is $3070.00/acre or $0.0705/sq.ft. for new
imperviousness and no charge for existing imperviousness. Please provide the
"new" impervious area being added to your site plan. In the Old Town Drainage
basin, 5000 sq.ft of "new" imperviousness can be added to a site without providing a
drainage study or onsite detention. Normally a grading plan is required with an
increase of 350 sq.ft of new imperious area. However that requirement is being
waived since the new impervious areas are driveways and parking areas, not
buildings. It is suggested the applicant make sure the new impervious areas drain
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
JAMES SWANSTROM
400 CORMORANT CT
FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
Date: 10/18/2006
Staff has reviewed your submittal for 638 WEST PROSPECT ROAD BOARDING
HOUSE PDP, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer
Topic: General
Number: 36 Created: 10/18/2006
This proposal is ready for a Type I (Administrative) Public Hearing. Steve Olt and I
agree that it makes the most sense to hold one public hearing for all six boarding
house proposals. If the proposal is approved at the public hearing, you will be
required to address any remaining issues with your final plan submittal.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 28 Created: 10/10/2006
[10/10/06] The parking lot does not work (cars can't back out without going onto the
grass). Either rotate the stalls 90 degrees or increase the parking lot to include a
drive aisle and room to back out.
Number: 4 Created: 11 /29/2005
[10/10/06] Please remove the incorrect sidewalk label and dimension as it conflicts
with the new & correct label.
[6/9/06] dimension sidewalk (not concrete) and driveway opening: repeat.
[11/29/05] Dimension and label existing ROW, sidewalk width, and driveway
opening.
Number: 10 Created: 12/1 /2005
[10/10/06] Please show, label and dimension the existing easement discussed
below.
[6/9/06] There is an existing 5' by 10' utility easement on the SE comer of the
property for the electric transformer. Please include this on the plat. In addition, any
other exsiting easements must be shown on the plat.
[12/1/05] Show utilities on plan. When platting, we would need appropriate
easements dedicated to accommodate them.
Number: 25 Created:. 6/15/2006
[10/3/06] Repeat comment. Please see Figure 16-1 of LCUASS for this and other
requirements.
[6/15/06] The low rock wall on the property must be moved a minimum of 2' back
from the edge of the sidewalk.
Page I