HomeMy WebLinkAboutJOHNSTON ANNEXATION & ZONING - 9-06 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning & Zoning Board
May 18, 2006
Page 4
going to happen to future property values. If the area is developed with dense housing and with
commercial development around the Centex subdivision, it won't flow very well.
Mark Ashford, 1945 Prairie Hill Drive, addressed the Board to express concern about housing
values declining because of commercial development in that area. Ashford was not concerned
with the annexation, but more with zoning. He felt that it would make more sense aesthetically to
build more neighborhoods similar to the Centex subdivision. The roads are already there and felt it
would maintain the property values to continue with housing instead of commercial. Ashford also
expressed that there should be some open space given that the area is housing and churches βall
family oriented. With the Harmony area being developed commercially, Ashford believed there
would be sufficient shopping opportunities on Harmony and Centerra in Loveland. Ashford added
that there were concerns for a commercial area across the street from Bacon Elementary because
of traffic.
End of Public Participation
Member Schmidt asked Shepard for clarification in response to the citizen's comments, does MMN
allow a small amount of commercial? Shepard replied yes, all zones are mixed use. It was a
fundamental tenet of City Plan that all zones are mixed use. There are no exclusive land use
zones with the exception of RF and Urban Estate. The commercial center that is planned for this
area is on the Hansen property that is north of the subject property. There is no indication when
that property will be annexed and there is no development activity on the Hansen property. That is
where the designated neighborhood center will occur as part of the Fossil Reservoir Area Plan.
Timberline Road is a regional road, and the school district was aware of this when they selected
that site for Bacon Elementary. Timberline Road carries traffic from Windsor to downtown Fort
Collins. North of Harmony Road is designated as a six lane major arterial roadway. Traffic is
anticipated to increase on Timberline, and there will be commercial development north of Linden
Park and the Johnston Annexation.
Member Schmidt commented that it is most likely that if there is commercial development to the
north of the parcel of discussion this evening, it will remain residential and create a buffer between
neighborhoods and the commercial that is planned. However, when an actual PDP is filed, that is
when there can be more discussion about commercial development.
Board Member Schmidt motioned that the Planning & Zoning Board approve the Johnston
Annexation and Zoning #9-06 based on the facts and findings on page 5 of the staff report.
Board Member Rollins seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0.
The Board agreed to review Peterson Annexation and Zoning, #54-02B and Streamside
Annexation and Zoning, #55-02A given their proximity and similar characteristic
Project: Peterson Annexation and
Project Description: This is a t6annex and zone 27.89 acres located on the south
sid ast Vine Drive between Interstate 25 and County Road 5.
ontiguity with the existing municipal boundary is gained along the
west property boundary, which abuts_the Kirshner Annexation
(December, 1993). The property is undevetoped and located in the
FA1 β Farming District in Larimer County. The re d zoning for
Planning & Zoning Board
May 18, 2006
Page 3
Project: Johnston Annexation and Zoning, #9-06
Project Description: A request to annex and zone a 36.82 acre parcel. The site is 6111 S.
Timberline Road located approximately one-half mile south of
Kechter Road on the west side of Timberline Road. Contiguity with
the existing municipal boundary is gained along the entire south
boundary which is shared with the Keating Annexation (Linden Park
Subdivision). Contiguity is also gained along the entire east
boundary which is shared with the Westchase Annexation Number
One and along the entire west boundary which is shared with the
Union Pacific Railroad Fourth Annexation.
The requested zoning is Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood
on the easterly 16.94 acres and Low Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood on the westerly 19.87 acres. The requested zoning is
in conformance with the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan.
Staff Recommendation: Approval of the Annexation and Zoning and placement into the
Residential Neighborhood Sign District.
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence
Member Schmidt asked for clarification on the staff report that the MMN portion is designed to be in
conformance with the vacant land to the north that will form a neighborhood commercial center and
inquired if it presently zoned. Chief Planner, Ted Shepard replied yes that the area to the north of
the MMN is anticipated by the Fossil Creek Reservoir Area Plan to also be zoned MMN. The idea
there is that you would support a neighborhood commercial zone, which is also on the Fossil Creek
Reservoir Area Plan as well. The area to the north is not annexed; therefore, does not have a City
zoning.
Member Schmidt asked Shepard if it flows that the MMN is surrounded by the LMN and do the
people to the north have an option to be annexed or would they have to get a modification to the
Structure Plan if they wanted to do anything else besides a neighborhood commercial center.
Shepard replied yes, they would have to modify the Structure Plan and the Fossil Creek Reservoir
Area Plan if they wanted to diverge from the proposed zoning of MMN and neighborhood
commercial center.
Member Schmidt, referring to an email received from Joseph Gallagher, 1909 Prairie Hill Drive (a
property owner in the adjacent development of Linden Park) expressing concerns about the
Johnston Annexation, asking if Shepard had comments on the email. Shepard replied that there
was a written response (both a hard copy and an email) to Mr. Gallagher. Member Schmidt
inquired to Gallagher's issue about the fence, that it would be addressed in a PDP. Shepard
replied yes.
Public Participation
Willie Lopez, 2015 Prairie Hill Drive, addressed the Board expressing opposition to the annexation.
Commercial activity developing in that area will create the potential for property values to decline.
Member Lingle asked for clarification that the concern is not for the annexation as it is the zoning.
Lopez replied the concern was not so much for the zoning. There was more concern about what is
Chairperson Lingle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Rollins, Fries, Schmidt, Meyer, Stockover, Smith, and Lingle.
Staff Present: Gloss, Mapes, Olt, Shepard, Deines
Citizen participation: None.
Director of Current Planning, Cameron Gloss, reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agendas:
Consent Agenda:
1. Minutes of the February 16, 2006 and April 20, 2006 Planning and Zoning hearings
(continued)
2. Recommendation to City Council regarding the Fort Collins Loveland Municipal Airport
Master Plan Update
3. #54-02B Peterson Annexation and Zoning
4. #55-02A Streamside Annexation and Zoning
5. #9-06 Johnston Annexation and Zoning
6. #11-06 Cargill Rezoning
Discussion Items:
7. #90-85R Hilton Garden Inn at Preston Center at Wildwood Business Park, First Filing β
Major Amendment
8. #36-05A Bella Vira β Project Development Plan
9. Recommendation to City Council for Spring 2006 Biannual Revisions, Clarification and
Additions to the Land Use Code.
Member Schmidt moved for approval of Consent Agenda item #6, with the exception of
Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 which were pulled by Member Schmidt as well as Citizen participation.
Member Stockover seconded the motion. Motion passed 6-0.
Pro Recommendation to City Council regarding the Fort Colli eland
Municipal Airport Master Plan Update
Project Description: an update of the Fort C - oveland Municipal Airport
Master P a ich is a y document that assesses and directs
physical impro at will likely be necessary to accommodate
future on needs at the rt.
Staff Re,o endation: Approval