HomeMy WebLinkAboutCARGILL EXPANSION - PDP/FDP - FDP130043 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Comment Number.
Comment Originated: 11106/2013
11/06/2013: Show the location of the parking lot light poles on the site plan. Add a note stating that all
building and pole mounted light fixtures will be shielded and down directional.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/0612013
11/06/2013: Show the building setback distances to the south and west lot lines on the plan.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/06/2013: The lenght of the parking stalls and the width of the drive aisles are shown, but not the
width of the stalls. Please show the parking stall width.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/06/2013: The parking lot on the south and east side of the building contains 54 parking spaces and
needs to have at least 3 handicap parking spaces.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/06/2013: Add a note stating that ground mounted and building mounted HVAC units will be
screened from view. If there will be ground mounted units, show the locations on the site plan.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 11/08/2013
11/08/2013: The site plan shows an'existing wrought iron fence'. That fence was approved as part of
the recent Basic Development Review for the last Greenhouse, and was approved with off -sets and
articulation. The fence shown on the site plan for this application doesn't show those features. Please
correct the site plan to reflect the previously approved fence.
Page 10 of 10
Comment Number. 4 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please add "Cargill Subdivision" to the beginning of the legal description.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Ward Stanford, 970.221.6820, wstanfordCaDfcstov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: Please provide a scaled plan that shows the nearest access drive and/or intersections on
Drake so the City can verify intersection (drives and/or streets) separation distances meet City odes.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221.6854, rbuffinnton0fcaov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: Show/label the existing water service to the building northeast of the proposed building.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11119/2013: Provide a minimum of 10 feet between the storm sewer and the water main.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: Provide a minimum of 10 feet between the water main and the edge of utility easement.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: A portion of the water main north of the west building on Lot 1 appears to be out of the
utility easement.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: See redlined utility plans for other comments.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416.2355, pbarnesefcnov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/0612013: If there are wall -mounted or roof -mounted mechanical units, please indicate location. The
trash enclosure is show to be 6V tall. Any fence or wall that exceeds 6' in height requires a building
permit and the structure must be engineered to comply with building code regulations. Consider
decreasing height to 6'. It looks like there will be wall mounted light fixtures - please show the location
on the building elevations.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/06/2013: Each parking lot landscape island must contain at least one decidious tree. The islands
in the west parking lot do not appear to contain trees.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2013
11/06/2013: 1 didn't see a modification request for the build to line standards. I'll defer to Planning
regarding the modification,
Page 9 of 10
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 9
11/21/2013: No comments.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 10
11/21/2013: The boundary & legal description close.
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Do you need both the Notice Of Other Documents & Development Agreement Note on
sheet 1? See redlines.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/2112013: Are there any lienholders? If not, please add a note stating that there are none. If there are
or it is unclear if any, please add a signature block. This can be removed later if it is discovered there
are none.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please add the missing title commitment information when it is available.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please label the Point Of Commencement & Point Of Beginning.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please change the direction of the Basis Of Bearings shown on sheet 2. See redlines.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Has the 50' Temporary Construction Easement shown on across the southern edge of the
property expired?
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: If the 20' Drainage Easement & 20' Slope & Drainage Easement along the southern edge
of the property were granted to the City, the portions lying within the newly dedicated City right of way
self -extinguish, and should be removed. See redlines.
Comment Number: 18
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please show the south right of way line of Drake Road and the source of the right of way
dedication. See Rigden Farm 10th, Rigden Farm 9th Parkside Commoms, Rigden Farm Third
Parkside West, Rigden Farm plats, and reception # 20040102612. There appears tp be 54' half right of
way. Please verify,
Comment Number: 19
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please show the adjoining subdivisions to the south of Drake Road.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: All easements must be labeled and locatable. See redlines.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please use a different linetype or other method to indicate the tie distances of the
easements. See redlines.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: Please rotate the marked bearing & distance along the easterly boundary. See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
Page 8 of 10
Comment Number.
Comment Originated: 11/05/2013
11/05/2013: Erosion Control Calculation needs corrections based on the email sent on 11-5-2013.
Redlines should be addressed specifically on 1) An effective sediment trap 2) Steep slope protection.
If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse
Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fogov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416.2418, wlamarau2@kgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: The LID requirements for development in the City of Fort Collins require 50% of the site
area to drain through an appropriately sized LID device and for 25% of the private parking and drive
aisles be designed as porous pavement. The proposed design is not meeting these requirements.
A meeting is suggested to go over what will be required for this site.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013: The calculations show the detention pond volumes do not include the water quality
volume in addition to the quantity volume. Please revise the detention volume to include both the
quantity and quality volumes.
Comment Number:
11/19/2013:
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, icountv(&fcaov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 1
11/21/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet EL3. See redlines.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11121/2013: Please mask text within hatching on sheets 3, 5 & 6. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: There is a text over text issue on sheet 5. See redlines.
Comment Number: 5
11/21/2013: There is a cut off text issue on sheet 7. See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number. 6
11/21/2013: Please correct the sheet numbering on sheet 1. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7
11/2112013: There is a line over text issue on sheet 2. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8
11/21/2013: Please mask text within hatching on sheets 2 & 3. See redlines.
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
Page 7 of 10
Comment Numbei. i IComment Originated: 11/04/2013
11/04/2013: The developer will need to coordinate power requirements and transformer location(s)
with Light & Power Engineering at 970-221-6700.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/04/2013
11/04/2013: Electric developement and system modification charges will apply.
Department: Park Planning
Contact: Craig Foreman, 970-221.6618, cforemani&fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/05/2013
11/05/2013: No comments
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970.416-2869, jlvnxwilerCrilaoudre-fire.ora
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/20/2013
11/20/2013: FIRE CONTAINMENT
Any new building exceeding 5000 square feet shall be sprinklered or fire contained. This is applicable
to greenhouse and other Group-U occupancy structures. If containment is used, the containment
construction shall be reviewed and approved by the Poudre Fire Authority prior to installation.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/20/2013
11/20/2013: FIRE LANES
Portions of the Office Building, Lab, and Growth Room are out of fire access. Fire access needs to be
provided on the south side of the property and be part of the EAE in order to correct this. Please
contact me with any questions.
061FC 503.1.1: Fire Lanes shall be provided to within 150' of all portions of the building, as measured
by an approved route around the exterior of the building. When fire lanes cannot be provided, the fire
code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet if the building is equipped throughout
with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system.
Comment Number: 3
11/20/2013: TURNING RADII
Comment Originated: 11120/2013
EAE turning radii are not consistently meeting current code requirements for 25' inside and 50' outside.
It is understood that some portions of the site were designed and approved under the old standards of
20' inside and 40' outside radii. Existing conditions remain acceptable, however please verify that all
NEW improvements are meeting the current code standards.
061FC 503.2.4 and Local Amendments: The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall
be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218.2932, ischlamofcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Page 6 of 10
Comment Number. 4
Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/22/2013: Drainage easements are needed for the detention ponds. See redlines. Please add
drainage easements to the plat.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/2212013: Please add the standard note to the plat:
There shall be no private conditions, covenants or restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of
resource conserving equipment or landscaping that are allowed by Sections 12-120—12-133 of the
City Code.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224.6143, lex@fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013
11/21/2013: No comments.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchanan aOfcaov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
11/19/2013:
If there are any existing significant trees on the site that will be impacted by construction then contact
the City Forester for an on -site meeting to obtain information for a tree inventory and mitigation plan.
Comment Number: 2
11/19/2013:
Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
Tree protection note number 7 may not apply. Review and remove the note if this is the case. If the
project feels the note is necessary then it should be re -worked to say in effect the following.
Pruning of off -site trees that have canopy that extends over the project shall follow the
recommendations of an ISA Certified Arborist and occur with permission of the adjacent property
owner. Tree pruning work shall be performed by a City of Fort Collins Licensed Arborist.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russ Hovland, ,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/08/2013
11/08/2013: 1 don't have any comments on the Cargill expansion. Please have them call me for a
pre -submittal meeting in the early design stage of the Building plans.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmar ine(a)fceov.com
Topic: General
Page 5 of 10
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 97b-"1.6501, tsieamund(a)fcpov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/22/2013: Please add the following sidewalk note to the utility plan (sheet 3) and the site plan.
Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as streets, sidewalks,
curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be
replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins standards at the Developer's expense prior to the
acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/2212013
11/22/2013: Label the entrance gate on the utility plan set. See redlies
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/2212013: Please show the alignment of the new proposed drive approach in relation to Kansas Dr,
across Drake Rd to the south. The proposed access drive needs to align with Kansas Dr.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/2212013
11/2212013: Please revise general note #1
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/2212013
11/2212013: Please revise general note #47- to read shall NOT
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/2212013: The project submittal does not address Section 3.6.3(F) in the Land Use Code as it
relates to street pattern and connectivity to adjacent developments. The development to the west has
constructed 2 street stubs to the boundary of this property. Per the Land Use Code this project needs
to continue the public street system through the project. Additional conversation with Planning is
needed to determine the process of this submittal and if a modification request is necessary if the
project does not intend to extend the public street system to meet Section 3.6.3(F).
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/22/2013: To meet current street standards a 15ft utility easement will need to be dedicated along
Drake Rd. The utility plans reference an existing 15ft utility easement but it is not shown on the plat.
Please show on the plat if this easement exists or add to the plat if the easement needs to be
dedicated.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/2212013: The proposed water main bends outside the dedicated utility easement for approximately
200ft. Please revise the water main or the utility easement so that the main is in easement as it wraps
around the rear of the new building. See sheet 3 redlines
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 11/22/2013
11/2212013: The plat references an existing 20ft water line easement. With the extension of the water
main with this project it appears that additional easement is needed as the waterline bends to the south
and appears to be out of easement. See plat redlines
Page 4 of 10
Comment Number. 12 Comment Originated: 11/1212013
11/12/2013: LUC 3.2.1(D)(1)(c) This section requires full tree stocking in landscape areas within 50 ft of
the building.
Please include a trees in the landscape islands 1) on the northeast comer of the warehouse and 2) the
island in front of the bike racks
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 11/12/2013
11/1212013: LUC 3.21(E)(4)(a) This section requires trees to planted along parkng lot perimeters at a
spacing of 1 for every 25ft along ROW and 1 for every 40ft along a side lot line.
There should be another tree added along the Drake Rd
There needs to be at least six trees along the West Parking lot area.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 11/15/2013
11/15/2013: The parking table shows the two uses split out for the parking maximum counts. Please
clerify that the 55 number of employees used for the industrial count. Is this 55 employees in addition
to those in the office portion of the building or does 55 include employes that work in the warehouse
growth -room and office portions of the building?
Comment Number: 21
Comment Originated: 11/15/2013
11/15/2013: The landscape island in the West side parking stall can it line up with the other landscape
island across the drive aisle and tree be positioned to allow a sidewalk connection the Lot 4 when it
developes.
Comment Number: 20
Comment Originated: 11/15/2013
11/15/2013: It is unclear how pedestrians move within the site and how they get from the different
buildings and adjoing lots with minimal conflicts with the vehicle traffic.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/15/2013
11/1512013: Please label the dimension of the trashlrecycling enclosure and that it is located on a
concrete pad.
Comment Number: 23
Comment Originated: 11/15/2013
11/15/2013: Please address the criteria for expanding an existing permitted use in LUC section 1.6.21
through 4 and 1.6.51through 7
Comment Number: 24
Comment Originated: 11/20/2013
11/20/2013: LUC 2.1.3(B)(2) Because the application does not seek to develope the enfire property at
this time an Overal Development Plan (ODP) is required.
The ODP is reviewed as a Type 2 and will need to be approved prior to the PDP hearing.
The PDP can still remain a Type 1 review.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970.221.6573, slanaenbemer(&fcaov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/20/2013
11/20/2013: The project owes an additonal $6,047.5 for the PDP TDRF. The full amount of land being
platted was not used in the acerage calculation.
Page 3 of 10
Comment Number. a
Comment Originated: 11/0112013
11/01/2013: LUC 4.5(E)(2)(e) requires not massing to be greater than 10,000 sq ft footprint. Please
show the square footage's of the differential building masses.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/0112013
11/01/2013: LUC 4.5(E)(2)(g) Outdoor storage is prohibited. Please include this as a note on the site
plan.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/01/2013
11/01/2013: LUC 4.5(E)(2)(h) In a note on the site please discuss the hours of operations and
deliveries and pickups
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11101/2013
11/01/2013: LUC 3.5.3(E)(2) This section requires all sides of the building shall include materials and
design characteristics consistent with those on the front.
The East elevation and the North of elevation is not consistent with the front with the lack of the brick
material that is establish on the front.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/08/2013
11/08/2013: LUC 4.5(E)(3) This section requires a minimum proportioning /subdividing features.
The growth room portion of the building that faces the street needs further proportioning.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/08/2013
11/08/2013: LUC 3.5.3(E)(6)(a) and (b) requires a recognizable 'base'and "top", further a
recognizable 'top" is more than a colored "stripes" or'bands"
The 2" metal reveal and different color of stucco is not enough to be comply with the standards for a
"top" of the section. Also the proposed is not clearly showing a recognizable "bottom". Please refer
to code section for examples.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 11/08/2013
11108/2013: The three greenhouses with the word future, please remove the word future so the
locations are approved with this submittal. Or remove the greenhouses from the plans.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 11/1212013
11/1212013: LUC 3.2.2(C)(5)(b) This section requires drive aisles leading to the main entrance have
walkways on both sides of the drive aisle.
Comment Number: 16
Comment Originated: 11/12/2013
11/1212013: The landscape plan cover sheet has some calculations not shown.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/12/2013
11/12/2013: The Trash enclosure elevation does not match the site plan. These need to match.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/1212013
11/1212013: The light pole loction at the entrance is it in conflict with a tree location? If so please
relocate the light.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 11/12/2013
11/12/2013: Please remove signs from the plans. Or revise sign note to include language that states
signs and their locations are not approve through this combined PDP/FP review process and will
obtain a separate sign permit.
Page 2 of 10
City, Of
F6rt Collins
November 22, 2013
Cathy Mathis
The Birdsall Group
Fort Collins, CO 80513
RE: Cargill Expansion, FDP130043, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6760
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentreview
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of
the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual
commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or
nbeals@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416.2313, nbealsgDfcoov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number. 7
Comment Originated: 11/01/2013
11/01/2013: The application did not include a modification request. Please include a modification
following the standards of section 2.8 of Land Use Code.
LUC 3.5.3(C)(2)
LUC 4.5(E)(2)(a)
LUC 4.5(E)(2)(f)
LUC 4.5(E)(2)(b)
LUC 4.5(E)(2)(e)
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 11/01/2013
11101/2013: On the light plan in the statistics table need to include the parking area statistics and that
the average for the parking areas is 1 fc.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 11/01/2013
11/01/2013: Land Use Code (LUC) 4.5(E)(4)(f)5. Rooftop equipment is required to be screened on all
four sides. Where are the locations of the roof -top equipment and what is the height and location of
the screening?
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 11101/2013
11/01/2013: LUC 4.5(E)(2)(d) An all flat roof building requires either a stepped roof or terrace. The
proposed building is not showing either.
Page 1 of 10