The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCARGILL EXPANSION - PDP/FDP - FDP130043 - CORRESPONDENCE -Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/07/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/0712014: Please correct the easement labels. See redlines. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221.6854, rbuffinpton(ftgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/07/2014: It appears there could be several conflicts between water main and storm sewer crossings. Provide storm sewer profiles showing crossings and a detail for each water main lowering that is needed. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/0712014: Add the tracer wire requirement to Note 2 on Sht 3. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/07/2014: The connection of the sewer service at the existing manhole must be made with a drop connection. Add appropriate notes and the drop connection detail. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Bames, 970.416-2355, pbames(Mcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/06/2013 12124/2013: The note has been added, but the light pole locations still haven't been shown on the site plan. 11/06/2013: Show the location of the parking lot light poles on the site plan. Add a note stating that all building and pole mounted light fixtures will be shielded and down directional. Page 5 of 5 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/08/2014: Repeat Comment: Please mask text within hatching on sheets 3, 5 & 6. See redlines. 11121/2013: Please mask text within hatching on sheets 3, 5 & 6. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11121/2013 01/08/2014: Repeat Comment: There is a text over text issue on sheet 5. See redlines. 11/21/2013: There is a text over text issue on sheet 5. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 24 01/07/2014: Please remove the "Matchline Sheet 3" from sheet 2. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 9 01/07/2014: No comments. 11/21/2013: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 10 01/07/2014: The new boundary & legal description close. 11/21/2013: The boundary & legal description close. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/07/2014: Please add a note stating that there are no lienholders associated with the property shown on this plat. 11/21/2013: Are there any lienholders? If not, please add a note stating that there are none. If there are or it is unclear if any, please add a signature block. This can be removed later if it is discovered there are none. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/07/2014: Please label all unplatted properties. See redlines. 11/21/2013: Please show the adjoining subdivisions to the south of Drake Road. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/0712014: There is a easement line that doesn't scale. See redlines. 11/21/2013: All easements must be labeled and locatable. See redlines. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/07/2014: Please correct the distance for the Basis Of Bearings. The distance does not match between the legal decription and what is shown on sheet 2. See redlines. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 01/07/2014: Please change the linework & labels for the marked easements along Drake Road. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/07/2014: Please add "Lots 2 & 3", and remove "A tract of land....". See redlines. 11/21/2013: Please add "Cargill Subdivision" to the beginning of the legal description. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 01/0712014 01/07/2014: Please continue the 15' utility easement shown along the south boundary. See redlines. Page 4 of 5 Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, fivnxwiler0poudre-fire.ora Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014 0110712014: Emergency Access Easements There are some labeling discrepancies as it pertains to the EAE on various pages of the plan which I would like to clear up. > SITE PLAN (updated 12118113): The greenhouse perimeter road on Lot 3 is labeled as'20' asphalt access drive typ.° when it should be labeled as an EAE and shown as such on the plat. > CARGILL SUBDIVISION, File Name 2013068SUB; Sheet 2 of 2 (dated 10/30/13) from last round of reviews: Details a portion of the required EAE in Lot 3. In the last round of comments, the project team was asked to revisit the required turning radii for fire apparatus in Lot 3. > CARGILL SUBDIVISION, File name 2013068SUB; Sheet 2 of 2 (also dated 10/30/13) the latest submitted plans: This page has now been updated to omit the EAE's in Lot 3. Please advise. Fire access roads are to be within 150' of all portions of any building. At this time, there is no EAE which fully covers the two most northern greenhouses and as such, places them out of fire access. Please contact me should you need to discuss this further. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, jschlamMcoov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/05/2013 12/31/2013: Erosion Control Plan has redlines 1) Sediment trap can't be replaced with straw wattle. The pressure head alone from that much water will render straw ineffective at preventing dirt discharges. Sediment trap was the correct direction but it will need to be effective please include a detail. 2) Escrow calculations call out for the matting for the steep slopes, please include them on the plan and the sequence chart. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com 11/05/2013: Erosion Control Calculation needs corrections based on the email sent on 11-5-2013. Redlines should be addressed specifically on 1) An effective sediment trap 2) Steep slope protection. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wiamaraue(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/10/2014 01/10/2014: The PDP is ready for a hearing. Another round will be required to provide the LID details mentioned in our meeting on 1/9114. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, 'county@fcoov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 01/08/2014: Repeat Comment: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines. 11/2112013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7. See redlines. Page 3 of 5 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/22/2013 01108/2014: Drainage easements are needed for the detention ponds that are outside of the plat boundary. Please submit the easement dedication documents for the drainage easement that need to be dedicated by separate document. You can contact me for additional information on process to dedicate easement by separate document or visit hftp://www.fegov.com/engineering/devrev.php 11/2212013: Drainage easements are needed for the detention ponds. See redlines. Please add drainage easements to the plat. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/08/2014 01/08/2014: See redlines. An 8ft easement on the plat needs to be labeled. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, lex(a)fccov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/21/2013 11/21/2013: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchanan(r-fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/06/2014 01/06/2014: In reference to landscape note number one these are the LUC required tree utility separations. Forty feet between shade trees and streetlights. Fifteen feet between ornamental trees and streetlights. Twenty feet between shade and or ornamental trees and traffic control signs and devices. Ten feet between trees and water or sewer mains. Six feet between trees and water or sewer service lines. Four feet between trees and gas lines. Eight feet away from driveways. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224-6152, dmartine(&fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/04/2013 11/04/2013: The developer will need to coordinate power requirements and transformer location(s) with Light & Power Engineering at 970-221-6700. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/04/2013 11/04/2013: Electric developement and system modification charges will apply. Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970.221.6618, cforeman(&fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 11/05/2013: No comments Comment Originated: 11/05/2013 Page 2of5 F6rt Collins January 10, 2014 Cathy Mathis The Birdsall Group Fort Collins, CO 80513 RE: Cargill Expansion, FDP130043, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6760 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416-2313, nbeals(cDfcsrov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/1212013 11/12/2013: The Trash enclosure elevation does not match the site plan. These need to match. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 11/15/2013 11/15/2013: It is unclear how pedestrians move within the site and how they get from the different buildings and adjoing lots with minimal conflicts with the vehicle traffic. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberoer0fcnov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/20/2013 01/07/14: The project now only owes an additional $964.75. The acerage on the FDP submittal was approximately 4 acres more than was identified on the PDP application. 11/20/2013: The project owes an additonal $6,047.5 for the PDP TDRF. The full amount of land being platted was not used in the acerage calculation. Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221.6501, tsiegmundGD.fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/08/2014 01/08/2014: Please label the private details on sheet 10 as "on site". See redlines Topic: Plat Page 1 of 5